Giuliano Jafrancesco
University of Bologna
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Giuliano Jafrancesco.
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | 2015
Davide Pacini; Antonio Pantaleo; Luca Di Marco; Alessandro Leone; Giuseppe Barberio; Alessandro Parolari; Giuliano Jafrancesco; Roberto Di Bartolomeo
BACKGROUND The development of acute kidney injury (AKI) in cardiac surgery is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The aim of the study was to assess the incidence and risk factors for AKI after thoracic aorta surgery, using antegrade selective cerebral perfusion (ASCP) and moderate hypothermia. METHODS We reviewed 641 patients undergoing thoracic aortic surgery, using ASCP and moderate hypothermia, from November 1996 to December 2012. Patient preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were evaluated for association with AKI with logistic regression analysis. Models including all variables and models, after the sequential removal of postoperative, and both postoperative and intraoperative variables, were assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS The mean age of the patients was 62.9 years, and 194 patients (30%) were women. The overall incidence of AKI was 19.0%. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in the AKI group (33.6% vs 6.7%; P < .001). Logistic regression analysis identified 8 predictors of AKI: 4 of them were preoperative (priority, diabetes, preoperative glomerular filtration rate, and weight); 2 intraoperative (mitral valve and aortic valve replacement); and 2 postoperative (overall neurologic complication and reoperation for bleeding). Model-discrimination performance improved from an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.737, for the model including only preoperative variables, to an AUC of 0.798 for the model including all variables (P = .012). CONCLUSIONS The incidence of AKI after thoracic aorta surgery is fairly common, and its occurrence strongly affects outcomes. Preoperative renal status and preoperative conditions are the main influences on AKI development. Predictive models can be improved by adding intraoperative and postoperative variables.
Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery | 2014
Carlo Savini; Giacomo Murana; Marco Di Eusanio; Sofia Martin Suarez; Giuliano Jafrancesco; Sebastiano Castrovinci; Andrea Castelli; Roberto Di Bartolomeo
ObjectiveMinimally invasive mitral valve surgery may require a prolonged period of myocardial ischemia. Cardioplegic solutions that necessitate a single dose for adequate myocardial protection are evoked to simplify surgery and result to be appealing in this setting. The aim of this study was to assess early outcomes after minimally invasive mitral valve surgery using one single dose of histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution (HTK; Custodiol) for myocardial protection. MethodsBetween February 2003 and October 2012, a total of 49 consecutive patients underwent minimally invasive mitral valve surgery using a single dose of HTK solution for myocardial protection. The patients’ mean (SD) age was 57 (14) years; the preoperative ejection fraction was normal in all cases. The mean (SD) CPB time and aortic cross-clamp time were 148 (45) minutes and 97 (45) minutes, respectively. ResultsThe heart spontaneously restarted after cross-clamp removal in 37 patients (75.5%). Five patients (10.2%) required prolonged inotropic drug support. Postoperatively, no significant increase in myocardial cytonecrosis enzymes was found [mean (SD) creatine kinase isoenzyme MB, 77.14 (53.67) &mgr;g/L at 3 hours, 71.2 (55.67) &mgr;g/L at 12 hours, and 42.53 (38.38) &mgr;g/L at 24 hours)], and no ischemic electrocardiogram modifications were observed before discharge. ConclusionsDuring minimally invasive mitral valve surgery, HTK solution provided excellent myocardial protection even after prolonged periods of cardioplegic arrest. The avoidance of repetitive infusions may reduce the risk for coronary malperfusion due to dislodgement of the endoaortic clamp (if used) and increase the surgeon’s comfort during the procedure.
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery | 2017
Antonio Pantaleo; Giacomo Murana; Luca Di Marco; Giuliano Jafrancesco; Giuseppe Barberio; Paolo Berretta; Alessandro Leone; Roberto Di Bartolomeo; Davide Pacini
OBJECTIVES In this study, a propensity-matching analysis was used to compare biological versus mechanical composite valve graft implantation for early mortality and morbidities and for late complications including the need for aortic reintervention. METHODS Between 1978 and 2011, 1112 consecutive patients underwent a complete aortic root replacement using either a biological Bentall (BB, n = 356) or a mechanical Bentall (MB, n = 756) valve conduit. Preoperative data were stratified according to the type of valve graft, and treatment bias was addressed by propensity score analysis. RESULTS Two homogeneous groups of 138 patients were obtained. Hospital mortality between them was comparable (MB = 7.2% and BB = 5.8%, P = 0.6). They also had similar results after a mean follow-up time of 40 ± 38 months. Propensity-adjusted Cox-regression analysis showed no relationship between the type of prosthesis and all-cause mortality at follow-up (hazards ratio: 0.88; 95% confidence interval: 0.50-2.14; P = 0.4). Freedom from proximal aortic reintervention at 1, 5 and 7 years was 99.1 ± 0.9% in the MB group compared with 98.4 ± 1.1%, 93.0 ± 3.2% and 93.0 ± 3.2% in the BB group (long-rank P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS The Bentall procedure is a safe and reproducible treatment for ascending aorta pathologies. The choice of either a mechanical or a biological valve graft seems to have no influence on early and late midterm adverse outcomes including need for aortic reinterventions.
Giornale italiano di cardiologia | 2014
Antonio Loforte; Emanuele Pilato; Martin Suarez S; Gianluca Folesani; Giuliano Jafrancesco; Sebastiano Castrovinci; Mariano Cefarelli; Luciano Potena; Gaia Magnani; Francesco Grigioni; Caramelli F; Guido Frascaroli; Di Bartolomeo R; Giuseppe Marinelli
BACKGROUND The RotaFlow (Maquet, Jostra Medizintechnik AG, Hirrlingen, Germany) and Levitronix CentriMag (Levitronix LCC, Waltham, MA, USA) veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support systems have been investigated as treatment for refractory cardiogenic shock. METHODS Between 2004 and 2012, 119 consecutive adult patients were supported on RotaFlow (n=104) or CentriMag (n=15) ECMO at our Institution (79 men; mean age 57.3 ± 12.5 years, range 19-78 years). Indications for support were: failure to wean from cardiopulmonary bypass in the setting of postcardiotomy (n=47) and primary graft failure (n=26); post-acute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock (n=11); acute myocarditis (n=3), and cardiogenic shock on chronic heart failure (n=32). RESULTS A central ECMO setting was established in 64 (53.7%) patients while peripherally in 55 (46.2%). Overall mean support time was 10.9 ± 8.7 days (range 1-43 days). Forty-two (35.2%) patients died on ECMO. Overall success rate, in terms of survival on ECMO (n=77), weaning from mechanical support (n=51; 42.8%) and bridge to heart transplantation (n=26; 21.8%), was 64.7%. Sixty-eight (57.1%) patients were successfully discharged. Stepwise logistic regression identified blood lactate levels and creatine kinase-MB relative index at 72h after ECMO initiation, and number of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) transfused on ECMO as significant predictors of mortality. Central ECMO population had a higher rate of continuous veno-venous hemofiltration need and bleeding events compared with the peripheral setting. CONCLUSIONS ECMO support provides encouraging results in different subsets of patients in cardiogenic shock. Blood lactate levels, creatine kinase-MB relative index and PRBCs transfused should be strictly monitored during veno-arterial ECMO running. Type of ECMO implantation, if peripheral or central, should be decided according to the specific patient subset.
Archive | 2016
Antonio Loforte; Giacomo Murana; Mariano Cefarelli; JacopoAlfonsi; Giuliano Jafrancesco; Francesco Grigioni; Emanuela Angeli Lucio Careddu; Gaetano Gargiulo; Giuseppe Marinelli
Early graft failure (EGF) is a major risk factor for death after heart transplantation (Htx) accounting for >40% of deaths within 30 days postoperatively. According to the last International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) consensus state‐ ment, the graft dysfunction (GD) is to be classified into primary (PGD), in case of an unknown triggering factor or secondary (SGD) where there is a discernible cause such as acute rejection, pulmonary hypertension, or known surgical complications. The diagnosis of GD is to be made within 24 h after completion of Htx surgery and a severity scale for GD should include mild, moderate, or severe grades based on specified criteria. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) for GD should be considered when medical management is not sufficient to support the newly transplanted graft. Currently, extra‐ corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is widely accepted as treatment of severe EGF, given its easy and quick setup, the system versatility, the optimal end‐organ perfusion provided, and the possibility of both biventricular and lung assistance by usage of a low‐cost single pump.
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery | 2016
Antonio Pantaleo; Giuliano Jafrancesco; Francesco Buia; Alessandro Leone; Luigi Lovato; V. Russo; Luca Di Marco; Roberto Di Bartolomeo; Davide Pacini
Artificial Organs | 2016
Antonio Loforte; Giacomo Murana; Mariano Cefarelli; Giuliano Jafrancesco; M. Sabatino; Sofia Martin Suarez; Emanuele Pilato; Davide Pacini; Francesco Grigioni; Roberto Di Bartolomeo; Giuseppe Marinelli
International journal of therapy and rehabilitation | 2013
Massimiliano Polastri; Maria Letizia Bacchi-Reggiani; Mariano Cefarelli; Giuliano Jafrancesco; Sofia Martìn-Suàrez
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery | 2017
Mariano Cefarelli; Giacomo Murana; Giuseppina G. Surace; Sebastiano Castrovinci; Giuliano Jafrancesco; Johannes C. Kelder; Patrick Klein; Uday Sonker; Wim J. Morshuis; Robin H. Heijmen
Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation | 2017
Antonio Loforte; M. Gremolini; Mariano Cefarelli; Giuliano Jafrancesco; Emanuele Pilato; Luciano Potena; M. Masetti; Francesco Grigioni; Giuseppe Marinelli