Giovanna Bianchi Scarrà

Rare missense variants in POT1 predispose to familial cutaneous malignant melanoma

Although CDKN2A is the most frequent high-risk melanoma susceptibility gene, the underlying genetic factors for most melanoma-prone families remain unknown. Using whole-exome sequencing, we identified a rare variant that arose as a founder mutation in the telomere shelterin gene POT1 (chromosome 7, g.124493086C>T; p.Ser270Asn) in five unrelated melanoma-prone families from Romagna, Italy. Carriers of this variant had increased telomere lengths and numbers of fragile telomeres, suggesting that this variant perturbs telomere maintenance. Two additional rare POT1 variants were identified in all cases sequenced in two separate Italian families, one variant per family, yielding a frequency for POT1 variants comparable to that for CDKN2A mutations in this population. These variants were not found in public databases or in 2,038 genotyped Italian controls. We also identified two rare recurrent POT1 variants in US and French familial melanoma cases. Our findings suggest that POT1 is a major susceptibility gene for familial melanoma in several populations.

Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies five new susceptibility loci for cutaneous malignant melanoma

Thirteen common susceptibility loci have been reproducibly associated with cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM). We report the results of an international 2-stage meta-analysis of CMM genome-wide association studies (GWAS). This meta-analysis combines 11 GWAS (5 previously unpublished) and a further three stage 2 data sets, totaling 15,990 CMM cases and 26,409 controls. Five loci not previously associated with CMM risk reached genome-wide significance (P < 5 × 10−8), as did 2 previously reported but unreplicated loci and all 13 established loci. Newly associated SNPs fall within putative melanocyte regulatory elements, and bioinformatic and expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) data highlight candidate genes in the associated regions, including one involved in telomere biology.

A variant in FTO shows association with melanoma risk not due to BMI

We report the results of an association study of melanoma that is based on the genome-wide imputation of the genotypes of 1,353 cases and 3,566 controls of European origin conducted by the GenoMEL consortium. This revealed an association between several SNPs in intron 8 of the FTO gene, including rs16953002, which replicated using 12,313 cases and 55,667 controls of European ancestry from Europe, the USA and Australia (combined P = 3.6 × 10−12, per-allele odds ratio for allele A = 1.16). In addition to identifying a new melanoma-susceptibility locus, this is to our knowledge the first study to identify and replicate an association with SNPs in FTO not related to body mass index (BMI). These SNPs are not in intron 1 (the BMI-related region) and exhibit no association with BMI. This suggests FTOs function may be broader than the existing paradigm that FTO variants influence multiple traits only through their associations with BMI and obesity.

CDKN2A is the main susceptibility gene in Italian pancreatic cancer families

Background Most familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) remains unexplained. The identification of individuals with a high genetic risk of developing pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PC) is important to elucidate its biological basis and is critical to better define emerging strategies for the detection of early pancreatic neoplasms. Patients and methods A series of 225 consecutively enrolled patients with PC were tested for CDKN2A mutations. After personal and family cancer histories of all the patients had been reviewed, a subset of the patients were classified as FPC and were also tested for mutations in PALLD, PALB2, BRCA1 and BRCA2 as FPC candidate genes. Results The CDKN2A mutation rate in the 225 PC cases was 5.7%. The CDKN2A founder mutations, p.E27X and p.G101W, were predominant, but the mutation spectrum also included p.L65P, p.G67R and two novel, potentially pathogenic variants, promoter variant c.-201ACTC>CTTT and p.R144C. None of the patients with FPC harboured germline mutations in PALLD, PALB2 or BRCA2. One family was positive for the BRCA1 UV variant p.P727L. Strikingly, five of 16 patients with FPC (31%) carried CDKN2A mutations. Conclusion These findings suggest that a sizeable subset of Italian FPC families may carry CDKN2A mutations. This result may be of value for identifying the best candidates for future PC screening trials in Italy.

Coexisting NRAS and BRAF Mutations in Primary Familial Melanomas with Specific CDKN2A Germline Alterations

To the Editor Germline aberrations in the CDKN2A gene are observed in some melanoma-prone families and represent high penetrance mutations (Hussussian et al., 1994; Kamb et al., 1994). INK4A (p16) and ARF (p14) are two distinct proteins encoded by the CDKN2A locus. Loss of INK4A has been associated with unrestricted cell cycle progression through retinoblastoma (RB) protein inactivation, while loss of ARF has been linked to p53 inactivation with subsequent malfunction in cell cycle regulation, apoptosis and DNA repair (Chin et al., 2006). The NRAS and BRAF genes are commonly mutated in sporadic primary cutaneous melanomas, with mutation frequencies between 4–50% (Platz et al., 2008) and 25–80% (Platz et al., 2008), respectively. Codon 61 is the most common position of NRAS alterations in melanoma, with frequent glutamine changes to either lysine, Q61K (c.181C>A), or arginine, Q61R (c.182A>G) (Omholt et al., 2002). Mutations in this residue lock the Ras protein in the GTP-bound state with subsequent continuous activation of its downstream effectors (Platz et al., 2008) through the Ras-Raf-MEK-ERK and Ras-PI3K-Akt pathways. Approximately 90% of reported BRAF mutations occur at residue 600, which is located in the activation domain of this kinase (Thomas, 2006). Current results from melanoma cohorts show that mutations in these genes are almost always mutually exclusive (Edlundh-Rose et al., 2006; Omholt et al., 2003; Platz et al., 2008). Moreover, a high rate of BRAF mutation is found also in nevi, suggesting a role in early stages of the neoplastic process (Pollock et al., 2003). Previously, a high frequency of NRAS mutations (95%) has been reported in Swedish familial melanoma cases with germline CDKN2A alterations (Eskandarpour et al., 2003). The association of BRAF somatic mutations with MC1R germline variants indicates an influence of constitutive genotype on the preferential acquisition of specific mutations during melanoma development (Landi et al., 2006). In line with this, cooperation between RAS and CDKN2A has been shown in animal models of melanoma (Chin et al., 1997). Since there is limited information on NRAS and BRAF mutations in familial melanoma we sought to assess their mutation frequency in melanomas from patients with different CDKN2A germline alterations. The study was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) primary familial cutaneous melanomas originating from Brisbane, Australia (16 samples from 15 patients) and Genoa, Italy (3 patients/samples). Clinical and pathological characteristics are shown in Table 1. One patient with a CDKN2A L32P mutation had two melanomas originating from the trunk and upper extremity, respectively, while a single melanoma was analyzed from each of the other patients. Eight different germline CDKN2A mutations were present in the patients from whom the melanomas were analyzed (Table 2). Laser capture microdissection, DNA extraction, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification, single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) and nucleotide sequence analyses of NRAS exon 2 and BRAF exon 15 were carried out as previously described (Jovanovic et al., 2008; Omholt et al., 2002; Omholt et al., 2003). Each mutation was confirmed by two independent PCR/SSCP analyses followed by sequence analysis performed in both directions. The study was approved by the Ethics Committees of the Queensland Institute of Medical Research, University of Genoa and Karolinska Institutet. Table 1 Patient and tumor characteristics Table 2 NRAS and BRAF genotypes in familial melanomas harboring CDKN2A germline mutations Three (16%) samples had NRAS residue 61 alterations (one Q61R and two Q61K substitutions) while 7 (37%) samples had valine to glutamic acid changes in amino acid 600 of BRAF (V600E; Table 2). The NRAS mutation frequency in this study was lower than we reported previously in melanomas from Swedish families with germline CDKN2A mutations (Eskandarpour et al., 2003). The reason for this is unclear. It could possibly be attributed to different origins of studied cohorts (Sweden versus Australia/Italy) and to different CDKN2A germline alterations in these two studies (the 112Argdup founder mutation is predominant in Swedish families, which is in contrast to genotypes reported here). However, we cannot exclude that technical factors, possibly related to the fragmented nature of DNA extracted from FFPE samples, may play a role in different rates of mutation detection. Intriguingly, all 3 tumors with NRAS mutations also had BRAF V600E mutations. The presence of both NRAS and BRAF V600E mutations in the same lesions is contrary to the current consensus that such mutations are almost always mutually exclusive in melanomas and other tumor types (Davies et al., 2002; Omholt et al., 2003; Thomas et al., 2007). However, Pollock et al (2003) observed concomitant NRAS and BRAF V600E mutations in 9% of nevi and suggested this might be due to different clonal nests of cells within these tumors carrying distinct mutations, a possibility that could also explain our findings. Although intriguingly, the joint presence of both NRAS and BRAF mutations was found only in tumors from patients with CDKN2A L32P mutations. In two of these tumors, NRAS and BRAF mutations (NRAS/BRAF: Q61K/V600E and Q61R/V600E) were found in two different DNA extracts while in one case, alterations of both genes (NRAS/BRAF: Q61K/V600E) were identified in the same DNA extract. Thus far, it is recognized that a mutation in either NRAS or BRAF is sufficient for activation of the Ras-Raf-MEK-ERK pathway, with mutant RAS having a 50-fold higher activation effect than mutant BRAF (Davies et al., 2002). Although we do not have any evidence that the NRAS and BRAF mutations found in the same DNA extract were coexisting in the same cells, it is possible that the L32P mutation in CDKN2A somehow permits cellular tolerance of these dual mutations. In conclusion, the NRAS and BRAF mutation rates we observed in familial melanomas were generally lower than most previous reports in sporadic melanoma but equal to those reported for primary melanomas of similar thickness (Goel et al., 2006; Shinozaki et al., 2004). Samples that harbored INK4A L32P substitutions also had high frequency of coexisting mutations in both NRAS and BRAF. This suggests that in some instances constitutional CDKN2A mutations affect the occurrence of somatic mutations in NRAS and BRAF, although further work is needed to substantiate this hypothesis.

Brooke-Spiegler syndrome: Report of two cases not associated with a mutation in the CYLD and PTCH tumor-suppressor genes

Brooke‐Spiegler syndrome represents an autosomal dominant disease characterized by the occurrence of multiple cylindromas, trichoepitheliomas and (sporadically) spiroadenomas. Patients with Brooke‐Spiegler syndrome are also at risk of developing tumors of the major and minor salivary glands. Patients with Brooke‐Spiegler syndrome have various mutations in the CYLD gene, a tumor‐suppressor gene located on chromosome 16q. To date, 68 unique CYLD mutations have been identified. We describe two families with Brooke‐Spiegler syndrome, one with familial cylindromatosis and one with multiple familial trichoepithelioma, which showed wide inter‐family phenotypic variability. Analysis of germline mutations of the CYLD and PTCH genes was performed using peripheral blood. In addition, formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded tumor samples were analyzed for PTCH somatic mutations and cylindroma cell cultures were obtained directly from patients for further growth and analysis. Clinically, the major features of Brooke‐Spiegler syndrome include the presence of heterogeneous skin tumors and wide inter‐ and intra‐familial phenotypic variability. Histopathologically, both cylindromas and trichoepitheliomas were found in affected individuals. Mutations or loss of heterozygosity was not found in CYLD and PTCH genes. In CYLD and PTCH mutation‐negative patients, other genes may be affected and further studies are needed to clarify whether these patients may be affected by de novo germline mutations.

MDM2 SNP309 genotype influences survival of metastatic but not of localized neuroblastoma.

MDM2 is a major negative regulator of p53 function and is directly regulated by MYCN in neuroblastoma (NB) cells. MDM2 SNP309, a T‐to‐G substitution in the MDM2 promoter associated with higher gene expression compared to wild‐type, may attenuate the p53 pathway in NB, in which p53 mutations are rare. We investigated its impact on NB development and survival in relation with major clinical and biological characteristics.

Increased Risk of Colorectal Adenomas in Italian Subjects Carrying the p53 PIN3 A2-Pro72 Haplotype

Background: Few reports have investigated the association of two p53 polymorphisms (Arg72Pro and PIN3-A2) with colorectal cancer (CRC) risk, and no previous study has analyzed their role as susceptibility alleles for colorectal adenoma. Aim: To explore the impact of the p53 PIN3-Arg72Pro haplotype on colorectal adenoma formation and progression to cancer. Methods: One hundred and eighty-four colorectal tumor patients (124 with adenomas and 60 with adenocarcinoma) and 188 controls (42 subjects with a clean colon, 54 hospital controls and 92 blood donors) from the Italian population were tested for PIN3-Arg72Pro haplotype status. Results: A significantly increased risk of colorectal adenomas was observed in patients carrying the PIN3 A2-Pro72 haplotype (OR = 2.02, 95% CI: 1.17–3.48; p = 0.01), while those carrying the PIN3 A1-Pro72 haplotype had a significantly increased risk of developing CRC (OR = 3.33; 95% CI: 1.40–7.89; p = 0.006). Comparisons of cases with the clean colon control group provided stronger evidence of the associations. A family history of CRC did not affect the risk estimates. No association was observed between the pathologic features of adenomas, the Arg72Pro and PIN3 polymorphisms, and the PIN3-Arg72Pro haplotype. Conclusions: Our finding that two different p53 haplotypes are associated with colorectal adenoma and cancer, respectively, suggests that each of these haplotypes may independently impact on p53 function(s) within different genetic pathways of colorectal carcinogenesis.

Fine mapping of genetic susceptibility loci for melanoma reveals a mixture of single variant and multiple variant regions

At least 17 genomic regions are established as harboring melanoma susceptibility variants, in most instances with genome‐wide levels of significance and replication in independent samples. Based on genome‐wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data augmented by imputation to the 1,000 Genomes reference panel, we have fine mapped these regions in over 5,000 individuals with melanoma (mainly from the GenoMEL consortium) and over 7,000 ethnically matched controls. A penalized regression approach was used to discover those SNP markers that most parsimoniously explain the observed association in each genomic region. For the majority of the regions, the signal is best explained by a single SNP, which sometimes, as in the tyrosinase region, is a known functional variant. However in five regions the explanation is more complex. At the CDKN2A locus, for example, there is strong evidence that not only multiple SNPs but also multiple genes are involved. Our results illustrate the variability in the biology underlying genome‐wide susceptibility loci and make steps toward accounting for some of the “missing heritability.”

CDKN2A and MC1R analysis in amelanotic and pigmented melanoma

Amelanotic melanoma (AM) is a rare subtype of melanoma with little or no clinically visible pigment; it is more difficult to diagnose than pigmented melanoma (PM), and has a worse prognosis. In the attempt to find a genetic explanation for the distinction between AM and PM, we conducted a case–case study, matching AM and PM patients, and testing them for germline mutations in high- (p16INK4A, p14ARF, CDK4) and low-penetrance (MC1R) melanoma susceptibility genes. Similar CDKN2A mutations were found in both sets of melanomas. A p14ARF splice germline mutation was detected for the first time in an Italian family with AM. This rare mutation, which has been described only once previously, may be involved in predisposition to the amelanotic phenotype in combination with germline MC1R variants and coordinate somatic expression of pigmentation genes and their regulators.