Goetz Gelbrich
Leipzig University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Goetz Gelbrich.
Circulation | 2011
Friedrich Koehler; Sebastian Winkler; Michael Schieber; Udo Sechtem; Karl Stangl; Michael Böhm; Herbert Boll; Gert Baumann; Marcus Honold; Kerstin Koehler; Goetz Gelbrich; Bridget-Anne Kirwan; Stefan D. Anker
Background— This study was designed to determine whether physician-led remote telemedical management (RTM) compared with usual care would result in reduced mortality in ambulatory patients with chronic heart failure (HF). Methods and Results— We enrolled 710 stable chronic HF patients in New York Heart Association functional class II or III with a left ventricular ejection fraction ⩽35% and a history of HF decompensation within the previous 2 years or with a left ventricular ejection fraction ⩽25%. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to RTM or usual care. Remote telemedical management used portable devices for ECG, blood pressure, and body weight measurements connected to a personal digital assistant that sent automated encrypted transmission via cell phones to the telemedical centers. The primary end point was death from any cause. The first secondary end point was a composite of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for HF. Baseline characteristics were similar between the RTM (n=354) and control (n=356) groups. Of the patients assigned to RTM, 287 (81%) were at least 70% compliant with daily data transfers and no break for >30 days (except during hospitalizations). The median follow-up was 26 months (minimum 12), and was 99.9% complete. Compared with usual care, RTM had no significant effect on all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.67 to 1.41; P=0.87) or on cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.67 to 1.19; P=0.44). Conclusions— In ambulatory patients with chronic HF, RTM compared with usual care was not associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality. Clinical Trial Registration:— URL: http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00543881.
European Journal of Heart Failure | 2010
Friedrich Koehler; Sebastian Winkler; Michael Schieber; Udo Sechtem; Karl Stangl; Michael Böhm; Herbert Boll; Simone S. Kim; Kerstin Koehler; Stephanie Lücke; Marcus Honold; Peter Heinze; Thomas Schweizer; Martin Braecklein; Bridget Anne Kirwan; Goetz Gelbrich; Stefan D. Anker
Remote patient management (telemonitoring) may help to detect early signs of cardiac decompensation, allowing optimization of and adherence to treatments in chronic heart failure (CHF). Two meta‐analyses have suggested that telemedicine in CHF can reduce mortality by 30–35%. The aim of the TIM‐HF study was to investigate the impact of telemedical management on mortality in ambulatory CHF patients.
European Journal of Heart Failure | 2011
Hans-Dirk Düngen; Svetlana Apostolovic; Simone Inkrot; Elvis Tahirovic; Agnieszka Töpper; Felix Mehrhof; Christiane Prettin; Biljana Putnikovic; Aleksandar Neskovic; Mirjana Krotin; Dejan Sakač; Mitja Lainscak; Frank T. Edelmann; Rolf Wachter; Thomas Rau; Thomas Eschenhagen; Wolfram Doehner; Stefan D. Anker; Finn Waagstein; Christoph Herrmann-Lingen; Goetz Gelbrich; Rainer Dietz
Various beta‐blockers with distinct pharmacological profiles are approved in heart failure, yet they remain underused and underdosed. Although potentially of major public health importance, whether one agent is superior in terms of tolerability and optimal dosing has not been investigated. The aim of this study was therefore to compare the tolerability and clinical effects of two proven beta‐blockers in elderly patients with heart failure.
Trials | 2009
Frank Peters-Klimm; Stephen Campbell; Thomas Müller-Tasch; Dieter Schellberg; Goetz Gelbrich; Wolfgang Herzog; Joachim Szecsenyi
BackgroundChronic (systolic) heart failure (CHF) is a common and disabling condition. Adherence to evidence-based guidelines in primary care has been shown to improve health outcomes. The aim was to explore the impact of a multidisciplinary educational intervention for general practitioners (GPs) (Train the trainer = TTT) on patient and performance outcomes.MethodsThis paper presents the key findings from the trial and discusses the lessons learned during the implementation of the TTT trial. Primary care practices were randomly assigned to the TTT intervention or to the control group. 37 GPs (18 TTT, 19 control) were randomised and 168 patients diagnosed with ascertained CHF (91 TTT, 77 control) were enrolled. GPs in the intervention group attended four meetings addressing clinical practice guidelines and pharmacotherapy feedback. The primary outcome was patient self-reported quality of life at seven months, using the SF-36 Physical Functioning scale. Secondary outcomes included other SF-36 scales, the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), total mortality, heart failure hospital admissions, prescribing, depressive disorders (PHQ-9), behavioural change (European Heart Failure Self-Care Behaviour Scale), patient-perceived quality of care (EUROPEP) and improvement of heart failure using NT-proBNP-levels. Because recruitment targets were not achieved an exploratory analysis was conducted.ResultsThere was high baseline achievement in both groups for many outcomes. At seven months, there were no significant mean difference between groups for the primary outcome measure (-3.3, 95%CI -9.7 to 3.1, p = 0.30). The only difference in secondary outcomes related to the prescribing of aldosterone antagonists by GPs in the intervention group, with significant between group differences at follow-up (42 vs. 24%, adjusted OR = 4.0, 95%CI 1.2–13; p = 0.02).ConclusionThe intervention did not change the primary outcome or most secondary outcomes. Recruitment targets were not achieved and the under-recruitment of practices and patients alongside a selection bias of participating GPs, prohibit definite conclusions, but the CI indicates a non-effectiveness of the intervention in this sample. We describe the lessons learned from conducting the trial for the future planning and conduct of confirmatory trials in primary care.Trial registrationISRCTN08601529.
Circulation | 2011
Friedrich Koehler; Sebastian Winkler; Michael Schieber; Udo Sechtem; Karl Stangl; Michael Böhm; Herbert Boll; Gert Baumann; Marcus Honold; Kerstin Koehler; Goetz Gelbrich; Bridget-Anne Kirwan; Stefan D. Anker
Background— This study was designed to determine whether physician-led remote telemedical management (RTM) compared with usual care would result in reduced mortality in ambulatory patients with chronic heart failure (HF). Methods and Results— We enrolled 710 stable chronic HF patients in New York Heart Association functional class II or III with a left ventricular ejection fraction ⩽35% and a history of HF decompensation within the previous 2 years or with a left ventricular ejection fraction ⩽25%. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to RTM or usual care. Remote telemedical management used portable devices for ECG, blood pressure, and body weight measurements connected to a personal digital assistant that sent automated encrypted transmission via cell phones to the telemedical centers. The primary end point was death from any cause. The first secondary end point was a composite of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for HF. Baseline characteristics were similar between the RTM (n=354) and control (n=356) groups. Of the patients assigned to RTM, 287 (81%) were at least 70% compliant with daily data transfers and no break for >30 days (except during hospitalizations). The median follow-up was 26 months (minimum 12), and was 99.9% complete. Compared with usual care, RTM had no significant effect on all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.67 to 1.41; P=0.87) or on cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.67 to 1.19; P=0.44). Conclusions— In ambulatory patients with chronic HF, RTM compared with usual care was not associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality. Clinical Trial Registration:— URL: http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00543881.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2013
Volker Holzendorf; Goetz Gelbrich; Rolf Wachter; Burkert Pieske; Anja Broda; Frank T. Edelmann
Diastolic dysfunction (DD) is a common condition. Algorithms for non-invasive diagnosis are not yet sufficiently validated. We aimed to examine the performance of eight echocardiographic schemes for diagnosis and grading of DD in diagnostically naive patients. The main objectives were to study (a)
Circulation | 2011
Friedrich Koehler; Sebastian Winkler; Michael Schieber; Udo Sechtem; Karl Stangl; Michael Böhm; Herbert Boll; Gert Baumann; Marcus Honold; Kerstin Koehler; Goetz Gelbrich; Bridget-Anne Kirwan; Stefan D. Anker
Background— This study was designed to determine whether physician-led remote telemedical management (RTM) compared with usual care would result in reduced mortality in ambulatory patients with chronic heart failure (HF). Methods and Results— We enrolled 710 stable chronic HF patients in New York Heart Association functional class II or III with a left ventricular ejection fraction ⩽35% and a history of HF decompensation within the previous 2 years or with a left ventricular ejection fraction ⩽25%. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to RTM or usual care. Remote telemedical management used portable devices for ECG, blood pressure, and body weight measurements connected to a personal digital assistant that sent automated encrypted transmission via cell phones to the telemedical centers. The primary end point was death from any cause. The first secondary end point was a composite of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for HF. Baseline characteristics were similar between the RTM (n=354) and control (n=356) groups. Of the patients assigned to RTM, 287 (81%) were at least 70% compliant with daily data transfers and no break for >30 days (except during hospitalizations). The median follow-up was 26 months (minimum 12), and was 99.9% complete. Compared with usual care, RTM had no significant effect on all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.67 to 1.41; P=0.87) or on cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.67 to 1.19; P=0.44). Conclusions— In ambulatory patients with chronic HF, RTM compared with usual care was not associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality. Clinical Trial Registration:— URL: http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00543881.
International Journal of Cardiology | 2012
Friedrich Koehler; Sebastian Winkler; Michael Schieber; Udo Sechtem; Karl Stangl; Michael Böhm; Sophie de Brouwer; Emilie Perrin; Gert Baumann; Goetz Gelbrich; Herbert Boll; Marcus Honold; Kerstin Koehler; Bridget Anne Kirwan; Stefan D. Anker
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy | 2015
Milica Dekleva; Jelena Suzic Lazic; Ivan Soldatovic; Simone Inkrot; Aleksandra Arandjelovic; Finn Waagstein; Goetz Gelbrich; Dane Cvijanovic; Hans-Dirk Düngen
Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2013
Guelmisal Gueder; Stefan Stoerk; Goetz Gelbrich; Susanne Brenner; Caroline Morbach; Dominik Berliner; Ertl Georg; Christiane E. Angermann