Giuseppe Natalini

Arterial versus plethysmographic dynamic indices to test responsiveness for testing fluid administration in hypotensive patients : A clinical trial

In the present study, we compared indices of respiratory-induced variation obtained from direct arterial blood pressure measurement with analogous indices obtained from the plethysmogram measured by the pulse oximeter to assess the value of these indices for predicting the cardiac output increase in response to a fluid challenge. Thirty-two fluid challenges were performed in 22 hypotensive patients who were also monitored with a pulmonary artery catheter. Hemodynamic and plethysmographic data were collected before and after intravascular volume expansion. Patients were classified as nonresponders if their cardiac index did not increase by 15% from baseline. Nonresponding patients had both lower arterial pulse variation ([10 ± 4]% vs [19 ± 13]%, P = 0.020) and lower plethysmographic pulse variation ([12 ± 7]% vs [21 ± 14]%, P = 0.034) when compared with responders. Fluid responsiveness was similarly predicted by arterial and plethysmographic pulse variations (area under ROC curve 0.74 vs 0.72, respectively, P = 0.90) and by arterial and plethysmographic systolic variation (area under ROC curve 0.64 vs 0.72, respectively, P = 0.50). Nonresponders were identified by changes in pulse variation both on arterial and plethysmographic waveform (area under ROC curve 0.80 vs 0.87, respectively, P = 0.40) and by changes in arterial and plethysmographic systolic variations (area under ROC curve 0.84 vs 0.80, respectively, P = 0.76). In the population studied, plethysmographic dynamic indices of respiratory-induced variation were just as useful for predicting fluid responsiveness as the analogous indices derived from direct arterial blood pressure measurement. These plethysmographic indices could provide a noninvasive tool for predicting the cardiac output increase by administering fluid.

Variations in arterial blood pressure and photoplethysmography during mechanical ventilation

We analyzed ventilation-induced changes in arterial blood pressure and photoplethysmography from waveforms obtained by monitoring 57 patients in the operating room and intensive care unit. Analysis of systolic and pulse pressure variations during positive pressure ventilation, &Dgr;Up, &Dgr;Down, and changes in the preejection period on both arterial and photoplethysmographic waveforms were possible in 49 (86%) patients. The pulse pressure variation and preejection period were similar when calculated using both arterial blood pressure and photoplethysmography, whereas the other variables were different. Photoplethysmographic pulse variation >9% identified patients with arterial pulse pressure variation >13% (area under ROC curve = 0.85) or &Dgr;Down >5 mm Hg (area under ROC curve = 0.85). In hypotensive patients, photoplethysmographic pulse variation >9% remained the best threshold value (pulse pressure variation >13%: area under ROC curve = 0.90; &Dgr;Down >5 mm Hg: area under ROC curve = 0.93) for predicting fluid responsiveness. In conclusion, this study showed that pulse variations observed in the arterial pressure waveform and photoplethysmogram are similiar in response to positive pressure ventilation. Furthermore, photoplethysmographic pulse variation > 9% identifies patients with ventilation-induced arterial blood pressure variation that is likely to respond to fluid administration.

Pressure controlled versus volume controlled ventilation with laryngeal mask airway

STUDY OBJECTIVE To quantify the impact on peak airway pressure of pressure-controlled and volume-controlled ventilation during Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) use. DESIGN Prospective, crossover clinical study. SETTING University-affiliated hospital. PATIENTS 32 ASA physical status I and II patients undergoing general anesthesia with the LMA. INTERVENTIONS Patients were ventilated for three minutes both with pressure-controlled and volume-controlled ventilation, provided that tidal volume (V(T) ) and inspiratory time (It) were constant. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The monitored parameters were electrocardiography, arterial blood pressure, pulse oximetry, capnography, neuromuscular transmission, airway pressure and flow, and concentration of ventilated vapors and gases. The actually delivered V(T) was similar with both types of ventilation (volume-controlled = 0.67 +/- 0.13 lt, pressure-controlled = 0.67 +/- 0.14 lt; p = 0.688). Peak airway pressure was lower during pressure-controlled ventilation (14.6 +/- 3.5 cmH(2)O) than during volume-controlled ventilation (16 +/- 4 cmH(2)O) (p < 0.001). Furthermore, we noted that the higher the airway pressure with volume-controlled ventilation, the greater was the reduction in airway pressure during pressure-controlled ventilation. CONCLUSIONS Pressure-controlled rather than volume-controlled ventilation can improve the effectiveness of mechanical ventilation in patients with high airway pressure.

Remifentanil Improves Breathing Pattern and Reduces Inspiratory Workload in Tachypneic Patients

BACKGROUND: Properly titrated opiates decrease respiratory rate but do not affect tidal volume or induce respiratory acidosis. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether remifentanil improves breathing pattern or reduces inspiratory effort in patients with acute respiratory failure and tachypnea or rapid shallow breathing. METHODS: We studied 14 patients who developed tachypnea and/or rapid shallow breathing if the pressure support level was reduced. During pressure support ventilation, each patient received 30-min infusions, separated by 30 min, of remifentanil and placebo. Measurements were obtained before commencing and before stopping each infusion, and after 3 min of unassisted breathing. The main outcomes were rapid shallow breathing index and change in pressure-time product. RESULTS: Remifentanil did not significantly affect tidal volume. During pressure support ventilation, remifentanil infusion reduced respiratory rate, pressure-time product, and cardiovascular double product (heart rate × systolic arterial pressure) without modifying the sedation score. Mean PaCO2 showed a small and clinically negligible increase during remifentanil, but PaCO2 increased more in the hypercapnic patients than in the normocapnic patients. Remifentanil reduced the rapid shallow breathing index after 3 min of unassisted breathing. CONCLUSIONS: Remifentanil improved respiratory pattern and decreased inspiratory muscles effort in patients with tachypnea or rapid shallow breathing, but did not affect oxygenation or sedation. Though the acid-base balance did not show clinically relevant changes on average, we cannot exclude the possibility that remifentanil might prolong weaning in hypercapnic patients. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT00665119)

Assessment of Factors Related to Auto-PEEP

BACKGROUND: Previous physiological studies have identified factors that are involved in auto-PEEP generation. In our study, we examined how much auto-PEEP is generated from factors that are involved in its development. METHODS: One hundred eighty-six subjects undergoing controlled mechanical ventilation with persistent expiratory flow at the beginning of each inspiration were enrolled in the study. Volume-controlled continuous mandatory ventilation with PEEP of 0 cm H2O was applied while maintaining the ventilator setting as chosen by the attending physician. End-expiratory and end-inspiratory airway occlusion maneuvers were performed to calculate respiratory mechanics, and tidal flow limitation was assessed by a maneuver of manual compression of the abdomen. RESULTS: The variable with the strongest effect on auto-PEEP was flow limitation, which was associated with an increase of 2.4 cm H2O in auto-PEEP values. Moreover, auto-PEEP values were directly related to resistance of the respiratory system and body mass index and inversely related to expiratory time/time constant. Variables that were associated with the breathing pattern (tidal volume, frequency minute ventilation, and expiratory time) did not show any relationship with auto-PEEP values. The risk of auto-PEEP ≥5 cm H2O was increased by flow limitation (adjusted odds ratio 17; 95% CI: 6–56.2), expiratory time/time constant ratio <1.85 (12.6; 4.7–39.6), respiratory system resistance >15 cm H2O/L s (3; 1.3–6.9), age >65 y (2.8; 1.2–6.5), and body mass index >26 kg/m2 (2.6; 1.1–6.1). CONCLUSIONS: Flow limitation, expiratory time/time constant, resistance of the respiratory system, and obesity are the most important variables that affect auto-PEEP values. Frequency expiratory time, tidal volume, and minute ventilation were not independently associated with auto-PEEP. Therapeutic strategies aimed at reducing auto-PEEP and its adverse effects should be primarily oriented to the variables that mainly affect auto-PEEP values.

Cardiac index and oxygen delivery during low and high tidal volume ventilation strategies in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a crossover randomized clinical trial

IntroductionThe beneficial effect of low tidal volume (TV) ventilation strategy on mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has been attributed to the protective effect on ventilator-induced lung injury, and yet its effect on cardiovascular function might also play an important role. The aim of this study was to assess whether low TV ventilation improves cardiac output and oxygen delivery compared with high TV ventilation strategy in patients with ARDS.MethodsIn this crossover randomized clinical trial 16 ARDS patients were recruited in an intensive care unit at a university-affiliated hospital. Each patient was ventilated for 30 min with low (6 mL/kg) and 30 min with high (12 mL/kg) TV. The two experimental periods, applied in random order and with allocation concealment, were separated by 30 min of basal ventilation. Minute ventilation was constantly maintained by appropriate respiratory rate changes.ResultsCompared with high TV ventilation, low TV ventilation showed decreased pH (7.37 vs. 7.41, P = 0.001) and increased PaCO2 (49 vs. 43 mmHg; P = 0.002). Cardiac index and oxygen delivery index were increased with low compared with high TV ventilation (3.9 vs. 3.5 L.min-1.m-2, P = 0.012, and 521 vs. 463 mL.min-1.m-2, P = 0.002, respectively), while oxygen extraction ratio decreased (0.36 vs. 0.44, P = 0.027). In four patients oxygen extraction ratio was >0.5 during high TV but not during low TV strategy. The magnitude of the change in cardiac index was positively associated with PaCO2 variation (P = 0.004), while it was unrelated to the magnitude of changes in TV and airway pressure. The decrease of cardiac index was predicted by PaCO2 reduction, with and area under ROC curve of 0.72.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that a low TV ventilation strategy increases cardiac index and oxygen delivery, thus supporting the hypothesis that the beneficial effect of low TV ventilation in patients with ARDS could be partially explained by hemodynamic improvement. In other words, low tidal volume ventilation could be protective also for the cardiovascular system and not only for the lung. The slight increase of PaCO2 during low TV ventilation seems to predict the increase of cardiac index.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00713713

Prediction of arterial pressure increase after fluid challenge.

BackgroundMean arterial pressure above 65 mmHg is recommended for critically ill hypotensive patients whereas they do not benefit from supranormal cardiac output values. In this study we investigated if the increase of mean arterial pressure after volume expansion could be predicted by cardiovascular and renal variables. This is a relevant topic because unnecessary positive fluid balance increases mortality, organ dysfunction and Intensive Care Unit length of stay.MethodsThirty-six hypotensive patients (mean arterial pressure < 65 mmH) received a fluid challenge with hydroxyethyl starch. Patients were excluded if they had active bleeding and/or required changes in vasoactive agents infusion rate in the previous 30 minutes. Responders were defined by the increase of mean arterial pressure value to over 65 mmHg or by more than 20% with respect to the value recorded before fluid challenge. Measurements were performed before and at one hour after the end of fluid challenge.ResultsTwenty-two patients (61%) increased arterial pressure after volume expansion. Baseline heart rate, arterial pressure, central venous pressure, central venous saturation, central venous to arterial PCO2 difference, lactate, urinary output, fractional excretion of sodium and urinary sodium/potassium ratio were similar between responder and non-responder. Only 7 out of 36 patients had valuable dynamic indices and then we excluded them from analysis. When the variables were tested as predictors of responders, they showed values of areas under the ROC curve ranging between 0.502 and 0.604. Logistic regression did not reveal any association between variables and responder definition.ConclusionsFluid challenge did not improve arterial pressure in about one third of hypotensive critically ill patients. Cardiovascular and renal variables did not enable us to predict the individual response to volume administration.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00721604.