Giovanni Sparaventi

Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin for Relapsed and Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myeloid Sarcomas

Antibody-targeted chemotherapy is a promising approach in patients with hematological malignancies. In particular, gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO, formerly CMA-676), an anti-CD33 antibody linked to calicheamicin, has been approved for the treatment of elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in relapse. Nevertheless, no data are until now available concerning the possible efficacy of GO for myeloid sarcomas (MS). We treated with GO 24 AML patients, in 5 cases presenting with myeloid sarcomas of the skin or bones. The overall complete response rate was 21%. The median duration of response was 6 months. Four out of the 5 patients with myeloid sarcoma showed a regression of the masses, in two cases also obtaining a clearance of marrow blasts. The most common adverse events included thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, infections, elevation of bilirubin and hepatic transaminases. Notably, severe bleeding occurred in 5 cases (21%). VOD was documented in 1 case. We conclude that GO is effective as a single agent in AML and myeloid sarcomas. Further data are required to clarify the possible correlation between GO administration and occurrence of bleeding.

Alternative novel therapies for the treatment of elderly acute myeloid leukemia patients

With a median age at diagnosis of approximately 65–70 years, acute myeloid leukemia (AML) represents a major therapeutic challenge in the elderly. Only 30–35% of elderly patients with AML are considered eligible for intensive chemotherapy and do actually receive it. However, the long-term benefit associated with intensive chemotherapy remains marginal, and the overall outcome for this population remains poor. The remaining 60–65% of elderly AML patients receives supportive care only. Nevertheless, several studies have indicated that patients who receive any therapy had a better outcome if compared with patients who receive supportive care only. Thus, the development of novel, less toxic, targeted agents is offering new options to older AML patients who are unfit for intensive approaches. In the present review, we will report on the results achieved using intensive chemotherapy and novel agents, and will describe some of the new strategies under development for treating older AML patients.

Cyclophosphamide, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CDOP) plus rituximab is effective and well tolerated in poor performance status elderly patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Lymphomas in elderly patients require special attention, not only for possible important co-morbidities and poor performance status, but also for diminished organ functions and altered drug metabolism, which modify the pharmacokinetics of the treatment [1]. Thus, first-line elderly non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) patients are frequently treated with a consequent dose reduction [2,3]. Similarly, the treatment outcome of salvage therapy for relapsed/ refractory NHL patients is limited by multidrug resistance, low performance status and the high toxicity of secondand third-line regimens. Anthracycline-based regimens are extremely effective in NHL; the main disadvantage is cardiotoxicity. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin has been shown to determine lower toxicity if compared with conventional doxorubicin, while having similar efficacy in patients with Kaposi’s sarcoma and solid tumors. Due to the prolonged half-life (nearly 43 h), it offers the opportunity of obtaining prolonged exposure of tumor cells to active concentrations, with possible effects on the disease. A recent study concluded that an improvement in the survival of elderly patients with lymphoma is related to an optimized toxicity chemotherapy schedule [4,5]. In addition, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP) plus rituximab has been demonstrated to be superior to CHOP alone in elderly patients with diffuse large cell lymphoma [6,7]. We thus tested the safety and efficacy of a regimen [cyclophosphamide, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CDOP) plus rituximab] using a pegylated liposomal doxorubicin instead of conventional doxorubicin, in order to reduce the toxic profile and preserve the dose intensity, administered as follows: day 1, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx, Schering Plough S.A., Italy) 40 mg/m, vincristine 1.4 mg/m, prednisone 100 mg p.o. days 1 – 5, rituximab 375 mg/ m on day 15 of every cycle; granulocyte colonystimulating factor (G-CSF) from day 10 to day 14. Therapy was repeated every 21 days for 6 cycles. Complete and partial remission were assessed as the overall response. Toxicity was evaluated according to the WHO criteria. Thirteen patients were treated (Table I); 12 (92%) completed the 6 courses and were assessable for response (Table II). A dose reduction (25%) was carried out in 2 cases (1 frail, 1 relapsed-refractory), due to their extremely altered clinical condition. Seven patients (53%) obtained complete remission, 5 (31%) partial remission, for an overall response rate of 84%. No major toxicity (WHO grade III/IV) occurred. Only 1 patient delayed therapy for grade II hematological toxicity. After a median follow-up of 18 months (range 8 – 22 months), 7 patients are in continuous complete remission (53%), 3 (23%) in partial remission, 1 in stable disease, whereas only 2 patients progressed. In our opinion, one of the reasons for the high overall response rate (84%) and of the maintenance of the response, even in this category of very fragile patients, is the respect of the doses, as well as of the

Consolidation therapy for adult acute myeloid leukemia: A systematic analysis according to evidence based medicine

Post-remission therapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains problematic. It has been demonstrated that younger patients can maintain longer complete remissions (CR) with aggressive post-remission therapies after induction treatment: allogeneic (allo), autologous (auto) stem cell transplantation (SCT), or intensive chemotherapy (ICC). The purpose of our study was to identify the most important randomized and controlled studies comparing these three therapeutic options, in order to draw conclusions and possible suggestions for post-remission therapy of AML, according to the evidence based medicine (EBM) rules. We performed an exhaustive analysis of the literature, searching either in electronic databases or among the references of the identified articles (hand searching). We searched the MEDLINE computer database for reports from 1985 through January 2005 and selected for analysis the clinical trials conducted over adults affected by newly diagnosed AML aged less than 65 years. The study design had to satisfy strict methodological criteria and must consider global mortality and/or disease free survival as primary outcomes. Overall we found 7750 papers; by using the limits “clinical trial” as publication type, “all adults 19+ years”, we were able to select 344 papers. Among these, a further selection was made, based on two main clinical queries: 1) is auto-SCT superior to ICC/no other therapy in improving DFS and/or OS in adult AML patients in first CR? 2) is allo-SCT superior to auto-SCT/other therapeutic options in improving DFS and/or OS in adult AML patients in first CR? Concerning the first query, a possible advantage of auto-SCT over ICC was not clearly supported by data from clinical trials; there is no evidence that auto-SCT is superior in terms of OS to chemotherapy. Nevertheless, the reported TRM has been significantly reduced within the past years. Thus, the percentage of patients suitable for auto-SCT in CR has increased. Moreover, the scarce data concerning the comparison between auto-SCT and chemotherapy in different subsets of patients are unable to suggest a differentiated approach in patients with high-risk, standard-risk or low-risk AML. Data from the literature show that patients with unfavorable risk disease are more often addressed to allo-SCT and patients with low-risk disease receive more often intensive consolidation chemotherapy. Concerning the second query, interpretation of data from the main prospective studies about the role of allo-SCT in previously untreated AML is not easy. The first problem is the lack of real randomized clinical trials; in fact, according to the reported studies, AML patients generally receive allo-SCT on the basis of donor availability (the so called “genetic randomization”). The second problem is the frequent absence of intention to treat analysis. Despite methodological limitations, it was possible to compare allo-SCT with auto-SCT on a donor versus no-donor analysis and within risk groups. No overall benefit of allo-grafting on survival was demonstrated by any trial. In conclusion, the EBM approach highlighted the limitations observed in the published studies concerning consolidation therapy in AML; some suggestions, emerging from non-randomized, as well as randomized studies, are adequate, but not conclusive. This point, coupled with the intrinsic complexity to study AML biological heterogeneity, is probably a major obstacle to draw conclusive evidences for consolidation therapy in AML. These observations should plan to address new randomized studies on AML therapy; however, due to the emergence of genetic subgroups and new drugs targeting specific abnormalities, these trials should probably be designed directly focusing on the single entities. In this way, the cure of AML could eventually become the cure of each specific AML subset with its peculiar biological, molecular and prognostic features.

An observational study of once weekly intravenous ganciclovir as CMV prophylaxis in heavily pre-treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients receiving subcutaneous alemtuzumab

Fifteen consecutive resistant/relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients (median age: 65 years) received alemtuzumab for 16 consecutive weeks. All patients had negative CMV anti genemia at baseline. Five patients received oral acyclovir 800 mg twice a day for CMV prophylaxis and 10 patients got intravenous (iv) ganciclovir 7.5 mg/kg once a week. A total of five CMV reactivations occurred, four in the acyclovir and one in the ganciclovir prophylaxis group. Alemtuzumab was then discontinued and all patients were treated with iv ganciclovir 7.5 mg/kg per day. All patients achieved negative CMV anti genemia after a median of 15 days of therapy. Weekly iv ganciclovir prophylaxis and alemtuzumab treatment were then restarted without any further CMV reactivations. In conclusion, weekly iv ganciclovir appears feasible and effective in preventing CMV reactivation and disease in this setting of high-risk immunocompromised patients, allowing an easier management of a therapy otherwise difficult to be routinely used.

Low-dose lenalidomide plus cytarabine induce complete remission that can be predicted by genetic profiling in elderly acute myeloid leukemia patients

Low-dose lenalidomide plus cytarabine induce complete remission that can be predicted by genetic profiling in elderly acute myeloid leukemia patients

Mini-ICE effectively mobilises peripheral blood stem cells after fludarabine-based regimens in acute myeloid leukaemia

Fludarabine‐based cycles severely impair mobilisation and collection of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). In an effort of reversing this side‐effect, we studied the action on mobilisation and collection of PBSC of a low‐dose regimen: 5‐d Mini‐ICE (oral idarubicin and etoposide; subcutaneous cytosine arabinoside) administered after fludarabine‐based regimens in seven adult AML patients. Leukapheresis were started when the CD34+ cell count was more than 10/μL. The median number of harvested CD34+ cells was 8.1 × 106/kg (range 3.08–15.2). All the patients were successfully submitted to PBSC transplantation. Median times to neutrophil and platelet recovery were rapid with a normal transfusional support. We suggest that the Mini‐ICE programme is feasible, well tolerated and effective in terms of PBSC mobilisation and collection in low‐yield AML patients previously treated with fludarabine. It is well known that a negative effect on stem cell mobilisation and harvest is observed not only after fludarabine administration in AML or low‐grade lymphomas, but also after cycles based on different agents, such as thalidomide in multiple myeloma. This preliminary experience, if confirmed on larger series and/or other haematological malignancies, could open new opportunities to perform autologous PBSC transplantation in heavily pretreated cases, allowing a full source of therapeutic options before the start of the mobilisation process.