Gloria del Solar

Rolling circle-replicating plasmids from Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria: a wall falls

Rolling circle‐replicating plasmids constitute a group of small, promiscuous multicopy replicons spread among eubacteria. Until recently, rolling circle replication seemed to be limited to small plasmids from Gram‐positive hosts and to single‐stranded bacteriophages from Gram‐negative bacteria. However, characterization of two small plasmids from Gram‐negative hosts has shown that this replication mechanism is general among eubacteria. This review focuses on a family of highly related promiscuous plasmids that replicate by the rolling circle mechanism, and that have been isolated from various Gram‐positive bacteria and from the Gram‐negative bacterium Helicobacter. They all share homologies at the leading‐strand origins and at the initiator of replication proteins. The plasmids of this family have directly repeated sequences at their plus origin of replication, which is located 5′ from the start point of the mRNA for the initiation of replication protein. Replication is controlled by an antisense RNA and by a transcriptional repressor protein. The features and regulatory circuits of replication of this plasmid family seem to be unique among rolling circle‐replicating plasmids. Members of this family replicate autonomously in Gram‐positive and‐negative hosts.

The structure of plasmid‐encoded transcriptional repressor CopG unliganded and bound to its operator

The structure of the 45 amino acid transcriptional repressor, CopG, has been solved unliganded and bound to its target operator DNA. The protein, encoded by the promiscuous streptococcal plasmid pMV158, is involved in the control of plasmid copy number. The structure of this protein repressor, which is the shortest reported to date and the first isolated from a plasmid, has a homodimeric ribbon–helix–helix arrangement. It is the prototype for a family of homologous plasmid repressors. CopG cooperatively associates, completely protecting several turns on one face of the double helix in both directions from a 13‐bp pseudosymmetric primary DNA recognition element. In the complex structure, one protein tetramer binds at one face of a 19‐bp oligonucleotide, containing the pseudosymmetric element, with two β‐ribbons inserted into the major groove. The DNA is bent 60° by compression of both major and minor grooves. The protein dimer displays topological similarity to Arc and MetJ repressors. Nevertheless, the functional tetramer has a unique structure with the two vicinal recognition ribbon elements at a short distance, thus inducing strong DNA bend. Further structural resemblance is found with helix–turn–helix regions of unrelated DNA‐binding proteins. In contrast to these, however, the bihelical region of CopG has a role in oligomerization instead of DNA recognition. This observation unveils an evolutionary link between ribbon–helix–helix and helix–turn–helix proteins.

Plasmid copy number control: an ever‐growing story

Bacterial plasmids maintain their number of copies by negative regulatory systems that adjust the rate of replication per plasmid copy in response to fluctuations in the copy number. Three general classes of regulatory mechanisms have been studied in depth, namely those that involve directly repeated sequences (iterons), those that use only antisense RNAs and those that use a mechanism involving an antisense RNA in combination with a protein. The first class of control mechanism will not be discussed here. Within the second class (the most ‘classical’ one), exciting insights have been obtained on the molecular basis of the inhibition mechanism that prevents the formation of a long‐range RNA structure (pseudoknot), which is an example of an elegant solution reached by some replicons to control their copy number. Among the third class, it is possible to distinguish between (i) cases in which proteins play an auxiliary role; and (ii) cases in which transcriptional repressor proteins play a real regulatory role. This latter type of regulation is relatively new and seems to be widespread among plasmids from Gram‐positive bacteria, at least for the rolling circle‐replicating plasmids of the pMV158 family and the theta‐replicating plasmids of the Inc18 streptococcal family.

The copy number of plasmid pLS1 is regulated by two trans‐acting plasmid products: the antisense RNA II and the repressor protein, RepA

The promiscuous plasmid pLS1 encodes two transacting elements that regulate its copy number: protein RepA and antisense RNA II. In vitro transcription showed that RNAs for both repressors are synthesized from two promoters, PAB and PII From PAB, genes encoding RepA (transcriptional repressor) and RepB (initiator of replication) are cotranscribed, the target of RepA being located within PAB Mutants in repA or in PAB are still sensitive to RepA. However, cloning of the repA gene in a compatible replicon did not result in incompatibility towards pLS1. From PII, the 50‐nucleotide RNA II is synthesized. The main incompatibility determinant towards pLS1 corresponds to the coding sequence for RNA II. The RNA II target could be reduced to 21 nucleotides, including the RepB initiation of translation signals. We propose that plasmids of the pLS1 family (pE194, pADB201, and pLB4) share functional and structural characteristics for the regulation of their copy numbers.

Replication of the promiscuous plasmid pLS1: a region encompassing the minus origin of replication is associated with stable plasmid inheritance.

Deletion of a region of the promiscuous plasmid pLS1 encompassing the initiation signals for the synthesis of the plasmid lagging strand led to plasmid instability in Streptococcus pneumoniae and Bacillus subtilis. This defect could not be alleviated by increasing the number of copies (measured as double-stranded plasmid DNA) to levels similar to those of the wild-type plasmid pLS1. Our results indicate that in the vicinity of, or associated with the single-stranded origin region of pLS1 there is a plasmid component involved in its stable inheritance. Homology was found between the DNA gyrase binding site within the par region of plasmid pSC101 and the pLS1 specific recombination site RSR.

Replication control of plasmid pLS1: efficient regulation of plasmid copy number is exerted by the combined action of two plasmid components, CopG and RNA II

Two elements, the products of genes copG and rnall, are involved in the copy‐number control of plasmid pLS1. RNA II is synthesized in a dosage‐dependent manner. Mutations in both components have been characterized. To determine the regulatory role of the two genes, we have cloned copG, rnall or both elements at various gene dosages into pLS1‐compatible plasmids. Assays of incompatibility towards wild‐type or mutant pLS1 plasmids showed that: (i) the rnall gene product, rather than the DNA sequence encoding it, is responsible for the incompatibility, and (ii) CopG and RNA II act in trans and are able to correct up fluctuations in pLS1 copy number. A correlation between the gene dosage at which the regulatory elements were supplied and the incompatibility effect on the resident plasmid was observed. The entire copG‐rnall circuit has a synergistic effect when compared with any of its components in the correction of pLS1 copy‐number fluctuations, indicating that, in the homoplasmid steady‐state situation, the control of pLS1 replication is exerted by the co‐ordinate action of CopG and RNA II.

Initiation of replication of plasmid pLS1. The initiator protein RepB acts on two distant DNA regions.

The broad host range streptococcal plasmid pLS1 encodes the 24.2 kDa protein RepB, which is involved in the initiation of plasmid replication by an asymmetric rolling circle. RepB was overproduced in an Escherichia coli expression system and the protein was purified and characterized. Determination of the amino-terminal sequence of RepB protein showed that translation starts from the first AUG codon, which is preceded by an atypical ribosome-binding site sequence. RepB protein has in vitro-specific endonuclease and topoisomerase-like activities on the plasmid ori(+). Footprinting experiments showed that RepB protein binds to a DNA region that includes three direct repeats of 11 base-pairs. Initiation of replication of pLS1 could start by a RepB-generated specific nick introduced on the plasmid coding strand. However, as a striking difference with other Gram-positive replicons, the nick generated by RepB lies 86 base-pairs upstream from its binding region. To explain the action of RepB at a distance, complex structures of the pLS1 ori(+) are proposed.

Replication control of plasmid pLS1: the antisense RNA II and the compact rnaII region are involved in translational regulation of the initiator RepB synthesis

Replication of the streptococcal plasmid pLS1 is controlled by two plasmid‐encoded gene products: the repressor protein CopG and the antisense RNA, RNA II. Two different mutants in rnaII have been isolated. The 5′‐end and the levels of RNA II synthesized by pneumococcal cells harbouring the wild‐type pLS1 or mutant plasmids (affected in either genes copG or rnaII ) were analysed. One of the rnaII mutants exhibited a high‐copy‐number phenotype, whereas an in vitro‐constructed mutation, which affects the −10 region of the rnaII promoter, resulted in plasmids lacking copy‐number phenotype. The latter mutation had a pleiotropic effect: it abolished RNA II synthesis, but it also affected the initiation of translation signals of the gene encoding the RepB initiator protein. Transcriptional and translational fusions, together with in vitro inhibition of RepB synthesis by specific oligonucleotides, showed translational inhibition of RepB synthesis by RNA II, perhaps by directly blocking the accessibility of the ribosomes to the repB initiation of translation signals.

Replication of the streptococcal plasmid pMV158 and derivatives in cell-free extracts of Escherichia coli

SummarypMV158 is a 5.4 kb broad host range multicopy plasmid specifying tetracycline resistance. This plasmid and two of its derivatives, pLS1 and pLS5, are stably mantained and express their genetic information in gram-positive and gram-negative hosts. The in vitro replication of plasmid pMV158 and its derivatives was studied in extracts prepared from plasmid-free Escherichia coli cells and the replicative characteristics of the streptococcal plasmids were compared to those of the E. coli replicons, ColE1 and the mini-R1 derivative pKN182. The optimal replicative activity of the E. coli extracts was found at a cellular phase of growth that corresponded to 2 g wet weight of cells per litre. Maximal synthesis of streptococcal plasmid DNA occurred after 90 min of incubation and at a temperature of 30° C. The optimal concentration of template DNA was 40 μg/ml. Higher plasmid DNA concentrations resulted in a decrease in the incorporation of dTMP, indicating that competition of specific replication factor(s) for functional plasmid origins may occur. In vitro replication of plasmid pMV158 and its serivatives required the host RNA polymerase and de novo protein synthesis. The final products of the streptococcal plasmid DNAs replicated in the E. coli in vitro system were monomeric supercoiled DNA forms that had completed at least one round of replication, although a set of putative replicative intermediates could also be found. The results suggest that a specific plasmid-encoded factor is needed for the replication of the streptococcal plasmids.

Broad-host-range plasmid replication: an open question

Many factors can influence the ability of plasmids to colonize different hosts, efficient replication probably being the most critical one. Two major strategies seem to facilitate promiscuous plasmid replication: (i) initiation independent of host initiation factors; and (ii) versatile communication between plasmid and host initiation factors. Appropriate communication between a replicon and the different hosts, which becomes crucial at the initation of plasmid replication, plays a major role in plasmid promiscuity. Fused replicons or mechanisms that rescue collapsed replication forks may increase the efficiency of plasmid propagation. However, their contribution to plasmid promiscuous replication remains to be fully evaluated. Several examples of host‐specific adaptation of promiscuous plasmids point to an enormous flexibility of these replicons.