Gisela Butera
George Washington University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Gisela Butera.
Medical Reference Services Quarterly | 2012
Elaine Sullo; Thomas Harrod; Gisela Butera; Alexandra Gomes
Since fall 2009, reference librarians at The George Washington Universitys Himmelfarb Health Sciences Library have been embedded in online classes through Blackboard within the School of Nursing and School of Medicine and Health Sciences. The authors sought to determine the types of questions asked of the librarian, with the goal of informing future interactions with distance education classes to help develop a standard “protocol” for working with this population of students. Eighty-two questions were categorized and qualitatively analyzed. The findings have prompted librarians to explore tools such as Elluminate Live!, a tool that allows librarians to provide synchronous instruction within the Blackboard environment.
Anatomical Sciences Education | 2014
Rosalyn A. Jurjus; Juliet Lee; Samantha Ahle; Kirsten Brown; Gisela Butera; Ellen F. Goldman; Jill A. Krapf
Surgical anatomy is taught early in medical school training. The literature shows that many physicians, especially surgical specialists, think that anatomical knowledge of medical students is inadequate and nesting of anatomical sciences later in the clinical curriculum may be necessary. Quantitative data concerning this perception of an anatomical knowledge deficit are lacking, as are specifics as to what content should be reinforced. This study identifies baseline areas of strength and weakness in the surgical anatomy knowledge of medical students entering surgical rotations. Third‐year medical students completed a 20–25‐question test at the beginning of the General Surgery and Obstetrics and Gynecology rotations. Knowledge of inguinal anatomy (45.3%), orientation in abdominal cavity (38.8%), colon (27.7%), and esophageal varices (12.8%) was poor. The numbers in parentheses are the percentage of questions answered correctly per topic. In comparing those scores to matched test items from this cohort as first‐year students in the anatomy course, the drop in retention overall was very significant (P = 0.009) from 86.9 to 51.5%. Students also scored lower in questions relating to pelvic organs (46.7%), urogenital development (54.0%), pulmonary development (17.8%), and pregnancy (17.8%). These data showed that indeed, knowledge of surgical anatomy is poor for medical students entering surgical clerkships. These data collected will be utilized to create interactive learning modules, aimed at improving clinically relevant anatomical knowledge retention. These modules, which will be available to students during their inpatient surgical rotations, connect basic anatomy principles to clinical cases, with the ultimate goal of closing the anatomical knowledge gap. Anat Sci Educ 7: 461–468.
Medical Reference Services Quarterly | 2014
Gisela Butera; Alexandra Gomes; Seema Kakar
This article describes how librarians became involved as members of an interdisciplinary curricular team in a problem-based learning course for first- and second-year medical students. The experience illustrates how librarians can become part of a team, collaborating with medical faculty to assist in revising curricula, incorporating innovative teaching techniques, and creating effective simulated patient case scenarios. Working within an interdisciplinary collaborative team on curriculum development allows librarians to move beyond the traditional role of instruction and can lead to additional opportunities, including research and ongoing involvement in curricular changes.
Anatomical Sciences Education | 2016
Rosalyn A. Jurjus; Kirsten Brown; Ellen F. Goldman; Artin Galoosian; Gisela Butera; Jill M. Krapf
Deficits in retention of anatomy knowledge from the preclinical years to clinical application on the wards have been well documented in the medical education literature. We developed and evaluated a web and laboratory‐based curriculum to address deficits in anatomy knowledge retention and to increase anatomy knowledge recall through repetition and application of clinical concepts during the obstetrics and gynecology (Ob/Gyn) core clinical clerkship. Using principles of adult learning and instructional design, a curriculum was designed consisting of (1) interactive, case‐based e‐modules reviewing clinically relevant anatomical topics and (2) a hands‐on laboratory session reinforcing the content of the e‐modules, with the practice of clinical techniques using anatomical cadaveric dissections. The curriculums effectiveness was evaluated by using multiple choice testing and comparing baseline and final test scores. For questions testing content directly covered in this curriculum, mean final scores increased by 14.3% (P < 0.001). In contrast, for questions not directly addressed in this curriculum, mean final scores did not increase significantly, only by 6.0% (P = 0.31). Questions related to the uterus showed the greatest gains in final scores (30.3% improvement, P = 0.002). A curriculum with web‐based preparatory material and a hands‐on gross anatomy laboratory session effectively addresses deficits in anatomy retention and improves anatomical knowledge recall for medical students on a clinical clerkship. In the future, the authors plan to conduct a multicenter study to further evaluate the ability of this curriculum to improve clinically relevant anatomical knowledge. Anat Sci Educ 9: 337–343.
Teaching and Learning in Medicine | 2017
Alexandra Gomes; Gisela Butera; Katherine C. Chretien; Terry Kind
Gates Open Research | 2018
Wolfgang Munar; Birte Snilstveit; Jennifer Stevenson; Nilakshi Biswas; John Eyers; Gisela Butera; Theresa Baffour; Ligia E. Aranda
Archive | 2018
Kathyrn Guida Calhoun; Patricia S. Latham; Gisela Butera; Kathleen Kline; Rosalyn Jurjus
Archive | 2018
Brendan Campbell; Gisela Butera; Jill A. Krapf; Rosalyn Jurjus
Medical science educator | 2018
Rosalyn A. Jurjus; Gisela Butera; Janette Krum; Michelle Davis; Alexandra Mills; Patricia S. Latham
Archive | 2017
Brian McDonald; Gisela Butera; Alexandra Gomes