Grant Fullarton

A Randomized Trial Comparing Heater Probe Plus Thrombin With Heater Probe Plus Placebo for Bleeding Peptic Ulcer

BACKGROUND & AIMS This multicenter, double-blind, controlled trial compared the efficacy of combined endoscopic hemostatic treatment using the heater probe plus thrombin injection with that of the heater probe plus placebo injection as treatment for peptic ulcers with active bleeding or nonbleeding visible vessels. Efficacy was defined in terms of primary hemostasis, prevention of rebleeding, and need for urgent surgery. METHODS Two hundred forty-seven patients presenting with major peptic ulcer bleeding were randomized to heater probe plus thrombin or to heater probe plus placebo. The groups were well matched for all risk categories including age, endoscopic stigmata, shock, and severity of comorbid diseases. Endoscopic therapy was applied using the heater probe followed by injection of thrombin or placebo. RESULTS Successful primary hemostasis was achieved in 97% of patients. Rebleeding developed in 19 (15%) of thrombin plus heater probe patients and 17 (15%) of placebo plus heater probe patients. Emergency surgery was necessary in 16 and 13 patients, respectively. Eight patients in the thrombin group had adverse events compared with 4 in the placebo group. Eight (6%) of thrombin plus heater probe patients and 14 (12%) of placebo plus heater probe patients died (P = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS The combination of thrombin and the heater probe does not confer an additional benefit over heater probe and placebo as endoscopic treatment for bleeding peptic ulcer. Our trial does not support the use of this combination of hemostatic therapy.

The current role of photodynamic therapy in oesophageal dysplasia and cancer

Over the last 15 years photodynamic therapy (PDT) has become a viable treatment for pre-malignant and malignant disease of the oesophagus. Its initial use was in the palliation of oesophageal malignant obstruction bringing improved swallowing hence increasing nutritional intake and improving general quality of life. As the therapeutic boundaries of PDT have stretched, current studies look at the role of PDT in the treatment of pre-malignant dysplastic Barretts epithelium and early malignancy as a curative mucosal ablative technique. As a curative treatment in early oesophageal cancer, PDT provides an alternative treatment to oesophagectomy for those more elderly or less medically fit patients. This paper reviews the uses of photodynamic therapy in oesophageal cancer with reference to the available publications on its use in the palliation of oesophageal cancer and treatment of early cancer and high grade dysplasia in Barretts mucosa.

Esomeprazole and aspirin in Barrett's oesophagus (AspECT): a randomised factorial trial

Summary Background Oesophageal adenocarcinoma is the sixth most common cause of cancer death worldwide and Barretts oesophagus is the biggest risk factor. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of high-dose esomeprazole proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) and aspirin for improving outcomes in patients with Barretts oesophagus. Methods The Aspirin and Esomeprazole Chemoprevention in Barretts metaplasia Trial had a 2 × 2 factorial design and was done at 84 centres in the UK and one in Canada. Patients with Barretts oesophagus of 1 cm or more were randomised 1:1:1:1 using a computer-generated schedule held in a central trials unit to receive high-dose (40 mg twice-daily) or low-dose (20 mg once-daily) PPI, with or without aspirin (300 mg per day in the UK, 325 mg per day in Canada) for at least 8 years, in an unblinded manner. Reporting pathologists were masked to treatment allocation. The primary composite endpoint was time to all-cause mortality, oesophageal adenocarcinoma, or high-grade dysplasia, which was analysed with accelerated failure time modelling adjusted for minimisation factors (age, Barretts oesophagus length, intestinal metaplasia) in all patients in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with EudraCT, number 2004-003836-77. Findings Between March 10, 2005, and March 1, 2009, 2557 patients were recruited. 705 patients were assigned to low-dose PPI and no aspirin, 704 to high-dose PPI and no aspirin, 571 to low-dose PPI and aspirin, and 577 to high-dose PPI and aspirin. Median follow-up and treatment duration was 8·9 years (IQR 8·2–9·8), and we collected 20 095 follow-up years and 99·9% of planned data. 313 primary events occurred. High-dose PPI (139 events in 1270 patients) was superior to low-dose PPI (174 events in 1265 patients; time ratio [TR] 1·27, 95% CI 1·01–1·58, p=0·038). Aspirin (127 events in 1138 patients) was not significantly better than no aspirin (154 events in 1142 patients; TR 1·24, 0·98–1·57, p=0·068). If patients using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were censored at the time of first use, aspirin was significantly better than no aspirin (TR 1·29, 1·01–1·66, p=0·043; n=2236). Combining high-dose PPI with aspirin had the strongest effect compared with low-dose PPI without aspirin (TR 1·59, 1·14–2·23, p=0·0068). The numbers needed to treat were 34 for PPI and 43 for aspirin. Only 28 (1%) participants reported study-treatment-related serious adverse events. Interpretation High-dose PPI and aspirin chemoprevention therapy, especially in combination, significantly and safely improved outcomes in patients with Barretts oesophagus. Funding Cancer Research UK, AstraZeneca, Wellcome Trust, and Health Technology Assessment.

Porfimer sodium photodynamic therapy in the treatment of early oesophageal carcinoma

BACKGROUND The gold standard treatment of early oesophageal carcinoma is oesophagectomy but the elderly population affected are often medically unfit for this radical intervention and less invasive curative options are required. We describe our experience of porfimer sodium photodynamic therapy (PDT) as an alternative to surgery in such a patient group. METHODS From 1999 to 2005 28 oesophageal cancer patients were found to have early stage disease based initially on endoscopy/CT and latterly on CT/endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) criteria. Although potentially suitable for major surgical resection these patients were judged to be medically unfit and were selected to have PDT. Patients were followed up endoscopically at 6-12-week intervals indefinitely with biopsy of the treated area. RESULTS 18/28 patients had an initial complete response 8 weeks post procedure. One patient died before reassessment of unrelated disease. Nine patients were non-responders. 7/18 complete responders remained disease free for a mean follow up period of 1166 days (249-2019). 11/18 developed recurrent local disease treated with further PDT with a median survival of 770 days (254-2049). Fourteen patients had EUS staging which accurately predicted response: all T1N0 patients (9/14) had initial complete response to treatment although 5/9 have required further PDT. All remain disease free at a follow up of 1103 days (249-2019). No patients with T2/3N0 disease had complete response to treatment. The major complication of PDT encountered was stricture formation which occurred in 50% of cases and required a median of five dilations (range 1-31). CONCLUSIONS Porfimer sodium PDT is a potentially curative treatment in patients with early oesophageal carcinoma who may be unfit or unwilling to undergo major surgery.