Ginah Nightingale

Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Led Medication Assessment Used to Identify Prevalence of and Associations With Polypharmacy and Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use Among Ambulatory Senior Adults With Cancer

PURPOSE The use of multiple and/or inappropriate medications in seniors is a significant public health problem, and cancer treatment escalates its prevalence and complexity. Existing studies are limited by patient self-report and medical record extraction compared with a pharmacist-led comprehensive medication assessment. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively examined medication use in ambulatory senior adults with cancer to determine the prevalence of polypharmacy (PP) and potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use and associated factors. PP was defined as concurrent use of five or more and less than 10 medications, and excessive polypharmacy (EPP) was defined as 10 or more medications. PIMs were categorized by 2012 Beers Criteria, Screening Tool of Older Persons Prescriptions (STOPP), and the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS). RESULTS A total of 248 patients received a geriatric oncology assessment between January 2011 and June 2013 (mean age was 79.9 years, 64% were women, 74% were white, and 87% had solid tumors). Only 234 patients (evaluated by pharmacists) were included in the final analysis. Mean number of medications used was 9.23. The prevalence of PP, EPP, and PIM use was 41% (n = 96), 43% (n = 101), and 51% (n = 119), respectively. 2012 Beers, STOPP, and HEDIS criteria classified 173 occurrences of PIMs, which were present in 40%, 38%, and 21% of patients, respectively. Associations with PIM use were PP (P < .001) and increased comorbidities (P = .005). CONCLUSION A pharmacist-led comprehensive medication assessment demonstrated a high prevalence of PP, EPP, and PIM use. Medication assessments that integrate both 2012 Beers and STOPP criteria and consider cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and cancer-related therapy are needed to optimize medication use in this population.

Polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medication use in geriatric oncology.

Polypharmacy is a highly prevalent problem in older persons, and is challenging to assess and improve due to variations in definitions of the problem and the heterogeneous methods of medication review and reduction. The purpose of this review is to summarize evidence regarding the prevalence and impact of polypharmacy in geriatric oncology patients and to provide recommendations for assessment and management. Polypharmacy has somewhat variably been incorporated into geriatric assessment studies in geriatric oncology, and polypharmacy has not been consistently evaluated as a predictor of negative outcomes in patients with cancer. Once screened, interventions for polypharmacy are even more uncertain. There is a great need to create standardized interventions to improve polypharmacy in geriatrics, and particularly in geriatric oncology. The process of deprescribing is aimed at reducing medications for which real or potential harm outweighs benefit, and there are numerous methods to determine which medications are candidates for deprescribing. However, deprescribing approaches have not been evaluated in older patients with cancer. Ultimately, methods to identify polypharmacy will need to be clearly defined and validated, and interventions to improve medication use will need to be based on clearly defined and standardized methods.

A pharmacist-led medication assessment used to determine a more precise estimation of the prevalence of complementary and alternative medication (CAM) use among ambulatory senior adults with cancer

OBJECTIVES The prevalence of complementary and alternative medication (CAM) use in senior adult oncology (SAO) patients is widely variable and little is known about whether polypharmacy (PP) and potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use influences CAM use given the increased number of comorbidities and polypharmacy. One approach to optimize medication management is through utilization of pharmacists as part of a team-based, healthcare model. MATERIALS AND METHODS Prevalence of CAM and factors influencing CAM use was examined in a secondary analysis of 248 patients who received an initial comprehensive geriatric oncology assessment between January 2011 and June 2013. Data was collected from electronic medical records. CAM was defined as herbal medications, minerals, or other dietary supplements, excluding vitamins. Patient characteristics influencing CAM use (e.g. comorbidities, PP and PIM use) were analyzed. RESULTS Only 234 patients (evaluated by pharmacists) were included in the final analysis. Mean age was 79.9 years [range 61-98]; 64% women, 74% Caucasian, 87% with a solid tumor, mean comorbidities, 7.69. CAM prevalence was 26.5% (n=62) and median CAM use was 0 (range 0-10). The proportion of CAM use (1, 2, and 3) was 19.2%, 6.4%, and 0.4%, respectively. Associations with CAM use (versus no-CAM) were polypharmacy (P=0.045), vision impairment (P=0.048) and urologic comorbidities (P=0.021). CONCLUSIONS A pharmacist-led comprehensive medication assessment demonstrated a more precise estimation of CAM prevalence in the ambulatory SAO population. CAM use was associated with polypharmacy, ophthalmic and urologic medical conditions. Integrating pharmacists into team-based (geriatric and oncology) care models is an underutilized yet viable solution to optimize medication use.

Ofatumumab: A Novel Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibody for Treatment of Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Objective: To present the current clinical evidence on ofatumumab for use in refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Data Sources: A literature search was performed using MEDLINE and PubMed (both 1966-May 2011), as well as the American Society of Hematology abstracts (2000-May 2011), using the primary search terms ofatumumab and HuMax-CD20, Study Selection and Data Extraction: Clinical studies and abstracts available in the English language, describing the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical activity, and safety of ofatumumab in CLL were included in this review. Data Synthesis: Ofatumumab is a human immunoglobulin monoclonal antibody that binds to B-lymphocytes expressing CD-20 cell surface antigens. Ofatumumab was granted accelerated approval by the Food and Drug Administration in October 2009 for the treatment of CLL refractory to fludarabine and alemtuzumab. A Phase 1/2 trial has established the safety and tolerability of single-agent ofatumumab at an initial dose of 300 mg intravenously on week 1, followed by 2000 mg once weekly for 7 doses (weeks 2–8), followed by 2000 mg once every 4 weeks for 4 doses (weeks 9–12), for a total of 12 doses. The final analysts of a pivotal international multicenter trial has shown promising activity in patients with CLL refractory to fludarabine and alemtuzumab, demonstrating overall response rates of 44–51 %, with prolonged progress ion-free and overall survival. Ofatumumab activity has also been shown in a variety of other malignant and nonmalignant conditions, including non-Hodgkin lymphoma, rheumatoid arthritis, and multiple sclerosis. The most common adverse effect is grade 1 and 2 infusion reactions. Other adverse effects include infection, neutropenia, anemia, rash, fever, and diarrhea. Conclusions: Clinical evidence suggests that ofatumumab is an effective agent in patients with CLL refractory to fludarabine and alemtuzumab. Data are awaited comparing ofatumumab to other salvage regimens. Until results of head-to-head trials are conducted comparing ofatumumab to existing regimens, it cannot be said whether ofatumumab is more efficacious or tolerable than currently available therapies.

Geriatric assessment in daily oncology practice for nurses and allied health care professionals: Opinion paper of the Nursing and Allied Health Interest Group of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG)

The management of older persons with cancer has become a major public health concern in developed countries because of the aging of the population and the steady increase in cancer incidence with advancing age. Nurses and allied health care professionals are challenged to address the needs of this growing population. The International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) Nursing and Allied Health (NAH) Interest Group described key issues that nurses and allied health care professionals face when caring for older persons with cancer. The domains of the Geriatric Assessment (GA) are used as a guiding framework. The following geriatric domains are described: demographic data and social support, functional status, cognition, mental health, nutritional status, fatigue, comorbidities, polypharmacy, and other geriatric syndromes (e.g. falls, delirium). In addition to these geriatric domains, quality of life (QoL) is described based on the overall importance in this particular population. Advice for integration of assessment of these geriatric domains into daily oncology practice is made. Research has mainly focused on the role of treating physicians but the involvement of nurses and allied health care professionals is crucial in the care of older persons with cancer through the GA process. The ability of nurses and allied health care professionals to perform this assessment requires specialized training and education beyond standard oncology knowledge.

The role of the ubiquitin proteasome system in lymphoma.

The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) maintains the integrity of cellular processes by controlling protein degradation pathways. The role of the UPS in proliferation, cell cycle, differentiation, DNA repair, protein folding, and apoptosis is well documented, and a wide range of protein activities in these signaling pathways can be manipulated by UPS inhibitors, which include many anti-cancer agents. Naturally occurring and synthetic drugs designed to target the UPS are currently used for hematological cancers, including lymphoma. These drugs largely interfere with the E1 and E2 regions of the 26S proteasome, blocking proteasomal activity and promoting apoptosis by enhancing activities of the extrinsic (death receptors, Trail, Fas) and intrinsic (caspases, Bax, Bcl2, p53, nuclear factor-kappa B, p27) cell death programs. This review focuses on recent clinical developments concerning UPS inhibitors, signaling pathways that are affected by down-regulation of UPS activities, and apoptotic mechanisms promoted by drugs in this class that are used to treat lymphoma.

Mercaptopurine-Induced Fever: Hypersensitivity Reaction in a Patient with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

The antimetabolite mercaptopurine is commonly used as part of treatment regimens for acute lymphoblastic leukemia and as treatment for inflammatory bowel diseases. Adverse effects associated with mercaptopurine include myelosuppression, hepatotoxicity, and hyperpigmentation. We describe a 36‐ year‐old man with Philadelphia chromosome‐negative pre‐B‐cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia who experienced a serious mercaptopurine‐induced hypersensitivity reaction requiring prolonged hospitalization and extensive laboratory testing and imaging. He was treated with a multiagent chemotherapy regimen. Mercaptopurine 60 mg/m2 /day orally was started as part of his third course of chemotherapy. On day 9 of mercaptopurine therapy, the patient developed persistent fevers, skaking chills, and rigors that persisted in the absence of documented infection, consistent with drug fever. All symptoms and signs resolved after discontinuation of mercaptopurine. Use of the Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale indicated a probable relationship between the patients development of fever and mercaptopurine therapy. Mercaptopurine‐induced fever has been reported in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases, but this case report is the first, to our knowledge, in a patient with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Health care professionals should be aware of the possible development of fever as a hypersensitivity reaction in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with mercaptopurine.

Clinical pharmacology of oncology agents in older adults: A comprehensive review of how chronologic and functional age can influence treatment-related effects

Unique challenges exist when managing older adults with cancer. Associations between cancer and age-related physiologic changes have a direct impact on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cancer therapies and can affect drug dosing, dose intensity, efficacy, safety and quality of life. The breadth and depth of these issues, however, have not been fully evaluated because the majority of clinical trials have focused on a younger and healthier population. As a consequence, little information is available to support clinicians in making evidence-based decisions regarding treatment with cancer therapies in older adults, especially those over age 75. Prior clinical pharmacology reviews summarized the literature on how age-related physiologic changes can influence and affect conventional and targeted anti-cancer treatments. Our article provides an updated review with expanded information that includes small molecule kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, immunotherapies, hormonal, conventional, and miscellaneous agents. Additionally, our article integrates how functional age, determined by the geriatric assessment (GA), can also influence treatment-related effects and health outcomes. Broadening cancer therapy trials to capture not only chronologic age but also functional age would allow clinicians to better identify subsets of older adults who benefit from treatment versus those most vulnerable to morbidity and/or mortality.

Implementing a pharmacist-led, individualized medication assessment and planning (iMAP) intervention to reduce medication related problems among older adults with cancer.

OBJECTIVES Medication-related problems (MRP) affecting older adults are a significant healthcare concern and account for billions in medication-related morbidity. Cancer therapies can increase the prevalence of MRP. The objective of this study was to test the feasibility and effectiveness of implementing a pharmacist-led individualized medication assessment and planning (iMAP) intervention on the number and prevalence of MRP. MATERIALS AND METHODS This prospective pilot study enrolled oncology outpatients aged ≥65years. Intervention feasibility encompassed recommendation acceptance rate and intervention delivery time. The intervention was facilitated by pharmacists where patients received comprehensive medication management at baseline and at the 30- and 60-day follow-up. RESULTS Forty-eight eligible patients enrolled and 41 patients (85.4%) were included in the analysis. Mean age was 79.1years [range 65-101]; 66% women, 83% Caucasian, mean comorbidity count was 7.76. Forty-six percent of the pharmacist recommendations were accepted and the prevalence of MRP at baseline versus 60-day follow-up decreased by 20.5%. The average time to conduct the initial session was 22min versus 15min for the follow-up sessions. Resources needed included a tracking system for scheduling follow-up calls and a database for tracking acceptance of recommendations. A total of 123 MRP were identified in 95% of patients (N=39) with a mean of 3 MRP per patient. The mean reduction in number of MRP (3 at baseline versus 1.6 at 60-day follow-up) was 45.5%. CONCLUSIONS The pharmacist-led iMAP intervention was feasible and effective at reducing MRP. Additional inter-professional medication safety based interventions measuring patient-reported outcomes are still needed.

Adherence to oral cancer therapy in older adults: The International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) taskforce recommendations

There is an increasing trend towards using oral systemic therapy in patients with cancer. Compared to parenteral therapy, oral cancer agents offer convenience, have similar efficacy, and are preferred by patients, consequently making its use appealing in older adults. However, adherence is required to ensure its efficacy and to avoid compromising treatment outcomes, especially when the treatment goal is curative, or in case of symptomatic/rapidly progressing disease, where dose-intensity is important. This opens a new challenge for clinicians, as optimizing patient adherence is challenging, particularly due to lack of consensus and scarcity of available clinical evidence. This manuscript aims to review the impact of age-related factors on adherence, summarize the evidence on adherence, recommend methods for selecting patients suitable for oral cancer agents, and advise monitoring interventions to promote adherence to treatment.