Giovanni Meola

Functional and clinical characterization of KCNJ2 mutations associated with LQT7 (Andersen syndrome)

Andersen syndrome (AS) is a rare, inherited disorder characterized by periodic paralysis, long QT (LQT) with ventricular arrhythmias, and skeletal developmental abnormalities. We recently established that AS is caused by mutations in KCNJ2, which encodes the inward rectifier K(+) channel Kir2.1. In this report, we characterized the functional consequences of three novel and seven previously described KCNJ2 mutations using a two-microelectrode voltage-clamp technique and correlated the findings with the clinical phenotype. All mutations resulted in loss of function and dominant-negative suppression of Kir2.1 channel function. In mutation carriers, the frequency of periodic paralysis was 64% and dysmorphic features 78%. LQT was the primary cardiac manifestation, present in 71% of KCNJ2 mutation carriers, with ventricular arrhythmias present in 64%. While arrhythmias were common, none of our subjects suffered sudden cardiac death. To gain insight into the mechanism of arrhythmia susceptibility, we simulated the effect of reduced Kir2.1 using a ventricular myocyte model. A reduction in Kir2.1 prolonged the terminal phase of the cardiac action potential, and in the setting of reduced extracellular K(+), induced Na(+)/Ca(2+) exchanger-dependent delayed afterdepolarizations and spontaneous arrhythmias. These findings suggest that the substrate for arrhythmia susceptibility in AS is distinct from the other forms of inherited LQT syndrome.

Common micro-RNA signature in skeletal muscle damage and regeneration induced by Duchenne muscular dystrophy and acute ischemia

The aim of this work was to identify micro‐RNAs (miRNAs) involved in the pathological pathways activated in skeletal muscle damage and regeneration by both dystrophin absence and acute ischemia. Eleven miRNAs were deregulated both in MDX mice and in Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients (DMD signature). Therapeutic interventions ameliorating the mdx‐phenotype rescued DMD‐signature alterations. The significance of DMD‐signature changes was characterized using a damage/regeneration mouse model of hind‐limb ischemia and newborn mice. According to their expression, DMD‐signature miRNAs were divided into 3 classes. 1) Regeneration miRNAs, miR‐31, miR‐34c, miR‐206, miR‐335, miR‐449, and miR‐494, which were induced in MDX mice and in DMD patients, but also in newborn mice and in newly formed myofibers during postischemic regeneration. Notably, miR‐206, miR‐34c, and miR‐335 were up‐regulated following myoblast differentiation in vitro. 2) Degenerative‐miRNAs, miR‐1, miR‐29c, and miR‐135a, that were down‐modulated in MDX mice, in DMD patients, in the degenerative phase of the ischemia response, and in newborn mice. Their down‐modulation was linked to myofiber loss and fibrosis. 3) Inflammatory miRNAs, miR‐222 and miR‐223, which were expressed in damaged muscle areas, and their expression correlated with the presence of infiltrating inflammatory cells. These findings show an important role of miRNAs in physiopathological pathways regulating muscle response to damage and regeneration.—Greco, S., De Simone, M., Colussi, C., Zaccagnini, G., Fasanaro, P., Pescatori, M., Cardani, R., Perbellini, R., Isaia, E., Sale, P., Meola, G., Capogrossi, M. C., Gaetano, C., Martelli, F. Common micro‐RNA signature in skeletal muscle damage and regeneration induced by Duchenne muscular dystrophy and acute ischemia. FASEB J. 23, 3335–3346 (2009). www.fasebj.org

Executive dysfunction and avoidant personality trait in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM-1) and in proximal myotonic myopathy (PROMM/DM-2)

A previous study in proximal myotonic myopathy (PROMM/DM-2) and myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM-1) using brain positron emission tomography demonstrated a reduced cerebral blood flow in the frontal and temporal regions associated with cognitive impairment. The objective was to investigate further cognitive and behavioural aspects in a new series of patients with DM-1 and PROMM/DM-2. Nineteen patients with genetically determined PROMM/DM-2 and 21 patients with moderately severe DM-1 underwent neuropsychological testing and neuropsychiatric interviews. DM-1 and PROMM/DM-2 patients had significantly lower scores on tests of frontal lobe function compared to controls. Neuropsychiatric interviews demonstrated an avoidant trait personality disorder in both patient groups. Brain single photon emission computed tomography showed frontal and parieto-occipital hypoperfusion. The results suggest that there is a specific cognitive and behavioural profile in PROMM/DM-2 and in DM-1, and that this profile is associated with hypoperfusion in frontal and parieto-occipital regions of the brain.

CEREBRAL INVOLVEMENT IN MYOTONIC DYSTROPHIES

Myotonic dystrophy types 1 (DM1) and 2 (DM2) are similar yet distinct autosomal‐dominant disorders characterized by muscle weakness, myotonia, cataracts, and multiple organ involvement, including the brain. One key difference between DM1 and DM2 is that a congenital form has been described for DM1 only. Expression of RNA transcripts containing pathogenic repeat lengths produces defects in alternative splicing of multiple RNAs, sequesters specific repeat‐binding proteins, and ultimately leads to developmentally inappropriate splice products for a particular tissue. Whether brain pathology in its entirety in adult DM1 and DM2 is caused by interference in RNA processing remains to be determined. This review focuses on the similarities and differences between DM1 and DM2 with respect to neuropsychological, neuropathological, and neuroimaging data relating to cerebral involvement, with special emphasis on the clinical relevance and social consequences of such involvement. Muscle Nerve, 2007

Histopathological differences of myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) and PROMM/DM2

Muscle biopsy findings in DM2 have been reported to be similar to those in DM1. The authors used myosin heavy chain immunohistochemistry and enzyme histochemistry for fiber type differentiation on muscle biopsies. Their results show that DM2 patients display a subpopulation of type 2 nuclear clump and other very small fibers and, hence, preferential type 2 fiber atrophy in contrast to type 1 fiber atrophy in DM1 patients.

Sodium channel mutations in acetazolamide‐responsive myotonia congenita, paramyotonia congenita, and hyperkalemic periodic paralysis

Hyperkalemic periodic paralysis (hyperKPP) and paramyotonia congenita (PC) are genetic muscle disorders sharing the common features of myotonia and episodic weakness. In hyperKPP, patient symptoms and signs are worsened by elevated serum potassium, whereas in PC, muscle cooling exacerbates the condition. There are patients in whom features of both hyperKPP and PC are present. These diseases result from molecular alterations in the adult skeletal muscle sodium channel. This report summarizes our sodium channel mutation analysis in 25 families with hyperKPP and PC. We also report the putative disease-causing mutation in acetazolamide-responsive myotonia congenita, a related disease in which myotonia is worsened by potassium but in which episodic weakness does not occur. This missense mutation (I1160V) occurs at a very highly conserved position in the sodium channel, cosegregates with the disease, and was not present in any of a large panel of normal DNAs. Electrophysiologic characterization of specific mutations will lead to better understanding of the biophysics of this voltage-gated ion channel.

Myotonic dystrophies: An update on clinical aspects, genetic, pathology, and molecular pathomechanisms

Myotonic dystrophy (DM) is the most common adult muscular dystrophy, characterized by autosomal dominant progressive myopathy, myotonia and multiorgan involvement. To date two distinct forms caused by similar mutations have been identified. Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1, Steinerts disease) is caused by a (CTG)n expansion in DMPK, while myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) is caused by a (CCTG)n expansion in ZNF9/CNBP. When transcribed into CUG/CCUG-containing RNA, mutant transcripts aggregate as nuclear foci that sequester RNA-binding proteins, resulting in spliceopathy of downstream effector genes. However, it is now clear that additional pathogenic mechanism like changes in gene expression, protein translation and micro-RNA metabolism may also contribute to disease pathology. Despite clinical and genetic similarities, DM1 and DM2 are distinct disorders requiring different diagnostic and management strategies. This review is an update on the recent advances in the understanding of the molecular mechanisms behind myotonic dystrophies. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Neuromuscular Diseases: Pathology and Molecular Pathogenesis.

Reduced cerebral blood flow and impaired visual–spatial function in proximal myotonic myopathy

Objective: To compare brain involvement in myotonic dystrophy (DM) with that of proximal myotonic myopathy (PROMM). Background: PROMM is a multisystem disease with many features in common with DM. Methods: Twenty patients with DM (CTG[500–700]), 20 patients with PROMM, and 20 normal control subjects were studied. Neuropsychological testing was performed in 12 patients with PROMM and in 18 patients with DM; brain MRI was performed in 17 of 20 PROMM patients and 15 of 20 DM patients. Ten patients with PROMM and 11 patients with DM were subjected to H215O PET. Results: Two-thirds of the patients with PROMM and one-half of those with DM were impaired on visual–spatial recall, whereas one-third of the patients with PROMM and less than half of those with DM showed an impairment in visual–spatial construction. Brain MRI was normal, or showed only nonspecific white matter abnormalities in both PROMM and DM patients. PET studies in PROMM patients showed a bilateral decrease in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) of the orbitofrontal and medial frontal cortex, whereas DM patients had more widespread hypoperfusion that extended to the dorsolateral frontal cortex and subcortical regions. Conclusions: Impaired visual–spatial function may be present in proximal myotonic myopathy. This correlates best with a reduction in regional cerebral blood flow observed in H215O PET brain scans rather than with specific structural abnormalities observed on brain MRI.

Mexiletine for Symptoms and Signs of Myotonia in Nondystrophic Myotonia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

CONTEXT Nondystrophic myotonias (NDMs) are rare diseases caused by mutations in skeletal muscle ion channels. Patients experience delayed muscle relaxation causing functionally limiting stiffness and pain. Mexiletine-induced sodium channel blockade reduced myotonia in small studies; however, as is common in rare diseases, larger studies of safety and efficacy have not previously been considered feasible. OBJECTIVE To determine the effects of mexiletine for symptoms and signs of myotonia in patients with NDMs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 2-period crossover study at 7 neuromuscular referral centers in 4 countries of 59 patients with NDMs conducted between December 23, 2008, and March 30, 2011, as part of the National Institutes of Health-funded Rare Disease Clinical Research Network. INTERVENTION Oral 200-mg mexiletine or placebo capsules 3 times daily for 4 weeks, followed by the opposite intervention for 4 weeks, with 1-week washout in between. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Patient-reported severity score of stiffness recorded on an interactive voice response (IVR) diary (scale of 1 = minimal to 9 = worst ever experienced). Secondary end points included IVR-reported changes in pain, weakness, and tiredness; clinical myotonia assessment; quantitative measure of handgrip myotonia; and Individualized Neuromuscular Quality of Life summary quality of life score (INQOL-QOL, percentage of maximal detrimental impact). RESULTS Mexiletine significantly improved patient-reported severity score stiffness on the IVR diary. Because of a statistically significant interaction between treatment and period for this outcome, primary end point is presented by period (period 1 means were 2.53 for mexiletine and 4.21 for placebo; difference, -1.68; 95% CI, -2.66 to -0.706; P < .001; period 2 means were 1.60 for mexiletine and 5.27 for placebo; difference, -3.68; 95% CI, -3.85 to -0.139; P = .04). Mexiletine improved the INQOL-QOL score (mexiletine, 14.0 vs placebo, 16.7; difference, -2.69; 95% CI, -4.07 to -1.30; P < .001) and decreased handgrip myotonia on clinical examination (mexiletine, 0.164 seconds vs placebo, 0.494 seconds; difference, -0.330; 95% CI, -0.633 to -0.142; P < .001). The most common adverse effect was gastrointestinal (9 mexiletine and 1 placebo). Two participants experienced transient cardiac effects that did not require stopping the study (1 in each group). One serious adverse event was determined to be not study related. CONCLUSION In this preliminary study of patients with NDMs, the use of mexiletine compared with placebo resulted in improved patient-reported stiffness over 4 weeks of treatment, despite some concern about the maintenance of blinding. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00832000.

Dysregulation and cellular mislocalization of specific miRNAs in myotonic dystrophy type 1.

Myotonic Dystrophy Type-1 (DM1) is caused by the expansion of a CTG repeat with a peculiar pattern of multisystemic involvement affecting skeletal muscles, the heart, the eye, the central nervous system and the endocrine system. Since microRNA expression is disrupted in several myopathies, the expression of 24 candidate microRNAs was analyzed in skeletal muscle biopsies of 15 DM1 patients. Controls were constituted by biopsies without overt pathological features derived from 14 subjects with suspected neuromuscular disorder of undetermined nature. We found that miR-1 and miR-335 were up-regulated, whereas miR-29b and c, and miR-33 were down-regulated in DM1 biopsies compared to controls. We also found that the cellular distribution of muscle specific miR-1, miR-133b and miR-206 was severely altered in DM1 skeletal muscles. MicroRNA dysregulation was likely functionally relevant, since it impacted on the expression of the predicted miR-1, and miR-29 targets. The observed miRNA dysregulations and myslocalizations may contribute to DM1 pathogenetic mechanisms.