Giovanni Angelini
University of Bologna
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Giovanni Angelini.
Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics | 2016
Giovanni Angelini; Luca Fanelli
This paper focuses on the dynamic misspecification that characterizes the class of small-scale New Keynesian models currently used in monetary and business cycle analysis, and provides a remedy for the typical difficulties these models have in accounting for the rich contemporaneous and dynamic correlation structure of the data. We suggest using a statistical model for the data as a device through which it is possible to adapt the econometric specification of the New Keynesian model such that the risk of omitting important propagation mechanisms is kept under control. A pseudo-structural form is built from the baseline system of Euler equations by forcing the state vector of the system to have the same dimension as the state vector characterizing the statistical model. The pseudo-structural form gives rise to a set of cross-equation restrictions that do not penalize the autocorrelation structure and persistence of the data. Standard estimation and evaluation methods can be used. We provide an empirical illustration based on USA quarterly data and a small-scale monetary New Keynesian model.
Social Science Research Network | 2017
Giovanni Angelini; Luca De Angelis
This paper evaluates the efficiency in online betting markets for European (association) football championships. The existing literature shows mixed empirical evidence regarding the degree to which betting markets are efficient. We propose a forecast-based approach to formally test the efficiency of online betting markets. By considering the odds proposed by 41 bookmakers on 11 European championships over the last 11 years, we find evidence of different degree of efficiency among markets. We show that, if best odds are selected across bookmakers, seven markets are efficient while four markets show inefficiencies which imply profit opportunities for bettors. In particular, our approach allows the estimation of the odd thresholds that could be used to set a profitable betting strategy both ex post and ex ante.
Quaderni di Dipartimento | 2016
Giovanni Angelini; Giuseppe Cavaliere; Luca Fanelli
This paper explores the potential of bootstrap methods in the empirical evalu- ation of dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) models and, more generally, in linear rational expectations models featuring unobservable (latent) components. We consider two dimensions. First, we provide mild regularity conditions that suffice for the bootstrap Quasi- Maximum Likelihood (QML) estimator of the structural parameters to mimic the asymptotic distribution of the QML estimator. Consistency of the bootstrap allows to keep the probability of false rejections of the cross-equation restrictions under control. Second, we show that the realizations of the bootstrap estimator of the structural parameters can be constructively used to build novel, computationally straightforward tests for model misspecification, including the case of weak identification. In particular, we show that under strong identification and boot- strap consistency, a test statistic based on a set of realizations of the bootstrap QML estimator approximates the Gaussian distribution. Instead, when the regularity conditions for inference do not hold as e.g. it happens when (part of) the structural parameters are weakly identified, the above result is no longer valid. Therefore, we can evaluate how close or distant is the esti- mated model from the case of strong identification. Our Monte Carlo experimentations suggest that the bootstrap plays an important role along both dimensions and represents a promising evaluation tool of the cross-equation restrictions and, under certain conditions, of the strength of identification. An empirical illustration based on a small-scale DSGE model estimated on U.S. quarterly observations shows the practical usefulness of our approach.
Social Indicators Research | 2013
Cristina Bernini; Andrea Guizzardi; Giovanni Angelini
Archive | 2018
Giovanni Angelini; Luca Fanelli
Archive | 2018
Giovanni Angelini; Paolo Gorgi
International Journal of Forecasting | 2018
Giovanni Angelini; Luca De Angelis
Economics Letters | 2018
Giovanni Angelini; Paolo Gorgi
Archive | 2017
Giovanni Angelini; Giovanni Caggiano; Luca Fanelli
Econometrics and Statistics | 2017
Giovanni Angelini