Götz Laible
AgResearch
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Götz Laible.
The EMBO Journal | 1999
Louise Aagaard; Götz Laible; Philipp Selenko; Manfred Schmid; Rainer Dorn; Gunnar Schotta; Steffi Kuhfittig; Andrea Wolf; Angelika Lebersorger; Prim B. Singh; Gunter Reuter; Thomas Jenuwein
The chromo and SET domains are conserved sequence motifs present in chromosomal proteins that function in epigenetic control of gene expression, presumably by modulating higher order chromatin. Based on sequence information from the SET domain, we have isolated human (SUV39H1) and mouse (Suv39h1) homologues of the dominant Drosophila modifier of position‐effect‐variegation (PEV) Su(var)3‐9. Mammalian homologues contain, in addition to the SET domain, the characteristic chromo domain, a combination that is also preserved in the Schizosaccharyomyces pombe silencing factor clr4. Chromatin‐dependent gene regulation is demonstrated by the potential of human SUV39H1 to increase repression of the pericentromeric white marker gene in transgenic flies. Immunodetection of endogenous Suv39h1/SUV39H1 proteins in a variety of mammalian cell lines reveals enriched distribution at heterochromatic foci during interphase and centromere‐specific localization during metaphase. In addition, Suv39h1/SUV39H1 proteins associate with M31, currently the only other characterized mammalian SU(VAR) homologue. These data indicate the existence of a mammalian SU(VAR) complex and define Suv39h1/SUV39H1 as novel components of mammalian higher order chromatin.
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences | 1998
Thomas Jenuwein; Götz Laible; Rainer Dorn; Gunter Reuter
Abstract. The SET domain is a 130-amino acid, evolutionarily conserved sequence motif present in chromosomal proteins that function in modulating gene activities from yeast to mammals. Initially identified as members of the Polycomb- and trithorax-group (Pc-G and trx-G) gene families, which are required to maintain expression boundaries of homeotic selector (HOM-C) genes, SET domain proteins are also involved in position-effect-variegation (PEV), telomeric and centromeric gene silencing, and possibly in determining chromosome architecture. These observations implicate SET domain proteins as multifunctional chromatin regulators with activities in both eu- and heterochromatin – a role consistent with their modular structure, which combines the SET domain with additional sequence motifs of either a cysteine-rich region/zinc-finger type or the chromo domain. Multiple functions for chromatin regulators are not restricted to the SET protein family, since many trx-G (but only very few Pc-G) genes are also modifiers of PEV. Together, these data establish a model in which the modulation of chromatin domains is mechanistically linked with the regulation of key developmental loci (e.g. HOM-C).
The EMBO Journal | 1997
Götz Laible; Andrea Wolf; Rainer Dorn; Gunter Reuter; Corey Nislow; Angelika Lebersorger; Dan Popkin; Lorraine Pillus; Thomas Jenuwein
Gene silencing is required to stably maintain distinct patterns of gene expression during eukaryotic development and has been correlated with the induction of chromatin domains that restrict gene activity. We describe the isolation of human (EZH2) and mouse (Ezh1) homologues of the Drosophila Polycomb‐group (Pc‐G) gene Enhancer of zeste [E(z)], a crucial regulator of homeotic gene expression implicated in the assembly of repressive protein complexes in chromatin. Mammalian homologues of E(z) are encoded by two distinct loci in mouse and man, and the two murine Ezh genes display complementary expression profiles during mouse development. The E(z) gene family reveals a striking functional conservation in mediating gene repression in eukaryotic chromatin: extra gene copies of human EZH2 or Drosophila E(z) in transgenic flies enhance position effect variegation of the heterochromatin‐associated white gene, and expression of either human EZH2 or murine Ezh1 restores gene repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants that are impaired in telomeric silencing. Together, these data provide a functional link between Pc‐G‐dependent gene repression and inactive chromatin domains, and indicate that silencing mechanism(s) may be broadly conserved in eukaryotes.
Molecular and Cellular Biology | 2000
Dónal O'Carroll; Harry Scherthan; Antoine H.F.M. Peters; Susanne Opravil; Andrew R. Haynes; Götz Laible; Stephen Rea; Manfred Schmid; Angelika Lebersorger; Martin Jerratsch; Lydia Sattler; M. G. Mattei; Paul Denny; Stephen Brown; Dieter Schweizer; Thomas Jenuwein
ABSTRACT Higher-order chromatin has been implicated in epigenetic gene control and in the functional organization of chromosomes. We have recently discovered mouse (Suv39h1) and human (SUV39H1) histone H3 lysine 9-selective methyltransferases (Suv39h HMTases) and shown that they modulate chromatin dynamics in somatic cells. We describe here the isolation, chromosomal assignment, and characterization of a second murine gene, Suv39h2. Like Suv39h1,Suv39h2 encodes an H3 HMTase that shares 59% identity with Suv39h1 but which differs by the presence of a highly basic N terminus. Using fluorescent in situ hybridization and haplotype analysis, theSuv39h2 locus was mapped to the subcentromeric region of mouse chromosome 2, whereas the Suv39h1 locus resides at the tip of the mouse X chromosome. Notably, although bothSuv39h loci display overlapping expression profiles during mouse embryogenesis, Suv39h2 transcripts remain specifically expressed in adult testes. Immunolocalization of Suv39h2 protein during spermatogenesis indicates enriched distribution at the heterochromatin from the leptotene to the round spermatid stage. Moreover, Suv39h2 specifically accumulates with chromatin of the sex chromosomes (XY body) which undergo transcriptional silencing during the first meiotic prophase. These data are consistent with redundant enzymatic roles for Suv39h1 and Suv39h2 during mouse development and suggest an additional function of the Suv39h2 HMTase in organizing meiotic heterochromatin that may even impart an epigenetic imprint to the male germ line.
Nature Biotechnology | 2003
Brigid Brophy; Grant Smolenski; Thomas T. Wheeler; David N. Wells; Phil L'Huillier; Götz Laible
To enhance milk composition and milk processing efficiency by increasing the casein concentration in milk, we have introduced additional copies of the genes encoding bovine β- and κ-casein (CSN2 and CSN3, respectively) into female bovine fibroblasts. Nuclear transfer with four independent donor cell lines resulted in the production of 11 transgenic calves. The analysis of hormonally induced milk showed substantial expression and secretion of the transgene-derived caseins into milk. Nine cows, representing two high-expressing lines, produced milk with an 8–20% increase in β-casein, a twofold increase in κ-casein levels, and a markedly altered κ-casein to total casein ratio. These results show that it is feasible to substantially alter a major component of milk in high producing dairy cows by a transgenic approach and thus to improve the functional properties of dairy milk.
Molecular and Cellular Biology | 2000
Martin Melcher; Manfred Schmid; Louise Aagaard; Philipp Selenko; Götz Laible; Thomas Jenuwein
ABSTRACT SUV39H1, a human homologue of theDrosophila position effect variegation modifierSu(var)3-9 and of theSchizosaccharomyces pombe silencing factorclr4, encodes a novel heterochromatic protein that transiently accumulates at centromeric positions during mitosis. Using a detailed structure-function analysis of SUV39H1 mutant proteins in transfected cells, we now show that deregulated SUV39H1 interferes at multiple levels with mammalian higher-order chromatin organization. First, forced expression of full-length SUV39H1 (412 amino acids) redistributes endogenous M31 (HP1β) and induces abundant associations with inter- and metaphase chromatin. These properties depend on the C-terminal SET domain, although the major portion of the SUV39H1 protein (amino acids 89 to 412) does not display affinity for nuclear chromatin. By contrast, the M31 interaction surface, which was mapped to the first 44 N-terminal amino acids, together with the immediately adjacent chromo domain, directs specific accumulation at heterochromatin. Second, cells overexpressing full-length SUV39H1 display severe defects in mitotic progression and chromosome segregation. Surprisingly, whereas localization of centromere proteins is unaltered, the focal, G2-specific distribution of phosphorylated histone H3 at serine 10 (phosH3) is dispersed in these cells. This phosH3 shift is not observed with C-terminally truncated mutant SUV39H1 proteins or with deregulated M31. Together, our data reveal a dominant role(s) for the SET domain of SUV39H1 in the distribution of prominent heterochromatic proteins and suggest a possible link between a chromosomal SU(VAR) protein and histone H3.
Theriogenology | 2003
David N. Wells; Götz Laible; F.C Tucker; A.L Miller; J. E. Oliver; T Xiang; J.T Forsyth; M.C Berg; K Cockrem; P.J L’Huillier; H.R. Tervit; B Oback
Several studies have shown that both quiescent and proliferating somatic donor cells can be fully reprogrammed after nuclear transfer (NT) and result in viable offspring. So far, however, no comparative study has conclusively demonstrated the relative importance of donor cell cycle stage on nuclear cloning efficiency. Here, we compare two different types of bovine fetal fibroblasts (BFFs) that were synchronized in G(0), G(1), and different phases within G(1). We show that for non-transgenic (non-TG) fibroblasts, serum starvation into G(0) results in a significantly higher percentage of viable calves at term than synchronization in early G(1) or late G(1). For transgenic fibroblasts, however, cells selected in G(1) show significantly higher development to calves at term and higher post-natal survival to weaning than cells in G(0). This suggests that it may be necessary to coordinate donor cell type and cell cycle stage to maximize overall cloning efficiency.
Biotechnology Journal | 2009
Götz Laible; Lucía Alonso‐González
The development of methods for cell‐mediated transgenesis, based on somatic cell nuclear transfer, provides a tremendous opportunity to shape the genetic make‐up of livestock animals in a much more directed approach than traditional animal breeding and selection schemes. Progress in the site‐directed modulation of livestock genomes is currently limited by the low efficiencies of gene targeting imposed by the low frequency of homologous recombination and limited proliferative capacity of primary somatic cells that are used to produce transgenic animals. Here we review the current state of the art in the field, discuss the crucial aspects of the methodology and provide an overview of emerging approaches to increase the efficiency of gene targeting in somatic cells.
Biotechnology Journal | 2015
Götz Laible; Jingwei Wei; Stefan Wagner
Humans have a long history in shaping the genetic makeup of livestock to optimize production and meet growing human demands for food and other animal products. Until recently, this has only been possible through traditional breeding and selection, which is a painstakingly slow process of accumulating incremental gains over a long period. The development of transgenic livestock technology offers a more direct approach with the possibility for making genetic improvements with greater impact and within a single generation. However, initially the technology was hampered by technical difficulties and limitations, which have now largely been overcome by progressive improvements over the past 30 years. Particularly, the advent of genome editing in combination with homologous recombination has added a new level of efficiency and precision that holds much promise for the genetic improvement of livestock using the increasing knowledge of the phenotypic impact of genetic sequence variants. So far not a single line of transgenic livestock has gained approval for commercialization. The step change to genome‐edited livestock with precise sequence changes may accelerate the path to market, provided applications of this new technology for agriculture can deliver, in addition to economic incentives for producers, also compelling benefits for animals, consumers, and the environment.
Molecular and Cellular Biology | 2013
Jisha Antony; F. C. Oback; Lawrence W. Chamley; Björn Oback; Götz Laible
ABSTRACT Correct reprogramming of epigenetic marks in the donor nuclei is crucial for successful cloning by nuclear transfer. Specific epigenetic modifications, such as repressive histone lysine methylation marks, are known to be very stable and difficult to reprogram. The discovery of histone lysine demethylases has opened up opportunities to study the effects of removing repressive histone lysine methylation marks in donor cells prior to nuclear transfer. In this study, we generated mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells for the inducible expression of JMJD2B (also known as KDM4B), a demethylase that primarily removes the histone-3 lysine-9 trimethylation (H3K9me3) mark. Induction of jmjd2b in the ES cells decreased total levels of H3K9me3 by 63%. When these cells were used for nuclear transfer, H3K9me3 levels were normalized within minutes following fusion with an enucleated oocyte. This transient reduction of H3K9me3 levels improved in vitro development into cloned embryos by 30%.