Giovanni Bennardo

Temporal Frames of Reference: Conceptual Analysis and Empirical Evidence from German, English, Mandarin Chinese and Tongan

Despite a close correspondence between spatial and temporal cognition, empirical approaches to the two domains have used distinct theoretical conceptions: frames of reference for the former, and moving perspectives and reference-point metaphors for the latter. Our analysis reveals that these conceptions can ‐ and should ‐ be related more closely to each other. Mapping spatial frames of reference (FoRs) onto temporal relations, we obtain a taxonomy that allows us to distinguish more types of referencing than existing conceptions do and that is applicable to linguistic cases not accounted for so far. A cross-cultural experiment with speakers of German, English, Chinese and Tongan provides evidence for the psychological reality of the newly proposed FoRs and establishes culture-specific preferences. We conclude that spatial referencing systems indeed help to organize temporal representations.

Cognition, Algebra, and Culture in the Tongan Kinship Terminology

We present an algebraic account of the Tongan kinship terminology (TKT) that provides an insightful journey into the fabric of Tongan culture. We begin with the ethnographic account of a social event. e account provides us with the activities of that day and the centrality of kin relations in the event, but it does not inform us of the conceptual system that the participants bring with them. Rather, it is a slice in time of an ongoing dynamic process that links behavior with a conceptual system of kin relations and vice versa. To understand this interplay, we need an account of the underlying conceptual system that is being activated during the event. Thus, we introduce a formal, algebraically based account of TKT. is account brings to the fore the underlying logic of TKT and allows us to distinguish between features of the kinship system that arise from the logic of TKT as a generative structure and features that must have arisen through cultural intervention.

Three Innovative Research Tools to Store, Visualize, and Analyze Data in and from the Field

In this article, the authors describe three research tools that have been prepared to store, visualize, and analyze data in and from the field. These tools are intended to be used for a research that investigates a hypothesized cultural model in Tonga, Polynesia. The three tools are (1) the Digitized Tonga database, (2) the interactive 3-D display of the island of Vava’u and the village of Houma, and (3) the Synchronized Media and Visualization Analysis Tool (SMVAT). A detailed description of the genesis of the tools is provided. Two brief examples illustrate how these tools can be used and the types of innovative analyses they allow.

Cognitive anthropology's contributions to cognitive science: a cultural human mind, a methodological trajectory, and ethnography.

Does Cognitive Science (CS) need Anthropology, and specifically Cognitive Anthropology (CA)? The answer is yes! The contributors to the topiCS issue seem to agree. So, why write this commentary? After reading the issue, I found myself compelled to indicate three fundamental reasons why the answer to the question is positive. I recognize that these reasons have been lightly mentioned in the various contributions. However, I am convinced that readers might not come out with the necessary clarity about their relevance in the debate. These are the reasons: