Graeme J. Kennedy

Effects of global shape on angle discrimination

Previous studies have been inconclusive as to whether angle discrimination performance can be predicted by the sensitivity of orientation discrimination mechanisms or by that of mechanisms specialised for angle coding. However, these studies have assumed that angle discrimination is independent of the shape of the object of which the angle is a part. This assumption was tested by measuring angle discrimination using angles that were parts of different triangular shapes. Angle discrimination thresholds were lowest when angles were presented in isosceles triangles (sides forming the angle were of identical length). Performance was significantly poorer when angles were presented in scalene triangles (sides of different lengths) and as much as three times worse when the sides forming the angle varied randomly in length between presentations. Comparing orientation discrimination for single lines with angle discrimination for different stimulus conditions (isosceles, scalene and random triangles) leads to conflicting conclusions as to the mechanisms underlying angle perception: line orientation sensitivity correctly predicts angle discrimination for random triangles, but underestimates angle acuity for isosceles triangles. The fact that performance in angle discrimination tasks is strongly dependant on the overall stimulus geometry implies that geometric angles are computed by mechanisms that are sensitive to global aspects of the stimulus.

Global shape versus local feature: An angle illusion

We have shown previously that the precision of angle judgments depends strongly on the global stimulus configuration: discrimination thresholds for angles that form part of isosceles triangles are up to 3 times lower than for those that form part of scalene triangles [Kennedy, G. J., Orbach, H. S., & Loffler, G. (2006). Effects of global shape on angle discrimination. VisionResearch, 46(8-9), 1530-1539]. Here, we investigated whether or not the perceived size of an angle (accuracy) is also affected by the overall shape of which it forms a part. Observers compared the relative sizes of angles contained in isosceles triangles with those of angles in scalene triangles and points of subjective equality were determined. For a reference angle of 60 degrees , angles embedded in isosceles triangles were judged to be on average 14 degrees larger than angles embedded in scalene triangles. This result is largely independent of the reference angle, triangle orientation and triangle size. Moreover, the effect is present whether or not triangles of different shapes enclose the same area, whether or not the side of the triangle opposite the angle is present and whether the triangle is outlined or defined by dots at its vertexes. In sum, our results provide evidence for a novel illusion where an angle embedded in an isosceles triangle is judged substantially larger than the same angle embedded in a scalene triangle. This finding demonstrates that mechanisms for computing angles are sensitive to the context within which angles are presented.

Distinct lower visual field preference for object shape

Humans manipulate objects chiefly within their lower visual field, a consequence of upright posture and the anatomical position of hands and arms.This study tested the hypothesis of enhanced sensitivity to a range of stimuli within the lower visual field. Following current models of hierarchical processing within the ventral steam, discrimination sensitivity was measured for orientation, curvature, shape (radial frequency patterns), and faces at various para-central locations (horizontal, vertical, and main diagonal meridians) and eccentricities (5° and 10°). Peripheral sensitivity was isotropic for orientation and curvature. By contrast, observers were significantly better at discriminating shapes throughout the lower visual field compared to elsewhere. For faces, however, peak sensitivity was found in the left visual field, corresponding to the right hemispheric localization of human face processing. Presenting head outlines without any internal features (e.g., eyes, mouth) recovered the lower visual field advantage found for simple shapes. A lower visual field preference for the shape of an object, which is absent for more localized information (orientation and curvature) but also for more complex objects (faces), is inconsistent with a strictly feed-forward model and poses a challenge for multistage models of object perception. The distinct lower visual field preference for contour shapes is, however, consistent with an asymmetry at intermediate stages of visual processing, which may play a key role in representing object characteristics that are particularly relevant to visually guided actions.

Idiopathic, isolated fovea plana with bilateral off-centre multifocal ERGs

BackgroundThe purpose of this paper is to report a case of idiopathic isolated fovea plana showing asymmetry in the multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG).MethodsWe carried out optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging, macular pigment density measurement, genetic testing and electrophysiological testing with visual evoked potentials and mfERGs on a young, highly myopic female of Pakistani origin, who had good visual acuity and no nystagmus.ResultsOCT imaging revealed a complete absence of any foveal pit in either eye. Macular pigment density was normal and visual evoked potentials indicated normal chiasmal crossings, excluding albinism. Genetic testing revealed normal PAX6 coding data, excluding aniridia as a cause. mfERGs showed asymmetry consistent with off-centre fixation to the temporal side of the fovea in both eyes, but were otherwise normal.ConclusionLack of a foveal pit is a well-known finding in conditions such as oculocutaneous albinism and PAX6 gene-related aniridia. Isolated fovea plana is less common, and this case illustrates that the absence of a foveal pit does not necessarily result in a poor visual outcome. The finding of asymmetry in the mfERG in such a case is novel, and may indicate a functional adaptation to the structure of the fovea.