Grant Izmirlian
National Institutes of Health
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Grant Izmirlian.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute | 2012
Gerald L. Andriole; E. David Crawford; Robert L. Grubb; Saundra S. Buys; David Chia; Timothy R. Church; Mona N. Fouad; Claudine Isaacs; Paul A. Kvale; Douglas J. Reding; Joel L. Weissfeld; Lance A. Yokochi; Barbara O’Brien; Lawrence R. Ragard; Jonathan D. Clapp; Joshua M. Rathmell; Thomas L. Riley; Ann W. Hsing; Grant Izmirlian; Paul F. Pinsky; Barnett S. Kramer; Anthony B. Miller; John K. Gohagan; Philip C. Prorok
BACKGROUND The prostate component of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial was undertaken to determine whether there is a reduction in prostate cancer mortality from screening using serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and digital rectal examination (DRE). Mortality after 7-10 years of follow-up has been reported previously. We report extended follow-up to 13 years after the trial. METHODS A total of 76 685 men, aged 55-74 years, were enrolled at 10 screening centers between November 1993 and July 2001 and randomly assigned to the intervention (organized screening of annual PSA testing for 6 years and annual DRE for 4 years; 38 340 men) and control (usual care, which sometimes included opportunistic screening; 38 345 men) arms. Screening was completed in October 2006. All incident prostate cancers and deaths from prostate cancer through 13 years of follow-up or through December 31, 2009, were ascertained. Relative risks (RRs) were estimated as the ratio of observed rates in the intervention and control arms, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated assuming a Poisson distribution for the number of events. Poisson regression modeling was used to examine the interactions with respect to prostate cancer mortality between trial arm and age, comorbidity status, and pretrial PSA testing. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS Approximately 92% of the study participants were followed to 10 years and 57% to 13 years. At 13 years, 4250 participants had been diagnosed with prostate cancer in the intervention arm compared with 3815 in the control arm. Cumulative incidence rates for prostate cancer in the intervention and control arms were 108.4 and 97.1 per 10 000 person-years, respectively, resulting in a relative increase of 12% in the intervention arm (RR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.07 to 1.17). After 13 years of follow-up, the cumulative mortality rates from prostate cancer in the intervention and control arms were 3.7 and 3.4 deaths per 10 000 person-years, respectively, resulting in a non-statistically significant difference between the two arms (RR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.87 to 1.36). No statistically significant interactions with respect to prostate cancer mortality were observed between trial arm and age (P(interaction) = .81), pretrial PSA testing (P(interaction) = .52), and comorbidity (P(interaction) = .68). CONCLUSIONS After 13 years of follow-up, there was no evidence of a mortality benefit for organized annual screening in the PLCO trial compared with opportunistic screening, which forms part of usual care, and there was no apparent interaction with age, baseline comorbidity, or pretrial PSA testing.
JAMA | 2011
Saundra S. Buys; Edward E. Partridge; Amanda Black; Christine Cole Johnson; Lois Lamerato; Claudine Isaacs; Douglas J. Reding; Robert T. Greenlee; Lance A. Yokochi; Bruce Kessel; E. David Crawford; Timothy R. Church; Gerald L. Andriole; Joel L. Weissfeld; Mona N. Fouad; David Chia; Barbara O'Brien; Lawrence R. Ragard; Jonathan D. Clapp; Joshua M. Rathmell; Thomas L. Riley; Patricia Hartge; Paul F. Pinsky; Claire Zhu; Grant Izmirlian; Barnett S. Kramer; Anthony B. Miller; Jian Lun Xu; Philip C. Prorok; John K. Gohagan
CONTEXT Screening for ovarian cancer with cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) and transvaginal ultrasound has an unknown effect on mortality. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of screening for ovarian cancer on mortality in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Randomized controlled trial of 78,216 women aged 55 to 74 years assigned to undergo either annual screening (n = 39,105) or usual care (n = 39,111) at 10 screening centers across the United States between November 1993 and July 2001. Intervention The intervention group was offered annual screening with CA-125 for 6 years and transvaginal ultrasound for 4 years. Participants and their health care practitioners received the screening test results and managed evaluation of abnormal results. The usual care group was not offered annual screening with CA-125 for 6 years or transvaginal ultrasound but received their usual medical care. Participants were followed up for a maximum of 13 years (median [range], 12.4 years [10.9-13.0 years]) for cancer diagnoses and death until February 28, 2010. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Mortality from ovarian cancer, including primary peritoneal and fallopian tube cancers. Secondary outcomes included ovarian cancer incidence and complications associated with screening examinations and diagnostic procedures. RESULTS Ovarian cancer was diagnosed in 212 women (5.7 per 10,000 person-years) in the intervention group and 176 (4.7 per 10,000 person-years) in the usual care group (rate ratio [RR], 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99-1.48). There were 118 deaths caused by ovarian cancer (3.1 per 10,000 person-years) in the intervention group and 100 deaths (2.6 per 10,000 person-years) in the usual care group (mortality RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.82-1.71). Of 3285 women with false-positive results, 1080 underwent surgical follow-up; of whom, 163 women experienced at least 1 serious complication (15%). There were 2924 deaths due to other causes (excluding ovarian, colorectal, and lung cancer) (76.6 per 10,000 person-years) in the intervention group and 2914 deaths (76.2 per 10,000 person-years) in the usual care group (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.96-1.06). CONCLUSIONS Among women in the general US population, simultaneous screening with CA-125 and transvaginal ultrasound compared with usual care did not reduce ovarian cancer mortality. Diagnostic evaluation following a false-positive screening test result was associated with complications. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00002540.
The New England Journal of Medicine | 2012
Robert E. Schoen; Paul F. Pinsky; Joel L. Weissfeld; Lance A. Yokochi; Timothy R. Church; Adeyinka O. Laiyemo; Robert S. Bresalier; Gerald L. Andriole; Saundra S. Buys; E. David Crawford; Mona N. Fouad; Claudine Isaacs; Christine Cole Johnson; Douglas J. Reding; Barbara O'Brien; Danielle M. Carrick; Patrick Wright; Thomas L. Riley; Mark P. Purdue; Grant Izmirlian; Barnett S. Kramer; Anthony B. Miller; John K. Gohagan; Philip C. Prorok; Christine D. Berg
BACKGROUND The benefits of endoscopic testing for colorectal-cancer screening are uncertain. We evaluated the effect of screening with flexible sigmoidoscopy on colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality. METHODS From 1993 through 2001, we randomly assigned 154,900 men and women 55 to 74 years of age either to screening with flexible sigmoidoscopy, with a repeat screening at 3 or 5 years, or to usual care. Cases of colorectal cancer and deaths from the disease were ascertained. RESULTS Of the 77,445 participants randomly assigned to screening (intervention group), 83.5% underwent baseline flexible sigmoidoscopy and 54.0% were screened at 3 or 5 years. The incidence of colorectal cancer after a median follow-up of 11.9 years was 11.9 cases per 10,000 person-years in the intervention group (1012 cases), as compared with 15.2 cases per 10,000 person-years in the usual-care group (1287 cases), which represents a 21% reduction (relative risk, 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72 to 0.85; P<0.001). Significant reductions were observed in the incidence of both distal colorectal cancer (479 cases in the intervention group vs. 669 cases in the usual-care group; relative risk, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.80; P<0.001) and proximal colorectal cancer (512 cases vs. 595 cases; relative risk, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.97; P=0.01). There were 2.9 deaths from colorectal cancer per 10,000 person-years in the intervention group (252 deaths), as compared with 3.9 per 10,000 person-years in the usual-care group (341 deaths), which represents a 26% reduction (relative risk, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.87; P<0.001). Mortality from distal colorectal cancer was reduced by 50% (87 deaths in the intervention group vs. 175 in the usual-care group; relative risk, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.64; P<0.001); mortality from proximal colorectal cancer was unaffected (143 and 147 deaths, respectively; relative risk, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.22; P=0.81). CONCLUSIONS Screening with flexible sigmoidoscopy was associated with a significant decrease in colorectal-cancer incidence (in both the distal and proximal colon) and mortality (distal colon only). (Funded by the National Cancer Institute; PLCO ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00002540.).
JAMA | 2011
Martin M. Oken; Willam G. Hocking; Paul A. Kvale; Gerald L. Andriole; Saundra S. Buys; Timothy R. Church; E. David Crawford; Mona N. Fouad; Claudine Isaacs; Douglas J. Reding; Joel L. Weissfeld; Lance A. Yokochi; Barbara O’Brien; Lawrence R. Ragard; Joshua M. Rathmell; Thomas L. Riley; Patrick Wright; Neil Caparaso; Ping Hu; Grant Izmirlian; Paul F. Pinsky; Philip C. Prorok; Barnett S. Kramer; Anthony B. Miller; John K. Gohagan; Christine D. Berg
CONTEXT The effect on mortality of screening for lung cancer with modern chest radiographs is unknown. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect on mortality of screening for lung cancer using radiographs in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Randomized controlled trial that involved 154,901 participants aged 55 through 74 years, 77,445 of whom were assigned to annual screenings and 77,456 to usual care at 1 of 10 screening centers across the United States between November 1993 and July 2001. The data from a subset of eligible participants for the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), which compared chest radiograph with spiral computed tomographic (CT) screening, were analyzed. INTERVENTION Participants in the intervention group were offered annual posteroanterior view chest radiograph for 4 years. Diagnostic follow-up of positive screening results was determined by participants and their health care practitioners. Participants in the usual care group were offered no interventions and received their usual medical care. All diagnosed cancers, deaths, and causes of death were ascertained through the earlier of 13 years of follow-up or until December 31, 2009. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Mortality from lung cancer. Secondary outcomes included lung cancer incidence, complications associated with diagnostic procedures, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS Screening adherence was 86.6% at baseline and 79% to 84% at years 1 through 3; the rate of screening use in the usual care group was 11%. Cumulative lung cancer incidence rates through 13 years of follow-up were 20.1 per 10,000 person-years in the intervention group and 19.2 per 10,000 person-years in the usual care group (rate ratio [RR]; 1.05, 95% CI, 0.98-1.12). A total of 1213 lung cancer deaths were observed in the intervention group compared with 1230 in usual care group through 13 years (mortality RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.87-1.22). Stage and histology were similar between the 2 groups. The RR of mortality for the subset of participants eligible for the NLST, over the same 6-year follow-up period, was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.81-1.10). CONCLUSION Annual screening with chest radiograph did not reduce lung cancer mortality compared with usual care. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00002540.
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation | 1998
Taina Rantanen; Jack M. Guralnik; Grant Izmirlian; Jeff D. Williamson; Eleanor M. Simonsick; Luigi Ferrucci; Linda P. Fried
Our aim was to study the association of lower limb strength with maximum walking speed in disabled older women and to try to detect the reserve capacity threshold for maximum walking speed and the minimum strength required for walking at a speed of 1.22 m x s(-1), which is required in crossing signaled intersections. The data are from the baseline of Womens Health and Aging Study, a population-based study on causes and course of disability. Altogether, 1,002 disabled women participated in the tests, which took place at their homes. Maximum isometric hip flexion and knee extension forces were measured on both sides using a handheld dynamometer. For analytic purposes, knee extension torque/body mass ratio (KET/BM) was calculated. Maximum walking speed was measured with a stopwatch during a 4-m walk. KET/BM had a significant effect on walking speed after controlling for number of chronic conditions, balance, use of walking aid, joint pain, age, and body height and mass. A total of 42.3% of the variation in maximum walking speed was explained by these variables. The cumulative percentage distribution of KET/BM of those able to attain a maximum walking speed of 1.22 m x s(-1) (n = 148) was flat to the level of 1.1 N x m x kg(-1), after which it turned upward, indicating that the probability of attaining 1.22 m x s(-1) started to increase after that level. By using segmented linear regression analysis, 2.3 N x m x kg(-1) was found to be the cutoff point beyond which an increase in KET/BM did not correspond to an increase in maximum walking speed. Muscle strength was positively but not linearly associated with maximum walking speed. Strength testing may help to identify people close to functional thresholds and, thus, at risk of impaired walking, who would benefit most from strengthening exercises.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2011
E. David Crawford; Robert L. Grubb; Amanda Black; Gerald L. Andriole; Ming-Hui Chen; Grant Izmirlian; Christine D. Berg; Anthony V. D'Amico
PURPOSE Estimates of prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) were similar for men randomly assigned to intervention compared with usual care on the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian PC screening study. However, results analyzed by comorbidity strata remain unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between 1993 and 2001, of 76,693 men who were randomly assigned to usual care or intervention at 10 US centers, 73,378 (96%) completed a questionnaire that inquired about comorbidity and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing before random assignment. Fine and Grays multivariable analysis was performed to assess whether the randomized screening arm was associated with the risk of PCSM in men with no or minimal versus at least one significant comorbidity, adjusting for age and prerandomization PSA testing. RESULTS After 10 years of follow-up, 9,565 deaths occurred, 164 from PC. A significant decrease in the risk of PCSM (22 v 38 deaths; adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 0.56; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.95; P = .03) was observed in men with no or minimal comorbidity randomly assigned to intervention versus usual care, and the additional number needed to treat to prevent one PC death at 10 years was five. Among men with at least one significant comorbidity, those randomly assigned to intervention versus usual care did not have a decreased risk of PCSM (62 v 42 deaths; AHR, 1.43; 95% CI, 0.96 to 2.11; P = .08). CONCLUSION Selective use of PSA screening for men in good health appears to reduce the risk of PCSM with minimal overtreatment.
BJUI | 2008
Robert L. Grubb; Paul F. Pinsky; Robert T. Greenlee; Grant Izmirlian; Anthony B. Miller; Thomas Hickey; Thomas L. Riley; Jerome Mabie; David L. Levin; David Chia; Barnett S. Kramer; Douglas J. Reding; Timothy R. Church; Lance A. Yokochi; Paul A. Kvale; Joel L. Weissfeld; Donald A. Urban; Saundra S. Buys; Edward P. Gelmann; Lawrence R. Ragard; E. David Crawford; Philip C. Prorok; John K. Gohagan; Christine D. Berg; Gerald L. Andriole
To describe the results of the first four rounds (T0‐T3) of prostate cancer screening in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial (designed to determine the value of screening in the four cancers), that for prostate cancer is evaluating whether annual screening with prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) and a digital rectal examination (DRE) reduces prostate cancer‐specific mortality.
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | 2009
Robert L. Grubb; Amanda Black; Grant Izmirlian; Thomas Hickey; Paul F. Pinsky; Jerome Mabie; Thomas L. Riley; Lawrence R. Ragard; Philip C. Prorok; Christine D. Berg; E. David Crawford; Timothy R. Church; Gerald L. Andriole
Background: Previous studies have shown an inverse relationship between prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration and body mass index (BMI). It has been recently proposed that this relationship may be explained by the larger plasma volume of obese men diluting a fixed amount of PSA (hemodilution effect). We examined this hypothesis in a cohort of men enrolled in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial. Methods: Of 38,349 men ages 55 to 74 years randomized in PLCO to receive annual PSA and digital rectal examination screening, 28,380 had a baseline PSA, complete demographic information, and no prostate cancer diagnosis within 6 years from baseline. Self-reported height and weight were used to calculate BMI and to estimate plasma volume. PSA mass was estimated as PSA concentration times plasma volume. Multivariable linear regression models were used to investigate the relationship between PSA concentration, plasma volume, PSA mass, and BMI. Results: PSA concentration significantly decreased with increasing BMI (P < 0.001); mean PSA values were 1.27, 1.25, 1.18, and 1.07 ng/mL among normal (BMI, 18.5-25), overweight (BMI, 25-30), obese (BMI, 30-35), and morbidly obese (BMI, >35) men, respectively. However, plasma volume also increased with increasing BMI and PSA mass showed no association with BMI, with mean values of 3.78, 3.95, 3.97, and 3.82 μg across the four BMI categories (P = 0.10). Conclusions: This study confirms earlier findings that the inverse relationship between PSA concentration and BMI may be explained by a hemodilution effect. These findings could have implications for prostate cancer screening in large men. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18(3):748–51)
Cancer | 2013
Paul F. Pinsky; Timothy R. Church; Grant Izmirlian; Barnett S. Kramer
The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), which compared lung cancer screening with low‐dose computed tomography (LDCT) versus chest radiography (CXR), demonstrated a statistically significant mortality benefit of LDCT screening. In the current study, the authors performed a post hoc analysis to examine whether the benefit was affected by various baseline factors, including age, sex, and smoking status, and whether it differed by tumor histology.
American Journal of Public Health | 1999
Maria Chiara Corti; Jack M. Guralnik; Luigi Ferrucci; Grant Izmirlian; Suzanne G. Leveille; Marco Pahor; Harvey J. Cohen; Carl F. Pieper; Richard J. Havlik
OBJECTIVES This cohort study evaluated racial differences in mortality among Blacks and Whites 65 years and older. METHODS A total of 4136 men and women (1875 Whites and 2261 Blacks) living in North Carolina were interviewed in 1986 and followed up for mortality until 1994. Hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause and cause-specific mortality were calculated, with adjustment for sociodemographic and coronary heart disease (CHD) risk factors. RESULTS Black persons had higher mortality rates than Whites at young-old age (65-80 years) but had significantly lower mortality rates after age 80. Black persons age 80 or older had a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR of Blacks vs Whites, 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.62, 0.90) and of CHD mortality (HR 0.44: 95% CI = 0.30, 0.66). These differences were not observed for other causes of death. CONCLUSIONS Racial differences in mortality are modified by age. This mortality crossover could be attributed to selective survival of the healthiest oldest Blacks or to other biomedical factors affecting longevity after age 80. Because the crossover was observed for CHD deaths only, age overreporting by Black older persons seems an unlikely explanation of the mortality differences.