Giuseppina Trincas
University of Cagliari
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Giuseppina Trincas.
Journal of Affective Disorders | 2014
Mauro Giovanni Carta; Maria Francesca Moro; Lorena Lorefice; Giuseppina Trincas; Eleonora Cocco; E. Del Giudice; Giuseppe Fenu; Francesc Colom; Maria Giovanna Marrosu
BACKGROUND The aim was to determine the risk of Mood Disorders (MD), particularly Bipolar Disorders (BD), in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) using standardized psychiatric diagnostic tools. METHODS Case-control study. CASES 201 consecutive-patients with MS. CONTROLS 804 sex- and age-matched subjects without MS, randomly selected from a database concurrently used for an epidemiological study on the MD prevalence in the community. Psychiatric diagnoses according to DSM-IV were determined by physicians using structured interview tools (ANTAS-SCID). RESULTS Compared to controls, MS patients had a higher lifetime prevalence of DSM-IV Major Depressive Disorders (MDD; P<0.0001), BD I (P=0.05), BD II (P<0.0001) and Cyclothymia (P=0.0001). As people with MS had a higher risk of depressive and bipolar spectrum disorders, ratio MDD/bipolar spectrum disorders was lower among cases (P<0.005) indicating a higher association with Bipolar Spectrum Disorders and MS. LIMITATIONS MS diagnosis was differently collected in cases and controls. Even if this might have produced false negatives in controls, it would have reinforced the null hypothesis of no increased risk for MD in MS; therefore, it does not invalidate the results of the study. CONCLUSIONS This study was the first to show an association between BD and MS using standardized diagnostic tools and a case-control design. The results suggest a risk of under-diagnosis of BD (particularly type II) in MS and caution in prescribing ADs to people with depressive episodes in MS without prior excluding BD. The association between auto-immune degenerative diseases (like MS) and BD may be an interesting field for the study of the pathogenic hypothesis.
Journal of Affective Disorders | 2014
Mauro Giovanni Carta; Maria Francesca Moro; Lorena Lorefice; A. Picardi; Giuseppina Trincas; Giuseppe Fenu; Eleonora Cocco; F. Floris; Daniel Bessonov; H.S. Akiskal; M. G. Marrosu
BACKGROUND The purpose is to measure the worsening of the Quality of Life (QoL) in people with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and the concomitant role of co-morbid Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and Bipolar Disorder (BD), the latter not yet studied even though it was found strictly associated with MS. METHODS CASES 201 consecutive-MS-patients. CONTROLS 804 sex-and-age-matched subjects without MS, randomly selected from an epidemiological database study. Psychiatric diagnoses according to DSM-IV were determined by physicians using structured interview tools (ANTAS-SCID). Bipolar Spectrum Disorders were identified by Mood Disorders Questionnaire (MDQ). QoL was measured by SF-12. RESULTS MS was the strongest determinant in worsening the QoL in the overall sample. Both MDD and BD type-II lifetime diagnoses were significantly associated with a poorer quality of life in the total sample as in cases of MS. In MS the impairment of the QoL attributable to BD type-II was even greater than that in MDD. LIMITATIONS The MS diagnosis was made differently in cases and controls. Although this may have produced false negatives in controls, it would have reinforced the null hypothesis (no role of MS in worsening the QoL); therefore, it does not invalidate the study. CONCLUSIONS MDD as well BD type-II are co-determinants in worsening QoL in MS. Clinicians should consider depressive symptoms as well as the hypomanic and mixed components in MS. Additional research is required to confirm our results and further clarify the manner in which BD and the mixed symptoms of BD type-II may affect awareness of both the underlying disease and psychiatric component and finally to what extent they impact treatment adherence with the available therapies for MS.
Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health | 2015
Roberta Agabio; Giuseppina Trincas; Francesca Floris; Gioia Mura; Federica Sancassiani; Matthias C. Angermeyer
Background: Alcohol use in adolescents constitutes a major public health concern. Europe is the heaviest drinking region of the world. Several school-based alcohol prevention programs have been developed but it is not clear whether they are really effective. The present study was aimed at identifying the typology with the best evidence of effectiveness in European studies. Methods: A systematic search of meta-analyses and/or randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on interventions school-based prevention programs aimed at preventing alcohol consumption or changing the attitudes to consume alcohol. Results: A meta-analysis published in 2011 and 12 RCTs more recently published were identified. The meta-analysis evaluated 53 RCTs but only 11.3% of them were conducted in Europe. Globally, 23 RCTs (43.4%) showed some evidence of effectiveness, and 30 RCTs (56.6%) did not find significant difference between the groups. According to the conclusions of the meta-analysis, the Unplugged program should be considered as a practice option in Europe. Among the other 12 RCTs, 42% were conducted in Europe. Globally, 7 studies (58.3%) achieved positive results, and 5 studies (41.7%) did not find significant differences or produced a mixed pattern of results. Three of the 5 European trials (60%) used the Unplugged program with positive results. Conclusion: Even if further studies should be conducted to confirm these results, Unplugged appears to be the prevention project with the best evidence of effectiveness in European studies.
BMC Psychiatry | 2013
Mauro Giovanni Carta; Matthias C. Angermeyer; Federica Sancassiani; Francesco Tuligi; Roberto Pirastu; Anna Pisano; Elisa Pintus; Gisa Mellino; Mirra Pintus; Emanuele Pisanu; Maria Francesca Moro; Davide Massidda; Giuseppina Trincas; Dinesh Bhugra
BackgroundThis survey followed a cohort of patients with chronic psychosis recruited from five catchment areas (DSMs) of the Sardinian community mental health services. The objective was to examine whether the amount of resources in the different sites may be a determinant of the outcomes.MethodsNaturalistic follow-up study on 309 consecutive users with diagnosis of schizophrenic disorder, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar affective disorder with psychotic symptoms (DSM-IV TR) of five Sardinian community mental health services. Mental state and clinical symptoms along with functioning were assessed using semi-structured clinical interviews (ANTAS), Clinical Global Impression Severity Scale (CGI-S), Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF) and Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HONOS). Assessments were conducted at the beginning of the study and after one year.ResultsThe proportion of professionals working in all DSMs participating in the study was found lower than the national Italian standard (0.7 vs 1.0 per 1,500 inhabitants). Follow-up revealed significant differences between DSMs in the improvement of the Honos scores (F = 5.932, p = 0.000). These differences correlate with the improvement of resources in terms of number of professionals during, and one year prior, to the trial.ConclusionsThe study shows that mental health services provided in the public sector in Sardinia are still very resource-poor, at least in terms of human resources. Our findings suggest that mental health service resources influence outcomes as regards the social functioning of users. We urge policy makers to take these observations into account when planning future services.
Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health | 2017
Federica Sancassiani; Stefano Lorrai; Giulia Cossu; Alessio Cocco; Giuseppina Trincas; Francesca Floris; Gisa Mellino; Sergio Machado; Antonio Egidio Nardi; Elisabetta Pascolo Fabrici; Antonio Preti; Mauro Giovanni Carta
Introduction: Physical activity helps to improve several clinical outcomes of people with severe psychosocial disabilities. The aims of this study were; 1) to assess the efficacy of a psychosocial rehabilitative intervention focused on sailing in a crew on: a) social functioning; b) severity of the psychosocial disability; c) general functioning; d) dysregulation of biorhythms of people with severe psychosocial disabilities, and 2) to evaluate the attenders’ satisfaction about the project. Methods: A randomized waitlist controlled trial with parallel groups was carried out involving 51 people with severe psychosocial disabilities. The intervention was a 3 months-lasting course to learn sailing in a crew. Just after the randomization, a group began the sailing course and the other group (wait list) attended the sailing course after 3 months of treatments as usual. Before and after the sailing course, as well as the waiting list period, all attenders were assessed by HoNOS, GAF, CGI-S and BRIAN. At the end of the sailing course, they completed also a self-report satisfaction questionnaire. Results: Social functioning significantly improved after the sailing course (HoNOS total score “time X group”: p=0.011), mainly because of the improvement of psychopathological symptoms (HoNOS symptoms score “time X group”: p=0.003). Furthermore, participants greatly appreciated the rehabilitative program based on sailing in a crew. Conclusions: When compared to more traditional rehabilitative activities that are usually carried out in mental health services, a psychosocial rehabilitative intervention based on sailing in a crew significantly improve the social functioning of people with severe psychosocial disabilities.
Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health | 2017
Federica Sancassiani; Alessio Cocco; Giulia Cossu; Stefano Lorrai; Giuseppina Trincas; Francesca Floris; Gisa Mellino; Sergio Machado; Antonio Egidio Nardi; Elisabetta Pascolo Fabrici; Antonello Preti; Mauro Giovanni Carta
Introduction: It has been proposed that sailing can improve quality of life, personal and social skills of people with severe psychosocial disabilities. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a psychosocial rehabilitative intervention focused on sailing on quality of life, self-efficacy and sense of coherence in people with severe psychosocial disabilities. Methods: The study was a randomized, with parallel groups, waiting-list controlled trial. Participants were 51 people with severe psychosocial disabilities. The intervention was a structured course to learn sailing in a crew lasting three months. A randomized group began the sailing course immediately after a pre-treatment assessment; the waitlist group began the sailing course after a three months period of treatments as usual. Participants were assessed before and after the sailing course, or the waiting list period, on the General Self-Efficacy scale (GSES), Sense Of Coherence scale (SOC) and Health Survey-short form (SF-12). Results: Self-efficacy significantly increased after the sailing course and decreased after treatment as usual (p=0.015). Sense of coherence and the levels of quality of life tended to improve after the sailing course, albeit below levels of statistical significance. Conclusion: When compared to more traditional psychosocial rehabilitative activities, an intervention focused on sailing in a crew positively impacts the sense of coherence and the levels of quality of life and significantly improves self-efficacy of people with severe psychosocial disabilities. Further longitudinal research is required.
Archive | 2015
Mauro Giovanni Carta; Maria Francesca Moro; Giuseppina Trincas; Lorena Lorefice; Eleonora Cocco; Maria Giovanna Marrosu
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neurological disorder with high prevalence among young adults and a heavy impact on quality of life. Co-morbidity of MS and mood disorders has relevance because these disorders may interact with MS, thus increasing the burden of disability and worsening the course of illness and quality of life.
Rheumatology International | 2014
Sergio Mameli; G. M. Pisanu; S. Sardo; A Marchi; A. Pili; M. Carboni; Luigi Minerba; Giuseppina Trincas; Mauro Giovanni Carta; Maria Rosaria Melis; Roberta Agabio
Neurological Sciences | 2015
Lorena Lorefice; Giuseppe Fenu; Giuseppina Trincas; Maria Francesca Moro; Jessica Frau; Giancarlo Coghe; Eleonora Cocco; Maria Giovanna Marrosu; Mauro Giovanni Carta
Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health | 2017
Federica Sancassiani; Alessio Cocco; Giulia Cossu; Stefano Lorrai; Giuseppina Trincas; Francesca Floris; Gisa Mellino; Sergio Machado; Antonio Egidio Nardi; Elisabetta Pascolo Fabrici; Antonello Preti; Mauro Giovanni Carta