Giridhar Jothiprasad
General Electric
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Giridhar Jothiprasad.
Journal of Turbomachinery-transactions of The Asme | 2012
Giridhar Jothiprasad; Robert Carl Murray; Katherine Essenhigh; Grover Andrew Bennett; Seyed Gholamali Saddoughi; Aspi Rustom Wadia; Andrew Breeze-Stringfellow
This research investigates different dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) actuator configurations for affecting tip leakage flow and suppressing stall inception. Computational investigations were performed on a low speed rotor with a highly loaded tip region that was responsible for stall-onset. The actuator was mounted on the casing upstream of the rotor leading edge. Plasma injection had a significant impact on the predicted tip-gap flow and improved stall margin. The effect of changing the actuator forcing direction on stall margin was also studied. The reduction in stalling flow was closely correlated with a reduction in loading parameter that quantifies mechanisms responsible for end-wall blockage generation. The actuation reduced end-wall losses by increasing the static pressure of tip-gap flow emerging from blade suction-side. Lastly, an approximate speed scaling developed for the DBD force helped estimate force requirements for stall margin enhancement of transonic rotors.
ASME 2011 Turbo Expo: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition | 2011
Liping Wang; Xingjie Fang; Arun K. Subramaniyan; Giridhar Jothiprasad; Martha Gardner; Amit Kale; Srikanth Akkaram; Don Beeson; Gene Wiggs; John Nelson
Model calibration, validation, prediction and uncertainty quantification have progressed remarkably in the past decade. However, many issues remain. This paper attempts to provide answers to the key questions: 1) how far have we gone? 2) what technical challenges remain? and 3) what are the future directions for this work? Based on a comprehensive literature review from academic, industrial and government research and experience gained at the General Electric (GE) Company, the paper will summarize the advancements of methods and the application of these methods to calibration, validation, prediction and uncertainty quantification. The latest research and application thrusts in the field will emphasize the extension of the Bayesian framework to validation of engineering analysis models. Closing remarks will offer insight into possible technical solutions to the challenges and future research directions.Copyright
Volume 5: Industrial and Cogeneration; Microturbines and Small Turbomachinery; Oil and Gas Applications; Wind Turbine Technology | 2010
Arathi Kamath Gopinath; Giridhar Jothiprasad; Trevor Howard Wood; Le Tran
The impact of wet compression technology on compressor performance is studied using a coupled water-evaporation-pitch-line numerical model. The model uses an iterative approach to compute the modified flow conditions at blade-row stations due to inter-stage evaporation of water droplets introduced at the compressor inlet. The evaporation rate predicted by the model is compared with experimental data for stationary droplets in a duct. Performance predictions are compared with data for a GE-proprietary compressor. Study of various water droplet sizes and various water-to-air mass ratios is discussed.Copyright
32nd AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit | 2002
Giridhar Jothiprasad; Dimitri Mavriplis
The efficiency gains obtained using higher-order implicit Runge-Kutta (RK) schemes as compared with the second-order accurate backward difference schemes for the unsteady Navier-Stokes equations are investigated. Three different algorithms for solving the nonlinear system of equations arising at each time step are presented. The first algorithm (nonlinear multigrid, NMG) is a pseudo-time-stepping scheme which employs a nonlinear full approximation storage (FAS) agglomeration multigrid method to accelerate convergence. The other two algorithms are based on inexact Newtons methods. The linear system arising at each Newton step is solved using iterative/Krylov techniques and left preconditioning is used to accelerate convergence of the linear solvers. One of the methods (LMG) uses Richardsons iterative scheme for solving the linear system at each Newton step while the other (PGMRES) uses the generalized minimal residual method. Results demonstrating the relative superiority of these Newtons method based schemes are presented. Efficiency gains as high as 10 are obtained by combining the higher-order time integration schemes such as fourth-order Runge-Kutta (RK64) with the more efficient inexact Newtons method based schemes (LMG).
Archive | 2002
Giridhar Jothiprasad; Dimitri Mavriplis
Archive | 2010
John Thomas Herbon; Matthew Patrick Boespflug; Grover Andrew Bennett; Fengfeng Tao; Giridhar Jothiprasad
Archive | 2014
Sungho Yoon; John David Stampfli; Ramakrishna Venkata Mallina; Vittorio Michelassi; Giridhar Jothiprasad; Ajay Keshava Rao; Rudolf Konrad Selmeier; Davide Giacché; Ivan Malcevic
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids | 2008
Giridhar Jothiprasad
Archive | 2017
Mehmet Muhittin Dede; Satoshi Atsuchi; Byron Andrew Pritchard; Erich Alois Krammer; Giridhar Jothiprasad; Shourya Prakash Otta; Corey Bourassa
Archive | 2017
Byron Andrew Pritchard; Corey Bourassa; Erich Alois Krammer; Giridhar Jothiprasad; Mehmet Muhittin Dede; Satoshi Atsuchi; Shourya Prakash Otta