Gino Seravalle

Sympathetic Activation in Obese Normotensive Subjects

Human obesity is characterized by profound alterations in the hemodynamic and metabolic states. Whether these alterations involve sympathetic drive is controversial. In 10 young obese subjects (body mass index, 40.5 +/- 1.2 kg/m2, mean +/- SEM) with normal blood pressure and 8 age-matched lean normotensive control subjects, we measured beat-to-beat arterial blood pressure (Finapres technique), heart rate (electrocardiogram), postganglionic muscle sympathetic nerve activity (microneurography at the peroneal nerve), and venous plasma norepinephrine (high-performance liquid chromatography). The measurements were performed in baseline conditions and, with the exception of plasma norepinephrine, during baroreceptor stimulation and deactivation caused by increases and reductions of blood pressure via intravenous infusions of phenylephrine and nitroprusside. Baseline blood pressure and heart rate were similar in obese and control subjects. Plasma norepinephrine was also similar in the two groups. Muscle sympathetic nerve activity, however, was 38.6 +/- 5.1 bursts per minute in obese subjects and less than half that level in control subjects (18.7 +/- 1.3 bursts per minute), the difference being highly statistically significant (P < .02). Muscle sympathetic nerve activity and heart rate were reduced during phenylephrine infusion and increased during nitroprusside infusion, but the changes were about half as great in obese subjects as in control subjects. Thus, even in the absence of any blood pressure alteration, human obesity is characterized by a marked sympathetic activation, possibly because of an impairment of reflex sympathetic restraint. This may be involved in the high rate of hypertension and cardiovascular complications seen in obesity.

Baroreflex Control of Sympathetic Nerve Activity in Essential and Secondary Hypertension

Studies performed in experimental animals and in humans have documented that high blood pressure markedly impairs baroreceptor control of heart rate. Whether a similar impairment also characterizes baroreceptor control of sympathetic activity modulating peripheral vasomotor tone is still unknown. In 28 untreated essential hypertensive subjects [14 of moderate and 14 of more severe degree, age 51.6+/-2.4 and 52.6+/-2.1 years (mean+/-SEM)] and in 13 untreated secondary hypertensives (renovascular or pheochromocytoma, age 50.1+/-4.6 years), we measured beat-to-beat arterial blood pressure (finger photoplethysmographic device), heart rate (electrocardiogram), and efferent postganglionic muscle sympathetic nerve activity (microneurography) at rest and during baroreceptor stimulation and deactivation induced by stepwise intravenous infusions of phenylephrine and nitroprusside, respectively. Data were compared with those obtained in 15 age-matched normotensive control subjects. Muscle sympathetic nerve activity (bursts per 100 heart beats) showed a progressive and significant (P<.01) increase from normotension (40.3+/-3.3) to moderate (55.6+/-4.1) and more severe essential hypertension (68.2+/-4.1), paralleling the progressive increase in blood pressure values. In contrast, muscle sympathetic nerve activity was not increased in secondary hypertensives (40.5+/-6.7) despite blood pressure values similar to or even greater than those of severe essential hypertensives. In both essential and secondary hypertensives, baroreceptor-heart rate control was displaced toward elevated blood pressure values and markedly impaired compared with normotensive subjects (average reduction, 38.5%). In contrast, the sympathoinhibitory and sympathoexcitatory responses to baroreceptor stimulation and deactivation were displaced toward elevated blood pressure values but similar in all groups. Thus, sympathetic activation characterizes essential but not secondary hypertension. Regardless of its nature, however, hypertension is not accompanied by an impairment of baroreceptor modulation of sympathetic activity.

Sympathetic Activation in the Pathogenesis of Hypertension and Progression of Organ Damage

Although animal models of hypertension have clearly shown that high blood pressure is associated with and is probably caused by an increase in sympathetic cardiovascular influences, a similar demonstration in humans has been more difficult to obtain for methodological reasons. There is now evidence, however, of increased sympathetic activity in essential hypertension. This article will review this evidence by examining data showing that plasma norepinephrine is increased in essential hypertension and that this is also the case for systemic and regional norepinephrine spillover, as well as for the sympathetic nerve firing rate in the skeletal muscle nerve district. Evidence will also be provided that sympathetic activation is a peculiar feature of essential hypertension, particularly in its early stages, with secondary forms of high blood pressure not usually characterized by an increased central sympathetic outflow. Humoral, metabolic, reflex, and central mechanisms are likely to be the factors responsible for the adrenergic activation characterizing hypertension, which may also promote the development and progression of the cardiac and vascular alterations that lead to hypertension-related morbidity and mortality, independent of blood pressure values. This represents the rationale for considering sympathetic deactivation one of the major goals of antihypertensive treatment.

Sympathetic Activation and Loss of Reflex Sympathetic Control in Mild Congestive Heart Failure

BACKGROUND Baroreflex control of sympathetic activity is impaired in severe congestive heart failure (CHF), probably causing the marked sympathetic activation typical of this condition. Little information exists, however, as to whether baroreflex impairment and related sympathetic activation also occur in mild CHF. METHODS AND RESULTS We studied 19 patients (age, 57.5 +/- 2.2 years, mean +/- SEM) with CHF in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV and with a marked reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, 30.1 +/- 1.5% from echocardiography) and 17 age-matched patients with CHF in NYHA class I or II and with an only slightly reduced LVEF (44.9 +/- 3.3%) that never was < 40%. Seventeen age-matched healthy subjects served as control subjects. Primary measurements included beat-to-beat arterial blood pressure (with the Finapres technique), heart rate (from ECG), and postganglionic muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA, from microneurography at the peroneal nerve). Measurements were performed at baseline and during baroreceptor stimulation (intravenous phenylephrine infusion), baroreceptor deactivation (intravenous nitroprusside infusion), and cold-pressor test. Baseline blood pressure was similar in the three groups, whereas heart rate was progressively greater from control subjects to patients with mild and severe CHF, MSNA (bursts per 100 heart beats) increased significantly and markedly from control subjects to patients with mild and severe CHF (47.1 +/- 2.9 versus 64.4 +/- 6.2 and 82.1 +/- 3.4, P < .05 and P < .01, respectively). Heart rate and MSNA were progressively reduced by phenylephrine infusion and progressively increased by nitroprusside infusion. Compared with control subjects, the responses were strikingly impaired in severe CHF patients, but a marked impairment also was seen in mild CHF patients. On average, baroreflex sensitivity in mild CHF patients was reduced by 59.1 +/- 5.5% (MSNA) and 64.8 +/- 4.8% (heart rate). In contrast, reflex responses to the cold-pressor test were similar in the three groups. CONCLUSIONS These results demonstrate that in mild CHF patients the baroreceptor inhibitor influence on heart rate and MSNA is already markedly impaired. This impairment may be responsible for the early sympathetic activation that occurs in the course of CHF.

Body Weight Reduction, Sympathetic Nerve Traffic, and Arterial Baroreflex in Obese Normotensive Humans

BACKGROUND Previous studies have shown that sympathetic cardiovascular outflow is increased in obese normotensive subjects and that this increase is associated with a baroreflex impairment. The purpose of this study was to determine whether these abnormalities are irreversible or can be favorably affected by body weight reduction. METHODS AND RESULTS In 20 obese normotensive subjects (age, 31.3+/-1.7 years; body mass index, 37.6+/-0.9 kg/m2, mean+/-SEM), we measured beat-to-beat arterial blood pressure (Finapres technique), heart rate (ECG), postganglionic muscle sympathetic nerve activity (microneurography at a peroneal nerve), and venous plasma norepinephrine (high-performance liquid chromatography) at rest and during baroreceptor stimulation and deactivation induced by increases and reductions of blood pressure via stepwise intravenous infusions of phenylephrine and nitroprusside. Measurements were repeated in 10 subjects after a 16-week hypocaloric diet with normal sodium content (4600 to 5000 J and 210 mmol NaCl/d) and in the remaining 10 subjects after a 16-week observation period without any reduction in the caloric intake. The hypocaloric diet significantly reduced body mass index, slightly reduced blood pressure, and caused a significant and marked decrease in both muscle sympathetic nerve activity (from 50.0+/-5.1 to 32.9+/-4.6 bursts per 100 heart beats, P<.01) and plasma norepinephrine (from 356.2+/-43 to 258.4+/-29 pg/mL, P<.05). This was associated with a significant improvement in the sensitivity of the baroreceptor heart rate (+71.5 +/- 11%, P<.01) and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (+124.5 +/- 22%, P<.001) reflex. Total body glucose uptake also increased significantly (+60.8 +/- 12.0%, P<.05), indicating an increase in insulin sensitivity. All variables remained unchanged in subjects not undergoing caloric restriction. CONCLUSIONS In obese normotensive subjects, a reduction in body weight induced by a hypocaloric diet with normal sodium content exerts a marked reduction in sympathetic activity owing to central sympathoinhibition. This can be due to the consequences of an increased insulin sensitivity but also to a restoration of the baroreflex control of the cardiovascular system with weight loss.

Mechanisms responsible for sympathetic activation by cigarette smoking in humans.

The pressor and tachycardic effects of cigarette smoking are associated with an increase in plasma catecholamines, suggesting the dependence of these effects on adrenergic stimulation. Whether the stimulation occurs at a central or a peripheral level and whether reflex mechanisms are involved is unknown. Methods and ResultsIn nine normotensive healthy subjects (age, 33.0±3.5 years, mean±SEM), we measured blood pressure (Finapres device), heart rate (ECG), calf blood flow and vascular resistance (venous occlusion plethysmography), plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine (high-performance liquid chromatography assay), and postganglionic muscle sympathetic nerve activity (microneurography from the peroneal nerve) while subjects were smoking a filter cigarette (nicotine content, 1.1 mg) or were in control condition. Cigarette smoking (which raised plasma nicotine measured by highperformance liquid chromatography from 1.0±0.9 to 44.2±7.1 ng/mL) markedly and significantly increased mean arterial pressure (+13.2±2.3%), heart rate (+30.3±4.7%), calf vascular resistance (+ 12.1±4.9%), plasma norepinephrine (+34.8±7.0%), and plasma epinephrine (+90.5±39.0%). In contrast, muscle sympathetic nerve activity showed a marked reduction (integrated activity −31.8±5.1%, P < .01). The reduction was inversely related to the increase in mean arterial pressure (r= −.67, P < .05), but the slope of the relation was markedly less (−54.1±7.5%, P < .05) than that obtained by intravenous infusion of phenylephrine in absence of smoking. The hemodynamic and neurohumoral changes were still visible 30 minutes after smoking and occurred again on smoking a second cigarette. Sham smoking was devoid of any hemodynamic and neurohumoral effect. ConclusionsThese data support the hypothesis that in humans the sympathetic activation induced by smoking depends on an increased release and/or a reduced clearance of catecholamines at the neuroeffector junctions. Central sympathetic activity is inhibited by smoking, presumably via a baroreceptor stimulation triggered by the smoking-related pressor response. The baroreflex is impaired by smoking, however, indicating that partial inability to reflexly counteract the effect of sympathetic activation is also responsible for the pressor response.

Neuroadrenergic and reflex abnormalities in patients with metabolic syndrome

Aims/hypothesisPrevious studies have shown that alterations in vascular, metabolic, inflammatory and haemocoagulative functions characterise the metabolic syndrome. Whether this is also the case for sympathetic function is not clear. We therefore aimed to clarify this issue and to determine whether metabolic or reflex mechanisms might be responsible for the possible adrenergic dysfunction.MethodsIn 43 healthy control subjects (age 48.2±1.0 years, mean±SEM) and in 48 untreated age-matched subjects with metabolic syndrome (National Cholesterol Education Program’s Adult Treatment Panel III Report criteria) we measured, along with anthropometric and metabolic variables, blood pressure (Finapres), heart rate (ECG) and efferent postganglionic muscle sympathetic nerve activity (microneurography) at rest and during baroreceptor manipulation (vasoactive drug infusion technique).ResultsCompared with control subjects, subjects with metabolic syndrome had higher BMI, waist circumference, blood pressure, cholesterol, triglycerides, insulin and homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) index values but lower HDL cholesterol values. Sympathetic nerve traffic was significantly greater in subjects with metabolic syndrome than in control subjects (61.1±2.6 vs 43.8±2.8 bursts/100 heartbeats, p<0.01), the presence of sympathetic activation also being detectable when the metabolic syndrome did not include hypertension as a component. Muscle sympathetic nerve traffic correlated directly and significantly with waist circumference (r=0.46, p<0.001) and HOMA index (r=0.49, p<0.001) and was inversely related to baroreflex sensitivity (r=−0.44, p<0.001), which was impaired in the metabolic syndrome.Conclusions/interpretationThese data provide evidence that the metabolic syndrome is characterised by sympathetic activation and that this abnormality (1) is also detectable when blood pressure is normal and (2) depends on insulin resistance as well as on reflex alterations.

Adrenergic and Reflex Abnormalities in Obesity-Related Hypertension

Previous studies have shown that essential hypertension and obesity are both characterized by sympathetic activation coupled with a baroreflex impairment. The present study was aimed at determining the effects of the concomitant presence of the 2 above-mentioned conditions on sympathetic activity as well as on baroreflex cardiovascular control. In 14 normotensive lean subjects (aged 33.5±2.2 years, body mass index 22.8±0.7 kg/m2 [mean±SEM]), 16 normotensive obese subjects (body mass index 37.2±1.3 kg/m2), 13 lean hypertensive subjects (body mass index 24.0±0.8 kg/m2), and 16 obese hypertensive subjects (body mass index 37.5±1.3 kg/m2), all age-matched, we measured beat-to-beat arterial blood pressure (by Finapres device), heart rate (HR, by ECG), and postganglionic muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA, by microneurography) at rest and during baroreceptor stimulation and deactivation induced by stepwise intravenous infusions of phenylephrine and nitroprusside, respectively. Blood pressure values were higher in lean hypertensive and obese hypertensive subjects than in normotensive lean and obese subjects. MSNA was significantly (P <0.01) greater in obese normotensive subjects (49.1±3.0 bursts per 100 heart beats) and in lean hypertensive subjects (44.5±3.3 bursts per 100 heart beats) than in lean normotensive control subjects (32.2±2.5 bursts per 100 heart beats); a further increase was detectable in individuals with the concomitant presence of obesity and hypertension (62.1±3.4 bursts per 100 heart beats). Furthermore, whereas in lean hypertensive subjects, only baroreflex control of HR was impaired, in obese normotensive subjects, both HR and MSNA baroreflex changes were attenuated, with a further attenuation being observed in obese hypertensive patients. Thus, the association between obesity and hypertension triggers a sympathetic activation and an impairment in baroreflex cardiovascular control that are greater in magnitude than those found in either of the above-mentioned abnormal conditions alone.

Dissociation Between Muscle and Skin Sympathetic Nerve Activity in Essential Hypertension, Obesity, and Congestive Heart Failure

Essential hypertension, obesity, and congestive heart failure are characterized by an increase in muscle sympathetic nerve activity. Whether in these conditions skin sympathetic nerve activity is also increased has never been systematically examined, however. In 10 untreated mild essential hypertensive, 12 untreated normotensive obese, 10 mild (New York Heart Association class II) heart failure, and 10 normotensive lean healthy control subjects, we measured beat-to-beat arterial blood pressure (Finapres technique), body mass index, and postganglionic sympathetic nerve activity in skeletal muscle and skin areas (microneurographic technique, peroneal nerve). The muscle and skin nerve measurements were made in a randomized sequence. All data were obtained with the subject supine in a quiet, semidark environment at constant temperature over two periods of 30 minutes each, separated by a 20- to 30-minute interval. Blood pressure was increased only in hypertensive and body mass index only in obese subjects. Muscle sympathetic nerve activity quantified as bursts/min was markedly and significantly (P<.01) greater in essential hypertensive (33.3+/-1.7), obese (42.2+/-2.8), and congestive heart failure subjects (55.8+/-4.3) in comparison with control subjects (23.9+/-1.6). This was the case also for muscle sympathetic nerve activity, quantified as bursts per 100 heart beats. In contrast, skin sympathetic nerve activity (bursts per minute) was superimposable in hypertensive, obese, heart failure, and control subjects, its ability to increase being documented in all four groups by the marked response to an acoustic stimulus. Thus, in various diseases, muscle but not skin sympathetic activity is increased, with the sympathetic activation not being uniformly distributed over the whole cardiovascular system.

Comparative effects of candesartan and hydrochlorothiazide on blood pressure, insulin sensitivity, and sympathetic drive in obese hypertensive individuals: Results of the CROSS study

Objective The increase in blood pressure that accompanies the obese state is almost invariably associated with alterations in metabolism (insulin resistance and dyslipidaemia) and the neurohumoral profile (activation of the renin–angiotensin system, sympathetic overactivity), which potentiate the cardiovascular risk associated with hypertension. However, debate remains as to the antihypertensive drug on which treatment of obesity-related hypertension should be based. The CROSS (Candesartan Role on Obesity and on Sympathetic System) study was undertaken to examine the antihypertensive, neuroadrenergic, and metabolic effects of an angiotensin II receptor blocker in comparison with a diuretic in obese hypertensive individuals. Methods In 127 obese hypertensive individuals aged 50.7 ± 5.1 years (mean ± SD), we measured clinic blood pressure, heart rate, plasma glucose, and insulin at rest and during an oral glucose load before and 12 weeks after treatment with either candesartan cilexetil (8–16 mg once daily) or hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ, 25–50 mg once daily), administered orally in accordance with a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-parallel-groups study design. Insulin sensitivity was expressed as insulin resistance index (IRI), calculated as the ratio of the area under the curve (AUC) for glucose to that for insulin. In a subgroup of patients, measurements also included direct microneurographic recording of muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) in the peroneal nerve. Results Candesartan cilexetil caused a significant (P < 0.01) reduction in both mean blood pressure (from 114.2 ± 5.1 to 99.6 ± 6.0 mmHg) and MSNA (from 51.0 ± 12.3 to 40.4 ± 12.5 bursts per 100 heart beats), and a significant (P < 0.02) increase in insulin sensitivity (AUC IRI: from −23.2 ± 22.1 to −17.6 ± 12.2). In contrast, HCTZ did not significantly affect MSNA and worsened insulin sensitivity, while achieving blood pressure reductions similar to those produced by candesartan cilexetil. Conclusions These data provide evidence that, in obese hypertensive individuals, treatment with candesartan cilexetil has an antihypertensive effect similar to that of HCTZ. Unlike diuretic treatment, however, treatment with candesartan cilexetil improves insulin sensitivity and exerts sympathoinhibitory effects.