Giuseppe Capovilla

ILAE classification of the epilepsies: Position paper of the ILAE Commission for Classification and Terminology

The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Classification of the Epilepsies has been updated to reflect our gain in understanding of the epilepsies and their underlying mechanisms following the major scientific advances that have taken place since the last ratified classification in 1989. As a critical tool for the practicing clinician, epilepsy classification must be relevant and dynamic to changes in thinking, yet robust and translatable to all areas of the globe. Its primary purpose is for diagnosis of patients, but it is also critical for epilepsy research, development of antiepileptic therapies, and communication around the world. The new classification originates from a draft document submitted for public comments in 2013, which was revised to incorporate extensive feedback from the international epilepsy community over several rounds of consultation. It presents three levels, starting with seizure type, where it assumes that the patient is having epileptic seizures as defined by the new 2017 ILAE Seizure Classification. After diagnosis of the seizure type, the next step is diagnosis of epilepsy type, including focal epilepsy, generalized epilepsy, combined generalized, and focal epilepsy, and also an unknown epilepsy group. The third level is that of epilepsy syndrome, where a specific syndromic diagnosis can be made. The new classification incorporates etiology along each stage, emphasizing the need to consider etiology at each step of diagnosis, as it often carries significant treatment implications. Etiology is broken into six subgroups, selected because of their potential therapeutic consequences. New terminology is introduced such as developmental and epileptic encephalopathy. The term benign is replaced by the terms self‐limited and pharmacoresponsive, to be used where appropriate. It is hoped that this new framework will assist in improving epilepsy care and research in the 21st century.

Spectrum of SCN1A mutations in severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy

Objectives: SCN1A mutations were recently reported in several patients with severe myoclonic epilepsy in infancy (SMEI). The authors analyzed SCN1A mutations in 93 patients with SMEI and made genotype-phenotype correlation to clarify the role of this gene in the etiology of SMEI. Methods: All patients fulfilled the criteria for SMEI. The authors analyzed all patients for SCN1A mutations using denaturing high performance liquid chromatography. If a patient’s chromatogram was abnormal, the authors sequenced the gene in the patient and both parents. Results: SCN1A mutations were identified in 33 patients (35%). Most mutations were de novo, but were inherited in three patients. Parents carrying the inherited mutations had either no symptoms or a milder form of epilepsy. A greater frequency of unilateral motor seizures was the only clinical difference between patients with SCN1A mutations and those without. Truncating mutations were more frequently associated with such seizures than were missense mutations. The percentage of cases with family history of epilepsy was significantly higher in patients with SCN1A mutations. Conclusions: Unilateral motor seizures may be a specific clinical characteristic of SMEI caused by SCN1A mutations. Ten percent of SCN1A mutations are inherited from an asymptomatic or mildly affected parent, suggesting that SMEI is genetically heterogeneous. The increased frequency of familial epilepsy indicates that other genetic factors may contribute to this disorder.

Experience with immunomodulatory treatments in Rasmussen’s encephalitis

The authors investigated immunomodulatory treatments in 15 patients with Rasmussen encephalitis (RE) (14 with childhood and one with adolescent onset RE). Positive time-limited responses were obtained in 11 patients using variable combinations of corticosteroids, apheresis, and high-dose IV immunoglobulins. Although surgical exclusion of the affected hemisphere is the only treatment that halts disease progression, immunomodulation can be considered when early surgery is not feasible, in late-onset patients with slower disease progression, and in the few cases of bilateral disease.

An open-label trial of levetiracetam in severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy

Objective: To conduct an open-label, add-on trial on safety and efficacy of levetiracetam in severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy (SMEI). Patients and Methods: SMEI patients were recruited from different centers according to the following criteria: age ≥3 years; at least four tonic-clonic seizures/month during the last 8 weeks; previous use of at least two drugs. Levetiracetam was orally administrated at starting dose of approximately 10 mg/kg/day up to 50 to 60 mg/kg/day in two doses. Treatment period included a 5- to 6-week up-titration phase and a 12-week evaluation phase. Efficacy variables were responder rate by seizure type and reduction of the mean number per week of each seizure type. Analysis was performed using Fisher exact and Wilcoxon tests. Results: Twenty-eight patients (mean age: 9.4 ± 5.6 years) entered the study. Sixteen (57.1%) showed SCN1A mutations. Mean number of concomitant drugs was 2.5. Mean levetiracetam dose achieved was 2,016 mg/day. Twenty-three (82.1%) completed the trial. Responders were 64.2% for tonic-clonic, 60% for myoclonic, 60% for focal, and 44.4% for absence seizures. Number per week of tonic-clonic (median: 3 vs 1; p = 0.0001), myoclonic (median: 21 vs 3; p = 0.002), and focal seizures (median: 7.5 vs 3; p = 0.031) was significantly decreased compared to baseline. Levetiracetam effect was not related to age at onset and duration of epilepsy, genetic status, and concomitant therapy. Levetiracetam was well tolerated by subjects who completed the study. To date, follow-up ranges 6 to 36 months (mean, 16.2 ± 13.4). Conclusion: Levetiracetam add-on is effective and well tolerated in severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy. Placebo-controlled studies should confirm these findings.

Rasmussen's encephalitis: Early characteristics allow diagnosis

Objective: To identify early manifestations of Rasmussen encephalitis (RE) that can prompt early and reasonably secure diagnosis, allowing medical or surgical therapies at an early stage when they may be more effective in slowing the disease. Methods: The authors studied 12 patients with clinical and neuropathologic diagnosis of RE, followed from disease onset, assessing clinical history, imaging, and EEG and focusing on early characteristics. Anti-GluR3 antibody assays were also considered in 11 patients. Results: By 4 months from first symptoms, all cases had 1) refractory focal seizures with a predominant motor component, 2) slow focal activity on EEG contralateral to the motor manifestations, and 3) focal contralateral white matter hyperintensity with insular cortical atrophy on neuroimaging. Less constant or later findings were epilepsia partialis continua, oligoclonal bands, and serum anti-GluR3 antibodies. Conclusions: The association of partial seizures with focal EEG and neuroimaging changes allows a tentative diagnosis of RE 4 to 6 months after first symptoms.

Topiramate as add-on drug in severe myoclonic epilepsy in infancy: an Italian multicenter open trial

PURPOSE This study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of topiramate (TPM) in patients with severe myoclonic epilepsy in infancy (SMEI) and refractory seizures. METHODS We performed a prospective multicentric open label add-on study in 18 patients (age 2-21 years, mean 9 years) with SMEI and refractory seizures of different types. TPM was added to one or two other baseline drugs and the efficacy was rated according to seizure type and frequency. RESULTS TPM was initiated at a daily dose of 0.5-1 mg/kg, followed by a 2-week titration at increments of 1-3 mg/kg/24 h up to a maximum daily dose of 12 mg/kg. After a mean period of 11.9 months (range 2-24 months), three patients (16.7%) had 100% fewer seizures and ten patients (55.5%) had a more than 50% seizure decrease. In no patient there was a seizure worsening. Mild to moderate adverse events were present in four patients (22.2%), represented by weight loss, hypermenorrhoea, renal microlithiasis, nervousness and dysarthric speech. CONCLUSION TPM may be a useful drug in patients with SMEI, being particularly effective against generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Further studies are needed to evaluate the early use of this drug in such a severe syndrome.

Genome-wide association analysis of genetic generalized epilepsies implicates susceptibility loci at 1q43, 2p16.1, 2q22.3 and 17q21.32

Genetic generalized epilepsies (GGEs) have a lifetime prevalence of 0.3% and account for 20-30% of all epilepsies. Despite their high heritability of 80%, the genetic factors predisposing to GGEs remain elusive. To identify susceptibility variants shared across common GGE syndromes, we carried out a two-stage genome-wide association study (GWAS) including 3020 patients with GGEs and 3954 controls of European ancestry. To dissect out syndrome-related variants, we also explored two distinct GGE subgroups comprising 1434 patients with genetic absence epilepsies (GAEs) and 1134 patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME). Joint Stage-1 and 2 analyses revealed genome-wide significant associations for GGEs at 2p16.1 (rs13026414, P(meta) = 2.5 × 10(-9), OR[T] = 0.81) and 17q21.32 (rs72823592, P(meta) = 9.3 × 10(-9), OR[A] = 0.77). The search for syndrome-related susceptibility alleles identified significant associations for GAEs at 2q22.3 (rs10496964, P(meta) = 9.1 × 10(-9), OR[T] = 0.68) and at 1q43 for JME (rs12059546, P(meta) = 4.1 × 10(-8), OR[G] = 1.42). Suggestive evidence for an association with GGEs was found in the region 2q24.3 (rs11890028, P(meta) = 4.0 × 10(-6)) nearby the SCN1A gene, which is currently the gene with the largest number of known epilepsy-related mutations. The associated regions harbor high-ranking candidate genes: CHRM3 at 1q43, VRK2 at 2p16.1, ZEB2 at 2q22.3, SCN1A at 2q24.3 and PNPO at 17q21.32. Further replication efforts are necessary to elucidate whether these positional candidate genes contribute to the heritability of the common GGE syndromes.

Continuous Spike-and-Wave Activity During Slow-Wave Sleep: Syndrome or EEG Pattern?

Summary: Purpose: We reviewed the electroclinical pictures and clinical characteristics of 32 patients with continuous spike‐and‐wave activity during slow sleep (CSWS) to ascertain to what extent this electroencephalogram (EEG) pattern is associated with the age‐related CSWS syndrome as defined by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) International Classification or with different clinical settings.

The system epilepsies: a pathophysiological hypothesis.

We postulate that “system epilepsies” (SystE) are due to an enduring propensity to generate seizures of functionally characterized brain systems. Data supporting this hypothesis—that some types of epilepsy depend on the dysfunction of specific neural systems—are reviewed. The SystE hypothesis may drive pathophysiologic and clinical studies that can advance our understanding of epilepsies and can open up new therapeutic perspectives.

Recommendations of the Italian League Against Epilepsy Working Group on Generic Products of Antiepileptic Drugs

Summary:  The availability of generic products of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) has been increasing in recent years. In view of the importance of the issue, the Italian League against Epilepsy (LICE) set up an ad hoc working group whose task was to assess available evidence on the efficacy and safety of generic AEDs in the treatment of epilepsy and to produce recommendations on their use. A careful review of the literature revealed no adequately powered randomized controlled trials that assessed the risk/benefit ratio of generic substitution. Although there have been reports of loss or worsened seizure control, or appearance of adverse events, following the switch from brand products to generics, a critical assessment of the evidence generally does not allow us to establish a cause–effect relationship between the switch and a change in clinical status. Overall, the working group concluded that generic AEDs meeting current regulatory criteria for bioequivalence represent a valuable choice in the management of epilepsy by allowing a substantial reduction of treatment costs, particularly in patients initiating monotherapy or adjunctive treament and in those with persistent seizures. The working group considered that in patients who achieved seizure freedom a modest change in plasma drug levels, which may occasionally occur even after substitution of products that meet bioequivalence criteria, could in rare cases lead to seizure breakthrough. Therefore, generic substitution is not recommended in patients who achieved seizure remission. Switches between a particular generic and another generic should also be preferably avoided. Finally, sustained‐release AED formulations should not be used interchangeably with immediate‐release brand or generic products. Patients need to be informed about the stringent criteria that currently govern the approval of generic products and about the implications of the use of generic AEDs, and their opinion should be taken into consideration at the time of prescribing.