Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Giuseppe Trifirò is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Giuseppe Trifirò.


Annals of Surgical Oncology | 2003

Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Microinvasive Breast Cancer

Mattia Intra; Stefano Zurrida; Fausto Maffini; Angelica Sonzogni; Giuseppe Trifirò; Roberto Gennari; Paolo Arnone; Guillermo Bassani; Antonio Opazo; Giovanni Paganelli; Giuseppe Viale; Umberto Veronesi

AbstractBackground:Ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion (DCISM) is a separate pathological entity, distinct from pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). DCISM is a true invasive breast carcinoma with a well-known metastatic potential. Currently, there is controversy regarding the indication for complete axillary dissection (CAD) to stage the axilla in patients with DCISM. The role of CAD is questioned given its morbidity and reported low incidence of axillary involvement. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) may obviate the need for CAD in these patients without compromising the staging of the axilla and the important prognostic information. Methods:From March 1996 to December 2002, 4602 consecutive patients with invasive breast carcinoma underwent SLN biopsy. Of these, 41 patients with DCISM were selected. Results:Metastasis in the SLN were detected in 4 of 41 (9.7%) patients. Two of the 4 patients had only micrometastasis in the SLN. In three patients, the SLN was the only positive node after CAD. Conclusions:SLN biopsy should be considered as a standard procedure in DCISM patients. SLNB can detect nodal micrometastasis and accurately stage the axilla avoiding the morbidity of a CAD. Complete AD may not be mandatory if only the SLN contains micrometastatic disease. Informed consent is very important in the decision not to undergo CAD.


Annals of Surgical Oncology | 2009

Joint Practice Guidelines for Radionuclide Lymphoscintigraphy for Sentinel Node Localization in Oral/Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Lee W. T. Alkureishi; Zeynep Burak; Julio Alvarez; James R. Ballinger; Anders Bilde; Alan J. Britten; Luca Calabrese; Carlo Chiesa; Arturo Chiti; R. de Bree; H. W. Gray; Keith D. Hunter; Adorján F. Kovács; Michael Lassmann; Charles R. Leemans; G. Mamelle; Mark McGurk; Jakob Mortensen; Tito Poli; Taimur Shoaib; Philip Sloan; Jens Ahm Sørensen; Sandro J. Stoeckli; Jørn Bo Thomsen; Giuseppe Trifirò; Jochen A. Werner; Gary L. Ross

Involvement of the cervical lymph nodes is the most important prognostic factor for patients with oral/oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), and the decision of whether to electively treat patients with clinically negative necks remains a controversial topic. Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) provides a minimally invasive method for determining the disease status of the cervical node basin, without the need for a formal neck dissection. This technique potentially improves the accuracy of histologic nodal staging and avoids overtreating three-quarters of this patient population, minimizing associated morbidity. The technique has been validated for patients with OSCC, and larger-scale studies are in progress to determine its exact role in the management of this patient population. This document is designed to outline the current best practice guidelines for the provision of SNB in patients with early-stage OSCC, and to provide a framework for the currently evolving recommendations for its use. Preparation of this guideline was carried out by a multidisciplinary surgical/nuclear medicine/pathology expert panel under the joint auspices of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) Oncology Committee and the Sentinel European Node Trial (SENT) Committee.


Nuclear Medicine Communications | 2004

Sentinel node biopsy in male breast cancer

Concetta De Cicco; Silvia M. Baio; Paolo Veronesi; Giuseppe Trifirò; Antonio Ciprian; Annarita Vento; Joel Rososchansky; Giuseppe Viale; Giovanni Paganelli

ObjectiveMale breast cancer is a rare disease and axillary status is the most important prognostic indicator. Lymphoscintigraphy associated with gamma-probe guided surgery has been proved to reliably detect sentinel nodes in female patients with breast cancer. This study evaluates the feasibility of the surgical identification of sentinel node by using lymphoscintigraphy and a gamma-detecting probe in male patients, in order to select subjects who would be suitable for complete axillary lymphadenectomy. MethodsColloid human albumin labelled with 99Tc was administered to 18 male patients with breast cancer and clinically negative axillary lymph nodes. Lymphoscintigraphy was performed the day before surgery. An intraoperative gamma-detecting probe was used to identify sentinel nodes during surgery. ResultsLymphoscintigraphy and biopsy of the sentinel node were successful in all cases. A total of 20 sentinel nodes were removed. Pathological examinations showed 11 infiltrating ductal carcinomas, two intraductal carcinomas and five intracystic papillary carcinomas. Six patients (33%) had positive sentinel node (micrometastases were found in three patients). These patients underwent axillary dissection; in five of them (83%) the sentinel node was the only positive node. Twelve patients (67%) showed negative sentinel nodes; in all of them no further surgical treatments were planned. ConclusionsAs in women, lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel node biopsy under the guidance of a gamma-detecting probe proved to be an easy method for the detection of sentinel nodes in male breast carcinoma. In male patients with early stage cancer, sentinel node biopsy might represent the standard surgical procedure in order to avoid unnecessary morbidity after surgery, preserving accurate staging of the disease in the axilla.


Annals of Surgical Oncology | 2005

Second biopsy of axillary sentinel lymph node for reappearing breast cancer after previous sentinel lymph node biopsy

Mattia Intra; Giuseppe Trifirò; Giuseppe Viale; Nicole Rotmensz; Oreste Gentilini; Javier Soteldo; Viviana Galimberti; Paolo Veronesi; Alberto Luini; Giovanni Paganelli; Umberto Veronesi

BackgroundSentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a safe and accurate axillary staging procedure for patients with primary operable breast cancer. An increasing proportion of these patients undergo breast-conserving surgery, and 5% to 15% will develop local relapses that necessitate reoperation. Although a previous SLNB is often considered a contraindication for a subsequent SLNB, few data support this concern.MethodsBetween January 2000 and June 2004, 79 patients who were previously treated at our institution with breast-conserving surgery and who had a negative SLNB for early breast cancer developed, during follow-up, local recurrence that was amenable to reoperation. Eighteen of these patients were offered a second SLNB because of a clinically negative axillary status an average of 26.1 months after the primary event.ResultsIn all 18 patients (7 with ductal carcinoma-in-situ and 11 with invasive recurrences), preoperative lymphoscintigraphy showed an axillary sentinel lymph node, with a preoperative identification rate of 100%, and 1 or more SLNs (an average of 1.3 per patient) were surgically removed. Sentinel lymph node metastases were detected in two patients with invasive recurrence, and a complete axillary dissection followed. At a median follow up of 12.7 months, no axillary recurrences have occurred in patients who did not undergo axillary dissection.ConclusionsSecond SLNB after previous SLNB is technically feasible and likely effective in selected breast cancer patients. A larger population and longer follow-up are necessary to confirm these preliminary data.


European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | 2004

Optimised nuclear medicine method for tumour marking and sentinel node detection in occult primary breast lesions

C. De Cicco; Giuseppe Trifirò; Mattia Intra; G. Marotta; A. Ciprian; A. Frasson; Gennaro Prisco; Alberto Luini; Giuseppe Viale; Giovanni Paganelli

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of sentinel node (SN) biopsy in occult breast lesions with different radiopharmaceuticals and to establish the optimal lymphoscintigraphic method to detect both occult lesions and SNs (SNOLL: sentinel node and occult lesion localisation). Two hundred and twenty-seven consecutive patients suspected to have clinically occult breast carcinoma were enrolled in the study. In addition to the radioguided occult lesion localisation (ROLL) procedure, using macroaggregates of technetium-99m labelled human serum albumin (MAA) injected directly into the lesion, lymphoscintigraphy was performed with nanocolloids (NC) injected in a peritumoral (group I) or a subdermal site (group II). In group III, a sole injection of NC was done into the lesion in order to perform both ROLL and SNOLL. Overall, axillary SNs were identified in 205 of the 227 patients (90.3%). In 12/62 (19.4%) patients of group I and 9/79 (11.4%) patients of group III, radioactive nodes were not visualised, whereas SNs were successfully localised in 85 of 86 patients of group II (P<0.001). Pathological findings revealed breast carcinoma in 148/227 patients (65.2%) and benign lesions in 79 (34.8%). A total of 131 axillary SNs were removed in 118 patients with breast carcinoma; intraoperative examination of the SNs revealed metastatic involvement in 16 out of 96 cases of invasive carcinoma (16.7%). It is concluded that the combination of the ROLL procedure with direct injection of MAA into the lesion and lymphoscintigraphy performed with subdermal injection of radiocolloids represents the method of choice for accurate localisation of both non-palpable lesions and SNs.


Annals of Surgical Oncology | 2007

Occult breast lesion localization plus sentinel node biopsy (SNOLL): Experience with 959 patients at the European Institute of Oncology

Simonetta Monti; Viviana Galimberti; Giuseppe Trifirò; Concetta De Cicco; Nicolas Peradze; Fabricio Brenelli; Julia Fernandez-Rodriguez; Nicole Rotmensz; Antuono Latronico; Anastasio Berrettini; Manuela Mauri; Leonidas Machado; Alberto Luini; Giovanni Paganelli

BackgroundNon-palpable breast lesions are diagnosed frequently posing the problem of localization and removal. When such lesions are malignant, axillary node status must be determined. We report our experience using radio-guided occult lesion localization (ROLL) for locating and removing non-palpable breast lesions together with sentinel node biopsy (SNB) to assess axillary status. We call the technique SNOLL.MethodsFrom March 1997 to April 2004, 1046 consecutive patients presented suspicious non-palpable breast lesions and were programmed for conservative surgery and SNB. In 87 patients intraoperative histological examination revealed a benign lesion and SNB was not performed. The remaining 959 patients, with cytologically or histologically proven cancer, underwent SNOLL with immobile radiotracer injected under mammographic or ultrasound (US) guidance into the lesion, and subsequent injection of mobile tracer subdermally to localize the sentinel node (SN). Patients then underwent breast surgery and SNB.ResultsBreast lesions were localized by ROLL in 99.6% of cases and were removed radically with negative margins in 91.9% of cases. Sentinel nodes were detected in all but one case. Intraoperative or definitive histological examination revealed 776 invasive/microinvasive carcinomas and 182 with in situ disease. Sentinel nodes were positive in 154 (19.8%) of 776 invasive/microinvasive cancers and in two with ductal intraepithelial neoplasia (1.1%).ConclusionsIn SNOLL the injection procedures are performed separately, but both lesion and SNs are removed together; axillary dissection is performed if the SN is positive, thus definitive treatment of malignant non-palpable lesions occurs in a single surgical session.


British Journal of Surgery | 2007

Second axillary sentinel node biopsy for ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence.

Mattia Intra; Giuseppe Trifirò; Viviana Galimberti; Oreste Gentilini; Nicole Rotmensz; Paolo Veronesi

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the standard procedure for axillary staging in patients with primary operable breast cancer and uninvolved axillary nodes. These patients increasingly have breast‐conserving surgery (BCS), and 5 to 10 per cent develop ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence during follow‐up. If axillary nodes remain clinically uninvolved after a previous negative SLNB the question remains whether second SLNB is a suitable option.


Abdominal Imaging | 2010

Peritoneal carcinomatosis from ovarian cancer: the role of CT and [18F]FDG-PET/CT

L. Funicelli; Laura Lavinia Travaini; F. Landoni; Giuseppe Trifirò; L. Bonello; Massimo Bellomi

PurposeThe diagnosis of peritoneal carcinomatosis secondary to ovarian cancer is a real challenge in the cancer imaging field. In this retrospective study, we evaluate the accuracy of Single Detector Computed Tomography (SDCT), Multi Detector Computed Tomography (MDCT), and Positron Emission Tomography–Computed Tomography with F18-fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG-PET/CT) in the diagnosis of peritoneal seeding and we evaluate the possible applications of MDCT to predict the complete surgical removal of the peritoneal deposits.Methods and materialsA total of 228 scans (91 SDCT, 89 MDCT, and 48 [18F]FDG-PET/CT) of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis secondary to ovarian cancer proved at laparoscopy and confirmed by histopathology were retrospectively reviewed by two independent groups of Radiologists and Nuclear Medicine Physicians for the evaluation of ascites, peritoneal nodules, and omental cake signs.ResultsMDCT showed 81% of true positives, SDCT 72.5%, and [18F]FDG-PET/CT 77%. False negatives were 19% for MDCT, 27.5% for SDCT, and 23% for [18F]FDG-PET/CT.ConclusionFrom our results, we concluded that MDCT is the technique of choice in the diagnosis of peritoneal seeding, while [18F]FDG-PET/CT, though showing similar accuracy, remains the most accurate technique for monitoring therapeutic response and disease recurrence. MDCT could play an important role due to its ability to predict the possibility of complete surgical removal of disease thus influencing the treatment plan aimed to improve quality of life.


European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | 2006

Lymphatic mapping to tailor selective lymphadenectomy in cN0 tongue carcinoma: beyond the sentinel node concept.

C. De Cicco; Giuseppe Trifirò; Luca Calabrese; Roberto Bruschini; Mahila Ferrari; Laura Lavinia Travaini; Maurizio Fiorenza; Giuseppe Viale; Fausto Chiesa; Giovanni Paganelli

PurposeCervical lymph node status is the most important pathological determinant of prognosis and decision making in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The aim of this study was to demonstrate that lymphoscintigraphy (LS) can supply a complete map of the lymphatic drainage before surgery, allowing planning of the type of intervention and serving to guide lymphadenectomy.MethodsThe study population comprised 14 patients with T2–4 SCCs of the tongue and clinically negative lymph nodes in the neck (cN0) who were scheduled to undergo tumour resection and selective level I–IV neck dissection extended to level V. LS was performed in all patients following the injection of 99mTc-colloidal sulphide in three aliquots around the primary lesion. Dynamic, static and tomographic images of the head and neck were acquired. The operative specimens were subjected to lymphoscintigraphic evaluation. Preoperative and postoperative imaging results were compared with the pathological findings. All nodes were examined using haematoxylin-eosin staining.ResultsPreoperative LS was successful in all patients. Preferential pathways of lymphatic drainage were identified: level II of the neck was the most common lymphatic drainage pattern, followed by levels IV and III. Contralateral drainage occurred in 11 patients and in two of them metastatic nodes were found on the contralateral side. Metastases were observed only in radioactive lymph nodes.ConclusionLS is able to supply a complete map of the lymphatic drainage before surgery, making it possible to tailor selective neck dissection to each individual patient based on the results of preoperative mapping, thereby sparing healthy lymphatic tissue and reducing surgery-related morbidity.


Tumori | 2000

Detection of sentinel nodes by lymphoscintigraphy and gamma probe guided surgery in vulvar neoplasia

M. Sideri; C De Cicco; A Maggioni; N Colombo; L Bocciolone; Giuseppe Trifirò; M De Nuzzo; C Mangioni; Giovanni Paganelli

Background Pathologic lymph node status is the most important prognostic factor in vulvar cancer; however, complete inguinofemoral node dissection is associated with significant morbidity. Intraoperative lymphoscintigraphy associated with gamma detecting probe-guided surgery has proved to be reliable in the detection of sentinel node (SN) involvement in melanoma and breast cancer patients. The present study evaluates the feasibility of the surgical identification of inguinal sentinel nodes using lymphoscintigraphy and a gamma detecting probe in patients with early vulvar cancer. Methods Technetium-99-labeled colloid human albumin was administered perilesionally in 44 patients. Twenty patients had T1 and 23 had T2 invasive epidermoid vulvar cancer; one patient had a lower-third vaginal cancer. An intraoperative gamma detecting probe was used to identify SNs during surgery. Complete inguinofemoral node dissection was subsequently performed. SNs underwent separate pathologic evaluation. Results A total of 77 groins were dissected in 44 patients. SNs were identified in all the studied groins. Thirteen cases had positive nodes: the SN was positive in all of them; in 10 cases the SN was the only positive node. Thirty-one patients showed negative SNs: all of them were negative for lymph node metastasis. Conclusions Lymphoscintigraphy and SN biopsy under gamma detecting probe guidance proved to be an easy and reliable method for detection of SNs in early vulvar cancer. If these preliminary data will be confirmed, the technique would represent a real progress towards less aggressive treatment in patients with vulvar cancer.

Collaboration


Dive into the Giuseppe Trifirò's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Giovanni Paganelli

European Institute of Oncology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Laura Lavinia Travaini

European Institute of Oncology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Giuseppe Viale

European Institute of Oncology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Viviana Galimberti

European Institute of Oncology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paolo Veronesi

European Institute of Oncology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alberto Luini

European Institute of Oncology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mattia Intra

European Institute of Oncology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alessandro Testori

European Institute of Oncology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Giovanni Mazzarol

European Institute of Oncology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Javier Soteldo

European Institute of Oncology

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge