Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Grace Ibay is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Grace Ibay.


American Journal of Human Genetics | 2004

Genomewide Linkage Scan for Myopia Susceptibility Loci among Ashkenazi Jewish Families Shows Evidence of Linkage on Chromosome 22q12

Dwight Stambolian; Grace Ibay; Lauren Reider; Debra Dana; Chris Moy; Melissa Schlifka; Taura N. Holmes; Elise Ciner; Joan E. Bailey-Wilson

Mild/moderate (common) myopia is a very common disorder, with both genetic and environmental influences. The environmental factors are related to near work and can be measured. There are no known genetic loci for common myopia. Our goal is to find evidence for a myopia susceptibility gene causing common myopia. Cycloplegic and manifest refraction were performed on 44 large American families of Ashkenazi Jewish descent, each with at least two affected siblings. Individuals with at least -1.00 diopter or lower in each meridian of both eyes were classified as myopic. Microsatellite genotyping with 387 markers was performed by the Center for Inherited Disease Research. Linkage analyses were conducted with parametric and nonparametric methods by use of 12 different penetrance models. The family-based association test was used for an association scan. A maximum multipoint parametric heterogeneity LOD (HLOD) score of 3.54 was observed at marker D22S685, and nonparametric linkage analyses gave consistent results, with a P value of.0002 at this marker. The parametric multipoint HLOD scores exceeded 3.0 for a 4-cM interval, and significant evidence of genetic heterogeneity was observed. This genomewide scan is the first step toward identifying a gene on chromosome 22 with an influence on common myopia. At present, we are following up our linkage results on chromosome 22 with a dense map of >1,500 single-nucleotide-polymorphism markers for fine mapping and association analyses. Identification of a susceptibility locus in this region may eventually lead to a better understanding of gene-environment interactions in the causation of this complex trait.


Genetic Epidemiology | 2008

Genomewide Scan of Ocular Refraction in African-American Families Shows Significant Linkage to Chromosome 7p15

Elise Ciner; Robert Wojciechowski; Grace Ibay; Joan E. Bailey-Wilson; Dwight Stambolian

Refractive development is influenced by environmental and genetic factors. Genetic studies have identified several regions of linkage to ocular refraction, but none have been carried out in African‐derived populations. We performed quantitative trait locus linkage analyses in African‐American (AA) families to identify genomic regions responsible for refraction. We recruited 493 AA individuals in 96 families to participate in the Myopia Family Study. Genotyping of 387 microsatellite markers was performed on 398 participants. The mean refraction among genotyped individuals was −2.87 D (SD=3.58) and myopia of at least 1 D was present in 267 (68%) participants. Multipoint, regression‐based, linkage analyses were carried out on a logarithmic transformation of ocular refraction using the statistical package MERLIN‐REGRESS. Empirical significance levels were determined via 4,898 whole‐genome gene‐dropping simulations. Linkage analyses were repeated after clustering families into two subgroups based on admixture proportions as determined by the software package STRUCTURE. Genomewide significant linkage was seen at 47 cM on chromosome 7 (logarithm of the odds ratio (LOD)=5.87, P=0.00005). In addition, three regions on chromosomes 2p, 3p and 10p showed suggestive evidence of linkage (LOD>2, P<0.005) for ocular refraction. We mapped the first quantitative trait locus for ocular refraction in an AA population to chr.7p15. Two previous studies in European‐derived families reported some evidence of linkage to a nearby region, suggesting that this region may contain polymorphisms that mediate refraction across populations. The genomic region under our linkage peak spans ∼17 Mb and contains ∼170 genes. Further refinement of this region will be pursued in future studies. Genet. Epidemiol. 2008. Published 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


BMC Medical Genetics | 2004

Candidate high myopia loci on chromosomes 18p and 12q do not play a major role in susceptibility to common myopia

Grace Ibay; Betty Doan; Lauren Reider; Debra Dana; Melissa Schlifka; Heping Hu; Taura N. Holmes; Jennifer O'Neill; Robert Owens; Elise Ciner; Joan E. Bailey Wilson; Dwight Stambolian

BackgroundTo determine whether previously reported loci predisposing to nonsyndromic high myopia show linkage to common myopia in pedigrees from two ethnic groups: Ashkenazi Jewish and Amish. We hypothesized that these high myopia loci might exhibit allelic heterogeneity and be responsible for moderate /mild or common myopia.MethodsCycloplegic and manifest refraction were performed on 38 Jewish and 40 Amish families. Individuals with at least -1.00 D in each meridian of both eyes were classified as myopic. Genomic DNA was genotyped with 12 markers on chromosomes 12q21-23 and 18p11.3. Parametric and nonparametric linkage analyses were conducted to determine whether susceptibility alleles at these loci are important in families with less severe, clinical forms of myopia.ResultsThere was no strong evidence of linkage of common myopia to these candidate regions: all two-point and multipoint heterogeneity LOD scores were < 1.0 and non-parametric linkage p-values were > 0.01. However, one Amish family showed slight evidence of linkage (LOD>1.0) on 12q; another 3 Amish families each gave LOD >1.0 on 18p; and 3 Jewish families each gave LOD >1.0 on 12q.ConclusionsSignificant evidence of linkage (LOD> 3) of myopia was not found on chromosome 18p or 12q loci in these families. These results suggest that these loci do not play a major role in the causation of common myopia in our families studied.


Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2009

Genomewide linkage scans for ocular refraction and meta-analysis of four populations in the Myopia Family Study

Robert Wojciechowski; Dwight Stambolian; Elise Ciner; Grace Ibay; Taura N. Holmes; Joan E. Bailey-Wilson

PURPOSE Genomewide linkage scans were performed in Caucasian (CAUC) and Old Order Amish (OOA) families to identify genomic regions containing genes responsible for refractive error control. We also performed a meta-analysis by combining these results with our previous linkage results from Ashkenazi Jewish (ASHK) and African American (AFRAM) families. METHODS Two hundred seventy-one CAUC and 411 OOA participants (36 and 61 families, respectively) were recruited to participate in the Myopia Family Study. Recruitment criteria were designed to enrich the sample for multiplex myopic families. Genomewide, model-free, multipoint linkage analyses were performed separately for each population by using >370 microsatellite markers. Empirical significance levels were determined via gene-dropping simulations. A meta-analysis was performed by combining linkage results from the CAUC, OOA, AFRAM, and ASHK samples, and results were compared to previously reported loci for myopia and refraction. RESULTS Suggestive evidence of linkage was found at 12q24 (LOD = 4.583, P = 0.00037) and 4q21 (LOD = 2.72, P = 0.0028) in the CAUC sample and at 5qter (LOD = 3.271, P = 0.0014) in the OOA. Meta-analysis linkage results were largely driven by population-specific signals from ASHK and AFRAM families. The meta-analysis showed suggestive evidence of linkage to 4q21-22 (meta-P = 0.00214) adjacent to the previously reported MYP9 and MYP11 loci. CONCLUSIONS The results showed suggestive evidence of linkage of ocular refraction to 12q24 and 4q21 in CAUC and to 5qter in OOA families. The meta-analysis supports the view that several genes play a role in refractive development across populations. In MFS families, four broad genomic regions (on 1p, 4q, 7p, and 12q) most likely contain genes that influence ocular refraction.


American Journal of Ophthalmology | 2009

Genome-wide scan of African-American and white families for linkage to myopia.

Elise Ciner; Grace Ibay; Robert Wojciechowski; Debra Dana; Taura N. Holmes; Joan E. Bailey-Wilson; Dwight Stambolian

PURPOSE To identify myopia susceptibility genes influencing common myopia in 94 African-American and 36 White families. DESIGN A prospective study of families with myopia consisting of a minimum of two individuals affected with myopia. METHODS Extended families consisting of at least two siblings affected with myopia were ascertained. A genome-wide linkage scan using 387 markers was conducted by the Center for Inherited Disease Research. Linkage analyses were conducted with parametric and nonparametric methods. Model-free linkage analysis was performed maximizing over penetrance and over dominance (that is, fitting a wide range of both dominant and recessive models). RESULTS Under the model-free analysis, the maximum two point heterogeneity logarithm of the odds score (MALOD) was 2.87 at D6S1009 in the White cohort and the maximum multipoint MALOD was 2.42 at D12S373-D12S1042 in the same cohort. The nonparametric linkage (NPL) maximum multipoint at D6S1035 had a P value of .005. An overall multipoint NPL score was obtained by combining NPL scores from both populations. The highest combined NPL score was observed at D20S478 with a significant P value of .008. Suggestive evidence of linkage in the White cohort mapped to a previously mapped locus on chromosome 11 at D11S1981 (NPL = 2.14; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS Suggestive evidence of linkage to myopia in both African Americans and Whites was seen on chromosome 20 and became more significant when the scores were combined for both groups. The locus on chromosome 11 independently confirms a report by Hammond and associates mapping a myopia quantitative trait locus to this region.


BMC Genomics | 2004

GeneLink: a database to facilitate genetic studies of complex traits

Elizabeth M. Gillanders; Anthony Masiello; Derek Gildea; Lowell Umayam; Priya Duggal; Mary Pat Jones; Alison P. Klein; Diana Freas-Lutz; Grace Ibay; Ken Trout; Tyra G. Wolfsberg; Jeffrey M. Trent; Joan E. Bailey-Wilson; Andreas D. Baxevanis

BackgroundIn contrast to gene-mapping studies of simple Mendelian disorders, genetic analyses of complex traits are far more challenging, and high quality data management systems are often critical to the success of these projects. To minimize the difficulties inherent in complex trait studies, we have developed GeneLink, a Web-accessible, password-protected Sybase database.ResultsGeneLink is a powerful tool for complex trait mapping, enabling genotypic data to be easily merged with pedigree and extensive phenotypic data. Specifically designed to facilitate large-scale (multi-center) genetic linkage or association studies, GeneLink securely and efficiently handles large amounts of data and provides additional features to facilitate data analysis by existing software packages and quality control. These include the ability to download chromosome-specific data files containing marker data in map order in various formats appropriate for downstream analyses (e.g., GAS and LINKAGE). Furthermore, an unlimited number of phenotypes (either qualitative or quantitative) can be stored and analyzed. Finally, GeneLink generates several quality assurance reports, including genotyping success rates of specified DNA samples or success and heterozygosity rates for specified markers.ConclusionsGeneLink has already proven an invaluable tool for complex trait mapping studies and is discussed primarily in the context of our large, multi-center study of hereditary prostate cancer (HPC). GeneLink is freely available at http://research.nhgri.nih.gov/genelink.


BMC Genetics | 2003

Importance sampling method of correction for multiple testing in affected sib-pair linkage analysis

Alison P. Klein; Ilija Kovac; Alexa J.M. Sorant; Agnes Baffoe-Bonnie; Betty Q Doan; Grace Ibay; Erica Lockwood; Diptasri Mandal; Lekshmi Santhosh; Karen Weissbecker; Jessica G. Woo; A. Zambelli-Weiner; Jie Zhang; Daniel Q. Naiman; James D. Malley; Joan E. Bailey-Wilson

Using the Genetic Analysis Workshop 13 simulated data set, we compared the technique of importance sampling to several other methods designed to adjust p-values for multiple testing: the Bonferroni correction, the method proposed by Feingold et al., and naïve Monte Carlo simulation. We performed affected sib-pair linkage analysis for each of the 100 replicates for each of five binary traits and adjusted the derived p-values using each of the correction methods. The type I error rates for each correction method and the ability of each of the methods to detect loci known to influence trait values were compared. All of the methods considered were conservative with respect to type I error, especially the Bonferroni method. The ability of these methods to detect trait loci was also low. However, this may be partially due to a limitation inherent in our binary trait definitions.


BMC Genetics | 2005

Identification of tag single-nucleotide polymorphisms in regions with varying linkage disequilibrium

Priya Duggal; Elizabeth M. Gillanders; Rasika A. Mathias; Grace Ibay; Alison P. Klein; Agnes Baffoe-Bonnie; Liang Ou; Ian P. Dusenberry; Ya Yu Tsai; Peter S Chines; Betty Q Doan; Joan E. Bailey-Wilson

We compared seven different tagging single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) programs in 10 regions with varied amounts of linkage disequilibrium (LD) and physical distance. We used the Collaborative Studies on the Genetics of Alcoholism dataset, part of the Genetic Analysis Workshop 14. We show that in regions with moderate to strong LD these programs are relatively consistent, despite different parameters and methods. In addition, we compared the selected SNPs in a multipoint linkage analysis for one region with strong LD. As the number of selected SNPs increased, the LOD score, mean information content, and type I error also increased.


Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2011

Current gene discovery strategies for ocular conditions

Priya Duggal; Grace Ibay; Alison P. Klein

Many eye diseases are complex traits influenced by both genetic and environmental factors. Even for the common ocular conditions, such as refractive errors and glaucoma, there is a wide spectrum in the relative contribution of genetic and nongenetic factors in the development of disease. Some individuals develop disease, because they have inherited a single genetic mutation, whereas in others, the disease reflects the action of multiple genetic and/or environmental exposures. Recent advances in genetic technology have greatly enhanced our ability to identify the genetic variants underlying disease. In this review, we discuss how to determine whether an ocular phenotype has genetic components and if so, how to identify susceptibility genes associated with that phenotype. We also review the best approaches for identifying genetic variants of large effect (i.e., those with large relative risk) and genetic variants of smaller effect (i.e., those with small relative risk). Finally, we discuss how next-generation sequencing approaches will change the current paradigm for gene discovery. Figure 1 outlines the different genetic epidemiology approaches. Figure 1. Overview of the genetic epidemiology approach.


Human Genetics | 2006

Genomewide scan in Ashkenazi Jewish families demonstrates evidence of linkage of ocular refraction to a QTL on chromosome 1p36

Robert Wojciechowski; Chris Moy; Elise Ciner; Grace Ibay; Lauren Reider; Joan E. Bailey-Wilson; Dwight Stambolian

Collaboration


Dive into the Grace Ibay's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dwight Stambolian

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joan E. Bailey-Wilson

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Taura N. Holmes

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Debra Dana

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lauren Reider

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Chris Moy

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Melissa Schlifka

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge