Graça Esteves

Randomized Phase II Study of Bortezomib, Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone With or Without Cyclophosphamide As Induction Therapy in Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma

PURPOSE Bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone (VTD) is an effective induction therapy in multiple myeloma (MM). This phase II, noncomparative study sought to determine whether addition of cyclophosphamide to this regimen (VTDC) could further increase efficacy without compromising safety. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients age 18 to 70 years with previously untreated, measurable MM, who were eligible for high-dose chemotherapy-autologous stem-cell transplantation (HDCT-ASCT), were randomly assigned to bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2), thalidomide 100 mg, and dexamethasone 40 mg, with (n = 49) or without (n = 49) cyclophosphamide 400 mg/m(2) for four 21-day cycles, followed by HDCT-ASCT. The primary end point was postinduction combined rate of near-complete response (nCR) or better (including complete response [CR] with normalized serum κ:λ free light chain ratio, CR, and nCR). RESULTS Postinduction, 51% (VTD) and 44% (VTDC) of patients achieved combined CR/nCR, with bone marrow-confirmed CR in 29% and 31%, overall response rates of 100% and 96%, respectively, and very good partial response or better rates of 69% per arm. Post-HDCT-ASCT, combined CR/nCR rates were 85% (VTD) and 77% (VTDC). In all, 35% (VTD) and 27% (VTDC) of patients were negative for minimal residual disease (MRD) during induction and postinduction. Three-year overall survival was 80% (both arms). Grade 3 to 4 adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs were observed in 47% and 22% (VTD) and 57% and 41% (VTDC) of patients, respectively. The primary health-related quality of life end point (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 [EORTC QLQ-C30] Global Health score) steadily increased with VTD during induction and reached a clinically relevant difference post-transplantation versus baseline. CONCLUSION Both VTD and VTDC are highly active induction regimens producing high combined CR/nCR and MRD-negative rates; however, VTDC was associated with increased toxicity and suggestion of transient decreases in Global Health score, without an increase in activity.

Review of therapy for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: focus on lenalidomide.

Purpose of review Multiple myeloma is a malignant neoplasm of plasma cells, for which there is no known cure. This article examines the efficacy and tolerability of lenalidomide, a potent structural analogue of thalidomide, for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Recent findings Lenalidomide, a thalidomide analogue, was designed to provide increased efficacy, while avoiding the adverse effects associated with thalidomide therapy. Studies assessing lenalidomide as therapy for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma have shown promising beneficial effects. Lenalidomide–dexamethasone is associated with significantly longer median time to disease progression and overall survival, as well as a significantly higher proportion of patients who respond to treatment compared with dexamethasone alone. Lenalidomide (with dexamethasone) was associated with a high rate of myelosuppression in clinical trials; neutropenia, infection, thrombocytopenia, and venous thromboembolism were common grade 3–4 adverse events. However, appropriate management of these adverse events maximizes the clinical benefit of lenalidomide. Summary Lenalidomide in combination with dexamethasone is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Lenalidomide is recommended as a treatment option for patients with multiple myeloma in both United States and European treatment guidelines.

Immune status of high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma patients and its therapeutic modulation under LenDex: a longitudinal analysis.

There is significant interest in immunotherapy for the treatment of high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), but no available data on the immune status of this particular disease stage. Such information is important to understand the interplay between immunosurveillance and disease transformation, but also to define whether patients with high-risk SMM might benefit from immunotherapy. Here, we have characterized T lymphocytes (including CD4, CD8, T-cell receptor γδ, and regulatory T cells), natural killer (NK) cells, and dendritic cells from 31 high-risk SMM patients included in the treatment arm of the QUIREDEX trial, and with longitudinal peripheral blood samples at baseline and after 3 and 9 cycles of lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (LenDex). High-risk SMM patients showed at baseline decreased expression of activation-(CD25/CD28/CD54), type 1 T helper-(CD195/interferon-γ/tumor necrosis factor-α/interleukin-2), and proliferation-related markers (CD119/CD120b) as compared with age-matched healthy individuals. However, LenDex was able to restore the normal expression levels for those markers and induced a marked shift in T-lymphocyte and NK-cell phenotype. Accordingly, high-risk SMM patients treated with LenDex showed higher numbers of functionally active T lymphocytes. Together, our results indicate that high-risk SMM patients have an impaired immune system that could be reactivated by the immunomodulatory effects of lenalidomide, even when combined with low-dose dexamethasone, and support the value of therapeutic immunomodulation to delay the progression to multiple myeloma. The QUIREDEX trial was registered to www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00480363.

Bortezomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone, with or without cyclophosphamide, for patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma: 5-year follow-up.

This follow‐up extension of a randomised phase II study assessed differences in long‐term outcomes between bortezomib‐thalidomide‐dexamethasone (VTD) and VTD‐cyclophosphamide (VTDC) induction therapy in multiple myeloma. Newly diagnosed patients (n = 98) were randomised 1:1 to intravenous bortezomib (1·3 mg/m2; days 1, 4, 8, 11), thalidomide (100 mg; days 1–21), and dexamethasone (40 mg; days 1–4, 9–12), with/without cyclophosphamide (400 mg/m2; days 1, 8), for four 21‐day cycles before stem‐cell mobilisation/transplantation. After a median follow‐up of 64·8 months, median time‐to‐next therapy was 51·8 and 47·9 months with VTD and VTDC, respectively. Type of subsequent therapy was similar in both arms. After adjusting for asymmetric censoring, median time to progression was not significantly different between VTD and VTDC [35·7 vs. 34·5 months; Hazard ratio (HR) 1·26, 95% confidence interval: 0·76–2·09; P = 0·370]. Five‐year survival was 69·1% and 65·3% with VTD and VTDC, respectively. When analysed by minimal residual disease (MRD) status, overall survival was longer in MRD‐negative versus MRD‐positive patients with bone marrow‐confirmed complete response (HR 3·66, P = 0·0318). VTD induction followed by transplantation provides long‐term disease control and, consistent with the primary analysis, there is no additional benefit from adding cyclophosphamide. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00531453).

Monoclonal Gammopathies of Indetermined Significance: Diagnosis and Clinical Follow-up Guidelines

The Portuguese group of multiple myeloma of the Portuguese Society of Hematology proposes a national protocol for diagnosis and clinical follow-up of monoclonal gammopathies. The proposed protocol aims to standardize clinical management of monoclonal gammopathies. Furthermore, it would also define the major risk factors for progression to Multiple Myeloma that require a precocious close articulation between general practitioners and a Hematology Clinic.