Giuseppe Falco

Surgical management of advanced gastric cancer: An evolving issue

Worldwide, gastric cancer represents the fifth most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer deaths. Although the overall 5-year survival for resectable disease was more than 70% in Japan due to the implementation of screening programs resulting in detection of disease at earlier stages, in Western countries more than two thirds of gastric cancers are usually diagnosed in advanced stages reporting a 5-year survival rate of only 25.7%. Anyway surgical resection with extended lymph node dissection remains the only curative therapy for non-metastatic advanced gastric cancer, while neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapies can improve the outcomes aimed at the reduction of recurrence and extension of survival. High-quality research and advances in technologies have contributed to well define the oncological outcomes and have stimulated many clinical studies testing multimodality managements in the advanced disease setting. This review article aims to outline and discuss open issues in current surgical management of advanced gastric cancer.

Primary angiosarcoma of the breast

Primary angiosarcoma (AS) of the breast is a rare neoplasia that is not related to radiation exposure. It represents less than 0.05% of all malignant breast tumors. This lesion is characterized by aggressive patterns and poor prognosis and by the absence of typical features at radiologic examination. Currently there are not evidence-based guidelines regarding surgical and adjuvant treatment for this tumor even though wide surgical resection followed by chemo- radiotherapy appears to improve both disease free survival and overall survival. The aim of this study was to analyze the available series of AS patients suggesting the most reliable treatment options for this rare neoplasia.

Axillary masses in a woman with a history of breast cancer: Dermatopathic lymphadenopathy

The presence of axillary enlarged lymph nodes in the follow-up of a woman with a history of breast cancer should always be thoroughly indagated. Dermatopathic lymphadenopathy presents a specific pathologic pattern found within the lymph nodes and is usually associated with cutaneous rashes. Patients with various skin conditions can develop regional lymphadenopathy, which can result in the asymptomatic enlargement of the lymph nodes, especially in the inguinal, axillary and cervical regions. Dermatopathic lymphadenopathy should be considered in the differential diagnosis also in patients with minimal cutaneous findings. Dermatopathic lymphadenopathy is a benign process and management of these patients consists in simple clinical, mammographic and ultrasonographic follow-up.

Abdominal Hernias, Giant Colon Diverticulum, GIST, Intestinal Pneumatosis, Colon Ischemia, Cold Intussusception, Gallstone Ileus, and Foreign Bodies: Our Experience and Literature Review of Incidental Gastrointestinal MDCT Findings

Incidental gastrointestinal findings are commonly detected on MDCT exams performed for various medical indications. This review describes the radiological MDCT spectrum of appearances already present in the past literature and in todays experience of several gastrointestinal acute conditions such as abdominal hernia, giant colon diverticulum, GIST, intestinal pneumatosis, colon ischemia, cold intussusception, gallstone ileus, and foreign bodies which can require medical and surgical intervention or clinical follow-up. The clinical presentation of this illness is frequently nonspecific: abdominal pain, distension, nausea, fever, rectal bleeding, vomiting, constipation, or a palpable mass, depending on the disease. A proper differential diagnosis is essential in the assessment of treatment and in this case MDCT exam plays a central rule. We wish that this article will familiarize the radiologist in the diagnosis of this kind of incidental MDCT findings for better orientation of the therapy.

Contralateral risk reducing mastectomy in Non-BRCA-Mutated patients

Abstract The use of contralateral risk reducing mastectomy (CRRM) is indicated in women affected by breast cancer, who are at high risk of developing a contralateral breast cancer, particularly women with genetic mutation of BRCA1, BRCA2 and P53. However we should consider that the genes described above account for only 20-30% of the excess familiar risk. What is contralaterally indicated when genetic assessment results negative for mutation in a young patient with unilateral breast cancer? Is it ethically correct to remove a contralateral “healthy” breast? CRRM rates continue to rise all over the world although CRRM seems not to improve overall survival in women with unilateral sporadic breast cancer. The decision to pursue CRRM as part of treatment in women who have a low-to-moderate risk of developing a secondary cancer in the contralateral breast should consider both breast cancer individual-features and patients preferences, but should be not supported by the surgeon and avoided as first approach with the exception of women highly worried about cancer. Prospective studies are needed to identify cohorts of patients most likely to benefit from CRRM.

A rare case of true carcinosarcoma of the breast

Background True carcinosarcoma of the breast is an extremely rare condition, accounting for 0.08–0.2% of all breast malignancies. The correct definition of this tumor requires both a carcinomatous component and a malignant non-epithelial component of mesenchymal origin, without evidence of a transition zone between the two elements. Case presentation We present a case of a 49-year-old woman presenting with a 4 cm mass at the level of her left breast upper-outer quadrant with a histologic diagnosis of true carcinosarcoma of the breast. Discussion The most appropriate therapeutic regimens for breast carcinosarcoma are still unclear because of the rarity of this condition, but Breast Conserving Treatment (BCT) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy seems to provide a prognosis equalling that of usual Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of the breast.

Breast conserving treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ in the elderly: Can radiation therapy be avoided? Our experience

INTRODUCTION Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) is a heterogeneous, pre-malignant disease accounting for 15-20% of all new breast cancers. If appropriately managed, DCIS has a small chance of impacting on patient life expectancy. Despite the possibility of a further recurrence or of a development in an invasive form, we are unable to select treatment of choice especially in the elderly. In particularly we risk an overtreatment of women at low risk of progression to invasive breast cancer. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the outcome of elderly patients affected by DCIS not undergoing Radiation Therapy (RT) after Breast Conserving Surgery (BCS). MATERIAL AND METHODS We reviewed our prospectively-maintained database from 1998 to 2013, selecting all women over 65 years old diagnosed with DCIS who did not receive RT for personal choice. We considered two groups, according to the risk of local recurrence (Low Risk (Group 1) vs. High Risk (Group 2)). RESULTS We identified 44 cases of DCIS treated with surgery alone or with surgery followed by adjuvant tamoxifen. 24 patients presented low risk of local recurrence (Group 1) and 20 had characteristics associated to high risk of local recurrence (Group 2). At a median follow-up of 66.3 months, no local recurrences have been described in group 1. No patients presented distant metastases, while 4 patients died for other causes. At a median follow-up of 72 months we observed 5 local recurrences in the second group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Our results suggest that radiation therapy can be safely avoided in a selected group of elderly patients affected by DCIS.

Mammographic findings after reshaping with autoprosthesis in women undergoing contralateral breast reconstruction and mastectomy.

Aims and background Breast reduction and mastopexy combined with inferior dermo-lipo-glandular flap (autoprosthesis) gives good breast shape, long-term projection, and upper pole fullness. We assess the impact on breast oncologic surveillance compared to other techniques. Methods A total of 105 patients who underwent mastectomy and reconstruction were divided into 3 groups of 35 patients each: groups 1 and 2 include patients with contralateral breast symmetrization performed with and without autoprosthesis technique, respectively. Group 3 is a control group without contralateral breast reshaping. On mammography, edema, skin thickening, architectural distortion, and calcifications were recorded, as well as further diagnostic examinations, biopsies, and surgical treatments required. Results Statistically significant differences (p<0.001) in the first follow-up mammography between groups 1 and 2 were stromal edema (6% vs 51%) and architectural distortion (74% vs 63%). The latest findings meant architectural distortion also have significant difference (p<0.001) in the last mammography (79% vs 66%). Microcalcification has statistically significant difference (p<0.001) in the latest postsurgical mammography, increased in group 1. Skin thickening had a similar course in either group. Mammography follow-up was not impaired in most cases notwithstanding the parenchyma distortion as compared with mammography after breast-conserving surgery. Four core biopsies were performed in both groups: 3 new breast cancers and 1 benign epithelial hyperplasia were found. Conclusions No difficulties were found impairing mammographic evaluation in patients treated with autoprosthesis as compared to other techniques.

Fat Grafting for Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Refinements in Breast Reconstruction: The Hybrid Autologous Reconstruction

Breast reconstruction performed using deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP) is currently applied in reconstructive microsurgery and can be considered the gold standard of autologous breast reconstruction. Nowadays it is important to focus on the aesthetic outcome recreating symmetrical natural-appearing breasts while preserving patient safety and quality of life. Clinical experience has shown that poor abdomen shape and partial marginal liponecrosis of the flap may follow large perforator flaps. Additional lipofilling procedures may be necessary to improve aesthetic outcomes of the reconstructed breast or abdominal donor site. In selected patients the abdomen is not the only source of fat that can be transferred to reconstruct the breast. In those patients we developed a two-stage procedure consisting in a first step with moderate-sized DIEP flap and a second one with fat injection harvested from different body areas. Usually one lipofilling injection was enough because of the high rate of fat intake in the highly vascularized new breast tissue. The authors call this procedure the Hybrid Autologous breast reconstruction.

How to Avoid Nipple–Areola Complex Complications in High-Grade Gynecomastia Patients Treated by Mastectomy: Surgical Pearls

Gynecomastia is an enlargement of the male breast common in both neonates and adolescent boys and senescent males. The authors discuss classification and the surgical treatment of gynecomastia as well as nonsurgical therapeutic options for treatment of gynecomastia that are based on medical therapy aimed to achieve a spontaneous regression of breast tissue regulating the hormonal imbalance. Described are the authors’ technique of performing the procedure and the results thereof.