Giovanni Capnist

Hairy Cell Leukemia: a Clinical Review Based on 725 Cases of the Italian Cooperative Group (ICGHCL)

The Italian Registry for hairy cell leukemia (HCL) has recorded 725 patients with HCL diagnosed over 25 years. We analysed this large series of patients with the aim of providing an evaluation of changes in clinical presentation, impact of initial therapy and modifications in prognostic factors over the period of two decades.

A phase II study of idarubicin (4-demethoxydaunorubicin) in advanced myeloma

Idarubicin (IDA) is an anthracycline analog which differs from the parent compound by the substitution of a C4 methoxyl group with an hydrogen atom in the aglycone moiety. This drug has shown greater potency and activity in experimental and human leukemias and lymphomas by intravenous and oral routes of administration together with less cardiotoxicity than doxorubicin (DX) and daunorubicin (DNR). We have treated 15 patients with advanced multiple myeloma (MM) refractory or relapsed to standard chemotherapy regimens. The treatment schedule consisted of idarubicin 40 mg/m2 orally on day 1 every 3 weeks for 6-8 months. We obtained 8/14 partial response, 4/14 minor response and 2 progressions. One patient was not evaluable for the response because of liver toxicity not related to IDA administration. The median duration of response was 8 months with a minimum of 2 and a maximum of 12 months. Hematologic toxicity occurred in about 20% of patients and no treatment was delayed. Cardiotoxicity, defined as impairement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), was observed in one case. The major systemic toxicity observed was nausea in 80% of patients and vomiting in 40%. Hair loss resulting was socially acceptable. These results indicate that IDA is useful as a single agent, easy to administer, not cross resistant with DX and recommended for a combination regimen.

Interferon alfa-2b and chlorambucil in the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

SummaryTwenty-two patients with non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL) were treated with a combined regimen of interferon alfa-2b (Intron A; Schering-Plough) and chlorambucil to evaluate the response and efficacy in pre-treated or relapsed patients. Ten patients were classified as having follicular lymphoma and 12 diffuse lymphoma.The treatment schedule consisted of interferon alfa-2b 3 × 106 IU/m2 thrice-weekly and chlorambucil 10 mg daily for three weeks, with a weeks rest between each cycle. Treatment continued for upto six cycles.We obtained two complete remissions (CR), 12 good partial remissions (GPR), seven no remissions (NR) and one stable disease. On histologic examination we observed a response in 8 of 10 patients with follicular lymphoma (2 CR and 6 GPR); three of five patients with diffuse mixed lymphoma, and three of seven patients with diffuse lymphoma showed GPR.The major toxicity consisted of fever and nausea and, in one case, lethargy. In one patient the treatment was stopped at the second cycle because of poor compliance. Hematologic toxicity was generally mild and occurred between the third and fourth cycle. We observed hepatic toxicity i.e. a transient increase of transaminase levels, in three patients.We consider this regimen to be effective in the treatment of relapsed or resistant NHL and no more toxic than single agent therapy. A randomized study to verify this therapeutic approach versus conventional therapy with chlorambucil alone in first-line treatment is recommended.

Long Term Results of Interferon Treatment in Hairy Cell Leukemia Italian Cooperative Group of Hairy Cell Leukemia (ICGHCL)

Eighty nine of 104 patients with hairy cell leukemia (HCL), enrolled between 1985 and 1987 in a multicenter prospective study on human lymphoblastoid IFN alpha-n1, were evaluable for long-term follow-up. The induction treatment, 3 MU/mq daily for a median of 5.7 months, produced a response of 93%, complete+partial response (CR+PR) = 80%, minor (MR) = 13%. Neither prior splenectomy nor pre-treatment variables were associated with the rate of response to IFN. However maintenance treatment of 3 MU/mq weekly given randomly had a slightly significant effect on failure free survival (FFS). Of the 43 patients who relapsed, 31/36 (86%) obtained a new response with IFN. No differences in FFS were recorded between first and second response. At the third induction 7/11 patients were treated again with IFN, 4/7 obtaining some response, but the FFS was significantly worse. The overall survival is still 85%. We conclude that (1) IFN should be used as chronic uninterrupted treatment for HCL, (2) reduced dosage is sufficient to prolong the disease free status and (3) continuous lymphoblastoid IFN administration seems not to be associated with the development of resistance to retreatment.

Impact of Interferon at Induction Chemotherapy and Maintenance Treatment for Multiple Myeloma Preliminary results of a multicenter study by the Italian Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Cooperative Study Group (NHLCSG)

In 1990 the Italian Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma Cooperative Study Group (NHLSG) started a multicenter study on the role of interferon (IFN) in multiple myeloma (MM). The schedule of treatment was based on the assumption that melphalan plus prednisone (MP) would be better for good-prognosis patients, whereas poor-prognosis patients would benefit from polychemotherapy. Accordingly, IFN was included randomly for the induction treatment of good-prognosis patients and randomly as maintenance of the response achieved in both groups. Up to now 78 patients of the 124 enrolled have completed the induction treatment and are evaluable for response and response duration. The overall response rate was 59%. Sixty-two percent of good-prognosis patients obtained objective response, 9/14 (64%) with MP and 9/15 (60%) with MP+IFN. Up to now, with a median follow-up of 9 months from the evaluation of response, no difference has been recorded between the maintenance and no maintenance groups on relapse rate, neither in good- nor in poor-prognosis patients.

Does the Therapy According to Stage Improve Response and Survival in Multiple Myeloma Patients

The records of 104 patients (1972-80) with Multiple Myeloma (MM) were reviewed and a staging system was used dividing patients into Low Risk (LR) and High Risk (HR) groups, according to individual factors. Serum-calcium and serum creatinine, haemoglobin and the percentage of bone marrow plasma cells (BMPC), at the time of diagnosis, had predictive value on survival. This group of patients had already received treatment independent of these risk categories. Subsequently during 1980 to 1988, 114 evaluable patients with MM entered a prospective study using two treatment regimens according to that same staging system: LR patients were treated with Melphalan + Prednisone (MP) and HR patients with Vincristine, Melphalan, Cyclophosphamide and Prednisone (VMCP) for a minimum of six cycles. In the event of no response to the initial therapy given, a more aggressive regimen was then used: VMCP for LR patients and VAP or BAP (Vincristine or BCNU, Adriamycin, Prednisone) for the HR group for six to twelve cycles. The rate of response for Low and High Risk category was 42% and 73%, respectively. The median duration of response to initial therapy was 19 months for LR and 11 months for HR patients. Furthermore therapy chosen according to stage resulted in an improvement in survival compared to the earlier 1972-80 series. This was particularly significant for HR patients who benefited by an obvious decrease in the number of early deaths, due to progression of disease, when the combined regimens were used. The study indicates that therapy according to risk categories seems to be a worthwhile approach, MP being an appropriate initial treatment for LR while combination chemotherapy may be better for HR patients.

Immunobeads test (antibody coated polyacrylamide beads) in the immunological characterization of lymphoproliferative disorders.

Three groups of patients with immunoproliferative disorders (15 multiple myeloma, 11 non-Hodgkins lymphoma, 21 chronic lymphocytic leukemia) were studied by immunological characterization and compared to a group of 20 normal subjects (controls) using anti-immunoglobulin coated polyacrylamide beads (T-B Quantigen test, QT), erythrocyte rosettes (ER), surface immunoglobulin (SIg), and monoclonal antibodies for T and B cells (OKT3; OKT11; OKT8; OKT4; IaDR); null cells (NC) and double marker (DM) cells were also considered. The values for normal subjects for T-B, NC and DM cells were comparable. Results for the patient groups strikingly differed. There were progressively larger differences between the T and B percentages obtained with different techniques. The largest differences were seen in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and the smallest in multiple myeloma patients; values were intermediate in non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The different findings were related to the number of DM cells (ER +, SIg+ QT+) and the different tests used. The importance of these findings in the diagnostic appproach to lymphoproliferative disorders is discussed.

Red cell washing during plasma exchange

To the Editor: A weak expression of the Dantigen on red cells oftype D” depends on one of two mechanisms: A D gene producing a weak antigen, designated D”, or a normal D gene in trans position to an r‘ gene (Cde) or a Tar gene (Rh 40). Wiener and others showed that the D antigen appears to be a mosaic. and named its parts A, B, C, D. D-positive red cells regularly have all the parts, but on rare occasions one or more of them may be missing. Such a lack of a mosaic part is only discovered when a D-positive or D”-positive person developsanti-D in his serum (not reacting with his own cells). Such persons may be designated D variant, or if there is a weak D antigen, D” variant. A person who is thus shown to be either D variant or D” variant must receive only Dnegative blood when transfused, because he has anti-D in his serum. The practice of applying the designation “ D variant” to Rh-positive D“ blood with no anti-D in the serum is unfortunately widespread. One can trace it from Unger and Wiener in 1959’ all the way to the current edition of the AABB Technical Manual.’ Linguistically, this practice seems reasonable, since “variant” has the meaning “a different form of the same thing”or “an example slightly differing from the typical.” In spite of this, it is important to restrict the serologic use of the term to such cells (Rh-positive, and Rh-positive, D”) which, through the presence of immune anti-D in the serum, are showing a D mosaic d e f e ~ t . ~ To further reduce confusing terminology, the practice of using the designation “DD”+”4 to indicate the group