Gilberto Caldeira Bandeira de Melo

Methane and hydrogen sulfide emissions in UASB reactors treating domestic wastewater.

The release of CH(4) and H(2)S in UASB reactors was evaluated with the aim to quantify the emissions from the liquid surfaces (three-phase separator and settler compartment) and also from the reactors discharge hydraulic structures. The studies were carried out in two pilot- (360 L) and one demo-scale (14 m(3)) UASB reactors treating domestic wastewater. As expected, the release rates were much higher across the gas/liquid interfaces of the three-phase separators (5.4-9.7 kg CH(4) m(-2) d(-1) and 23.0-35.8 g S m(-2) d(-1)) as compared with the quiescent settler surfaces (11.0-17.8 g CH(4) m(-2) d(-1) and 0.21 to 0.37 g S m(-2) d(-1)). The decrease of dissolved methane and dissolved hydrogen sulfide was very large in the discharging hydraulic structures very close to the reactor (>60 and >80%, respectively), largely due to the loss to the atmosphere, indicating that the concentration of these compounds will probably fall to values close to zero in the near downstream structures. The emission factors due to the release of dissolved methane in the discharge structure amounted to around 0.040 g CH(4) g COD(infl)(-1) and 0.060 g CH(4) g COD(rem)(-1), representing around 60% of the methane collected in the three-phase separator.

Alternativas para o controle de emissões odorantes em reatores anaeróbios tratando esgoto doméstico

This technical note aims at consolidating the main characteristics, advantages and disadvantages of the methods usually applied to the control of odorous emissions, with a critical analysis upon the applicability of each method to the treatment of odours in treatment plants of domestic wastewater. It was verified that several methods are sophisticated, present high cost, and are often non-applicable to the treatment of odour emissions from anaerobic reactors treating domestic wastewater. The qualitative analysis of the various methods points out that direct combustion and biochemical processes gather more advantages for the treatment of waste gases produced in anaerobic reactors.

Energy potential and alternative usages of biogas and sludge from UASB reactors: case study of the Laboreaux wastewater treatment plant

This work assessed the energy potential and alternative usages of biogas and sludge generated in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors at the Laboreaux sewage treatment plant (STP), Brazil. Two scenarios were considered: (i) priority use of biogas for the thermal drying of dehydrated sludge and the use of the excess biogas for electricity generation in an ICE (internal combustion engine); and (ii) priority use of biogas for electricity generation and the use of the heat of the engine exhaust gases for the thermal drying of the sludge. Scenario 1 showed that the electricity generated is able to supply 22.2% of the STP power demand, but the thermal drying process enables a greater reduction or even elimination of the final volume of sludge to be disposed. In Scenario 2, the electricity generated is able to supply 57.6% of the STP power demand; however, the heat in the exhaust gases is not enough to dry the total amount of dehydrated sludge.

Tratamento de Resíduos de Serviços de Saúde pelo processo de pirólise

This work shows the technical and environmental evaluation of a pilot plant for treatment of health waste by pyrolysis, regarding its productivity, fuel consumption, weight loss in the process, atmospheric emissions, wastewater and the charcoal obtained. The process resulted in values of weight loss between 46,75 and 58,77%, for processing time ranged between 2 and 6 hours. The greatest environmental safety was obtained in the third tested operation condition, concerning atmospheric emissions of pollutants, as the concentration of dioxins and furans value obtained was 0,0162ng/Nm3. Two combustors were used in the operation, pyrolysis gas was injected in the biomass feed pipe, and the air flow volume was increased by 15% in the combustion zone of the wood chips, mixed with the pyrolysis gas. The proposed solution has shown great potential to be used in municipalities dealing with proper management of health waste as a challenge to be overcome.

Energy potential and alternative usages of biogas and sludge from UASB reactors: case study of the Laboreaux wastewater treatment plant (Itabira) / Potencial energético e alternativas para o aproveitamento do biogás e lodo de reatores UASB: Estudo de caso Estação de tratamento de efluentes Laboreaux (Itabira)

This work assesses the potential of energy recovery of the byproducts biogas and sludge produced at the Laboreaux wastewater treatment plant (WWTP), in Itabira (MG), which is integrated by UASB reactors, trickling filters and sludge dehydration unit (filter press). The byproducts biogas and sludge were quantitatively (production) and qualitatively (composition and calorific value) characterized during a monitoring period of 12 months. Two scenarios for energy recovery from the byproducts were considered: (i) priority use of biogas for sludge thermal drying and the excess of biogas being used for power generation in an internal combustion engine (ICE); and (ii) primary use of biogas for power generation and the heat of the engine exhaustion gases being used for sludge thermal drying. Biogas burning conditions into a combustion chamber and in an internal combustion engine, as well as mass and energy balances for each scenario, were assessed with the CHEMCAD(r) software. The study analysed the potential use of the byproducts as sources of renewable energy for use in the WWTP itself and to be offered to third party. In scenario 1, the electricity generation is lower (fulfilling 22.2% of the WWTP energy demand), but thermal drying allows greater reduction of sludge volume to be disposed of, or the entire elimination of final disposal if the dry sludge (with 10% moisture content) is used as fuel by the third party. As for scenario 2, the electricity generation is sufficient to supply 57.6% of the WWTP energy demand, nevertheless the heat contained in exhausted gases is not enough to dry the whole dehydrated sludge, configuring a lower reduction of sludge amount to be disposed of (13.5 or 24.9% of mass reduction, depending on the moisture reduction alternative chosen).