Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Glenn Salkeld is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Glenn Salkeld.


Journal of the American Geriatrics Society | 1999

Home Visits by an Occupational Therapist for Assessment and Modification of Environmental Hazards: A Randomized Trial of Falls Prevention

Robert G. Cumming; Margaret Thomas; George Szonyi; Glenn Salkeld; Elizabeth O'Neill; Christine Westbury; Gina Frampton

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether occupational therapist home visits targeted at environmental hazards reduce the risk of falls.


Thrombosis and Haemostasis | 2014

Feasibility and cost-effectiveness of stroke prevention through community screening for atrial fibrillation using iPhone ECG in pharmacies: The SEARCH-AF study

Nicole Lowres; Lis Neubeck; Glenn Salkeld; Ines Krass; Andrew J. McLachlan; Julie Redfern; Alexandra A Bennett; Tom Briffa; Adrian Bauman; Carlos Martinez; Christopher Wallenhorst; J. Lau; David Brieger; Raymond W. Sy; S. B. Freedman

Atrial fibrillation (AF) causes a third of all strokes, but often goes undetected before stroke. Identification of unknown AF in the community and subsequent anti-thrombotic treatment could reduce stroke burden. We investigated community screening for unknown AF using an iPhone electrocardiogram (iECG) in pharmacies, and determined the cost-effectiveness of this strategy.Pharmacists performedpulse palpation and iECG recordings, with cardiologist iECG over-reading. General practitioner review/12-lead ECG was facilitated for suspected new AF. An automated AF algorithm was retrospectively applied to collected iECGs. Cost-effectiveness analysis incorporated costs of iECG screening, and treatment/outcome data from a United Kingdom cohort of 5,555 patients with incidentally detected asymptomatic AF. A total of 1,000 pharmacy customers aged ≥65 years (mean 76 ± 7 years; 44% male) were screened. Newly identified AF was found in 1.5% (95% CI, 0.8-2.5%); mean age 79 ± 6 years; all had CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2. AF prevalence was 6.7% (67/1,000). The automated iECG algorithm showed 98.5% (CI, 92-100%) sensitivity for AF detection and 91.4% (CI, 89-93%) specificity. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of extending iECG screening into the community, based on 55% warfarin prescription adherence, would be


BMJ | 2004

Inclusion of cost effectiveness in licensing requirements of new drugs: the fourth hurdle

Rod Taylor; Michael Drummond; Glenn Salkeld; Sean D. Sullivan

AUD5,988 (€3,142;


Social Science & Medicine | 1992

A cost utility analysis of mammography screening in Australia

Jane Hall; Karen Gerard; Glenn Salkeld; Jeff Richardson

USD4,066) per Quality Adjusted Life Year gained and


BMJ | 2005

Model of outcomes of screening mammography: information to support informed choices.

Alexandra Barratt; Kirsten Howard; Les Irwig; Glenn Salkeld; Nehmat Houssami

AUD30,481 (€15,993;


Nephrology | 2009

The cost effectiveness of increasing kidney transplantation and home based dialysis

Kirsten Howard; Glenn Salkeld; Sarah L. White; Stephen P. McDonald; Steve Chadban; Jonathan C. Craig; Alan Cass

USD20,695) for preventing one stroke. Sensitivity analysis indicated cost-effectiveness improved with increased treatment adherence.Screening with iECG in pharmacies with an automated algorithm is both feasible and cost-effective. The high and largely preventable stroke/thromboembolism risk of those with newly identified AF highlights the likely benefits of community AF screening. Guideline recommendation of community iECG AF screening should be considered.


Diseases of The Colon & Rectum | 2003

What do patients want? Patient preferences and surrogate decision making in the treatment of colorectal cancer

Michael J. Solomon; Chet K. Pager; Anil Keshava; Michael Findlay; Phyllis Butow; Glenn Salkeld; Rachael Roberts

Increasing numbers of countries are considering cost effectiveness in decisions about which drugs to make available for prescription. How do the different approaches work and is it time for standardisation?


Health Expectations | 2004

A matter of trust – patient's views on decision-making in colorectal cancer

Glenn Salkeld; Michael J. Solomon; Leonie Marjorie Short; Phyllis Butow

Cost utility analysis is the preferred method of analysis when quality of life instead is an important outcome of the project being appraised. However, there are several methodological issues to be resolved in implementing cost utility analysis, including whether to use generalised measures or direct disease specific outcome assessment, the choice of measurement technique, and the combination of different health states. Screening for breast cancer meets this criterion as mammographic screening has been shown to reduce mortality; and it is said that earlier treatment frequently results in less radical surgery so that women are offered the additional benefit of improved quality of life. Australia, like many other countries, has been debating whether to introduce a national mammographic screening programme. This paper presents the results of a cost utility analysis of breast cancer screening using an approach to measuring outcome, Healthy Year Equivalents, developed within this study to resolve these problems. Descriptions of breast cancer quality of life were developed from surveys of women with breast cancer, health professionals and the published literature. The time trade off technique was then used to derive values for breast cancer treatment outcomes in a survey of women in Sydney, Australia. Respondents included women with breast cancer and women who had not had breast cancer. Testing of (i) the effect of prognosis on the value attached to a health scenario; and (ii) whether the value attached to a health scenario remains constant over time has been reported. The estimate of the net costs of screening are reported. The costs of breast cancer screening include the screening programme itself, the further investigations and the subsequent treatment of breast cancer cases. Breast cancer is treated in the absence of screening, many commentators claim earlier treatment is costly but there is little evidence. Therefore we have investigated current patterns of breast cancer treatment, current use of investigations for women presenting with symptoms and current use of covert mammography screening. The results are extrapolated to obtain estimates of the costs and outcomes presented as cost per healthy year equivalent. This analysis produces important information for the Australian policy debate over mammography. It also contributes to the development of cost utility analysis and the approach developed here can be applied more generally.


Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health | 2000

The cost effectiveness of a home hazard reduction program to reduce falls among older persons

Glenn Salkeld; Robert G. Cumming; Margaret Thomas; George Szonyi; Christine Westbury; Elizabeth O'Neill

Abstract Objective To provide easy to use estimates of the benefits and harms of biennial screening mammography for women aged 40, 50, 60, and 70 years. Design Markov process model, with data from BreastScreen Australia, the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, and the Australian Bureau of Statistics. Main outcome measure Age specific outcomes expressed per 1000 women over 10 years. Results For every 1000 women screened over 10 years, 167-251 (depending on age) receive an abnormal result; 56-64 of these women undergo at least one biopsy, 9-26 have an invasive cancer detected by screening, and 3-6 have ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) detected by screening. More breast cancers (both invasive and DCIS) are diagnosed among screened than unscreened women. For example, among 1000 women aged 50 who have five biennial screens, 33 breast cancers are diagnosed: 28 invasive cancers (18 detected at screening and 10 interval cancers) and five DCIS (all detected at screening). By comparison, among 1000 women aged 50 who decline screening, 20 cancers are diagnosed over 10 years. There are about 0.5, 2, 3, and 2 fewer deaths from breast cancer over 10 years per 1000 women aged 40, 50, 60, and 70, respectively, who choose to be screened compared with women who decline screening at times determined by relevant policy. Conclusion Benefits and harms of screening mammography are relatively finely balanced. Quantitative estimates such as these can be used to support individual informed choices about screening.


BMJ | 2008

Communicating about screening

Vikki Entwistle; Stacy M. Carter; Lyndal Trevena; Kathy Flitcroft; Les Irwig; Kirsten McCaffery; Glenn Salkeld

Background:  Renal replacement therapy (RRT) consumes sizable proportions of health budgets internationally, but there is considerable variability in choice of RRT modality among and within countries with major implications for health outcomes and costs. We aimed to quantify these implications for increasing kidney transplantation and improving the rate of home‐based dialysis.

Collaboration


Dive into the Glenn Salkeld's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jesper Bo Nielsen

University of Southern Denmark

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael J. Solomon

Royal Prince Alfred Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge