Giovanni Pacini

Methods for clinical assessment of insulin sensitivity and β-cell function

The quantitative assessment of insulin sensitivity (IS) and β-cell function (BCF) is fundamental in the study of metabolic disorders. The most relevant experimental tests and data analysis methods for assessing both IS and BCF are described and their characteristic features discussed. Advantages and limitations of each method are comparatively reviewed to help investigators choose the most suitable test for their needs. The problem of properly relating BCF to IS is also addressed. Particular attention is paid to the oral glucose tolerance test, which has recently received considerable interest. The role of mathematical models in IS and BCF assessment is also emphasized.

Adipokines in NASH: Postprandial lipid metabolism as a link between adiponectin and liver disease†

Circulating levels of four adipokines (adiponectin, TNF‐α, leptin, and resistin) and the postprandial lipid and adiponectin responses to an oral fat load were assessed in 25 non‐obese, non‐diabetic patients with biopsy‐proven nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and correlated with metabolic indices and liver histology. Circulating adiponectin was lower in NASH compared with controls (5,476 ± 344 vs. 11,548 ± 836 ng/mL; P = .00001) and on multiple regression analysis correlated negatively with liver steatosis, necroinflammation (OR = 5.0; P = .009), and fibrosis (OR = 8.0; P = .003).The magnitude of postprandial lipemia was significantly higher in NASH than in controls and was related to fasting adiponectin (β = −0.78; P = .00003). Controls showed a significant increase in serum adiponectin in response to the fat load, whereas patients with NASH showed a slight decrease. Postprandial free fatty acids response correlated inversely with adiponectin response in both groups and independently predicted the severity of liver steatosis in NASH (β = 0.51; P = .031). In conclusion, hypoadiponectinemia is present before overt diabetes and obesity appear and correlates with the severity of liver histology in NASH. Impaired postprandial lipid metabolism may be an additional mechanism linking hypoadiponectinemia and NASH and posing a higher cardiovascular risk to these subjects. The mechanism(s) underlying these differences are unknown, but the type of dietary fat seems to play a role. These findings may have important pathogenetic and therapeutic implications in both liver and metabolic disease. (HEPATOLOGY 2005.)

Hypoadiponectinemia Predicts the Severity of Hepatic Fibrosis and Pancreatic Beta-Cell Dysfunction in Nondiabetic Nonobese Patients with Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

OBJECTIVES:The relationships between the adipokines tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and adiponectin and the parameters of glucose homeostasis and severity of liver disease were assessed in nonobese nondiabetic subjects with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH).METHODS:A frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test, serum cytokine measurement, and 7-day alimentary record were performed in 20 biopsy-proven NASH patients and 45 age-, sex-, and BMI-matched controls (30 insulin sensitive and 15 insulin resistant).RESULTS:Patients with NASH had impaired pancreatic β-cell function compared with both insulin-sensitive (adaptation index, AI: 97.7 ± 17.7 vs 307.4 ± 24.1 min−2 mmol−1 L; p = 0.00001) and insulin-resistant (adaptation index, AI: 97.7 ± 17.7 vs 201.4 ± 41.1 min−2 mmol−1 L; p = 0.001) controls. Serum adiponectin levels were also significantly lower in the NASH group than in the two control groups and correlated with adaptation index and with the severity of hepatic steatosis, necroinflammation, and fibrosis. When NASH patients were grouped according to the severity of histological liver damage, adiponectin was the only variable discriminating patients with higher necroinflammatory grade and fibrosis score from those with milder lesions.CONCLUSIONS:β-cell secretory impairment is present in nonobese patients with NASH before glucose intolerance appears and may contribute to their increased risk for developing diabetes. Hypoadiponectinemia is a feature of NASH and may have a pathogenetic role in β-cell dysfunction and in hepatic necroinflammation and fibrosis, independently of insulin resistance, visceral fat accumulation, TNF-α axis activity, and dietary habits. Our findings provide further rationale for therapeutic approaches aimed at increasing adiponectin levels together with restoring β-cell function and insulin sensitivity.

Importance of Glucose Per Se to Intravenous Glucose Tolerance: Comparison of the Minimal-Model Prediction with Direct Measurements

Glucose disappearance after an oral or intravenous challenge is a function of the effects of both endogenously secreted insulin and of glucose itself. We previously introduced the term “glucose effectiveness,” or SG, defined as the ability of glucose per se to enhance its own disappearance independent of an increment in plasma insulin. The present investigation, performed in conscious dogs, was undertaken to quantify this glucose effect by minimal-model-based analysis of insulin and glucose dynamics after a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIGT). The values from the standard FSIGT were then compared with direct measurementsobtained from experiments in which the dynamic insulin response to glucose was suppressed with somatostatin (SRIF). In addition, we examined SG values from the modified FSIGT protocol, which involves both glucose and tolbutamide injections. Protocol I (N = 9): FSIGTs were performed and the glucose and insulin data were analyzed by computer. KG was 2.65 ± 0.28 min−1, S1 was 4.09 ± 0.34 × 10−4 min−1/(μU/ml), and SG was 0.033 ± 0.004 min−1. Protocol II (N = 6): FSIGTs were performed on animals in which SRIF was infused (0.8 μg/min−1kg) to obliterate the dynamic insulin response to glucose injection. Before the FSIGT, insulin and glucagon were infused intraportally to reattain basal glycemia. Without dynamic insulin, KG was reduced to 0.96 ± 0.18 min−1 (P < 0.0001). However, SG, estimated from the exponential rate of fall of plasma glucose in the absence of dynamic insulin, was similar to the standard FSIGTs: 0.025 ± 0.004 (P > 0.25). Protocol III (N = 6): modified FSIGTs wereperformed using glucose and tolbutamide injections for a better estimate of model parameters. Model parameters S1 and SG, and the KGwere not different from standard FSIGTs (P > 0.3). In fact, the value of SG (0.028 ± 0.003 min−1) was nearly identical to the direct measure from protocol II. Therefore, the effect of glucose per se on glucose decline, estimated by modeling the standard and modified FSIGTs, was confirmed by a direct measurement with the endogenous insulin response suppressed with SRIF. Also, the time course of the insulin effect to enhance net glucose disappearance from plasma [leff(t)] was calculated from the data of protocol II, and was the same as the time coursepredicted by the model. These studies demonstrate the ability of the computer modeling approach to separate insulin-dependent and glucose-dependent glucose disappearance, and represent a direct confirmation of the minimal model. More important, they confirm that glucose per se, independent of the dynamic insulin response, is a very significant factor in the determination of glucose tolerance.

Pronounced Insulin Resistance and Inadequate β-cell Secretion Characterize Lean Gestational Diabetes During and After Pregnancy

OBJECTIVE To evaluate β-cell secretion and glucose metabolism in lean subjects with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) compared with that in subjects with normal pregnancy and obesity. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Insulin secretion, insulin sensitivity (S1), and hepatic insulin extraction were assessed in pregnant women with GDM before and after delivery and in those with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) in comparison to healthy nonpregnant lean and obese women. Kinetic analysis of glucose, insulin, and C-peptide plasma concentrations during oral and intravenous glucose tolerance tests was performed by mathematical modeling. RESULTS S1 was blunted in pregnant women with GDM by 84% and in those with NGT by 66% compared with lean nonpregnant women (P < 0.005 vs. healthy nonpregnant lean control subjects; P < 0.05, GDM vs. pregnant women with NGT), whereas glucose effectiveness was decreased by 33% in both pregnant groups (P < 0.05 vs. healthy nonpregnant lean control subjects). Insulin secretion was 30% higher (P < 0.05) in subjects with GDM than in pregnant women with NGT or in nonpregnant lean women, but decreased (P < 0.005) when compared with obese women with a comparable degree of insulin resistance. Fractional hepatic insulin extraction was similar in both pregnant groups, being lower (P < 0.0001) by 30% versus nonpregnant females. β-cell sensitivity to glucose for insulin release was decreased in subjects with GDM versus pregnant women with NGT as well as nonpregnant women by 40-50% (P < 0.01). Twelve weeks after delivery, GDM returned to normal glucose tolerance, but S1 remained 50% lower than that in lean nonpregnant women, while β-cell sensitivity to glucose did not change (P < 0.01 vs. healthy nonpregnant lean control subjects). CONCLUSIONS Pregnancy is characterized by insulin resistance, diminished hepatic insulin extraction, and glucose effectiveness. Lean subjects with GDM are additionally characterized by having more pronounced insulin resistance and inadequate insulin secretion, which persist after delivery. Compared with other insulin-resistant prediabetic states like impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), defective insulin secretion seems to be a predominant defect in lean GDM subjects, indicating that it might represent a specific prediabetic condition.

Sex and Gender Differences in Risk, Pathophysiology and Complications of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

The steep rise of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and associated complications go along with mounting evidence of clinically important sex and gender differences. T2DM is more frequently diagnosed at lower age and body mass index in men; however, the most prominent risk factor, which is obesity, is more common in women. Generally, large sex-ratio differences across countries are observed. Diversities in biology, culture, lifestyle, environment, and socioeconomic status impact differences between males and females in predisposition, development, and clinical presentation. Genetic effects and epigenetic mechanisms, nutritional factors and sedentary lifestyle affect risk and complications differently in both sexes. Furthermore, sex hormones have a great impact on energy metabolism, body composition, vascular function, and inflammatory responses. Thus, endocrine imbalances relate to unfavorable cardiometabolic traits, observable in women with androgen excess or men with hypogonadism. Both biological and psychosocial factors are responsible for sex and gender differences in diabetes risk and outcome. Overall, psychosocial stress appears to have greater impact on women rather than on men. In addition, women have greater increases of cardiovascular risk, myocardial infarction, and stroke mortality than men, compared with nondiabetic subjects. However, when dialysis therapy is initiated, mortality is comparable in both males and females. Diabetes appears to attenuate the protective effect of the female sex in the development of cardiac diseases and nephropathy. Endocrine and behavioral factors are involved in gender inequalities and affect the outcome. More research regarding sex-dimorphic pathophysiological mechanisms of T2DM and its complications could contribute to more personalized diabetes care in the future and would thus promote more awareness in terms of sex- and gender-specific risk factors.

Insulin secretion and hepatic extraction in humans by minimal modeling of C-peptide and insulin kinetics.

Methods for measuring insulin secretion and hepatic insulin extraction in vivo, e.g., hepatic vein catheterization, are invasive, and can be applied during steady state only. We introduce a noninvasive method for measuring in vivo insulin secretion and its extraction by the liver during an intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT). This method is based on a minimal model of C-peptide secretion and kinetics that is used for interpreting plasma C-peptide concentration data during an IVGTT in normal humans. The model allows the reconstruction of the time course of insulin secretion and, used in conjunction with a minimal model of insulin delivery and kinetics (described in a previous study), provides a noninvasive measure of the time course of hepatic insulin extraction [H(t)]. The C-peptide model also provides a direct prehepatic measure of β-cell sensitivity to glucose, expressed by two parameters related to first (ϕIC)- and second (ϕIIC)-phase insulin secretion. In the 11 healthy volunteers we studied, these parameters were 61 ± 11 pM · min−1 · mg−1 · dl and 0.0154 ± 0.0034 pM · min−2 · mg−1 · dl, respectively. H(t) showed an initial decrement for ∼30–50 min (from a fasting value of 63 ± 8% to a nadir of 53 ± 9%) after the glucose stimulus, then a steady value of ∼62% was reestablished and maintained throughout the experiment. The validity of the C-peptide model was further assessed by comparing its estimate of the fractional plasma clearance rate (k01) with that obtained in experiments in which biosynthetic human C-peptide was administered. The k01 averaged 0.063 ± 0.007 min−1, virtually identical to 0.060 ± 0.002 min−1 found in other studies. Because of its noninvasiveness, this modeling-based method should prove useful in the clinical investigation of many pathophysiological states

Proceedings From an International Consensus Meeting on Posttransplantation Diabetes Mellitus: Recommendations and Future Directions

A consensus meeting was held in Vienna on September 8–9, 2013, to discuss diagnostic and therapeutic challenges surrounding development of diabetes mellitus after transplantation. The International Expert Panel comprised 24 transplant nephrologists, surgeons, diabetologists and clinical scientists, which met with the aim to review previous guidelines in light of emerging clinical data and research. Recommendations from the consensus discussions are provided in this article. Although the meeting was kidney‐centric, reflecting the expertise present, these recommendations are likely to be relevant to other solid organ transplant recipients. Our recommendations include: terminology revision from new‐onset diabetes after transplantation to posttransplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM), exclusion of transient posttransplant hyperglycemia from PTDM diagnosis, expansion of screening strategies (incorporating postprandial glucose and HbA1c) and opinion‐based guidance regarding pharmacological therapy in light of recent clinical evidence. Future research in the field was discussed with the aim of establishing collaborative working groups to address unresolved questions. These recommendations are opinion‐based and intended to serve as a template for planned guidelines update, based on systematic and graded literature review, on the diagnosis and management of PTDM.

Early Basal Insulin Therapy Decreases New-Onset Diabetes after Renal Transplantation

No effective interventions to reduce risk for new-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT), a condition associated with postoperative hyperglycemia and reduced patient and graft survival, have been established. In this 1-year, proof-of-concept clinical trial, we randomly assigned 50 renal transplant recipients to immediate-postoperative isophane insulin for evening blood glucose ≥140 mg/dl (treatment group) or short-acting insulin and/or oral antidiabetic agents for blood glucose ≥180-250 mg/dl (standard-of-care control group). We included only patients without a history of diabetes who received tacrolimus. By the third postoperative evening, all patients in the treatment group had blood glucose ≥140 mg/dl and were subsequently treated with basal insulin; during the first 3 weeks after transplantation, the mean ± SD daily insulin dosage was 17±11 IU/d. Among controls, 23 (92%) of 25 had blood glucose ≥200 mg/dl and 18 (72%) of 25 received standard-of-care antihyperglycemic treatment. Asymptomatic hypoglycemia occurred five times in the treatment group and once in the control group. Throughout follow-up, the treatment group had 73% lower odds of NODAT (odds ratio, 0.27) than the control group, and hemoglobin A1c was on average 0.38% lower in the treatment group than the control group. Twelve months after transplantation, all patients in the treatment group were insulin-independent, whereas 7 (28%) of 25 controls required antidiabetic agents. The groups did not differ for insulin sensitivity, but the treatment group showed better β-cell function throughout the 1-year follow-up. In conclusion, this study suggests regimens that include basal insulin significantly reduce the odds for NODAT after renal transplantation, presumably via insulin-mediated protection of β cells.

Insulin sensitivity and glucose effectiveness: minimal model analysis of regular and insulin-modified FSIGT

The minimal model is widely used to evaluate insulin action on glucose disappearance from frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance tests (FSIGT). The common protocols are a regular (rFSIGT, single injection of 0.3 g/kg of glucose) and an insulin-modified test (mFSIGT, with an additional insulin administration at 20 min). This study compared the insulin sensitivity index (SI) and glucose effectiveness (SG) obtained in the same individual (16 normal subjects) with the two tests. SI was 7.11 ± 0.80 10-4 ⋅ min-1 ⋅ μU-1 ⋅ ml in rFSIGT and 6.96 ± 0.83 in mFSIGT ( P = 0.656), regression r = 0.92, P < 0.0001; SG was 0.0260 ± 0.0028 min-1 and 0.0357 ± 0.0052, respectively, statistically different ( P = 0.013) but still with a good regression ( r = 0.66, P = 0.0051). SG and insulin amount during the early period correlated ( r = 0.6, P = 0.015 in rFSIGT and r = 0.76, P = 0.0006 in mFSIGT). In summary, both FSIGTs with minimal model analysis provide the same SI, which is a very robust index. SG was different by 28% due probably to the relationship between SG and the amount of circulating insulin. In studies comparing groups, the simpler rFSIGT can still be used with the advantage of accounting for endogenous insulin, thus offering the possibility of direct inferences on the β-cell activity.The minimal model is widely used to evaluate insulin action on glucose disappearance from frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance tests (FSIGT). The common protocols are a regular (rFSIGT, single injection of 0.3 g/kg of glucose) and an insulin-modified test (mFSIGT, with an additional insulin administration at 20 min). This study compared the insulin sensitivity index (SI) and glucose effectiveness (SG) obtained in the same individual (16 normal subjects) with the two tests. SI was 7.11 +/- 0.80 10(-4).min-1.microU-1.ml in rFSIGT and 6.96 +/- 0.83 in mFSIGT (P = 0.656), regression r = 0.92, P < 0.0001; SG was 0.0260 +/- 0.0028 min-1 and 0.0357 +/- 0.0052, respectively, statistically different (P = 0.013) but still with a good regression (r = 0.66, P = 0.0051). SG and insulin amount during the early period correlated (r = 0.6, P = 0.015 in rFSIGT and r = 0.76, P = 0.0006 in mFSIGT). In summary, both FSIGTs with minimal model analysis provide the same SI, which is a very robust index. SG was different by 28% due probably to the relationship between SG and the amount of circulating insulin. In studies comparing groups, the simpler rFSIGT can still be used with the advantage of accounting for endogenous insulin, thus offering the possibility of direct inferences on the beta-cell activity.