Giulia Careri

Mechanisms of Coronary Artery Spasm

The term coronary artery spasm (CAS) refers to a sudden, intense vasoconstriction of an epicardial coronary artery that causes vessel occlusion or near occlusion. Although CAS may be involved in other coronary syndromes, it represents the usual cause of variant angina. The variant form of angina was first described in 1959 by Prinzmetal et al,1 who used this term to indicate that angina attacks, unlike the most common form of effort angina, occurred at rest and were associated with ST-segment elevation, rather than ST-segment depression, on the ECG (Figure 1). Because myocardial ischemia occurred in the absence of any change in myocardial oxygen demand, the authors hypothesized that it was caused by an increased tonus of vessels at the level of coronary stenoses.1 Figure 1. (Top) ST-segment elevation in anterior leads, with reciprocal mild ST-segment depression in inferior leads and V6, during an angina attack in a patient with variant angina. (Bottom) Normalization of the ECG after spontaneous resolution of chest pain. Some years later, in fact, coronary angiography, performed during spontaneous angina attacks, demonstrated that CAS is the usual cause of variant angina.2–4 Coronary angiography also showed that CAS could occur at the site of a stenosis (either minor or severe) or in angiographically normal coronary arteries,5 usually at a localized segment of an epicardial artery (focal spasm) (Figure 2).6 However, sometimes CAS involves 2 or more segments of the same (multifocal spasm) or of different (multivessel spasm) epicardial coronary arteries, or may also involve diffusely one or multiple coronary branches.7 Figure 2. Occlusive spasm of the left circumflex coronary artery and near occlusive spasm of the left anterior descending coronary artery (arrows) during coronary angiography (left, top), associated with dramatic ST-segment elevation at monitoring ECG leads (left, bottom). Complete resolution of spasm (right, …

Relation between cardiovascular risk factors and coronary microvascular dysfunction in cardiac syndrome X

Background The causes of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMVD) in patients with cardiac syndrome X (CSX) are largely unknown. Common cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) and increased markers of inflammation have been associated with CMVD in some studies, but their role in determining CMVD in CSX patients remains poorly known. Methods and results We studied 71 CSX patients (56 ± 9 years, 23 men) and 20 healthy volunteers (52 ± 7 years, nine men). Using transthoracic Doppler echocardiography, coronary microvascular vasodilator function was assessed in the left anterior descending coronary artery as the ratio of diastolic coronary blood flow (CBF) velocity at peak intravenous adenosine administration and during cold pressor test (CPT) to the respective basal CBF velocity values. Common CVRFs tended to be more frequent and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were higher (P < 0.001) in CSX patients than in controls. Both CBF responses to adenosine (2.05 ± 0.6 vs. 2.92 ± 0.9, P < 0.001) and to CPT (1.71 ± 0.6 vs. 2.42 ± 0.7, P < 0.001) were lower in CSX patients than in controls. The differences between the two groups in CBF response to adenosine and in CBF response to CPT remained highly significant (P < 0.01 for both) after adjustment for all CVRFs, including serum CRP levels. Conclusion In CSX patients, both endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent CMVD cannot be reliably predicted by CVRFs (including serum CRP levels), alone or in combination.

Relationship between cardiac autonomic function and sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillators

AIMS Low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is the main indication of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death, but ICD therapy at follow-up occurs in a minority of patients. We investigated whether heart rate variability (HRV) may improve risk stratification in DCM patients. METHODS AND RESULTS We studied 42 patients (age 67.3 ± 3.5; 37 males) who had undergone ICD implant for either idiopathic or ischaemic DCM (LVEF <40%) 34.6 ± 19.7 months prior to the study (range 6-84). Patients underwent 24 h electrocardiographic Holter monitoring, and HRV was assessed over 2 hours in the afternoon showing stable sinus rhythm. Left ventricular ejection fraction was measured by two-dimensional echocardiography. The serum levels of C-reactive protein and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) were also obtained. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of appropriate ICD shocks in the 6 months preceding the study. The occurrence of appropriate ICD discharge from ICD implant was considered as a secondary endpoint. In the last 6 months, appropriate ICD shocks had occurred in seven patients (17%). There were no differences between patients with and without ICD shocks in clinical variables, as well as in LVEF and in C-reactive protein and NT-proBNP serum levels. In contrast, most HRV parameters were significantly depressed in patients with, compared with those without, ICD shocks; the most significant difference was shown for the average of the standard deviations of RR intervals in all consecutive 5 min segments (n ¼ 12) within the 2 h (26.7 ± 9 vs. 39.7 ± 14 ms; P = 0.02) in the time domain and for LF amplitude (8.4 ± 3 vs. 14.8 ± 7 ms; P = 0.02) in the frequency domain. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator discharge had occurred in 11 patients (26%) since ICD implant (average 35 months). No clinical or laboratory variable showed significant differences between patients with or without ICD discharge, except very low-frequency (VLF) amplitude (23.8 ± 7 vs. 30.8 ± 10.6 ms, respectively; P = 0.049). CONCLUSION In ICD patients with reduced LVEF, several depressed HRV indices were significantly associated with appropriate ICD shocks in the previous 6 months, and VLF amplitude was the only variable significantly associated with ICD shocks recorded since ICD implant. These data suggest that full HRV analysis might be helpful for improving risk stratification for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias and ICD indication in patients with DCM.

Clinical Correlates and Prognostic Value of Flow Mediated Dilation in Patients With Non-ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes

Endothelial dysfunction can predict cardiovascular outcomes in several populations of patients. The aim of this study was to assess the severity, time course, and clinical implications of endothelial dysfunction in patients with non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE) acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Sixty patients with NSTE ACS (mean age 62 ± 8 years, 44 men) and 40 controls with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) (mean age 63 ± 10 years, 27 men) were studied. In patients with NSTE ACS and in those with stable CAD, endothelial function was assessed <12 hours after admission and at 3-month follow-up by measuring right brachial artery dilation after 5 minutes of forearm ischemia (flow-mediated dilation [FMD]). Clinical outcomes were assessed after a median follow-up period of 32 months (range 14 to 36). The primary end point was a combination of cardiac death or readmission for new ACS or recurrence of angina pectoris. FMD on admission was significantly lower in patients with NSTE ACS compared to those with stable CAD (2.1 ± 1.2% vs 4.8 ± 1.9%, p <0.001). FMD improved significantly at 3-month follow-up in patients with NSTE ACS, becoming comparable to that in patients with stable CAD (5.7 ± 2.6% vs 5.5 ± 1.7%, p = 0.93). During follow-up, 14 cardiac events (23%) occurred in patients with NSTE ACS. On multivariate analysis, only diabetes (hazard ratio 18.1, 95% confidence interval 3.9 to 83.9, p <0.001) and FMD at 3 months (hazard ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.61 to 0.99, p = 0.04) were independent predictors of the primary end point in patients with NSTE ACS. In conclusion, endothelial function is markedly impaired in the acute phase of NSTE ACS but improves significantly at 3-month follow-up. In patients with NSTE ACS, FMD at 3 months after the acute event is a significant independent predictor of cardiac outcomes.

Evidence of increased platelet reactivity in the first six months after acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction

INTRODUCTION Platelets play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of acute coronary syndromes. Accordingly, previous studies showed increased platelet reactivity on admission in these patients. In this study we assessed platelet reactivity at short-medium term follow-up in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI). MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifty-nine patients (58 ± 11 years, 45 men), treated with primary angioplasty, were studied 1 month after STEMI. Thirty-five patients were retested at 6 months. Twenty matched patients with stable coronary artery disease served as controls. Platelet reactivity was assessed by flow cyometry at rest and at peak exercise, with and without adenosine diphosphate (ADP) stimulation, by measuring monocyte-platelet aggregates (MPAs) and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (CD41) expression in the MPA gate, and CD41 and fibrinogen receptor (PAC-1) expression in the platelet gate. RESULTS Compared to controls, basal MPAs and CD41 in the MPA gate were higher in STEMI patients both at 1 month (p = 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively) and at 6 months (p = 0.03 and p = 0.01, respectively). Basal CD41 and PAC-1 expression was also higher in STEMI patients at the two assessments compared to controls (P<0.001 for both). Exercise induced a similar increase in platelet reactivity in patients and controls. ADP induced a higher increase in CD41 platelet expression in STEMI patients compared to controls both at 1 and 6 months (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Platelet reactivity is increased in the first 6 months after STEMI. The persistence of increased platelet reactivity in this time period may play a role in the early recurrence of coronary events after STEMI.

Prevalence and clinical correlates of early repolarization and J wave in a large cohort of subjects without overt heart disease

BACKGROUND Recent studies have suggested that early repolarization (ER) is associated with increased risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Early repolarization in these studies, however, was defined as J-wave (terminal QRS slurring or notching) or J-point elevation rather than typical ST-segment elevation (STE). Prevalence and characteristics of these different findings in the general population are poorly known. In this study, we assessed prevalence and correlates of STE typical of ER and of J wave in a large population of noncardiac subjects. METHODS We prospectively collected electrocardiograms of 4176 consecutive subjects without heart disease at our hospital. RESULTS Early repolarization was found in 84 subjects (2.0%) and J wave in 663 (15.9%). Among ER subjects, a J wave was present in 60 (71.4%). Variables independently associated with both ER and J wave included young age, male sex, and lower heart rate. There was no increased history of symptoms (palpitations and syncope) possibly related to arrhythmias in STE or J-wave subjects. CONCLUSIONS Typical ER pattern and J wave are common in noncardiac subjects, particularly in young people, and are not associated with symptoms potentially related to arrhythmias.

Clinical Spectrum and Outcome of Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome and No Obstructive Coronary Atherosclerosis.

BACKGROUND Because approximately 10% of patients with no-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) show no obstructive coronary artery disease (NOCAD) on angiography, we assessed the spectrum of diagnoses and the predictors of outcome of these patients. METHODSANDRESULTS We studied 178 patients admitted to a coronary care unit with an initial diagnosis of NSTE-ACS, based on clinical, ECG and laboratory data, but found to have NOCAD. The final diagnosis in these patients was heterogeneous; true NSTE-ACS (ie, coronary thrombosis on an unstable plaque) was ascertained in 1 patient (0.6%), whereas diagnosis at discharge was microvascular NSTE-ACS in 56.2% of patients, variant angina in 10.1%, myocarditis in 8.9%, takotsubo disease in 7.9%, tachyarrhythmia-related chest pain in 6.7%, and non-cardiac pain in 9.6%. At 24.5-month follow-up, 21 deaths (11.8%) had occurred, 9 (5.1%) from cardiovascular causes, including 2 (1.12%) coronary deaths. By multivariable Cox analysis, age only predicted global (hazard ratio [HR] 1.07 [1.02-1.12]; P=0.006) and cardiovascular (HR 1.08 [1.01-1.16]; P=0.04) mortality; non-coronary vascular disease was the main predictor of cardiovascular death or readmission for cardiovascular disease (HR 3.28 [1.75-6.14]; P<0.001) and coronary death or readmission for angina (HR 3.20 [1.26-8.14]; P=0.014). CONCLUSIONS Patients with an initial diagnosis of NSTE-ACS constitute a heterogeneous population with different final diagnoses. Patients have a rather high rate of fatal events, most of which, however, are not related to coronary causes. (Circ J 2016; 80: 1600-1606).

Usefulness of impairment of cardiac adrenergic nerve function to predict outcome in patients with cardiac syndrome X

Patients with cardiac syndrome X (CSX) have an excellent long-term prognosis, but a significant number show worsening angina over time. Previous studies have found a significant impairment of cardiac uptake of iodine-123-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) on myocardial scintigraphy, indicating abnormal function of cardiac adrenergic nerve fibers. The aim of this study was to assess whether cardiac MIBG results can predict symptomatic outcome in patients with CSX. Cardiac MIBG scintigraphy was performed in 40 patients with CSX (mean age 58 ± 5 years, 14 men). Cardiac MIBG uptake was measured by the heart/mediastinum uptake ratio and a single photon-emission computed tomographic regional uptake score (higher values reflected lower uptake). Clinical findings, exercise stress test parameters, sestamibi stress myocardial scintigraphy, and C-reactive protein serum levels were also assessed. At an average follow-up of 79 months (range 36 to 144), no patient had died or developed acute myocardial infarction. Cardiac MIBG defect score was significantly lower in patients with worsening versus those without worsening of angina status (13 ± 7 vs 38 ± 28, p = 0.001), in those with versus those without hospital readmission because of recurrent chest pain (15 ± 9 vs 35 ± 29, p = 0.01), and in those who underwent versus those who did not undergo repeat coronary angiography (11 ± 7 vs 36 ± 27, p = 0.001). Significant correlations were found between quality of life (as assessed by the EuroQoL scale) and heart/mediastinum ratio (r = 0.48, p = 0.002) and cardiac MIBG uptake score (r = -0.69, p <0.001). No other clinical or laboratory variable showed a significant association with clinical end points. In conclusion, in patients with CSX, abnormal function of cardiac adrenergic nerve fibers, as assessed by an impairment of cardiac MIBG uptake, identifies those with worse symptomatic clinical outcomes.

Determinants of heart rate turbulence in individuals without apparent heart disease and in patients with stable coronary artery disease

AIMS To assess the characteristics and determinants of heart rate turbulence (HRT) in individuals without any apparent heart disease and in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS AND RESULTS Heart rate turbulence parameters, turbulence onset (TO), and turbulence slope (TS) were calculated on 24 h electrocardiogram recordings in 209 individuals without any heart disease (group 1) and in 157 CAD patients (group 2). In group 1, only age independently predicted abnormal TO (≥0%) [odds ratio (OR), 1.05; P<0.001], while predictors of abnormal TS (≤2.5 ms/RR) were age (OR, 0.85; P < 0.001) and hypertension (OR, 0.19; P = 0.028). In group 2 patients, only age independently predicted TO (OR, 1.03; P = 0.038), while age (OR, 0.90; P = 0.001) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; OR, 1.07; P = 0.008) predicted TS. Heart rate turbulence values were different in groups 1 and 2. Turbulence onset was (mean, standard deviation) -1.80 ± 2.24 vs. -0.73 ± 1.61%, respectively (P < 0.001), whereas TS was (median, interquartile interval) 5.83 (3.25-10.55) vs. 2.93 (1.73-5.81) ms/RR, respectively (P < 0.001). Coronary artery disease group, however, did not predict abnormal HRT parameters in multivariable analyses, both in the whole population and when comparing two subgroups matched for age and gender. Age and (for TS) LVEF, indeed, were the only independent predictors of abnormal HRT. CONCLUSIONS Age is a major HRT determinant both in subjects without any apparent heart disease and in stable CAD patients. Hypertension and LVEF contribute independently to HRT in these two groups, respectively. Coronary artery disease group was not by itself associated with abnormal HRT parameters in multivariable analyses.

Response to Letter Regarding Article, “Mechanisms of Coronary Artery Spasm”

We very much appreciate the comments of Yasue et al on our review about coronary artery spasm (CAS).1 In our article, we questioned that endothelial dysfunction (ED) can by itself be the main pathophysiological substrate for CAS in the clinical setting for 2 main reasons: (1) the discrepancy between the high prevalence of ED and the low prevalence of vasospastic angina; (2) the lack of any significant relation between most cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) known to cause ED and CAS. In their letter, instead, Yasue et al propose that ED is the central abnormality in the mechanisms of CAS; specifically, they propose that smooth …