Giombattista Barrano

Mini-STAR as bail-out strategy for percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusion.

Background: Although the advancement of the equipment and the presence of innovative techniques, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusion (CTO) continues to be affected by lower procedural success in comparison with non occluded vessel PCI. Objective: We describe a new technique for the treatment of coronary CTO which utilizes a new generation of polymeric wires. Methods and Result: From March 2009 to June 2010 different strategies were adopted as “bail out” after an initial attempt failed in 117 consecutive CTO lesions. Among these, conventional strategies (CS) such as parallel wire, sub‐intimal tracking and re‐entry (STAR), microchannel technique, intracoronary ultrasound guided revascularization and anchor balloon, were used in 75 cases (64.1%), while in the remaining a new technique, the “mini‐STAR,” was used (39.9%). Although no substantial differences were observed regarding the distribution of clinical features and angiographic lesions characteristics between the populations, mini‐STAR was able to achieve a higher rate of procedural success in comparison with other CS (97.6% vs. 52%, P < 0.001) with lower contrast agent use (442 ± 259 cm3 vs. 561 ± 243 cm3, P = 0.01) and shorter procedural and fluoroscopy times (122 ± 61 vs. 157 ± 74 min, P = 0.009 and 60 ± 31 min vs. 75 ± 38 min, P = 0.03, respectively). No differences were observed in term of peri‐procedural complications such as procedural myocardial infarction, coronary perforations, and contrast‐induced nephropathy between mini‐STAR and CS. Conclusion: The mini‐STAR technique is a promising strategy for the treatment of CTO lesions, achieving a high procedural success rate and low occurrence of procedural adverse events.

Plaque Distribution Patterns in Distal Left Main Coronary Artery to Predict Outcomes After Stent Implantation

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate the association between plaque distribution at left main (LM) bifurcation and target lesion revascularization (TLR) after stenting. BACKGROUND Despite favorable reported mid- and long-term results, stent implantation on LM bifurcation remains challenging. The role of atherosclerotic plaque distribution in affecting LM bifurcation stenting outcomes has not been explored. METHODS A total of 329 patients undergoing LM bifurcation stenting in 2 centers were included. A method based on different plaque locations within the bifurcation area was applied. The overall population was divided in 2 groups according to the presence of a specific pattern characterized by plaque occupying (n = 145) or not occupying (n = 184) the whole bifurcation (WB) area. RESULTS Baseline clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics were well-balanced between the 2 groups. The WB group showed a significantly higher risk of 3-year TLR compared with the non-WB group (24.9% vs. 8.3%; unadjusted hazard ratio: 3.12; 95% confidence interval: 1.59 to 6.11; p = 0.001; adjusted hazard ratio: 2.84; 95% confidence interval: 1.43 to 5.64; p = 0.003). The 3-year TLR rate was not significantly different between patients treated with 1-or 2-stent techniques either in the WB or non-WB groups. In the WB group, TLR was similar between patients with lesions classified as 1,1,1 and non-1,1,1 by the Medina classification (20.7% vs. 26.8%, p = 0.57, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The WB pattern is associated with enhanced TLR risk, regardless of stent technique and plaque severity. This could impact the treatment strategy of high-risk lesions involving the whole bifurcation area.

Comparison of One-Year Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease and Acute Coronary Syndromes (from the CUSTOMIZE Registry)

Uncertainty surrounds the optimal revascularization strategy for patients with left main coronary artery disease presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACSs), and adequately sized specific comparisons of percutaneous and surgical revascularization in this scenario are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of 1-year major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in patients with left main coronary artery disease and ACS treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and drug-eluting stent implantation or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). A total of 583 patients were included. At 1 year, MACEs were significantly higher in patients treated with PCI (n = 222) compared to those treated with CABG (n = 361, 14.4% vs 5.3%, p <0.001), driven by a higher rate of target lesion revascularization (8.1% vs 1.7%, p = 0.001). This finding was consistent after statistical adjustment for MACEs (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2 to 5.9, p = 0.01) and target lesion revascularization (adjusted HR 8.0, 95% CI 2.2 to 28.7, p = 0.001). No statistically significant differences between PCI and CABG were noted for death (adjusted HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.4 to 3.0, p = 0.81) and myocardial infarction (adjusted HR 4.8, 95% CI 0.3 to 68.6, p = 0.25). No interaction between clinical presentation (ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) and treatment (PCI or CABG) was observed (p for interaction = 0.68). In conclusion, in patients with left main coronary artery disease and ACS, PCI is associated with similar safety compared to CABG but higher risk of MACEs driven by increased risk of repeat revascularization.

Prognostic value of exercise myocardial scintigraphy in patients with coronary chronic total occlusions.

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the prognostic value of exercise myocardial scintigraphy in patients undergoing incomplete revascularization by means of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with at least a residual chronic total occlusion (CTO) left untreated. METHODS Of 569 consecutive patients with multivessel disease undergoing myocardial scintigraphy after incomplete revascularization by PCI between March 1997 and December 2004, 126 (79% male, 64+/-10 years) with >or= 1 residual CTO fulfilled the eligibility criteria and entered in the study. Hard events defined as cardiac death and myocardial infarction, soft events defined as incidence of unstable angina and PCI procedures, and their composite were assessed at a median follow-up period of 44 months. RESULTS Hard events were observed in six patients (4.8%). All of them had severely abnormal perfusion defects detected by myocardial scintigraphy. Soft events occurred in 0 (0%), 10 (7.9%), and 15 (11.9%) patients with normal, mildly abnormal, and severely abnormal perfusion, respectively. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, the log-rank test was statistically significant across patients stratified by summed stress score either in terms of hard, soft and hard, or soft events. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards showed an incremental significant information when the scintigraphic variables were added to clinical, angiographic, left ventricular ejection fraction, and Duke treadmill score, for prediction of the composite of hard and soft cardiac events (P < 0.006). CONCLUSIONS Among patients with a residual CTO left untreated after PCI, myocardial perfusion imaging provides significant independent information concerning the subsequent risk of cardiac events.

Does Occlusion Duration Influence Procedural and Clinical Outcome of Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Chronic Total Occlusion

BACKGROUND Previous studies have reported that the indeterminable aging and long-duration occlusion are associated with procedural failure and adverse long-term outcome. We aimed to investigate the clinical impact of occlusion duration in a consecutive series of patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS From October 2005 to June 2009, a total of 303 patients with 328 CTO lesions were consecutively treated achieving a success rate of 86.3%. The average of occlusion duration estimated in 62.5% of cases (known occlusion duration [KOD] patients, n = 188) was 29.8 ± 41.3 months. In the remaining 37.5% of cases, the occlusion duration was indeterminate (indetermination of occlusion duration [IOD] patients, n = 115). No influence of duration in procedural outcome was observed. Moreover, no differences of 1-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were observed between KOD and IOD patients. The multivariate COX regression analysis identified diabetes mellitus and multivessel coronary disease as independent predictors of 12-month MACE (HR 5.023; 95% CI 0.164-9.653; P = 0.025 and HR 0.801; 95% CI 0.109-0.909, P = 0.033). The analysis did not show any influence of IOD and long occlusion duration in the occurrence of MACE. Predictors of angiographic failure recognized with multivariate binary logistic were vessel diameter <2.5 mm (OR 5.3; 95% CI 1.19-8.91; P = 0.02), CTO length >20 mm (OR 6.3; 95% CI 1.22-9.54; P = 0.02), and severe calcification (OR 3.2; 95% CI 1.62-5.51; P = 0.03). CONCLUSION IOD and long duration of CTO do not affect procedural and clinical outcome of patients who underwent CTO PCI. This marks the importance of considering PCI treatment, a reliable strategy in cases of IOD or long occlusion duration.

Comparative One-Year Effectiveness of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients <75 Versus ≥75 Years With Unprotected Left Main Disease (from the CUSTOMIZE Registry)

There is a lack of knowledge on the interaction between age and left main coronary artery revascularization. The aim of this study was to investigate the comparative effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with left main coronary artery disease aged <75 versus ≥75 years. Of a total of 894 patients included, 692 (77.4%) were aged <75 years and 202 (23.6%) ≥75 years. PCI was found to be significantly different from CABG with respect to the composite of major adverse cardiac events at 1-year follow-up in patients aged <75 years (15.5% vs 8.5%, p = 0.01) but not in those aged ≥75 years (16.4% vs 13.9%, p = 0.65). This finding was consistent after statistical adjustment for baseline confounders in the 2 groups (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 2.2, 95% confidence interval 1.2 to 4.1, p = 0.016 in younger patients; AHR 0.9, 95% confidence interval 0.3 to 3.0, p = 0.88 in older patients). In the 2 groups, PCI and CABG showed similar adjusted risks for all-cause death, cardiac death, and myocardial infarction. Target lesion revascularization occurred more frequently in patients aged <75 years treated with PCI compared to CABG (AHR 5.1, 95% confidence interval 1.9 to 13.6, p = 0.001) but not in those aged ≥75 years. A significant interaction between age and treatment with regard to major adverse cardiac events was identified (adjusted p for interaction = 0.034). In conclusion, compared to younger patients, elderly patients with left main disease are likely to derive the maximal gain from a less invasive procedure such as PCI.

Head-to-head comparison of early vessel healing by optical coherence tomography after implantation of different stents in the same patient.

Objectives Strut coverage represents the most powerful morphometric predictor of stent thrombosis and the best surrogate indicator of endothelization. The aim of this study was to get new insights on temporal patterns of vessel healing after stenting with different types of stent. Methods Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was used to investigate the early strut coverage of lesions treated with CATANIA (CAT) stent, drug-eluting stent (DES) or cobalt–chromium bare metal stent (BMS). Two cohorts of 10 and 24 patients underwent OCT follow-up at 7–10 and 28–32 days after stenting, respectively. In each cohort, patients were randomly assigned to receive a CAT stent in one lesion and a BMS or a DES in a separate lesion. Results A total of 7975 and 8406 struts were analyzed for the comparisons of CAT stent vs. DES and CAT stent vs. BMS at 7–10 days, respectively. A total of 21 123 and 25 069 struts were analyzed for the comparisons of CAT stent vs. DES and CAT stent vs. BMS at 28–32 days, respectively. At 7–10 days, the CAT stent showed higher coverage rates compared with DES (90.0 vs. 85.9%, P < 0.0001) and BMS (90.2 vs. 83.6%, P < 0.0001). Similarly, at 28–32 days, the coverage rate was higher with CAT stent compared with DES (97.7 vs. 90.5%, P < 0.0001) and BMS (97.2 vs. 96.5%, P < 0.0001). Conclusion The CAT stent yields quicker and more complete strut coverage than DES and BMS in the early phases of vessel healing following stent implantation.

Which are the Best Follow-Up Strategies for Patients Who Undergo Percutaneous Coronary Interventions?

Percutaneous coronary intervention has become a mainstay in the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease in recent years. However, restenosis, incomplete revascularization, and progression of disease continue to cause a need for a clinical functional assessment in order to reduce morbidity. Angiographic systematic follow-up should nowadays be considered a valuable approach only to monitor small groups of very high risk patients. Although coronary CT angiography seems able to non-invasively image the coronary artery lumen, but the presence of a stent could limit visualization of coronary morphology. Recurrence of symptoms itself has low sensitivity and specificity for detection of restenosis and myocardial ischemia. Exercise testing may provide useful information on symptoms and functional capacity of the patient; however, it is poorly diagnostic of restenosis and myocardial ischemia with a low level of sensitivity and specificity. Conversely, the significantly increased sensitivity and specificity obtained by stress nuclear, echocardiographic or magnetic resonance imaging provide great advantage for clinical assessment of these patients. Additional advantages of stress imaging are the ability to assess location and extent of myocardial ischemia regardless of symptoms as well as to evaluate patients who are unable to exercise or who have an uninterpretable electrocardiogram. Furthermore, the clear superiority of stress imaging with regard to specificity and predictive value for postrevascularization events makes this functional approach of paramount importance for assessing prognosis of such patients.