Glen L. Urban
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Glen L. Urban.
Journal of Marketing | 2005
Yakov Bart; Venkatesh Shankar; Fareena Sultan; Glen L. Urban
This research investigates the determinants and role of consumer trust in e-business. It examines consumer perceptions of trust in a Web site and addresses the following key research questions: What factors influence consumer trust in a Web site and what specific Web site trust cues are associated with these factors? How does trust affect consumer behavioral intent on a Web site? To address these questions, we develop a conceptual model that links consumer perceptions of Web site characteristics, consumer characteristics and demographics to perceptions of trust in a Web site, and trust to behavioral intent related to a Web site. We also examine whether trust mediates the relationship between Web site and consumer characteristics and behavioral intent related to the Web site. We test our hypotheses in a large-scale empirical study that estimates this model from 6831 consumers across 25 Web sites and eight industry categories. We validate the model using a holdout sample. The results show that Web site, consumer, category and demographic variables can explain 76% of the variance in trust. Web site characteristics such as privacy and security, navigation, presentation, brand, and advice account for as much as 98% of this explained variance in Web site trust. Surprisingly, over 80% of the explained variance in Web trust is due to factors other than privacy and security-mainly navigation, brand, advice, absence of errors, and presentation. We also find that trust mediates the relationships between Web site and consumer characteristics and behavioral intent related to Web sites. The results offer important implications for Web site strategies that include the manipulation of factors influencing Web site trust to favorably impact consumer behavior at the Web site
Management Science | 1986
Glen L. Urban; Theresa Idella Carter; Steven P. Gaskin; Zofia Mucha
An empirical analysis indicates that the order of entry of a brand into a consumer product category is inversely related to its market share. Market share is modeled as a log linear function of order of entry, time between entries, advertising, and positioning effectiveness. The coefficients of the entry, advertising, and positioning variables are significant in a regression analysis on an initial sample of 82 brands across 24 categories. These findings are confirmed by predictions on 47 not previously analyzed brands in 12 categories. Managerial implications for pioneers and later entrants are identified.
Journal of Marketing | 2004
Glen L. Urban; John R. Hauser
By “listening in” to ongoing dialogues between customers and Web-based virtual advisers (e.g., Kelley Blue Books Auto Choice Advisor), the authors identify new product opportunities based on new combinations of customer needs. The data are available at little incremental cost and provide the scale necessary for complex products (e.g., 148 trucks and 129 customer needs in the authors’ application). The authors describe and evaluate the methodologies with formal analysis, Monte Carlo simulation (calibrated on real data), and a “proof-of-concept” application in the pickup-truck category (more than 1000 Web-based respondents). The application identified opportunities for new truck platforms worth approximately
Journal of Marketing Research | 1997
Glen L. Urban; John R. Hauser; William J. Qualls; Bruce D. Weinberg; Jonathan D. Bohlmann; Roberta A. Chicos
2.4 billion–
Journal of Consumer Research | 1986
John R. Hauser; Glen L. Urban
3.2 billion and
Review of Industrial Organization | 1994
William T. Robinson; Gurumurthy Kalyanaram; Glen L. Urban
1 billion–
Journal of Marketing Research | 1969
Glen L. Urban
2 billion, respectively.
Journal of Public Policy & Marketing | 2005
Glen L. Urban
Stable URL:http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022-2437%28199702%2934%3A1%3C143%3AIAVALF%3E2.0.CO%3B2-MJournal of Marketing Research is currently published by American Marketing Association.Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTORs Terms and Conditions of Use, available athttp://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTORs Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtainedprior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content inthe JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained athttp://www.jstor.org/journals/ama.html.Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printedpage of such transmission.The JSTOR Archive is a trusted digital repository providing for long-term preservation and access to leading academicjournals and scholarly literature from around the world. The Archive is supported by libraries, scholarly societies, publishers,and foundations. It is an initiative of JSTOR, a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help the scholarly community takeadvantage of advances in technology. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact [email protected]://www.jstor.orgSun Oct 21 14:33:01 2007
Journal of Consumer Research | 1979
John R. Hauser; Glen L. Urban
Based on the behavioral sciences and mathematical programming, we hypothesize that consumers rank durables by a value (or net value) priority approximated by utility per dollar (or utility minus price) and plan to choose items in that order up to a budget cutoff. This paper derives these hypotheses and develops a convergent linear programming procedure to estimate utility. Using primary field data on reservation prices, purchase probabilities, lottery orders, and combination prizes, we estimate utilities and compare the hypotheses to 215 actual budget plans. LISREL V analysis provides further support for the hypotheses.
International Journal of Research in Marketing | 2013
Guilherme Liberali; Glen L. Urban; John R. Hauser
Market pioneers can develop first-mover advantages that span decades. The most general first-mover advantage that helps explain higher pioneer market share levels is a broad product line or brand proliferation. In markets for experience goods, pioneers tend to shape consumer tastes and preferences in favor of the pioneering brand. While the preliminary results vary by industry, they indicate that market pioneers donot tend to perish more often than later entrants. Accounting profits for market pioneers generally are lower in the first four years of operation, but higher thereafter. Overall, market pioneers follow innovative strategies that have high initial costs and risks, but yield high potential returns.