Gilles Lemesle

High on-treatment platelet reactivity with ticagrelor versus prasugrel: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Ticagrelor and prasugrel have shown superiority over clopidogrel. However, it remains unclear if one is superior to another regarding on‐treatment platelet reactivity.

Prognostic impact of ß-blocker use in patients with stable coronary artery disease

Objective To assess the association of ß-blocker use with cardiovascular mortality in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods We analysed the data of 4184 outpatients included in a prospective cohort study on stable CAD. Two groups were formed based on ß-blocker use at enrolment. Two propensity score analyses were performed to control for differences in covariates: one with adjustment among the entire cohort, and the other with propensity score matching. The outcome variable was cardiovascular mortality after a 2-year follow-up. Results There were 3320 patients with ß-blocker use. Younger age, hypertension, diabetes, prior myocardial infarction, multivessel CAD, prior coronary revascularisation, prior stroke, prior hospitalisation for heart failure and a low LVEF were associated with ß-blocker use. Clinical follow-up data were obtained for 4149 patients (99.2%). When adjusted on propensity score, ß-blocker use was associated with a HR for cardiovascular mortality of 0.64 (0.42–0.98) in the whole cohort (p=0.04). After one-to-one propensity score matching, both groups (n=839 in each group) were well matched on covariates. The cardiovascular mortality rate in the propensity-matched cohort was significantly lower in patients with ß-blocker use with a HR of 0.43 (0.22–0.82) (p=0.011). Non-cardiovascular mortality was similar in both groups. These results were consistent across different subgroups. Conclusions In this observational study of patients with stable CAD, the use of ß-blockers was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular mortality.

Copeptin in acute coronary syndromes and heart failure management: State of the art and future directions.

Over the past two decades, the use of multiple biomarkers has changed cardiovascular disease management. Recently, several trials have assessed the diagnostic and prognostic performances of copeptin, especially in patients with heart failure or acute coronary syndromes. Primary results are interesting, with copeptin looking promising for: the management of patients who present at emergency departments early after chest pain onset and the risk stratification of patients with heart failure. The purpose of this article is to review the data on the place of copeptin in the management of patients with chest pain or heart failure.

Dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with a long coronary artery lesion over 30 mm: Determinants and impact on prognosis.

BACKGROUND The ideal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is under debate. Lesion length is a well-recognized predictor of PCI complexity and long-term outcome. AIM To evaluate the determinants and impact on outcome of long-term DAPT in a retrospective cohort of patients treated for a long coronary lesion. METHODS Patients (n=460) who underwent PCI for a long lesion (>30 mm) were divided into two groups according to antiplatelet regimen at 1 year: patients who stopped DAPT before 1 year (single antiplatelet therapy group; n=168) and patients who continued DAPT for longer than 1 year (n=292). RESULTS Mean lesion length was 35.7±7.1 mm. The proportion of patients who continued DAPT after 1 year was 63.5%. The main determinants of long-term DAPT were initial presentation as myocardial infarction and implantation of a drug-eluting stent. Median follow-up was 37.4 (23-51) months after the 1-year period following the index PCI. Long-term DAPT was highly associated with a lower risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality by multivariable analysis and after adjustment for other predictors: hazard ratios 0.11 (95% confidence interval 0.03-0.32) and 0.15 (95% confidence interval 0.04-0.62), respectively. No increase in major bleeding was noted. CONCLUSION In a contemporary practice, nearly two-thirds of patients who undergo PCI for a long lesion are treated with DAPT for several years. Our results suggest that long-term DAPT is beneficial in this subset of patients identified as being at high risk.

Secondary medical prevention and clinical outcome in coronary artery disease patients with a history of non-coronary vascular intervention: A report from the CORONOR investigators

Aim To assess the level of secondary prevention and the outcome of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients who have a history of non-coronary vascular intervention. Background Patients with polyvascular disease have been reported to receive less evidence-based medications, with worse risk factor control and to be at higher risk than patients with single-bed disease. It is unknown whether these findings remain valid in the modern era of secondary prevention. Methods We included 4184 patients with stable CAD. Two groups were formed according to the absence (n = 3704) or presence (n = 480) of a history of non-coronary vascular intervention. Treatments and risk factor control were recorded at inclusion. Follow-up was performed after 2 years. Results Antiplatelets, angiotensin system antagonists, beta-blockers and statins were widely prescribed in both groups. The number of antihypertensive drugs was higher in patients with non-coronary vascular intervention. Except for slight increases in the rate of current smokers and in systolic blood pressure, risk factor control was similar between groups. All-cause and cardiovascular mortality rates were higher in patients with non-coronary intervention with adjusted HR of 1.55 (1.13–2.13) (p = 0.007), and 1.98 (1.24–3.15) (p = 0.004), respectively. Conclusions In modern practice and real life conditions, the higher risk of CAD patients with a history of non-coronary vascular intervention is taken into account, with more intense secondary prevention and similar risk factor control than patients without such history. In spite of the level of secondary prevention, patients with a history of non-coronary vascular intervention remain at high risk of cardiovascular events. This should be an incentive to discuss more stringent objectives for secondary prevention in patients with polyvascular disease.

Prevalence and correlates of non-optimal secondary medical prevention in patients with stable coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND In patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), non-optimal use of evidence-based medications is associated with an increased risk of adverse outcome. AIMS To assess the prevalence and correlates of non-optimal secondary medical prevention in patients with stable CAD. METHODS We included 4184 consecutive outpatients with stable CAD. Treatment at inclusion was classified as optimal/non-optimal regarding the four major classes of secondary prevention drugs: antithrombotics; statins; angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs); and beta-blockers. For each treatment, the prescription was considered non-optimal if the drug was missing despite a class IA indication according to international guidelines. To assess the information globally, non-optimal secondary prevention was defined as at least one major treatment missing. RESULTS The proportions of patients with non-optimal treatment were 0.7%, 7.8%, 12.9% and 10.3% for antithrombotics, statins, ACE inhibitors/ARBs and beta-blockers, respectively. Non-optimal secondary medical prevention was observed in 16.8% of cases. By multivariable analysis, the correlates of non-optimal secondary medical prevention were long time interval since last coronary event (P<0.0001), older age (P<0.0001), diabetes mellitus (P<0.0001), hypertension (P<0.0001), no history of myocardial infarction (P=0.001), no history of coronary revascularization (P=0.013) and low glomerular filtration rate (P=0.042). CONCLUSIONS Although most patients with stable CAD are receiving evidence-based medications according to guidelines, there remain subgroups at higher risk of non-optimal treatment. In particular, it might be feasible to improve prevention by focusing on patients in whom a long time has elapsed since the last coronary event.

Dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with stable coronary artery disease in modern practice: Prevalence, correlates, and impact on prognosis (from the Suivi d’une cohorte de patients COROnariens stables en region NORd-Pas-de-Calais study)

BACKGROUND The prevalence and correlates of dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) use in stable coronary artery disease (CAD) are unknown. In addition, whether prolonged DAPT may impact prognosis in stable CAD has not been studied in real-life conditions. METHODS We studied 3,691 patients included in a prospective registry on stable CAD. The patients were divided in 2 groups according to their antiplatelet therapy regimen at inclusion: patients treated with DAPT were compared with those treated with single-antiplatelet therapy (SAPT). The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. RESULTS Altogether, 868 (24%) patients received DAPT. Factors positively associated with DAPT use were persistent angina at inclusion, body mass index, myocardial infarction since 1 to 3 years, myocardial revascularization since 1 to 3 years, multivessel CAD, prior drug-eluting stent implantation, and prior aortic or peripheral intervention. Factors negatively associated with DAPT use were age, prior coronary bypass, and left ventricular ejection fraction. The rate of the primary outcome at 2 years was similar whether patients were treated with SAPT (4.6%) or DAPT (5.5%) (P = .301). Similar rates were also observed after propensity score matching: 5.7% when treated with SAPT versus 5.5% when treated with DAPT (P = .886). The rate of bleeding was similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS Our study shows that a significant proportion of stable CAD patients are treated with DAPT in modern practice. Several correlates of DAPT were identified. Although no increase in bleeding was observed, our results do not support the prescription of prolonged DAPT.

Practice Patterns for Outpatients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: A Case Vignette-based Survey Among French Cardiologists

Background Although medical management of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) is often based on scientific guidelines, a number of everyday clinical situations are not specifically covered by recommendations or the level of evidence is low. The aim of this study was to assess practice patterns regarding routine management of patients with stable CAD. Methods A survey comprising six questions on two clinical scenarios regarding stable CAD management was sent to 345 cardiologists from the Nord-Pas-de-Calais Region (France). We first assessed practice patterns globally and then searched for associations with physician characteristics (age, gender, sub-specialty, and type of practice). Findings The response rate was 92%. Regarding management of asymptomatic CAD, 86% of the cardiologists performed routine exercise testing, before which, 69% withdrew β-blockers. After a positive exercise test, 26% immediately performed coronary angiography and 67%, further imaging tests. In the absence of left ventricular dysfunction or history of myocardial infarction, routine β-blocker prescription for stable CAD was selected by 43%. When anticoagulation was needed for atrial fibrillation, 41% initiated direct oral anticoagulants rather than vitamin-K antagonists and 50% combined aspirin with anticoagulants. For recurrent stable angina in patients with known CAD, 24% performed coronary angiography directly, 49% requested a stress test, and 27% opted for medical therapy without further diagnostic testing. Age, gender of the cardiologist, academic environment, and practice of interventional cardiology were associated with certain management patterns. Interpretation When not guided by high-level recommendations, practice patterns for routine clinical situations in stable CAD vary considerably. Future clinical trials should address these clinical interrogations.

Arterial Pulsatility and Circulating von Willebrand Factor in Patients on Mechanical Circulatory Support

BACKGROUND The main risk factor for bleeding in patients with continuous-flow mechanical circulatory support (CF-MCS) is the acquired von Willebrand factor (VWF) defect related to the high shear-stress forces developed by these devices. Although a higher bleeding rate has been reported in CF-MCS recipients who had reduced pulsatility, the relation between pulsatility and the VWF defect has never been studied. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to investigate the relation between pulsatility and VWF under CF-MCS. METHODS We assessed the effect of 2 CF-MCS on VWF multimer degradation in a mock circulatory loop (model 1). Using these devices, we investigated in a dose-effect model (model 2) 3 levels of pulsatility in 3 groups of swine. In a cross-over model (model 3), we studied the effects of sequential changes of pulsatility on VWF. We reported the evolution of VWF multimerization in a patient undergoing serial CF-MCS and/or pulsatile-MCS. RESULTS We demonstrated the proteolytic degradation of VWF multimers by high shear CF-MCS in a circulatory loop without pulsatility. We observed both in swine models and in a patient that the magnitude of the VWF degradation is modulated by the pulsatility level in the high shear-stress level condition, and that the restoration of pulsatility is a trigger for the endothelial release of VWF. CONCLUSIONS We demonstrated that the VWF defect reflects the balance between degradation induced by the shear stress and the endothelial release of new VWF triggered by the pulsatility. This modulation of VWF levels could explain the relationship between pulsatility and bleeding observed in CF-MCS recipients. Preservation of pulsatility may be a new target to improve clinical outcomes of patients.