Ginevra De Marchi

Biomarkers of lymphoma in Sjögren's syndrome and evaluation of the lymphoma risk in prelymphomatous conditions: results of a multicenter study.

OBJECTIVES To define the biomarkers associated with lymphoproliferation in primary Sjögrens syndrome (pSS) by distinguishing in separate groups the two best-recognized non-malignant prelymphomatous conditions in pSS, i.e., salivary gland swelling and cryoglobulinemic vasculitis (CV). METHODS A multicenter study was conducted in 5 centres. Patients fulfilled the following criteria: (1) positive AECG criteria for pSS, (2) serum cryoglobulins evaluated, and (3) lack of hepatitis C virus infection. Four groups were distinguished and analysed by multinomial analyses: (1) B-cell non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL), (2) CV without lymphoma, (3) salivary swelling without NHL (SW), and (4) pSS patients without NHL or prelymphomatous conditions. RESULTS Six hundred and sixty-one patients were studied. Group 1/NHL comprised 40/661 (6.1%) patients, Group 2/CV 17/661 (2.6%), Group 3/SW 180/661 (27.2%), and Group 4/pSS controls 424/661 (64.1%). Low C4 [relative-risk ratio (RRR) 8.3], cryoglobulins (RRR 6.8), anti-La antibodies (RRR 5.2), and leukopenia (RRR 3.3) were the variables distinguishing Group 1/NHL from Group 4/Controls. As concerns the subset of patients with prelymphomatous conditions, the absence of these biomarkers provided a negative predictive value for lymphoma of 98% in patients with salivary swelling (Group 3/SW). Additional follow-up studies in patients with SW confirmed the high risk of lymphoma when at least 2/4 biomarkers were positive. CONCLUSIONS Lymphoma-associated biomarkers were defined in a multicentre series of well-characterized patients with pSS, by dissecting the cohort in the pSS-associated prelymphomatous conditions. Notably, it was demonstrated for the first time that among the pSS patients with salivary swelling, only those with positive biomarkers present an increased risk of lymphoma evolution.

Controversies on Rituximab Therapy in Sjögren Syndrome-Associated Lymphoproliferation

Sjögrens syndrome (SS) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by chronic inflammation of salivary and lachrymal glands, and frequently accompanied by systemic symptoms. A subgroup of SS patients develops malignant B cell non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL), usually of the mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) type and very often located in the major salivary glands. Currently, there is a lack of evidence-based intervention therapy which may influence SS-related chronic inflammation and lymphoproliferation. B cells are involved in the pathogenesis of SS, and B cell downregulation may lead to a decrease of disease activity. Rituximab (RTX), a chimeric monoclonal antibody targeting the CD20 antigen on the B cell surface, has been successfully investigated in other autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, ANCA-associated vasculitis, and mixed cryoglobulinemic syndrome. Preliminary experiences of RTX therapy in SS patients with or without a lymphoproliferative disorder suggest that SS patients with more residual exocrine gland function might better benefit from RTX. Efficacy of RTX in SS-associated B-cell lymphoma, mainly in low-grade salivary gland lymphomas, remains an open issue.

A Snapshot on the On-Label and Off-Label Use of the Interleukin-1 Inhibitors in Italy among Rheumatologists and Pediatric Rheumatologists: A Nationwide Multi-Center Retrospective Observational Study

Background: Interleukin (IL)-1 inhibitors have been suggested as possible therapeutic options in a large number of old and new clinical entities characterized by an IL-1 driven pathogenesis. Objectives: To perform a nationwide snapshot of the on-label and off-label use of anakinra (ANA) and canakinumab (CAN) for different conditions both in children and adults. Methods: We retrospectively collected demographic, clinical, and therapeutic data from both adult and pediatric patients treated with IL-1 inhibitors from January 2008 to July 2016. Results: Five hundred and twenty-six treatment courses given to 475 patients (195 males, 280 females; 111 children and 364 adults) were evaluated. ANA was administered in 421 (80.04%) courses, CAN in 105 (19.96%). Sixty-two (32.1%) patients had been treated with both agents. IL-1 inhibitors were employed in 38 different indications (37 with ANA, 16 with CAN). Off-label use was more frequent for ANA than CAN (p < 0.0001). ANA was employed as first-line biologic approach in 323 (76.7%) cases, while CAN in 37 cases (35.2%). IL-1 inhibitors were associated with corticosteroids in 285 (54.18%) courses and disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in 156 (29.65%). ANA dosage ranged from 30 to 200 mg/day (or 1.0–2.0 mg/kg/day) among adults and 2–4 mg/kg/day among children; regarding CAN, the most frequently used posologies were 150mg every 8 weeks, 150mg every 4 weeks and 150mg every 6 weeks. The frequency of failure was higher among patients treated with ANA at a dosage of 100 mg/day than those treated with 2 mg/kg/day (p = 0.03). Seventy-six patients (14.4%) reported an adverse event (AE) and 10 (1.9%) a severe AE. AEs occurred more frequently after the age of 65 compared to both children and patients aged between 16 and 65 (p = 0.003 and p = 0.03, respectively). Conclusions: IL-1 inhibitors are mostly used off-label, especially ANA, during adulthood. The high frequency of good clinical responses suggests that IL-1 inhibitors are used with awareness of pathogenetic mechanisms; adult healthcare physicians generally employ standard dosages, while pediatricians are more prone in using a weight-based posology. Dose adjustments and switching between different agents showed to be effective treatment strategies. Our data confirm the good safety profile of IL-1 inhibitors.

Response to interleukin-1 inhibitors in 140 Italian patients with adult-onset still's disease: A multicentre retrospective observational study

Background: Interleukin (IL)-1 plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of Adult onset Still’s disease (AOSD). Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anakinra (ANA) and canakinumab (CAN) in a large group of AOSD patients. Methods: Data on clinical, serological features, and concomitant treatments were retrospectively collected at baseline and after 3, 6, and 12 months from AOSD patients (Yamaguchi criteria) referred by 18 Italian centers. Pouchot’s score was used to evaluate disease severity. Results: One hundred forty patients were treated with ANA; 4 were subsequently switched to CAN after ANA failure. The systemic pattern of AOSD was identified in 104 (74.2%) of the ANA-treated and in 3 (75%) of the CAN-treated groups; the chronic-articular type of AOSD was identified in 48 (25.8%) of the ANA-treated and in 1 (25%) of the CAN-treated groups. Methotrexate (MTX) was the most frequent disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) used before beginning ANA or CAN [91/140 (75.8%), 2/4 (50%), respectively]. As a second-line biologic DMARD therapy in 29/140 (20.7%) of the patients, ANA was found effective in improving all clinical and serological manifestations (p < 0.0001), and Pouchot’s score was found to be significantly reduced at all time points (p < 0.0001). No differences in treatment response were identified in the ANA-group when the patients were stratified according to age, sex, disease pattern or mono/combination therapy profile. ANA primary and secondary inefficacy at the 12-month time point was 15/140 (10.7%) and 11/140 (7.8%), respectively. Adverse events (AEs) [mainly represented by in situ (28/47, 59.5%) or diffuse (12/47, 25.5%) skin reactions and infections (7/47, 14.8%)] were the main causes for discontinuation. Pouchot’s score and clinical and serological features were significantly ameliorated at all time points (p < 0.0001) in the CAN-group, and no AEs were registered during CAN therapy. Treatment was suspended for loss of efficacy only in one case (1/4, 25%). Conclusion: This is the largest retrospective observational study evaluating the efficacy and safety of IL-1 inhibitors in AOSD patients. A good response was noted at 3 months after therapy onset in both the ANA- and CAN-groups. Skin reaction may nevertheless represent a non-negligible AE during ANA treatment.

Dermoscopy of nail fold and elbow in the differential diagnosis of early psoriatic arthritis sine psoriasis and early rheumatoid arthritis

Differentiation between psoriatic arthritis (PsA) sine psoriasis and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may be a challenge, especially in the early stages, hence the need for new instrumental markers to assist their diagnosis. In this study, we investigated possible dermoscopic differences in vascular appearance of nail fold and elbow (a classic site of repeated trauma) in these two conditions. Fifteen patients with PsA sine psoriasis, 12 patients with RA and 12 controls were included in the study. Regarding the nail fold vascular appearance in PsA sine psoriasis and RA cohorts, the presence of diffuse reddish background with or without sparse dotted vessels was significant in the former, whereas the evidence of parallel dotted/short linear vessels (“fish school‐like” pattern) or irregular/ramified, blurry, purple vessels were significant in the latter; none of these patterns were detected in the control group. Regarding the elbow, the pattern significantly associated with PsA sine psoriasis consisted of diffusely distributed, red, dotted vessels. On the other hand, RA patients and controls displayed similar dermoscopic findings, with three possible vascular patterns being observed: (i) irregular, blurry, purple vessels; (ii) avascular appearance; and (iii) sparse, dotted, purple vessels. In conclusion, dermoscopy may be a useful supportive tool for differentiating early PsA sine psoriasis from RA.