Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Giridhar Upadhyaya is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Giridhar Upadhyaya.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology | 2010

Changes in the structure and function of microbial communities in drinking water treatment bioreactors upon addition of phosphorus.

Xu Li; Giridhar Upadhyaya; Wangki Yuen; Jess Brown; Eberhard Morgenroth; Lutgarde Raskin

ABSTRACT Phosphorus was added as a nutrient to bench-scale and pilot-scale biologically active carbon (BAC) reactors operated for perchlorate and nitrate removal from contaminated groundwater. The two bioreactors responded similarly to phosphorus addition in terms of microbial community function (i.e., reactor performance), while drastically different responses in microbial community structure were detected. Improvement in reactor performance with respect to perchlorate and nitrate removal started within a few days after phosphorus addition for both reactors. Microbial community structures were evaluated using molecular techniques targeting 16S rRNA genes. Clone library results showed that the relative abundance of perchlorate-reducing bacteria (PRB) Dechloromonas and Azospira in the bench-scale reactor increased from 15.2% and 0.6% to 54.2% and 11.7% after phosphorus addition, respectively. Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) experiments revealed that these increases started within a few days after phosphorus addition. In contrast, after phosphorus addition, the relative abundance of Dechloromonas in the pilot-scale reactor decreased from 7.1 to 0.6%, while Zoogloea increased from 17.9 to 52.0%. The results of this study demonstrated that similar operating conditions for bench-scale and pilot-scale reactors resulted in similar contaminant removal performances, despite dramatically different responses from microbial communities. These findings suggest that it is important to evaluate the microbial community compositions inside bioreactors used for drinking water treatment, as they determine the microbial composition in the effluent and impact downstream treatment requirements for drinking water production. This information could be particularly relevant to drinking water safety, if pathogens or disinfectant-resistant bacteria are detected in the bioreactors.


Water Research | 2010

Simultaneous removal of nitrate and arsenic from drinking water sources utilizing a fixed-bed bioreactor system

Giridhar Upadhyaya; Jeff Jackson; Tara M. Clancy; Sung Pil Hyun; Jess Brown; Kim F. Hayes; Lutgarde Raskin

A novel bioreactor system, consisting of two biologically active carbon (BAC) reactors in series, was developed for the simultaneous removal of nitrate and arsenic from a synthetic groundwater supplemented with acetic acid. A mixed biofilm microbial community that developed on the BAC was capable of utilizing dissolved oxygen, nitrate, arsenate, and sulfate as the electron acceptors. Nitrate was removed from a concentration of approximately 50 mg/L in the influent to below the detection limit of 0.2 mg/L. Biologically generated sulfides resulted in the precipitation of the iron sulfides mackinawite and greigite, which concomitantly removed arsenic from an influent concentration of approximately 200 ug/L to below 20 ug/L through arsenic sulfide precipitation and surface precipitation on iron sulfides. This study showed for the first time that arsenic and nitrate can be simultaneously removed from drinking water sources utilizing a bioreactor system.


Environmental Science & Technology | 2012

Optimization of arsenic removal water treatment system through characterization of terminal electron accepting processes.

Giridhar Upadhyaya; Tara M. Clancy; Jess Brown; Kim F. Hayes; Lutgarde Raskin

Terminal electron accepting process (TEAP) zones developed when a simulated groundwater containing dissolved oxygen (DO), nitrate, arsenate, and sulfate was treated in a fixed-bed bioreactor system consisting of two reactors (reactors A and B) in series. When the reactors were operated with an empty bed contact time (EBCT) of 20 min each, DO-, nitrate-, sulfate-, and arsenate-reducing TEAP zones were located within reactor A. As a consequence, sulfate reduction and subsequent arsenic removal through arsenic sulfide precipitation and/or arsenic adsorption on or coprecipitation with iron sulfides occurred in reactor A. This resulted in the removal of arsenic-laden solids during backwashing of reactor A. To minimize this by shifting the sulfate-reducing zone to reactor B, the EBCT of reactor A was sequentially lowered from 20 min to 15, 10, and 7 min. While 50 mg/L (0.81 mM) nitrate was completely removed at all EBCTs, more than 90% of 300 μg/L (4 μM) arsenic was removed with the total EBCT as low as 27 min. Sulfate- and arsenate-reducing bacteria were identified throughout the system through clone libraries and quantitative PCR targeting the 16S rRNA, dissimilatory (bi)sulfite reductase (dsrAB), and dissimilatory arsenate reductase (arrA) genes. Results of reverse transcriptase (RT) qPCR of partial dsrAB (i.e., dsrA) and arrA transcripts corresponded with system performance. The RT qPCR results indicated colocation of sulfate- and arsenate-reducing activities, in the presence of iron(II), suggesting their importance in arsenic removal.


Water Research | 2012

Effect of air-assisted backwashing on the performance of an anaerobic fixed-bed bioreactor that simultaneously removes nitrate and arsenic from drinking water sources

Giridhar Upadhyaya; Tara M. Clancy; Kathryn V. Snyder; Jess Brown; Kim F. Hayes; Lutgarde Raskin

Contaminant removal from drinking water sources under reducing conditions conducive for the growth of denitrifying, arsenate reducing, and sulfate reducing microbes using a fixed-bed bioreactor may require oxygen-free gas (e.g., N2 gas) during backwashing. However, the use of air-assisted backwashing has practical advantages, including simpler operation, improved safety, and lower cost. A study was conducted to evaluate whether replacing N2 gas with air during backwashing would impact performance in a nitrate and arsenic removing anaerobic bioreactor system that consisted of two biologically active carbon reactors in series. Gas-assisted backwashing, comprised of 2 min of gas injection to fluidize the bed and dislodge biomass and solid phase products, was performed in the first reactor (reactor A) every two days. The second reactor (reactor B) was subjected to N2 gas-assisted backwashing every 3-4 months. Complete removal of 50 mg/L NO3- was achieved in reactor A before and after the switch from N2-assisted backwashing (NAB) to air-assisted backwashing (AAB). Substantial sulfate removal was achieved with both backwashing strategies. Prolonged practice of AAB (more than two months), however, diminished sulfate reduction in reactor B somewhat. Arsenic removal in reactor A was impacted slightly by long-term use of AAB, but arsenic removals achieved by the entire system during NAB and AAB periods were not significantly different (p>0.05) and arsenic concentrations were reduced from approximately 200 μg/L to below 20 μg/L. These results indicate that AAB can be implemented in anaerobic nitrate and arsenic removal systems.


Journal of Environmental Management | 2016

Vinegar-amended anaerobic biosand filter for the removal of arsenic and nitrate from groundwater

Kathryn V. Snyder; Tara M. Webster; Giridhar Upadhyaya; Kim F. Hayes; Lutgarde Raskin

The performance of a vinegar-amended anaerobic biosand filter was evaluated for future application as point-of-use water treatment in rural areas for the removal of arsenic and nitrate from groundwater containing common ions. Due to the importance of sulfate and iron in arsenic removal and their variable concentrations in groundwater, influent sulfate and iron concentrations were varied. Complete removal of influent nitrate (50 mg/L) and over 50% removal of influent arsenic (200 μg/L) occurred. Of all conditions tested, the lowest median effluent arsenic concentration was 88 μg/L. Iron removal occurred completely when 4 mg/L was added, and sulfate concentrations were lowered to a median concentration <2 mg/L from influent concentrations of 22 and 50 mg/L. Despite iron and sulfate removal and the establishment of reducing conditions, arsenic concentrations remained above the World Health Organizations arsenic drinking water standard. Further research is necessary to determine if anaerobic biosand filters can be improved to meet the arsenic drinking water standard and to evaluate practical implementation challenges.


Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology | 2016

Evaluation of electron donors for biological perchlorate removal highlights the importance of diverse perchlorate-reducing populations

Nadine Kotlarz; Giridhar Upadhyaya; Paul Togna; Lutgarde Raskin

This research investigated the treatment of a synthetic groundwater with approximately 100 mg L−1 perchlorate (ClO4−) and 15 mg L−1 nitrate (NO3−-N) using a bench-scale, fluidized-bed bioreactor (FBR). The groundwater was amended sequentially with acetate and MicroC2000™, a proprietary, glycerol-based electron donor. Nitrate reduction to less than 0.05 mg L−1 NO3−-N and perchlorate removal to less than 0.3 mg L−1 ClO4− occurred under both electron donor regimes, although a higher biomass yield was observed and a higher influent COD concentration was required to maintain the same effluent quality when MicroC2000™ was used as the electron donor. High-throughput sequencing of partial 16S rRNA genes from biomass collected at several time points revealed that a single Dechloromonas population dominated the perchlorate-reducing community under both electron donors and Dechloromonas species comprised greater than 30% relative abundance of the bacterial community by the end of reactor operation. The same Dechloromonas population was abundant in two bench-scale systems fed lower perchlorate concentrations, although several other perchlorate-reducing bacteria, presumably with higher affinities for perchlorate, were also abundant in those systems. The results suggest that to reduce perchlorate to levels that allow groundwater to serve as a drinking water source, distinct environments for diverse perchlorate-reducing bacteria with high and low affinities for perchlorate are needed. Such conditions can be created by using two bioreactors in series.


Archive | 2008

Direct Fixed-Bed Biological Perchlorate Destruction Demonstration

Jess Brown; Chance Lauderdale; Gregorio Estavo; Axel Ettori; Winnie Shih; Sean Poust; Steven Walker; Lutgarde Raskin; Giridhar Upadhyaya; Xu Li; Eberhard Morgenroth


Archive | 2010

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SIMULTANEOUS BIOLOGICALLY MEDIATED REMOVAL OF CONTAMINANTS FROM CONTAMINATED WATER

Lutgarde Raskin; Giridhar Upadhyaya; Kim F. Hayes; Jess C. Brown


Journal American Water Works Association | 2015

Carbohydrate‐Based Electron Donor for Biological Nitrate and Perchlorate Removal From Drinking Water

Giridhar Upadhyaya; Nadine Kotlarz; Paul Togna; Lutgarde Raskin


Opflow | 2018

New Data Tracking Tool Monitors Biofilter Performance

Jennifer Nyfennegger; Jess Brown; Chance Lauderdale; Nishel Ross; Giridhar Upadhyaya; Sarah Burns; Christine Owen

Collaboration


Dive into the Giridhar Upadhyaya's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Xu Li

University of Nebraska–Lincoln

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eberhard Morgenroth

Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Wangki Yuen

University of Michigan

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge