Glen Wunderlich

Impulse Control Disorders in Parkinson Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study of 3090 Patients

CONTEXT An association between dopamine-replacement therapies and impulse control disorders (ICDs) in Parkinson disease (PD) has been suggested in preliminary studies. OBJECTIVES To ascertain point prevalence estimates of 4 ICDs in PD and examine their associations with dopamine-replacement therapies and other clinical characteristics. DESIGN Cross-sectional study using an a priori established sampling procedure for subject recruitment and raters blinded to PD medication status. PATIENTS Three thousand ninety patients with treated idiopathic PD receiving routine clinical care at 46 movement disorder centers in the United States and Canada. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The Massachusetts Gambling Screen score for current problem/pathological gambling, the Minnesota Impulsive Disorders Interview score for compulsive sexual behavior and buying, and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders research criteria for binge-eating disorder. RESULTS An ICD was identified in 13.6% of patients (gambling in 5.0%, compulsive sexual behavior in 3.5%, compulsive buying in 5.7%, and binge-eating disorder in 4.3%), and 3.9% had 2 or more ICDs. Impulse control disorders were more common in patients treated with a dopamine agonist than in patients not taking a dopamine agonist (17.1% vs 6.9%; odds ratio [OR], 2.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.08-3.54; P < .001). Impulse control disorder frequency was similar for pramipexole and ropinirole (17.7% vs 15.5%; OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.94-1.57; P = .14). Additional variables independently associated with ICDs were levodopa use, living in the United States, younger age, being unmarried, current cigarette smoking, and a family history of gambling problems. CONCLUSIONS Dopamine agonist treatment in PD is associated with 2- to 3.5-fold increased odds of having an ICD. This association represents a drug class relationship across ICDs. The association of other demographic and clinical variables with ICDs suggests a complex relationship that requires additional investigation to optimize prevention and treatment strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00617019.

Impulse control disorders in parkinson disease: A multicenter case–control study†

To assess factors associated with impulse control disorders (ICDs) in Parkinson disease (PD) using a multicenter case–control design.

Amantadine Use Associated with Impulse Control Disorders in Parkinson Disease in Cross-Sectional Study

A recent controlled clinical trial suggested a role for amantadine as a treatment for pathological gambling in patients with Parkinson disease (PD). Analyzing data from a large cross‐sectional study of impulse control disorders (ICDs) in PD, amantadine use (n = 728), vs no amantadine use (n = 2,357), was positively associated with a diagnosis of any ICD (17.6% vs 12.4%, p < 0.001) and compulsive gambling specifically (7.4% vs 4.2%, p < 0.001). This amantadine association remained after controlling for covariates of amantadine use, including both dopamine agonist use and levodopa dosage. Further research, including larger clinical trials, is needed to assess the role of amantadine in the development and treatment of ICDs in PD. Ann Neurol 2010

Reliability and Validity of the Sexual Interest and Desire Inventory–Female (SIDI-F), a Scale Designed to Measure Severity of Female Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder

The Sexual Interest and Desire Inventory–Female (SIDI-F) is a 13-item scale developed as a clinician-administered assessment tool to quantify the severity of symptoms in women diagnosed with hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD). The present investigation assessed the reliability and validity of the SIDI-F as a measure of HSDD severity. Results show that the SIDI-F exhibits excellent internal consistency, with Cronbachs alpha of 0.9. The validity of the SIDI-F as a measure of HSDD severity was confirmed by a number of observations. Women with a clinical diagnosis (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [DSM-IV-TR; American Psychiatric Association, 2000]) of HSDD had significantly lower SIDI-F scores than women not meeting diagnostic criteria for any subtype of female sexual dysfunction and women diagnosed with female orgasmic disorder. There was a high correlation between scores on the SIDI-F and scores on the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI; Rosen et al., 2000) and an interactive voice response version of the Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (CSFQ; Clayton, McGarvey, & Clavet, 1997; Clayton, McGarvey, Clavet, & Piazza, 1997), two validated measures that assess general female sexual dysfunction. In contrast, there was a poor correlation between SIDI-F scores and scores on a slightly modified Marital Adjustment Scale (Locke, Wallace, 1959; MAS), an assessment of general (nonsexual) relationship satisfaction. Taken together, the results of the present investigation indicate that the SIDI-F is a reliable and valid measure of HSDD severity, independent of relationship issues.

A multicenter randomized placebo‐controlled clinical trial of pramipexole for Tourette's syndrome

Dopamine agonists could theoretically normalize the suspected central dopamine hypersensitivity in Tourettes syndrome.

Validation of the Sexual Interest and Desire Inventory-Female in Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder

INTRODUCTION The Sexual Interest and Desire Inventory-Female (SIDI-F) is a 13-item scale developed as a clinician-administered assessment tool to measure hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) severity in women. AIM To estimate the reliability and validity of the SIDI-F as a measure of HSDD severity. METHODS Women, aged 18-65 years, with primary HSDD, Female Sexual Arousal Disorder (FSAD), or no Female Sexual Dysfunction (no FSD) participated in two nontreatment studies (in North America and Europe). On days 0 and 28, subjects were assessed using the SIDI-F, Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire-Female (CSFQ-F), Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Test (MAT) and the Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Discriminant validity, convergent validity, divergent validity, test-retest validity, and internal consistency of the SIDI-F. RESULTS The North American study enrolled women with HSDD (N = 113), FSAD (N = 49) and no FSD (N = 61); the European study enrolled women with HSDD (N = 130) and no FSD (N = 124). In both studies, mean SIDI-F total score for women with HSDD was lower than for those with no FSD (P < 0.001, for all) demonstrating discriminant validity. Further, mean SIDI-F total score for women with HSDD was lower than for those with FSAD in the North American study (P < 0.001). Convergent validity with the FSFI and CSFQ-F and divergent validity with MAT were demonstrated. Test-retest reliability and internal consistency were high. CONCLUSIONS The SIDI-F is a valid and reliable measure of HSDD severity in women.

eDiary and Female Sexual Distress Scale© in Evaluating Distress in Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder (HSDD)

Sex-related distress is integral to the diagnosis of hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD). This article describes the results of three prospective, non-treatment validation studies (two North American and one European), each testing over 200 participants with HSDD, other types of female sexual dysfunction (FSD), or no FSD in which the 12-item Female Sexual Distress Scale© (FSDS©), the 13-item FSDS–Revised©(FSDS–R©), and a single question asked using a daily electronic diary (the eDiary For HSDD Trials©; eDiary) were used to measure sex-related distress. FSDS results with 30- and seven-day recall were equivalent. The results observed with FSDS–R Item 13 (a single question assessing concern due to low sexual desire) were comparable to the FSDS. Mean eDiary monthly distress scores were closer to the minimum possible score (equivalent to “a little bit” of distress) and were about twice as variable as FSDS or FSDS–R Item 13 scores in participants with HSDD. All three measures confirmed that there is more distress in women with HSDD compared to women with no sexual dysfunction at all time points, demonstrating discriminant validity.

Cutoff Score of the Sexual Interest and Desire Inventory-Female for Diagnosis of Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder

OBJECTIVE To determine the most appropriate cutoff value for the Sexual Interest and Desire Inventory-Female (SIDI-F) score to discriminate between women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) and those with no female sexual dysfunction (FSD). The SIDI-F is a clinician-rated instrument consisting of 13 items designed to assess HSDD severity in women. The total score ranges from 0 to 51, with higher scores indicating better sexual function. METHODS Data from patients enrolled in a North American nontreatment study and a European nontreatment study were analyzed. Both studies were 4-week, prospective, multicenter trials designed to assess the reliability and validity of the SIDI-F. Only patients with HSDD or no FSD were included in this analysis. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was used to determine the ability of the SIDI-F to differentiate between patients with HSDD and those with no FSD at baseline. RESULTS A total of 428 women were included in this analysis: 174 from North America (HSDD 113, no FSD 61) and 254 from Europe (HSDD 130, no FSD 124). In the North American study, a SIDI-F cutoff score of 33 minimized the difference between sensitivity (94.7%) and specificity (93.4%). In the European study, SIDI-F cutoff scores of both 33 and 34 minimized the difference between sensitivity (95.2%) and specificity (94.4%). CONCLUSIONS In appropriately screened women, a SIDI-F score of ≤33 indicates the presence of HSDD.

The safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of BI 409306, a novel and potent PDE9 inhibitor: Overview of three Phase I randomised trials in healthy volunteers

Safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of BI 409306, a potent and selective phosphodiesterase 9A inhibitor, were assessed in healthy subjects in three Phase I, within-dose group, double-blind trials. Trial 1 randomised young and elderly subjects to receive BI 409306 25, 50, 100 mg, placebo once daily (OD) or BI 409306 50 mg twice daily (young) for 14 days. Trial 2 randomised young poor metabolisers (PM) of cytochrome P450 isoform 2C19 (CYP2C19) and elderly subjects to receive BI 409306 25, 50 mg or placebo OD for 14 days. Trial 3 randomised Chinese and Japanese extensive metabolisers of CYP2C19 to receive single doses (SD) of BI 409306 25, 50, 100 mg or placebo and Chinese (PM) to SD of BI 409306 100 mg or placebo (Part 1). Japanese PM received SD of BI 409306 100 mg or placebo (Day 1) followed by BI 409306 100 mg or placebo OD for 7 days after a 48-hour washout period (Part 2). Reported adverse events (AE) were mild-to-moderate intensity and increased with BI 409306 dose. Eye disorders were most commonly reported (Trial 1: 40.0-41.7%, Trial 2: 29.2-37.5%, Trial 3: 18.2-66.7%) and increased with dose and systemic exposure. PM reported more AEs than other treatment groups, corresponding to higher systemic exposure to BI 409306. Systemic exposure to BI 409306 produced dose-dependent increases and was slightly greater in elderly versus young subgroups (Trial 1). Steady state was achieved by Day 2-3. Overall, BI 409306 demonstrated good safety, tolerability and minor accumulation after multiple dosing.

Evaluation of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of BI 425809, a Novel GlyT1 Inhibitor: Translational Studies

BI 425809 is a potent and selective glycine transporter 1 (GlyT1) inhibitor being developed for the treatment of cognitive impairment in Alzheimer disease and schizophrenia. Translational studies evaluated the effects of BI 425809 on glycine levels in rat and human cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Oral administration of BI 425809 in rats induced a dose‐dependent increase of glycine CSF levels from 30% (0.2 mg/kg, not significant) to 78% (2 mg/kg, P < 0.01), relative to vehicle. Similarly, oral administration of BI 425809 in healthy volunteers resulted in a dose‐dependent increase in glycine CSF levels at steady state, with a mean 50% increase at doses as low as 10 mg. The peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of BI 425809 was achieved earlier in plasma than in CSF (tmax 3–5 vs. 5–8 hours, respectively). Generally, BI 425809 was safe and well tolerated. These data provide evidence of functional target engagement of GlyT1 by BI 425809.