Gilles Gasser

Organometallic Anticancer Compounds

The quest for alternative drugs to the well-known cisplatin and its derivatives, which are still used in more than 50% of the treatment regimes for patients suffering from cancer, is highly needed.1,2 Despite their tremendous success, these platinum compounds suffer from two main disadvantages: they are inefficient against platinum-resistant tumors, and they have severe side effects such as nephrotoxicity. The latter drawback is the consequence of the fact that the ultimate target of these drugs is ubiquitous: It is generally accepted that Pt anticancer drugs target DNA, which is present in all cells.3,4 Furthermore, as a consequence of its particular chemical structure, cisplatin in particular offers little possibility for rational improvements to increase its tumor specificity and thereby reduce undesired side effects. In this context, organometallic compounds, which are defined as metal complexes containing at least one direct, covalent metal−carbon bond, have recently been found to be promising anticancer drug candidates. Organometallics have a great structural variety (ranging from linear to octahedral and even beyond), have far more diverse stereochemistry than organic compounds (for an octahedral complex with six different ligands, 30 stereoisomers exist!), and by rational ligand design, provide control over key kinetic properties (such as hydrolysis rate of ligands). Furthermore, they are kinetically stable, usually uncharged, and relatively lipophilic and their metal atom is in a low oxidation state. Because of these fundamental differences compared to “classical coordination metal complexes”, organometallics offer ample opportunities in the design of novel classes of medicinal compounds, potentially with new metal-specific modes of action. Interestingly, all the typical classes of organometallics such as metallocenes, half-sandwich, carbene-, CO-, or π-ligands, which have been widely used for catalysis or biosensing purposes, have now also found application in medicinal chemistry (see Figure ​Figure11 for an overview of these typical classes of organometallics). Figure 1 Summary of the typical classes of organometallic compounds used in medicinal chemistry. In this Perspective, we report on the recent advances in the discovery of organometallics with proven antiproliferative activity. We are emphasizing those compounds where efforts have been made to identify their molecular target and mode of action by biochemical or cell biology studies. This Perspective covers more classes of compounds and in more detail than a recent tutorial review by Hartinger and Dyson.(5) Furthermore, whereas recent reviews and book contributions attest to the rapid development of bioorganometallic chemistry in general,6,7 this Perspective focuses on their potential application as anticancer chemotherapeutics. Another very recent review article categorizes inorganic anticancer drug candidates by their modes of action.(8) It should be mentioned that a full description of all currently investigated types of compounds is hardly possible anymore in a concise review. For example, a particularly promising class of organometallic anticancer compounds, namely, radiolabeled organometallics, has been omitted for space limitations. Recent developments of such compounds have been reviewed in detail by Alberto.(9)

The potential of organometallic complexes in medicinal chemistry

Organometallic complexes have unique physico-chemical properties, which have been widely used in homogenous catalysis, for example, for the synthesis of lead compounds and drug candidates. Over the past two decades, a few scientists from all over the world have extended the use of the specific characteristics of these compounds (e.g. structural diversity, possibility of ligand exchange, redox and catalytic properties) for medicinal purposes. The results are stunning. A few organometallic compounds have already entered clinical trials and it can be anticipated that several more will follow in coming years. In this short review, we present the specific advantages that organometallic metal complexes have over purely organic and also coordination compounds. Furthermore, using specific examples, we illustrate how these particular properties can be put to good use in medicinal chemistry. The examples we present have an emphasis on, but are not restricted to, anti-cancer activity.

Organometallic Compounds: An Opportunity for Chemical Biology?

Organometallic compounds are renowned for their remarkable applications in the field of catalysis, but much less is known about their potential in chemical biology. Indeed, such compounds have long been considered to be either unstable under physiological conditions or cytotoxic. As a consequence, little attention has been paid to their possible utilisation for biological purposes. Because of their outstanding physicochemical properties, which include chemical stability, structural diversity and unique photo‐ and electrochemical properties, however, organometallic compounds have the ability to play a leading role in the field of chemical biology. Indeed, remarkable examples of the use of such compounds—notably as enzyme inhibitors and as luminescent agents—have recently been reported. Here we summarise recent advances in the use of organometallic compounds for chemical biology purposes, an area that we define as “organometallic chemical biology”. We also demonstrate that these recent discoveries are only a beginning and that many other organometallic complexes are likely to be found useful in this field of research in the near future.

Small organometallic compounds as antibacterial agents.

The emergence of bacterial resistance to commercial antibiotics is an issue of global importance. During the last two decades, the number of antibacterial agents that have been discovered and introduced into the market has steadily declined and failed to meet the challenges posed by rapidly increasing resistance of the pathogens against common antibacterial drugs. The development of new classes of compounds to control the virulence of the pathogens is therefore urgently required. This perspective describes the historical development in brief and recent advances on the preparation of small organometallic compounds as new classes of antibacterial agents with potential for clinical development.

Highly Charged Ruthenium(II) Polypyridyl Complexes as Lysosome‐Localized Photosensitizers for Two‐Photon Photodynamic Therapy

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a noninvasive medical technique that has received increasing attention over the last years and been applied for the treatment of certain types of cancer. However, the currently clinically used PDT agents have several limitations, such as low water solubility, poor photostability, and limited selectivity towards cancer cells, aside from having very low two-photon cross-sections around 800 nm, which limits their potential use in TP-PDT. To tackle these drawbacks, three highly positively charged ruthenium(II) polypyridyl complexes were synthesized. These complexes selectively localize in the lysosomes, an ideal localization for PDT purposes. One of these complexes showed an impressive phototoxicity index upon irradiation at 800 nm in 3D HeLa multicellular tumor spheroids and thus holds great promise for applications in two-photon photodynamic therapy.

Underestimated Potential of Organometallic Rhenium Complexes as Anticancer Agents

In the recent years, organometallic compounds have become recognized as promising anti-cancer drug candidates. While radioactive (186/188)Re compounds are already used in clinics for cancer treatment, cold Re organometallic compounds have mostly been explored as luminescent probes for cell imaging and photosensitizers in photocatalysis. However, a growing number of studies have recently revealed the potential of Re organometallic complexes as anti-cancer agents. Several compounds have displayed cytotoxicity equaling or exceeding that of the well-established anti-cancer drug cisplatin. In this review, we present the currently known Re organometallic complexes that have shown anti-proliferative activity on cancer cell lines. A particular emphasis is placed on their cellular uptake and localization as well as their potential mechanism of action.

Visible-Light-Induced Annihilation of Tumor Cells with Platinum–Porphyrin Conjugates†

Despite the extensive use of porphyrins in photodynamic therapy (PDT), tetraplatinated porphyrins have so far not been studied for their anticancer properties. Herein, we report the synthesis of such novel platinum-porphyrin conjugates as well as their photophysical characterization and in vitro light-induced anticancer properties. These conjugates showed only minor cytotoxicity in the dark, but IC50 values down to 19 nM upon irradiation with light at 420 nm.These values correspond to an excellent phototoxic index (PI=IC50 in the dark/IC50 in light), which reached 5000 in a cisplatin-resistant cell line. After incubation with HeLa cells, nuclear Pt concentrations were 30 times higher than with cisplatin. All of these favorable characteristics imply that tetraplatinated porphyrin complexes are worthy of exploration as novel PDT anticancer agents in vivo.

DMSO‐Mediated Ligand Dissociation: Renaissance for Biological Activity of N‐Heterocyclic‐[Ru(η6‐arene)Cl2] Drug Candidates

Slipped under the radar? (1) H NMR spectroscopic examination revealed that [Ru(η(6) -arene)Cl2 (L)] (L=N-heterocyclic ligands) complexes readily undergo ligand exchange reaction in DMSO, a popular medium for preparing stock solutions for biological screening. It is therefore highly important for researchers to study stability in DMSO before reporting on the biological activity of such type of complexes.

Photo-induced uncaging of a specific Re(I) organometallic complex in living cells

In the last decades, a large number of organometallic complexes have shown promising anti-proliferative activity towards different cancer cell lines. However, these compounds generally had low cellular uptake and low selectivity towards cancer cells over healthy cells. The use of external triggers (e.g. light, ultra-sound, temperature, etc.) to modify the cytotoxic effect of a prodrug and the coupling of a targeting vector (e.g. peptides, antibodies, etc.) to a drug were found to be very successful techniques to tackle these drawbacks. Here, we envisioned combining these two methods, namely an external trigger (i.e. light activation) and a targeting vector, in an organometallic compound. More specifically, a Re(I) tricarbonyl N,N-bis(quinolinoyl) complex (Re-NH2) was derivatised with a photo-labile protecting group (PLPG) to cage Re-NH2 by formation of Re-PLPG. For organelle/cellular specificity, Re-PLPG was then further coupled to a nuclear localization sequence (NLS) or a bombesin peptide derivative to give Re-PLPG-NLS or Re-PLPG-Bombesin, respectively. Photolysis experiments in PBS buffer (pH 7.4) demonstrated that Re-NH2 was completely photo-released from Re-PLPG-NLS and Re-PLPG-Bombesin using a very low irradiation dose (1.2 J cm−2). To the best of our knowledge, these are the first two examples of the selective photo-release of an intact organometallic compound from a bioconjugate. Of high interest, both derivatives showed toxicity comparable to that of cisplatin towards cervical cancer cells (HeLa) upon light irradiation, although the phototoxic index (PTI) varied greatly with the targeting peptide. The cell death mechanism of Re-PLPG-NLS was explored using different techniques, including fluorescence microscopy, ICP-MS, gel electrophoresis, flow cytometry and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). It could be demonstrated that HeLa cells treated with Re-PLPG-NLS in the dark and upon irradiation showed severe cell stress (nucleolar segregation, pyknosis and vacuolation). The data obtained from an Annexin V/propidium iodide (PI) assay indicated that, after an early apoptotic stage, the onset induced by Re-PLPG-NLS led to cell death, with features ascribable to late apoptosis and necrosis, which were more marked for the treatment involving irradiation.

Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Chromium Bioorganometallics Based on the Antibiotic Platensimycin Lead Structure

The recent discovery of the natural product platensimycin as a new antibiotic lead structure has triggered the synthesis of numerous organic derivatives for structure–activity relationship studies. Herein, we describe the synthesis, characterization and biological evaluation of the first organometallic antibiotic inspired by platensimycin. Two bioorganometallic compounds containing (η6‐pentamethylbenzene)Cr(CO)3 (2) and (η6‐benzene)Cr(CO)3 (3), linked by an amide bond to the aromatic part of platensimycin, were synthesized. Their antibiotic activities were tested against B. subtilis 168 (Gram positive) and E. coli W3110 (Gram negative) bacterial strains. Both compounds were found to be inactive against E. coli but derivative 2 inhibits B. subtilis growth at a moderate MIC value of 0.15 mM. To test the intrinsic toxicity of chromium, several chromium salts along with {η6‐(3‐pentamethylphenyl propionic acid)}Cr(CO)3 (5) and {η6‐(3‐phenyl propionic acid)}Cr(CO)3 (6) were tested against both bacterial strains. No activity was observed against E. coli for any of the compounds; B. subtilis growth was not inhibited by Cr(NO3)3 and only very weakly by 5, K2Cr2O7 and Na2CrO4 at MIC values of 0.5, 0.68 and 1.24 mM, respectively. Compounds 2, 3, 5 and 4 (the pure organic analogue of 2) show similar cytotoxicity against HeLa, HepG2 and HT‐29 mammalian cell lines. Furthermore, the cellular uptake and the intracellular distribution of compounds 2, 3 and Cr(NO3)3 in B. subtilis were studied using atomic absorption spectroscopy to gain insight in to the possible cellular targets. Compound 2 was found to be readily taken up and distributed almost equally among cytosol, cell debris and cell membrane in B. subtilis.