Giovanna Spinozzi

HAND PREFERENCES IN UNIMANUAL AND COORDINATED-BIMANUAL TASKS BY TUFTED CAPUCHIN MONKEYS (CEBUS APELLA)

Hand preferences in 26 capuchin monkeys (Cebus apelld) were examined in 2 reaching-forfood tasks under 2 postural conditions. In the 1st task (unimanual), monkeys were required to reach for food from both a quadrupedal and an upright posture. A right-hand bias was found for the upright but not for the quadrupedal condition. In the 2nd task (coordinated bimanual), monkeys were required to extract the food from a hanging Plexiglas tube from both a crouched and an upright posture. A right-hand bias was found for both conditions. A significant increase in right-hand use was noted from the unimanual, quadrupedal, reaching task to the coordinated-bimanual task, with females exhibiting a greater right-hand preference than males. In addition, a significant effect of task complexity on strength in laterality was found. Results are discussed in the context of recent theories on primate laterality.

Early sensorimotor development in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

The cognitive and locomotor development of 4 chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) during their 1st year of life was examined with Piagetian theory and method as paradigm. The infant chimpanzees progressed through the same 4 stages of development as babies do. However, the chimpanzees seemed less developed than babies in object exploration and in object-object combination. When chimpanzee early cognition is compared with that of other nonhuman primates, chimpanzees appear more advanced than gorillas, capuchins, and macaques in these same areas of cognition and similar to orangutans. A unitary explantation of the relative advances and delays in chimpanzee early cognition, which refers to the relation between rates of locomotor and cognitive development, is proposed.

Development of tool use in a macaque and a gorilla

The development of the capacity to use a stick as a tool was tested in a macaque (Macaca fuscata) and a gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) infants that had previously shown to be able to use strings and supports as dragging tools. Subjects were tested between 15 and 38 months of age. Different levels of competence between the subjects emerged over testing. The macaque developed a stereotyped strategy to cope with the problem, only getting random successes, whilst the gorilla developed a flexible strategy and revealed to be able to mentally represent the solution of the problem. In fact, when not successful using the stick, the gorilla thought out an alternative strategy, choosing and adapting a new object to use it as a tool.

Hand Preferences in Different Tasks by Tufted Capuchins (Cebus apella)

We examined hand preferences in 25 tufted capuchins (Cebus apella) in three tasks. The hole task involved a single action of reaching for food in a hole. The horizontal panel and the vertical panel tasks required the alignment of two apertures, by moving or lifting a panel, to reach for food in a hole. We found a significant group-level right-hand preference for reaching actions in the hole and in the horizontal panel tasks, but not in the vertical panel task, in which the food retrieval implied the complementary use of both hands. No significant hand bias emerged for moving or lifting actions with high visuospatial components. There is a stronger hand preference in more complex manual activity—coordinated bimanual hand use for food retrieval—than in other unimanual measures. We discuss the results in the context of previous reports on primate laterality.

Object concept and mental representation inCebus apella andMacaca fascicularis

The achievement of Stage 6 object concept as an index of the representational capacity, was studied both in juveniles and adults of two nonhuman primate species,Cebus apella andMacaca fascicularis. The general goal of the present investigation was to evaluate the real nature of the strategy adopted by subjects searching an object in the invisible displacement task. To this purpose, the original Piagetian version of the invisible displacement task was used modifying some parameters and employing additional tasks and analyses in order to differentiate representational solutions from the nonrepresentational ones. With this method it was found that an adult cebus, but not macaques, solved the invisible displacement task with the use of the mental representation.

Local advantage in the visual processing of hierarchical stimuli following manipulations of stimulus size and element numerosity in monkeys (Cebus apella)

Previous studies suggest that monkeys process local elements of hierarchical visual patterns more quickly and more accurately than they process the global shape. These results could be indicative of differences between relatively high visual functions of humans and non-human primates. It is, however, important to rule out that relatively low-level factors can explain these differences. We addressed this issue with two experiments carried out on capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) using matching-to-sample tasks featuring hierarchical stimuli. The first experiment assessed whether manipulations of stimulus size can affect the local advantage so far observed in this New World monkey species. An overall local versus global advantage still emerges in capuchins, irrespectively of the amplitude of the visual angle subtended by the hierarchical shapes. Moreover, a local-to-global interference, indicative of a strong local advantage, was observed for the first time. In the second experiment, we manipulated size and numerosity of the local elements of hierarchical patterns, mimicking procedures that in human perception relegate the local elements to texture and enhance a global advantage. Our results show that in capuchin monkeys, a local advantage emerges clearly even when these procedures are used. These results are of interest since extensive neurophysiological research is carried out on non-human primate vision, often taking for granted a similarity of visual skills in human and non-human primates. These behavioural results show that this assumption is not always warranted and that more research is needed to clarify the differences in the processes involved in basic visual skills among primates.

Categorization in monkeys and chimpanzees

Studies on the classificatory ability of non-human primates are reviewed. The evidence suggests that there are important differences in the degree to which monkeys and chimpanzees detect same/different relations and construct classes that embody these relations. Data on matching to sample performance suggest that monkeys have a limited capacity for abstract representation of identity relations between individual objects. Chimpanzees, by contrast, not only detect similarities and differences between individual objects at a more abstract level than monkeys, but can also perceive same/different relations between pairs of objects. Further evidence for such cognitive differences between monkeys and chimpanzees comes from data on the development of spontaneous classificatory behavior. Monkeys develop first-order classifying. Their spontaneous spatial groupings are restricted to elements from one class. Chimpanzees progress from first-order to elementary second-order classifying. At 5 years of age they are capable of composing two contemporaneous sets in which objects are identical or similar within each set and different between sets.

Processing of visual hierarchical stimuli by fish (Xenotoca eiseni)

Three experiments were designed to investigate visual processing of global and local dimensions of hierarchical stimuli in fish (Xenotoca eiseni). In the first experiment, fish were trained to discriminate between a circle made of circle elements and a cross made of cross elements (consistent stimuli), and tested with a circle made of crosses and a cross made of circles (inconsistent stimuli) to asses their global/local encoding preferences. Fish were also tested for their ability to discriminate single-element shapes. The second and the third experiments manipulated the density of the local elements (Experiment 2) and the size of the global and local shapes of the stimuli (Experiment 3) to assess whether these variables could affect global or local perception of hierarchical visual patterns in fish. In all the experiments, fish showed a global preference irrespective of the density and the size of the stimuli. This preference was not because of an inability to perceive the local constituents of the stimulus, since both fish trained with consistent and fish trained with inconsistent figures showed a clear capacity to discriminate between single-element shapes. Overall, these results suggest that a global preference is not a unique trait of human beings and that differences among different vertebrate species in the global/local strategies of stimulus encoding may be because of different ecological adaptations making initial elaboration of a visual scene in a global or local way more likely.

Picture processing in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella)

Although pictures are frequently used in place of real objects to investigate various aspects of cognition in different non-human species, there is little evidence that animals treat pictorial stimuli as representations of the real objects. In the present study, we carried out four experiments designed to assess picture processing in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella), using a simultaneous Matching-to-Sample (MTS) task. The results of the first three experiments indicate that capuchins are able to match objects with their colour photographs and vice versa, and that object-picture matching in this New World monkey species is not due to picture-object confusion. The results of the fourth experiment show that capuchins are able to recognize objects in their pictures with a high level of accuracy even when less realistic images, such as black-and-white photographs, silhouettes and line drawings, are employed as bi-dimensional stimuli. Overall, these findings indicate that capuchin monkeys are able to establish a correspondence between the real objects and their pictorial representations.

Problem-Solving Strategies and Hand Preferences for a Multicomponent Task by Tufted Capuchins (Cebus apella)

We examined hand preferences in 23 tufted capuchins (Cebus apella) in 2 tasks requiring the lid of a box to be lifted before taking out a peanut. The first task, Box 1, could entail either 2 or 3 problem-solving acts, with the 3-act solution involving bimanual coordination for food retrieval. The second task, Box 2, involved only the 3-act solution. The results indicated that the types of solution employed to perform the task influenced capuchin hand preferences. In the 2-act solution, capuchins exhibited a significant right-hand bias for the final one-handed reaching action, but not for the initial lid lifting action. In contrast, in the 3-act solution, no significant asymmetry emerged for any act. We noted a significant effect of subjects sex on the strength of laterality, with males being more strongly lateralized than females. We discuss results in the light of recent models of primate laterality.