Giorgio Guazzoni

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies Reporting Potency Rates After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy

BACKGROUND Although the initial robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) series showed 12-mo potency rates ranging from 70% to 80%, the few available comparative studies did not permit any definitive conclusion about the superiority of this technique when compared with retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). OBJECTIVES The aims of this systematic review were (1) to evaluate the current prevalence and the potential risk factors of erectile dysfunction after RARP, (2) to identify surgical techniques able to improve the rate of potency recovery after RARP, and (3) to perform a cumulative analysis of all available studies comparing RARP versus RRP or LRP. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A literature search was performed in August 2011 using the Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Only comparative studies or clinical series including >100 cases reporting potency recovery outcomes were included in this review. Cumulative analysis was conducted using Review Manager v.4.2 software designed for composing Cochrane Reviews (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS We analyzed 15 case series, 6 studies comparing different techniques in the context of RARP, 6 studies comparing RARP with RRP, and 4 studies comparing RARP with LRP. The 12- and 24-mo potency rates ranged from 54% to 90% and from 63% to 94%, respectively. Age, baseline potency status, comorbidities index, and extension of the nerve-sparing procedure represent the most relevant preoperative and intraoperative predictors of potency recovery after RARP. Available data seem to support the use of cautery-free dissection or the use of pinpointed low-energy cauterization. Cumulative analyses showed better 12-mo potency rates after RARP in comparison with RRP (odds ratio [OR]: 2.84; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.46-5.43; p=0.002). Only a nonstatistically significant trend in favor of RARP was reported after comparison with LRP (OR: 1.89; p=0.21). CONCLUSIONS The incidence of potency recovery after RARP is influenced by numerous factors. Data coming from the present systematic review support the use of a cautery-free technique. This update of previous systematic reviews of the literature showed, for the first time, a significant advantage in favor of RARP in comparison with RRP in terms of 12-mo potency rates.

Assessing the Impact of Ischaemia Time During Partial Nephrectomy

CONTEXT The impact of applying renal ischaemia during nephron-sparing surgery to avoid renal damage in the treated kidney has gained importance in different surgical techniques. OBJECTIVE The main objective of the present study is to point out the limit of renal ischaemia times for warm and cold ischaemia approaches. Important results of research on renal ischaemia and different surgical techniques as well as results of clinical studies concerning renal function after renal ischaemia in partial nephrectomy are highlighted. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A Medline literature research was performed, combining queries on the keywords nephron-sparing surgery, partial nephrectomy, and ischemia. Links to related articles and cross-reading of citations in related articles were surveyed, as were reviews, letters to editors, and information collected from urologic textbooks. The references formed the basis of this review article, with selection and deletion based on the relevance and importance of the content. In a final step, interactive peer review by the expert panel of coauthors completed the review. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Renal ischaemia research showed an increasing renal damage proportional to ischemic time. Current clinical data support safe ischaemia times, within 20 min of warm ischaemia and up to 2 h of cold ischaemia, to minimise renal ischemic damage. To date, no ischaemia dose-response curve or algorithm is available to predict the risk of acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease in patients undergoing intraoperative ischaemia. In general, there seems to be a higher risk for comorbidity caused by renal damage in patients suffering from kidney tumour. CONCLUSIONS If ischaemia is required, the tumour should be removed within 20 min of warm ischaemia, regardless of surgical approach. Efforts should be made to start immediately with cold ischaemia, if the feasibility within this span of time seems to be jeopardised. Thus, cold ischaemia times up to 2 h can be tolerated by the kidney, depending on the individual method. Nevertheless, cold ischaemia with ice slush should be kept as short as possible--at best within 35 min. In ischemic nephron-sparing surgery, one of the surgeons main aims should be to avoid loss of renal function. Only after optimal preoperative appraisal and planning can the best postoperative outcomes for renal function be achieved.

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies Reporting Oncologic Outcome After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy

CONTEXT Despite the large diffusion of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), literature and data on the oncologic outcome of RARP are limited. OBJECTIVE Evaluate lymph node yield, positive surgical margins (PSMs), use of adjuvant therapy, and biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival following RARP and perform a cumulative analysis of all studies comparing the oncologic outcomes of RARP and retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic review of the literature was performed in August 2011, searching Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases. A free-text protocol using the term radical prostatectomy was applied. The following limits were used: humans; gender (male); and publications dating from January 1, 2008. A cumulative analysis was conducted using Review Manager software v.4.2 (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK) and Stata 11.0 SE software (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS We retrieved 79 papers evaluating oncologic outcomes following RARP. The mean PSM rate was 15% in all comers and 9% in pathologically localized cancers, with some tumor characteristics being the most relevant predictors of PSMs. Several surgeon-related characteristics or procedure-related issues may play a major role in PSM rates. With regard to BCR, the very few papers with a follow-up duration >5 yr demonstrated 7-yr BCR-free survival estimates of approximately 80%. Finally, all the cumulative analyses comparing RARP with RRP and comparing RARP with LRP demonstrated similar overall PSM rates (RARP vs RRP: odds ratio [OR]: 1.21; p=0.19; RARP vs LRP: OR: 1.12; p=0.47), pT2 PSM rates (RARP vs RRP: OR: 1.25; p=0.31; RARP vs LRP: OR: 0.99; p=0.97), and BCR-free survival estimates (RARP vs RRP: hazard ratio [HR]: 0.9; p=0.526; RARP vs LRP: HR: 0.5; p=0.141), regardless of the surgical approach. CONCLUSIONS PSM rates are similar following RARP, RRP, and LRP. The few data available on BCR from high-volume centers are promising, but definitive comparisons with RRP or LRP are not currently possible. Finally, significant data on cancer-specific mortality are not currently available.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

CONTEXT Perioperative complications are a major surgical outcome for radical prostatectomy (RP). OBJECTIVE Evaluate complication rates following robot-assisted RP (RARP), risk factors for complications after RARP, and surgical techniques to improve complication rates after RARP. We also performed a cumulative analysis of all studies comparing RARP with retropubic RP (RRP) or laparoscopic RP (LRP) in terms of perioperative complications. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic review of the literature was performed in August 2011, searching Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases. A free-text protocol using the term radical prostatectomy was applied. The following limits were used: humans; gender (male); and publications dating from January 1, 2008. A cumulative analysis was conducted using Review Manager software v.4.2 (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS We retrieved 110 papers evaluating oncologic outcomes following RARP. Overall mean operative time is 152 min; mean blood loss is 166 ml; mean transfusion rate is 2%; mean catheterization time is 6.3 d; and mean in-hospital stay is 1.9 d. The mean complication rate was 9%, with most of the complications being of low grade. Lymphocele/lymphorrea (3.1%), urine leak (1.8%), and reoperation (1.6%) are the most prevalent surgical complications. Blood loss (weighted mean difference: 582.77; p<0.00001) and transfusion rate (odds ratio [OR]: 7.55; p<0.00001) were lower in RARP than in RRP, whereas only transfusion rate (OR: 2.56; p=0.005) was lower in RARP than in LRP. All the other analyzed parameters were similar, regardless of the surgical approach. CONCLUSIONS RARP can be performed routinely with a relatively small risk of complications. Surgical experience, clinical patient characteristics, and cancer characteristics may affect the risk of complications. Cumulative analyses demonstrated that blood loss and transfusion rates were significantly lower with RARP than with RRP, and transfusion rates were lower with RARP than with LRP, although all other features were similar regardless of the surgical approach.

Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Versus Open Adrenalectomy for Benign Hyperfunctioning Adrenal Tumors: A Comparative Study

In our retrospective study we compare the effectiveness and safety of transperitoneal laparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy in 40 patients with benign hyperfunctioning unilateral adrenal tumors. Patients 1 to 20 underwent open adrenalectomy between July 1988 and July 1992, and patients 21 to 40 underwent the laparoscopic procedure between September 1992 and January 1994. Students t test for unpaired data was used to compare intraoperative and postoperative results, and morbidity observed in the 2 groups. The affected adrenal gland was successfully removed in all cases. Mean operative time was significantly longer for laparoscopy, although it shortened progressively due to the learning curve effect. Blood loss was significantly less with laparoscopy, while only 3 patients undergoing open surgery required blood transfusions. Overall invasiveness and analgesic requirement were significantly lower with laparoscopy. The intervals to oral intake and ambulation, hospital stay and return to preoperative normal activity were shorter with laparoscopy. Major complications were noted only in open surgery patients. At 3 months all patients in both groups were cured of the underlying adrenal disease. We conclude that transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy is equally effective and less invasive than open surgery, and that it should be considered the first choice therapy for benign hyperfunctioning adrenal tumors.

Best Practices in Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel

CONTEXT Radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) has long been the most common surgical technique used to treat clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa). More recently, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has been gaining increasing acceptance among patients and urologists, and it has become the dominant technique in the United States despite a paucity of prospective studies or randomized trials supporting its superiority over RRP. OBJECTIVE A 2-d consensus conference of 17 world leaders in prostate cancer and radical prostatectomy was organized in Pasadena, California, and at the City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, California, under the auspices of the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section to systematically review the currently available data on RARP, to critically assess current surgical techniques, and to generate best practice recommendations to guide clinicians and related medical personnel. No commercial support was obtained for the conference. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic review of the literature was performed in agreement with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis statement. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS The results of the systematic literature review were reviewed, discussed, and refined over the 2-d conference. Key recommendations were generated using a Delphi consensus approach. RARP is associated with less blood loss and transfusion rates compared with RRP, and there appear to be minimal differences between the two approaches in terms of overall postoperative complications. Positive surgical margin rates are at least equivalent with RARP, but firm conclusions about biochemical recurrence and other oncologic end points are difficult to draw because the follow-up in existing studies is relatively short and the overall experience with RARP in locally advanced PCa is still limited. RARP may offer advantages in postoperative recovery of urinary continence and erectile function, although there are methodological limitations in most studies to date and a need for well-controlled comparative outcomes studies of radical prostatectomy surgery following best practice guidelines. Surgeon experience and institutional volume of procedures strongly predict better outcomes in all relevant domains. CONCLUSIONS Available evidence suggests that RARP is a valuable therapeutic option for clinically localized PCa. Further research is needed to clarify the actual role of RARP in patients with locally advanced disease.

Pelvic/Retroperitoneal Salvage Lymph Node Dissection for Patients Treated With Radical Prostatectomy With Biochemical Recurrence and Nodal Recurrence Detected by [11C]Choline Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography

BACKGROUND The management of patients with clinical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (RP) remains challenging. OBJECTIVE To determine whether the removal of positive lymph nodes at [11C]choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan may have an impact on the prognosis of patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) and nodal recurrence after RP. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Prospective analysis of 72 patients affected by BCR after RP associated with a nodal pathologic [11C]choline PET/CT scan. INTERVENTION Patients underwent salvage lymph node dissection (LND). MEASUREMENTS Biochemical response (BR) to treatment was defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) <0.2 ng/ml at 40 d after salvage LND. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses addressed time to and predictors of clinical recurrence (CR) after salvage LND, respectively. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 56.9% of patients achieved BR. Mean and median follow-up after LND were 39.4 and 39.8 mo, respectively. The 5-yr BCR-free survival rate was 19%. Preoperative PSA <4 ng/ml (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.12; p = 0.005), time to BCR <24 mo (HR: 7.52; p = 0.005), and negative lymph nodes at previous RP (HR: 0.19; p=0.04) represented independent predictors of BR. Overall, 5-yr CR-free and cancer-specific survival were 34% and 75%, respectively. At multivariable analyses, only PSA >4 ng/ml (HR: 2.13; p=0.03) and the presence of retroperitoneal uptake at PET/CT scan (HR=2.92; p=0.004) represented independent preoperative predictors of CR. Similarly, the presence of pathologic nodes in the retroperitoneum (HR: 2.78; p=0.02), higher number of positive lymph nodes (HR: 1.04; p=0.006), and complete BR to salvage LND (HR: 0.31; p=0.002) represented postoperative independent predictors of CR. Main limitations consisted of the lack of a control group and the heterogeneity of patients included in the analyses. CONCLUSIONS Salvage LND is feasible in patients with BCR after RP and nodal pathologic uptake at [11C]choline PET/CT scan. Biochemical response after surgery can be achieved in a consistent proportion of patients. Although most patients invariably progressed to BCR after surgery at longer follow-up, 35% of patients showed the absence of CR at 5 yr.

A prospective study comparing paroxetine alone versus paroxetine plus sildenafil in patients with premature ejaculation.

PURPOSE We compared the efficacy of paroxetine alone and combined with sildenafil in patients complaining of premature ejaculation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Enrolled in this study were 80 consecutive potent men 19 to 47 years old (mean age 34) with premature ejaculation but without any obvious organic cause. Pretreatment evaluation included a history, self-administration of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire, physical examination and the Meares-Stamey test to exclude genital tract infection. The initial 40 patients received 10 mg. paroxetine daily for 21 days and then 20 mg. as needed, that is 3 to 4 hours before planned sexual activity, for 6 months (group 1). The other group of 40 men received 10 mg. paroxetine daily for 21 days and then 20 mg. as needed plus 50 mg. sildenafil as needed, that is 1 hour before planned sexual activity, for 6 months (group 2). Patients were followed 3 and 6 months after beginning therapy and were evaluated using several general assessment questions, IIEF and ejaculatory latency time. RESULTS Mean ejaculatory latency time +/- SE in group 1 was 0.33 +/- 0.04, 3.7 +/- 0.10 (p <0.01) and 4.2 +/- 0.03 (p <0.01) minutes at baseline, 3 and 6-month followup, while in group 2 it was 0.35 +/- 0.03, 4.5 +/- 0.07 (p <0.01) and 5.3 +/- 0.02 (p <0.001) minutes, respectively. When improvement in ejaculatory latency time was compared in the 2 groups, group 2 results proved to be significantly greater (p <0.05). Baseline, and 3 and 6-month mean intercourse satisfaction domain values of the IIEF were 9, 11 and 11 (p = 0.09, not significant), and 9, 11 and 14 (p <0.05) in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Group 2 patients reported significantly greater intercourse satisfaction than those in group 1 (p <0.05). At baseline, 3 and 6 months there was a mean of 0.9 +/- 0.1, 1.7 +/- 0.3 (not significant) and 2.5 +/- 0.3 (p <0.01) coitus episodes weekly in group 1, and 1 +/- 0.2, 2.3 +/- 0.3 (p <0.01) and 3.2 +/- 0.1 (p <0.001) in group 2, respectively. Group 2 patients reported a significantly higher number of coitus episodes weekly (p <0.05). Side effects in the 40 group 1 cases included anejaculation in 1 (2.5%), gastrointestinal upset and/or nausea in 5 (12.5%), headache in 4 (10%) and decreased libido in 2 (5%). Side effects in the 40 group 2 cases included anejaculation in 1 (2.5%), headache in 8 (20%), gastrointestinal upset and/or nausea in 6 (15%) and flushing in 6 (15%). Group 2 patients reported significantly more headaches (p <0.01) and flushing episodes (p <0.001) than those in group 1. After 6 months of treatment 33 men (82.5%) in group 1 and 36 (90%) in group 2 were willing to continue therapy (not significant). CONCLUSIONS Paroxetine combined with sildenafil appears to provide significantly better results in terms of ejaculatory latency time and intercourse satisfaction versus paroxetine alone in potent patients with premature ejaculation. However, combined treatment is associated with a mild increase in drug related side effects.

One-Stage Bulbar Urethroplasty: Retrospective Analysis of the Results in 375 Patients

OBJECTIVE To review the outcome of bulbar urethroplasty using one-stage surgical techniques. METHODS Of 375 patients, who underwent one-stage bulbar urethroplasties, 165 patients (44%) underwent anastomotic repair (AR), 40 (10.7%) underwent augmented anastomotic repair (AAR) using penile skin grafts (PSGs) or oral mucosal grafts (OMGs), and 170 (45.3%) underwent onlay grafting techniques (OGTs) using PSGs or OMGs. Clinical outcome was considered a failure when any postoperative instrumentation was needed. The chi2 and Fishers exact test for categorical data were used. The sample size of 375 patients provides a statistical power (1-beta) of 99% at alpha=0.05; p<0.05 was set as significant. RESULTS The average follow-up was 53 mo. Of 375 cases, 313 (83.5%) were successful and 62 (16.5%) failures. Of 165 ARs, 150 (90.9%) were successful and 15 (9.1%) failures. Of 40 AARs, 24 (60%) were successful and 16 (40%) failures. Of 170 OGTs, 139 (81.8%) were successful and 31 (18.2%) failures. The AR showed statistically significant higher success rate compared to OGT (p=0.023) and AAR (p=0.0001). Of 47 PSGs, 28 (59.6%) were successful and 19 (40.4%) failures. Of 163 OMGs, 135 (82.8%) were successful and 28 (17.2%) failures. This difference was statistically significant (p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS One-stage bulbar urethroplasties showed an overall 83.5% success rate. The AR showed the higher success rate compared to the OGT or AAR. OMGs (82.8% success rate) perform statistically better than PSGs (59.6% success rate).

A critical analysis of the actual role of minimally invasive surgery and active surveillance for kidney cancer.

CONTEXT The incidence of renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) has increased steadily-most rapidly for small renal masses (SRMs). Paralleling the changing face of RCC in the past 2 decades, new, less invasive surgical options have been developed. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) is an established procedure for the treatment of RCC. Treatment of SRMs includes open partial nephrectomy (OPN), laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN), thermal ablation, and active surveillance. OBJECTIVE To present an overview of minimally invasive treatment options and data on surveillance for kidney cancer. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Literature and meeting abstracts were searched using the terms renal cell carcinoma, minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic surgery, thermal ablation, surveillance, and robotic surgery. The articles with the highest level of evidence were identified with the consensus of all the collaborative authors and reviewed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Renal insufficiency, as measured by the glomerular filtration rate, occurs more often after radical nephrectomy than partial nephrectomy (PN). OPN and LPN show comparable results in long-term oncologic outcomes. The treatment modality for SRMs should therefore be nephron-sparing surgery (NSS). In select patients, thermal ablation or active surveillance of SRMs is an alternative. CONCLUSIONS LRN has become the standard of care for most organ-confined tumours not amenable to NSS. Amongst NSS options, PN is the treatment of choice, yet remains underutilised in the community. Initial data during its learning curve revealed that LPN had higher urologic morbidity. However, current emerging data indicate that in experienced hands, LPN has shorter ischaemia times, a lower complication rate, and equivalent long-term oncologic and renal functional outcomes, yet with decreased patient morbidity compared to OPN. Robotic partial nephrectomy is being explored at select centres, and cryotherapy and radiofrequency ablation are options for carefully selected tumours. Active surveillance is an option for selected high-risk patients. Percutaneous needle biopsy is likely to gain increasing relevance in the management of small renal tumours.