Giordano Caponigro
Novartis
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Giordano Caponigro.
Nature | 2012
Jordi Barretina; Giordano Caponigro; Nicolas Stransky; Kavitha Venkatesan; Adam A. Margolin; Sungjoon Kim; Christopher J. Wilson; Joseph Lehar; Gregory V. Kryukov; Dmitriy Sonkin; Anupama Reddy; Manway Liu; Lauren Murray; Michael F. Berger; John E. Monahan; Paula Morais; Jodi Meltzer; Adam Korejwa; Judit Jané-Valbuena; Felipa A. Mapa; Joseph Thibault; Eva Bric-Furlong; Pichai Raman; Aaron Shipway; Ingo H. Engels; Jill Cheng; Guoying K. Yu; Jianjun Yu; Peter Aspesi; Melanie de Silva
The systematic translation of cancer genomic data into knowledge of tumour biology and therapeutic possibilities remains challenging. Such efforts should be greatly aided by robust preclinical model systems that reflect the genomic diversity of human cancers and for which detailed genetic and pharmacological annotation is available. Here we describe the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE): a compilation of gene expression, chromosomal copy number and massively parallel sequencing data from 947 human cancer cell lines. When coupled with pharmacological profiles for 24 anticancer drugs across 479 of the cell lines, this collection allowed identification of genetic, lineage, and gene-expression-based predictors of drug sensitivity. In addition to known predictors, we found that plasma cell lineage correlated with sensitivity to IGF1 receptor inhibitors; AHR expression was associated with MEK inhibitor efficacy in NRAS-mutant lines; and SLFN11 expression predicted sensitivity to topoisomerase inhibitors. Together, our results indicate that large, annotated cell-line collections may help to enable preclinical stratification schemata for anticancer agents. The generation of genetic predictions of drug response in the preclinical setting and their incorporation into cancer clinical trial design could speed the emergence of ‘personalized’ therapeutic regimens.
Nature | 2010
Cory M. Johannessen; Jesse S. Boehm; So Young Kim; Sapana Thomas; Leslie Wardwell; Laura A. Johnson; Caroline Emery; Nicolas Stransky; Alexandria P. Cogdill; Jordi Barretina; Giordano Caponigro; Haley Hieronymus; Ryan R. Murray; Kourosh Salehi-Ashtiani; David E. Hill; Marc Vidal; Jean Zhao; Xiaoping Yang; Ozan Alkan; Sungjoon Kim; Jennifer L. Harris; Christopher J. Wilson; Vic E. Myer; Peter Finan; David E. Root; Thomas M. Roberts; Todd R. Golub; Keith T. Flaherty; Reinhard Dummer; Barbara Weber
Oncogenic mutations in the serine/threonine kinase B-RAF (also known as BRAF) are found in 50–70% of malignant melanomas. Pre-clinical studies have demonstrated that the B-RAF(V600E) mutation predicts a dependency on the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signalling cascade in melanoma—an observation that has been validated by the success of RAF and MEK inhibitors in clinical trials. However, clinical responses to targeted anticancer therapeutics are frequently confounded by de novo or acquired resistance. Identification of resistance mechanisms in a manner that elucidates alternative ‘druggable’ targets may inform effective long-term treatment strategies. Here we expressed ∼600 kinase and kinase-related open reading frames (ORFs) in parallel to interrogate resistance to a selective RAF kinase inhibitor. We identified MAP3K8 (the gene encoding COT/Tpl2) as a MAPK pathway agonist that drives resistance to RAF inhibition in B-RAF(V600E) cell lines. COT activates ERK primarily through MEK-dependent mechanisms that do not require RAF signalling. Moreover, COT expression is associated with de novo resistance in B-RAF(V600E) cultured cell lines and acquired resistance in melanoma cells and tissue obtained from relapsing patients following treatment with MEK or RAF inhibitors. We further identify combinatorial MAPK pathway inhibition or targeting of COT kinase activity as possible therapeutic strategies for reducing MAPK pathway activation in this setting. Together, these results provide new insights into resistance mechanisms involving the MAPK pathway and articulate an integrative approach through which high-throughput functional screens may inform the development of novel therapeutic strategies.
Cell Cycle | 2009
Dmitri Wiederschain; Susan Wee; Lin Chen; Alice Loo; Guizhi Yang; Alan Huang; Yan Chen; Giordano Caponigro; Yung Mae Yao; Christoph Lengauer; William R. Sellers; John D. Benson
The use of RNA interference (RNAi) has enabled loss-of-function studies in mammalian cancer cells and has hence become critical for identifying and validating cancer drug targets. Current transient siRNA and stable shRNA systems, however, have limited utility in accurately assessing the cancer dependency due to their short-lived effects and limited in vivo utility, respectively. In this study, a single-vector lentiviral, Tet-inducible shRNA system (pLKO-Tet-On) was generated to allow for the rapid generation of multiple stable cell lines with regulatable shRNA expression. We demonstrate the advantages and versatility of this system by targeting two polycomb group proteins, Bmi-1 and Mel-18, in a number of cancer cell lines. Our data show that pLKO-Tet-On-mediated knockdown is tightly regulated by the inducer tetracycline and its derivative, doxycycline, in a concentration- and time-dependent manner. Furthermore, target gene expression is fully restored upon withdrawal of the inducing agent. An additional, 17 distinct gene products have been targeted by inducible shRNAs with robust regulation in all cases. Importantly, we functionally validate the ability of the pLKO-Tet-On vector to reversibly silence targeted transcripts in vivo. The versatile and robust inducible lentiviral RNAi system reported herein can therefore serve as a powerful tool to rapidly reveal tumor cell dependence.
Nature Genetics | 2013
Jacob D. Jaffe; Yan Wang; Ho Man Chan; Jinghui Zhang; Robert Huether; Gregory V. Kryukov; Hyo-eun C. Bhang; Jordan E. Taylor; Min Hu; Nathan P. Englund; Feng Yan; Zhaofu Wang; E. Robert McDonald; Lei Wei; Jing Ma; John Easton; Zhengtian Yu; Rosalie deBeaumount; Veronica Gibaja; Kavitha Venkatesan; Robert Schlegel; William R. Sellers; Nicholas Keen; Jun Liu; Giordano Caponigro; Jordi Barretina; Vesselina G. Cooke; Charles G. Mullighan; Steven A. Carr; James R. Downing
Epigenetic dysregulation is an emerging hallmark of cancers. We developed a high-information-content mass spectrometry approach to profile global histone modifications in human cancers. When applied to 115 lines from the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia, this approach identified distinct molecular chromatin signatures. One signature was characterized by increased histone 3 lysine 36 (H3K36) dimethylation, exhibited by several lines harboring translocations in NSD2, which encodes a methyltransferase. A previously unknown NSD2 p.Glu1099Lys (p.E1099K) variant was identified in nontranslocated acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cell lines sharing this signature. Ectopic expression of the variant induced a chromatin signature characteristic of NSD2 hyperactivation and promoted transformation. NSD2 knockdown selectively inhibited the proliferation of NSD2-mutant lines and impaired the in vivo growth of an NSD2-mutant ALL xenograft. Sequencing analysis of >1,000 pediatric cancer genomes identified the NSD2 p.E1099K alteration in 14% of t(12;21) ETV6-RUNX1–containing ALLs. These findings identify NSD2 as a potential therapeutic target for pediatric ALL and provide a general framework for the functional annotation of cancer epigenomes.
Clinical Cancer Research | 2013
JulieAnn Rader; Mike R. Russell; Lori S. Hart; Michael S. Nakazawa; Lili T. Belcastro; Daniel Martinez; Yimei Li; Erica L. Carpenter; Edward F. Attiyeh; Sharon J. Diskin; Sunkyu Kim; Sudha Parasuraman; Giordano Caponigro; Robert W. Schnepp; Andrew C. Wood; Bruce R. Pawel; Kristina A. Cole; John M. Maris
Purpose: Neuroblastoma is a pediatric cancer that continues to exact significant morbidity and mortality. Recently, a number of cell-cycle proteins, particularly those within the Cyclin D/CDK4/CDK6/RB network, have been shown to exert oncogenic roles in neuroblastoma, suggesting that their therapeutic exploitation might improve patient outcomes. Experimental Procedures: We evaluated the effect of dual CDK4/CDK6 inhibition on neuroblastoma viability using LEE011 (Novartis Oncology), a highly specific CDK4/6 inhibitor. Results: Treatment with LEE011 significantly reduced proliferation in 12 of 17 human neuroblastoma-derived cell lines by inducing cytostasis at nanomolar concentrations (mean IC50 = 307 ± 68 nmol/L in sensitive lines). LEE011 caused cell-cycle arrest and cellular senescence that was attributed to dose-dependent decreases in phosphorylated RB and FOXM1, respectively. In addition, responsiveness of neuroblastoma xenografts to LEE011 translated to the in vivo setting in that there was a direct correlation of in vitro IC50 values with degree of subcutaneous xenograft growth delay. Although our data indicate that neuroblastomas sensitive to LEE011 were more likely to contain genomic amplification of MYCN (P = 0.01), the identification of additional clinically accessible biomarkers is of high importance. Conclusions: Taken together, our data show that LEE011 is active in a large subset of neuroblastoma cell line and xenograft models, and supports the clinical development of this CDK4/6 inhibitor as a therapy for patients with this disease. Clin Cancer Res; 19(22); 6173–82. ©2013 AACR.
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery | 2011
Giordano Caponigro; William R. Sellers
The genetic and epigenetic underpinnings of cancer are becoming increasingly clear owing to impressive and well-coordinated ventures occurring worldwide. As our understanding of the molecular alterations driving human cancer increases, there is an opportunity to direct the clinical application of cancer therapeutics with improved accuracy. The often empirical treatment of cancer — which was initially based on inhibiting DNA synthesis and cellular division — while having led to a number of remarkable successes, remains prone to a high rate of clinical failure that results partly from a lack of understanding of how best to implement drugs in the clinic. Consequently, it is vital that robust translational strategies be developed preclinically to both reduce failure rates in the clinic and shorten the time required to identify patient populations most likely to benefit from a given therapeutic. Here, we review both historical and current uses of preclinical model systems, being mindful that a combination of approaches will be needed to address all meritorious therapeutic hypotheses.
Nature | 2015
Nicolas Stransky; Mahmoud Ghandi; Gregory V. Kryukov; Levi A. Garraway; Joseph Lehar; Manway Liu; Dmitriy Sonkin; Audrey Kauffmann; Kavitha Venkatesan; Elena J. Edelman; Markus Riester; Jordi Barretina; Giordano Caponigro; Robert Schlegel; William R. Sellers; Frank Stegmeier; Michael B. Morrissey; Arnaud Amzallag; Iulian Pruteanu-Malinici; Daniel A. Haber; Sridhar Ramaswamy; Cyril H. Benes; Michael P. Menden; Francesco Iorio; Michael R. Stratton; Ultan McDermott; Mathew J. Garnett; Julio Saez-Rodriguez
Large cancer cell line collections broadly capture the genomic diversity of human cancers and provide valuable insight into anti-cancer drug response. Here we show substantial agreement and biological consilience between drug sensitivity measurements and their associated genomic predictors from two publicly available large-scale pharmacogenomics resources: The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia and the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer databases.
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics | 2013
Sunkyu Kim; Alice Loo; Rajiv Chopra; Giordano Caponigro; Alan Huang; Sadhna Vora; Sudha Parasuraman; Steve Howard; Nicholas Keen; William R. Sellers; Christopher Thomas Brain
The tumor suppressor Retinoblastoma protein (Rb) is often inactivated in cancer. In many tumors, the Rb protein itself is retained but functionally inactivated by increased CDK4/6 kinase activity. A number of key oncogenic aberrations can result in this increased activity, including inactivation of CDKN2A (p16), translocation or amplification of D-cyclins, amplification of CDK4/6 and mutations/deletions upstream of cyclin D, such as activating mutations of BRAF/PIK3CA and PTEN deletion. Abolishing CDK4/6 kinase activity and subsequent reactivation of Rb in these tumors has been demonstrated to inhibit tumor initiation and growth. Here we will describe LEE011- an orally bioavailable, selective small molecule inhibitor of CDK4/6 kinases. LEE011 inhibits CDK4/6 kinase activity with nM IC50 and is highly selective for these targets. In a number of preclinical tumor models, LEE011 demonstrates a dose dependent anti-tumor activity that tracks well with CDK4/6 inhibition. The primary mechanism for growth inhibitory effect appears to be G1 arrest in vitro , although, in some sensitive in vivo models, regressions are observed. Importantly, given the role of CDK4/6 downstream of other oncogenic driver mutations, LEE011 shows single agent activity in melanomas with activating mutations of BRAF or NRAS, and in breast cancers with intact estrogen receptor and/or activating aberrations of PIK3CA/Her-2. Combining LEE011 with LGX818, a V600E BRAF specific inhibitor, leads to robust anti-tumor activity in melanoma models that are both sensitive and, importantly, those that are resistant to LGX818. Furthermore, combining LEE011 with BYL719, a PIK3CA specific inhibitor, also leads to significant anti-tumor activity in breast cancer models both sensitive and resistant to BYL719. Several clinical studies evaluating LEE011 as single agent and in combinations are underway. Citation Information: Mol Cancer Ther 2013;12(11 Suppl):PR02. Citation Format: Sunkyu Kim, Alice Loo, Rajiv Chopra, Giordano Caponigro, Alan Huang, Sadhna Vora, Sudha Parasuraman, Steve Howard, Nicholas Keen, William Sellers, Christopher Brain. LEE011: An orally bioavailable, selective small molecule inhibitor of CDK4/6– Reactivating Rb in cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2013 Oct 19-23; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2013;12(11 Suppl):Abstract nr PR02.
Clinical Cancer Research | 2016
Clemens Krepler; Min Xiao; Katrin Sproesser; Patricia Brafford; Batool Shannan; Marilda Beqiri; Qin Liu; Wei Xu; Bradley Garman; Katherine L. Nathanson; Xiaowei Xu; Giorgos C. Karakousis; Gordon B. Mills; Yiling Lu; Tamer A. Ahmed; Poulikos I. Poulikakos; Giordano Caponigro; Markus Boehm; Malte Peters; Lynn M. Schuchter; Ashani T. Weeraratna; Meenhard Herlyn
Purpose: To test second-line personalized medicine combination therapies, based on genomic and proteomic data, in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. Experimental Design: We established 12 PDXs from BRAF inhibitor–progressed melanoma patients. Following expansion, PDXs were analyzed using targeted sequencing and reverse-phase protein arrays. By using multi-arm preclinical trial designs, we identified efficacious precision medicine approaches. Results: We identified alterations previously described as drivers of resistance: NRAS mutations in 3 PDXs, MAP2K1 (MEK1) mutations in 2, BRAF amplification in 4, and aberrant PTEN in 7. At the protein level, re-activation of phospho-MAPK predominated, with parallel activation of PI3K in a subset. Second-line efficacy of the pan-PI3K inhibitor BKM120 with either BRAF (encorafenib)/MEK (binimetinib) inhibitor combination or the ERK inhibitor VX-11e was confirmed in vivo. Amplification of MET was observed in 3 PDX models, a higher frequency than expected and a possible novel mechanism of resistance. Importantly, MET amplification alone did not predict sensitivity to the MET inhibitor capmatinib. In contrast, capmatinib as single agent resulted in significant but transient tumor regression in a PDX with resistance to BRAF/MEK combination therapy and high pMET. The triple combination capmatinib/encorafenib/binimetinib resulted in complete and sustained tumor regression in all animals. Conclusions: Genomic and proteomic data integration identifies dual-core pathway inhibition as well as MET as combinatorial targets. These studies provide evidence for biomarker development to appropriately select personalized therapies of patients and avoid treatment failures. Clin Cancer Res; 22(7); 1592–602. ©2015 AACR. See related commentary by Hartsough and Aplin, p. 1550
Molecular Cancer Research | 2008
Winfried Elis; Ellen Triantafellow; Natalie Wolters; Katie R. Sian; Giordano Caponigro; Jason Borawski; L. Alex Gaither; Leon O. Murphy; Peter Finan; Jeffrey P. MacKeigan
Members of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) family collectively control multiple cellular responses, including proliferation, growth, chemotaxis, and survival. These diverse effects can partly be attributed to the broad range of downstream effectors being regulated by the products of these lipid kinases, the 3′-phosphoinositides. However, an additional layer of complexity is introduced by the existence of multiple PI3K enzyme isoforms. Much has been learned over the last years on the roles of the classes I and III PI3K members in cellular signaling, but little is known about the isoform-specific tasks done by the class II PI3Ks (C2α, β, and γ). In this study, we used quantitative reverse transcription–PCR and RNA interference in mammalian cells to gain further insight into the function of these lesser studied PI3K enzymes. We find that PI3K-C2α, but not PI3K-C2β, has an important role in controlling cell survival and by using a panel of RNA interference reagents, we were able to determine a critical threshold of PI3K-C2α mRNA levels, below which the apoptotic program is switched on, via the intrinsic cell death pathway. In addition, knockdown of PI3K-C2α to levels that by themselves do not induce apoptosis sensitize cells to the anticancer agent Taxol (paclitaxel). Lastly, we report that lowering the levels of PI3K-C2α in a number of cancer cell lines reduces their proliferation and cell viability, arguing that PI3K inhibitors targeting not only the class Iα isoform but also class IIα may contribute to an effective anticancer strategy. (Mol Cancer Res 2008;6(4):614–23)