Gocha R. Tsetskhladze
University of Melbourne
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Gocha R. Tsetskhladze.
American Journal of Archaeology | 1997
John Boardman; Gocha R. Tsetskhladze; Franco De Angelis
The growth and understanding of the Early Western colonies, A.M. Snodgrass pre-colonization - early Greek contact with the East, M.R. Popham Phoenicians and Greeks in the West - a view from Pithekoussai, D. Ridgway prospectors and pioneers - Pithekoussai, Kyme and Central Italy, J.N. Coldstream Massalia and colonization in the North-Western Mediterranean, B.B. Shefton the foundations of Selinous - overpopulation or opportunities?, F. De Angelis Greek penetration of the Black Sea, G.R. Tsetskhladze settlement for trade and land in North Africa - problems of identity, J. Boardman.
Classical Review | 2011
Gocha R. Tsetskhladze
© 2011 The Classical Association. Online edition of the journal is available at http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=CAR
Classical Review | 2009
Gocha R. Tsetskhladze
Details of book being reviewed: Grammenos, D. V., & Petropoulos, E. K. (Eds.). Ancient Greek Colonies in the Black Sea 2. (BAR International Series 1675 [I] and [II].) ISBN: 9781407301112 (vol. I), 9781407301129 (vol. II), 9781407301105 (set).
Encyclopedia of Archaeology | 2008
Gocha R. Tsetskhladze
The article presents some general observations and methodological issues concerning Greek colonization of the Mediterannean and the Black Sea. It gives an overview of the processes whereby Greek colonies were established, the further development of the colonies, and the relationship between the colonists and local peoples.
Nationalism and Ethnic Politics | 2006
Gocha R. Tsetskhladze
a dictator to become a democrat overnight. We did this, and it was a grave tactical error” (p. 95). Jones also demonstrates that the dangers of supporting the uncompromising Tutsi were foreseeable. When the rebels prevailed in their demand for 50% of the command positions in a combined army, despite Tutsi representing no more than 17% of Rwanda’s population (including refugees), “a U.S. participant observed at the time that the division of the army as it stood would never be accepted by hard-line factions in the army” (p. 84). Such pro-Tutsi concessions also helped convert Hutu moderates into extremists. As Jones concludes, “A peace process that resulted in a better deal for moderates within the regime would have augmented the prospects of implementation” (p. 158). Alternatively, so long as the West supported the intransigent rebels, it needed to deploy a preventive peacekeeping force with “sufficient military clout to contain” the extremist backlash (p. 170). By doing neither—crippling the Hutu at the peace table without safeguarding against the predictable reaction—the international community essentially lit the fuse and walked away. In contrast to the common, caricatured morality tale of western indifference, Jones ably portrays the Rwanda tragedy as “a cautionary tale about the limits of conflict prevention and the potentially disastrous consequences of peacemaking done poorly” (p. 6).
Archive | 2006
Gocha R. Tsetskhladze
Archive | 1999
Gocha R. Tsetskhladze
Classical Review | 1995
Gocha R. Tsetskhladze
Archive | 1996
Philip L. Kohl; Gocha R. Tsetskhladze
Archive | 1997
A. J. Graham; Gocha R. Tsetskhladze; F. de Angelis