Gina M. Vaccaro

Phase 2 study of MK-2206, an allosteric inhibitor of AKT, as second-line therapy for advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer: A SWOG cooperative group trial (S1005)

The AKT inhibitor MK‐2206 at a dose of 60 mg every other day was evaluated in gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancers.

Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis: Evolving Paradigms and Future Directions

In patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) that metastasizes to the liver, there are several key goals for improving outcomes including early detection, effective prognostic indicators of treatment response, and accurate identification of patients at high risk for recurrence. Although new therapeutic regimens developed over the past decade have increased survival, there is substantial room for improvement in selecting targeted treatment regimens for the patients who will derive the most benefit. Recently, there have been exciting developments in identifying high-risk patient cohorts, refinements in the understanding of systemic vs localized drug delivery to metastatic niches, liquid biomarker development, and dramatic advances in tumor immune therapy, all of which promise new and innovative approaches to tackling the problem of detecting and treating the metastatic spread of CRC to the liver. Our multidisciplinary group held a state-of-the-science symposium this past year to review advances in this rapidly evolving field. Herein, we present a discussion around the issues facing treatment of patients with CRC liver metastases, including the relationship of discrete gene signatures with prognosis. We also discuss the latest advances to maximize regional and systemic therapies aimed at decreasing intrahepatic recurrence, review recent insights into the tumor microenvironment, and summarize advances in noninvasive multimodal biomarkers for early detection of primary and recurrent disease. As we continue to advance clinically and technologically in the field of colorectal tumor biology, our goal should be continued refinement of predictive and prognostic studies to decrease recurrence after curative resection and minimize treatment toxicity to patients through a tailored multidisciplinary approach to cancer care.

Significant understaging is seen in clinically staged T2N0 esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy

This study aimed to determine the impact of preoperative staging on the treatment of clinical T2N0 (cT2N0) esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy. We reviewed a retrospective cohort of 27 patients treated at a single institution between 1999 and 2011. Clinical staging was performed with computed tomography, positron emission tomography, and endoscopic ultrasound. Patients were separated into two groups: neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery (NEOSURG) and surgery alone (SURG). There were 11 patients (41%) in the NEOSURG group and 16 patients (59%) in the SURG group. In the NEOSURG group, three of 11 patients (27%) had a pathological complete response and eight (73%) were partial or nonresponders after neoadjuvant therapy. In the SURG group, nine of 16 patients (56%) were understaged, 6 (38%) were overstaged, and 1 (6%) was correctly staged. In the entire cohort, despite being clinically node negative, 14 of 27 patients (52%) had node-positive disease (5/11 [45%] in the NEOSURG group, and 9/16 [56%] in the SURG group). Overall survival rate was not statistically significant between the two groups (P = 0.96). Many cT2N0 patients are clinically understaged and show no preoperative evidence of node-positive disease. Consequently, neoadjuvant therapy may have a beneficial role in treatment.

Treatment and Survival of Small-bowel Adenocarcinoma in the United States: A Comparison With Colon Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Small-bowel adenocarcinoma is rare and fatal. Because of data paucity, there is a tendency to extrapolate treatment from colon cancer, particularly in the adjuvant stetting. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the current surgical and adjuvant treatments of small-bowel adenocarcinoma and compare with colon cancer. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: The linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results and Medicare database was used at a tertiary referral hospital. PATIENTS: Patients with small-bowel adenocarcinoma and colon cancer identified from 1992 to 2010, using International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, 3rd Revision, site, behavior, and histology codes were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall survival and cancer-specific survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and competing risk analysis. RESULTS: A total of 2123 patients with small-bowel adenocarcinoma and 248,862 patients with colon cancer were identified. Five-year overall survival rates for patients with small-bowel adenocarcinoma and colon cancer were 34.9% and 51.5% (p < 0.0001). A total of 1550 patients with small-bowel adenocarcinoma (73.0%) underwent surgery, compared with 177,017 patients with colon cancer (71.1%). The proportion of patients who received chemotherapy was similar, at 21.3% for small bowel and 20.0% for colon. In contrast to colon cancer, chemotherapy did not improve overall or cancer-specific survival for patients with small-bowel adenocarcinoma, regardless of stage. Predictors of poor survival for small-bowel adenocarcinoma on multivariate analysis included advanced age, black race, advanced stage, poor tumor differentiation, high comorbidity index, and distal location. Chemotherapy did not confer additional survival benefit compared with surgery alone (HR, 1.04 (95% CI, 0.90–1.22)). LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective review. The reliance on Medicare data limited granularity and may have affected the generalizability of the results. CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis for small-bowel adenocarcinoma is worse than that for colon cancer, and only surgery improves survival. In contrast to colon cancer, a survival benefit from current chemotherapy regimens for small-bowel adenocarcinoma is not seen, suggesting that it may be overused and needs more rigorous study.

Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Near the End of Life: A Longitudinal Qualitative Study of Their Illness Experiences.

Background: In the United States, the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is rising. For those diagnosed with terminal HCC, there is no curative treatment and duration of survival is typically 1 to 2 years. Research on illness and treatment experiences toward the end of life for patients with terminal HCC is limited. Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the illness experiences of patients with terminal HCC as they approached the end of life. Methods: This study used a prospective, longitudinal descriptive design. Interview data were collected from 14 patients once a month for up to 6 months, for a total of 45 interviews. Data were analyzed using conventional content analysis. Results: Three major themes (illness perceptions, decision to start treatment, and navigating treatment over time) and 10 subthemes were identified that were reflected across time in all patient experiences. Patients faced challenges with symptom experiences, treatment decisions, and unmet information needs affecting their quality of life. Conclusions: Gaining knowledge about the challenges facing patients with HCC is crucial for designing interventions that optimize their quality of life. Implications for Practice: Healthcare professionals may improve the quality of life of patients with terminal HCC by eliciting patients’ perceptions of their illness and treatment decisions, symptom experiences, and information needs as the disease progresses and providing symptom management and offering information tailored to their needs. Care for patients with HCC who are approaching the end of life should be multidisciplinary and include timely referral to palliative care.

Association of Intervals Between Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation and Surgical Resection With Pathologic Complete Response and Survival in Patients With Esophageal Cancer.

Importance Pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) may be a clinical prognostic marker of superior outcomes. In patients with esophageal cancer, pCR is associated with increased survival. While mechanisms for increasing the likelihood of pCR remain unknown, in other solid tumors, higher rates of pCR have been associated with longer time intervals between CRT completion and surgical procedures. Objective To determine the association between time intervals from the completion of CRT to surgical procedure with rates of pCR in patients with esophageal cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants A prospectively maintained multidisciplinary foregut database was reviewed for consecutively enrolled patients with esophageal cancer from January 2000 to July 2015 presenting for surgical evaluation at a single National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center within a quaternary academic medical center. Interventions Included patients successfully completed neoadjuvant CRT followed by esophagectomy. Main Outcomes and Measures Rate of pCR by logistic regression based on a categorized time interval (ie, 0 to 42, 43 to 56, 57 to 70, 71 to 84, 85 to 98, and 99 or more days) from the completion of CRT to surgical resection, adjusted for clinical stage, demographic information, and CRT regimen. Results Of the 234 patients who met inclusion criteria, 191 (81.6%) were male, and the median (range) age was 64 (58-70) years; 206 (88.0%) were diagnosed as having adenocarcinoma, and 65 (27.9%) had a pCR. Patients in the 85 to 98-day group had significantly increased odds of a pCR compared with other groups (odds ratio, 5.46; 95% CI, 1.16-25.68; P = .03). No significant differences in survival were seen between time groups overall or among patients with residual tumor. Conclusions and Relevance This study suggests that a time interval of 85 to 98 days between CRT completion and surgical resection is associated with significantly increased odds of a pCR in patients with esophageal cancer. No adverse association with survival was detected as a result of delaying resection, even in patients with residual tumor.

Preoperative carboplatin and paclitaxel-based chemoradiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma: results of a modified CROSS regimen utilizing radiation doses greater than 41.4 Gy

Trimodality therapy for resectable esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers utilizing preoperative radiotherapy with concurrent carboplatin and paclitaxel-based chemotherapy is being increasingly utilized secondary to the results of the phase III CROSS trial. However, there is a paucity of reports of this regimen as a component of chemoradiotherapy in North America. We aim to report on our clinical experience using a modified CROSS regimen with higher radiotherapy doses. Patients with advanced (cT2-cT4 or node positive) esophageal or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma who received preoperative carboplatin/paclitaxel-based chemoradiotherapy with radiation doses of greater than 41.4 Gray (Gy) followed by esophagectomy were identified from an institutional database. Patient, imaging, treatment, and tumor response characteristics were analyzed. Twenty-four patients were analyzed. All but one tumor had adenocarcinoma histology. The median radiation dose was 50.4 Gy. Pathologic complete response was achieved in 29% of patients, with all receiving 50.4 Gy. Three early postoperative deaths were seen, due in part to acute respiratory distress syndrome and all three patients received 50-50.4 Gy. With a median follow-up of 9.4 months (23 days-2 years), median survival was 24 months. Trimodality therapy utilizing concurrent carboplatin/paclitaxel with North American radiotherapy doses appeared to have similar pathologic complete response rates compared with the CROSS trial, but may be associated with higher toxicity. Although the sample size is small and further follow-up is necessary, radiation doses greater than 41.4 Gy may not be warranted secondary to a potentially increased risk of severe radiation-induced acute lung injury.

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratios can Predict Treatment Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Esophageal Cancer.

IntroductionWe hypothesized that serum neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios may predict pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer patients. The ability to predict favorable treatment response to therapy may aid in determining optimal treatment regimens.Materials and MethodsA retrospective review of a prospective esophageal disease registry was conducted. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was defined as the pre-chemoradiotherapy serum neutrophil count divided by lymphocyte count. Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio was similarly defined. Logistic regression was applied to analyze these ratios and their effect on pathologic complete response. A Cox proportional-hazards model was used to analyze survival.ResultsSixty patients were included. Elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio were both negative predictors of pathologic complete response (odds ratio: 0.62; 95% confidence interval: 0.37–0.89, P = 0.037 and odds ratio: 0.91; 95% confidence interval: 0.82–0.98, P = 0.028, respectively). Only platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio was predictive of decreased overall survival (hazard ratio: 1.05, 95% confidence interval: 0.94–1.16, P = 0.40).ConclusionElevated neutrophil and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios were significant predictors of a poor treatment response to neoadjuvant therapy. Only elevated platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio was predictive of worse overall survival. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios may offer a simple serum test to assess the likelihood of a pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal cancer.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin/5-fluorouracil is associated with increased pathologic complete response and improved survival compared to carboplatin/paclitaxel in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer.

Trimodal therapy consisting of neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy has become the standard of care in North America for locally advanced esophageal cancer. While cisplatin/5-fluorouracil has been a common concurrent chemotherapy regimen since the 1980s, its utilization has declined in recent years as the Chemoradiotherapy for Oesophageal Cancer Followed by Surgery Study (CROSS) trial regimen of carboplatin/paclitaxel has become widely adopted. The efficacy of the CROSS regimen compared to alternate chemotherapy choices, however, has rarely been evaluated when each is used as a component of a trimodal treatment approach. The aim of this study is to report our institutional experience with these two concurrent chemotherapy regimens at a specialized esophageal cancer center.We performed an Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective review of a prospectively maintained institutional foregut registry from a single National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center. Esophageal cancer patients who completed trimodal therapy with a chemotherapy regimen of either carboplatin/paclitaxel or cisplatin/5-fluorouracil were identified and divided into groups based on their chemotherapy regimens. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze pathologic complete response rates, while the Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models were utilized to evaluate recurrence-free and overall survival. Analytical models were adjusted for age, clinical stage, radiation dose, histologic subtype (adenocarcinoma vs. squamous cell carcinoma), and time interval from completion of neoadjuvant therapy to surgery.One hundred and forty-two patients treated between January of 2000 and July of 2015 were identified as meeting inclusion criteria. Of this group, 87 had received the CROSS regimen of carboplatin/paclitaxel, while 55 had completed cisplatin/5-fluorouracil. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that the cisplatin/5-fluorouracil.group had an increased odds of pathologic complete response (odds ratio = 2.68, 95% confidence interval, P = 0.032), as well as significantly improved recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.21-0.73, P = 0.003) and overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.46, 95% confidence interval 0.24-0.87, P = 0.016), compared to the carboplatin/paclitaxel group.Concurrent chemotherapy with cisplatin/5-fluorouracil in locally advanced esophageal cancer is associated with higher rates of pathologic complete response and improved recurrence-free and overall survival compared to the CROSS regimen of carboplatin/paclitaxel. This suggests that, for select patients, alternate neoadjuvant chemotherapy approaches, such as cisplatin/5-fluorouracil, merit reconsideration as potential primary treatment choices in the management of this highly morbid disease.

Living with hepatocellular carcinoma from the patient perspective: A longitudinal study.

373 Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a growing problem. For those diagnosed with terminal HCC, there is no curative treatment. Despite a high death rate, no longitudinal studies were found examining the illness experience of patients with HCC as they are approaching death. The aim of this study was to describe the experience of living with terminal HCC and how it may affect end of life care from the perspective of patients. Methods: This was a longitudinal, prospective mixed methods pilot study using quantitative and qualitative approaches. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a convenience sub-sample of 14 patients with HCC once a month for a 6-month period. The interview guide included questions about living with HCC, pain and symptom management strategies, treatment decisions, and any current concerns of significance. Interview data were analyzed using qualitative description. Results: This poster reports on qualitative analysis of 45 interviews from the sub-sample. Eleven patien...