Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Gregorio T. Obrador is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Gregorio T. Obrador.


Kidney International | 2010

KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients: a summary

Bertram L. Kasiske; Martin Zeier; Jeremy R. Chapman; Jonathan C. Craig; Henrik Ekberg; Catherine A. Garvey; Michael Green; Vivekanand Jha; Michelle A. Josephson; Bryce A. Kiberd; Henri Kreis; Ruth A. McDonald; John M. Newmann; Gregorio T. Obrador; Flavio Vincenti; Michael Cheung; Amy Earley; Gowri Raman; Samuel Abariga; Martin Wagner; Ethan M Balk

The 2009 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) clinical practice guideline on the monitoring, management, and treatment of kidney transplant recipients is intended to assist the practitioner caring for adults and children after kidney transplantation. The guideline development process followed an evidence-based approach, and management recommendations are based on systematic reviews of relevant treatment trials. Critical appraisal of the quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations followed the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The guideline makes recommendations for immunosuppression and graft monitoring, as well as prevention and treatment of infection, cardiovascular disease, malignancy, and other complications that are common in kidney transplant recipients, including hematological and bone disorders. Limitations of the evidence, especially the lack of definitive clinical outcome trials, are discussed and suggestions are provided for future research. This summary includes a brief description of methodology and the complete guideline recommendations but does not include the rationale and references for each recommendation, which are published elsewhere.


Archive | 2012

KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease

Jjv McMurray; Patrick S. Parfrey; John W. Adamson; Pedro Aljama; Jeffrey S. Berns; Julia Bohlius; Tilman B. Drüeke; Fredric O. Finkelstein; Steven Fishbane; Tomas Ganz; Iain C. Macdougall; Ruth A. McDonald; Lawrence P. McMahon; Gregorio T. Obrador; Gfm Strippoli; Günter Weiss; Andrzej Więcek

To the Editor: We have read the letter to the editor by Jerzy Przedlacki1 and the response from the authors2 of the Kidney Disease-Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) clinical practice guidelines for bisphosphonate (BP) treatment in chronic kidney disease (CKD), and would like to share our concerns regarding the use of BP treatment of CKD. The kidney is the organ that excretes many drugs, and any change in renal function will affect the pharmacology of these drugs. Existing or residual renal function of the patient will have to be taken into account while prescribing drugs. This is just as important for the patient with CKD 4 or 5, including those with CKD 5 already on peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis, who may still have residual renal function. Nephrotoxic drugs including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can very readily destroy whatever residual renal function patients may still have. Residual renal function is important to preserve as it contributes to less patient morbidity and mortality3 in the dialysis patient. Recently, there have been adverse reports of a certain BP that works by inhibiting osteoclast-mediated bone resorption, thereby slowing the breakdown of bone to reduce the risk of fractures. As of 14 August 2009, there have been 139 post-marketing reports of renal impairment following its use as an infusion worldwide. Many of these occur in patients with pre-existing medical conditions or risk factors (elderly, renal impairment, and/or concurrent dehydration), or in those on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or other concurrent exposure to other nephrotoxic agents. There have also been cases requiring dialysis, and occasional fatal outcomes have been reported in patients with pre-existing renal impairment and concomitant risk factors.4, 5, 6, 7


Kidney International | 2015

Executive summary of the KDIGO Controversies Conference on Supportive Care in Chronic Kidney Disease: developing a roadmap to improving quality care

Sara N. Davison; Adeera Levin; Alvin H. Moss; Vivekanand Jha; Edwina A. Brown; Frank Brennan; Fliss Murtagh; Saraladevi Naicker; Michael J. Germain; Donal O'Donoghue; Rachael L. Morton; Gregorio T. Obrador

Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) have a high burden of physical and psychosocial symptoms, poor outcomes, and high costs of care. Current paradigms of care for this highly vulnerable population are variable, prognostic and assessment tools are limited, and quality of care, particularly regarding conservative and palliative care, is suboptimal. The KDIGO Controversies Conference on Supportive Care in CKD reviewed the current state of knowledge in order to define a roadmap to guide clinical and research activities focused on improving the outcomes of people living with advanced CKD, including those on dialysis. An international group of multidisciplinary experts in CKD, palliative care, methodology, economics, and education identified the key issues related to palliative care in this population. The conference led to a working plan to address outstanding issues in this arena, and this executive summary serves as an output to guide future work, including the development of globally applicable guidelines.


Kidney International | 2010

Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in the Kidney Early Evaluation Program (KEEP) México and comparison with KEEP US

Gregorio T. Obrador; Guillermo Garcia-Garcia; Antonio R. Villa; Ximena Rubilar; Nadia Olvera; Evangelina Ferreira; Margarita Virgen; José Alfonso Gutiérrez-Padilla; Melissa Plascencia-Alonso; Martha Mendoza-Garcia; Salvador Plascencia-Pérez

The National Kidney Foundation Kidney Early Evaluation Program (KEEP) is a free community screening program aimed at early detection of kidney disease among high-risk individuals. A pilot phase of KEEP México began in 2008 in México City and Jalisco State. Adults with diabetes, hypertension, or family history of diabetes, hypertension, or chronic kidney disease (CKD) were invited to participate through advertising campaigns. All participants completed a questionnaire. Blood pressure, weight, and height were measured; blood and urine tests included albuminuria and serum creatinine to estimate glomerular filtration rate using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study equation. Mean age of KEEP México City and KEEP Jalisco participants was 46 and 53 years, respectively; >70% were women. CKD prevalence was 22% in KEEP México City and 33% in KEEP Jalisco, not significantly different from reported KEEP US prevalence of 26%. CKD stages 1 and 2 were more frequent in KEEP México and stage 3 in KEEP US. In KEEP México City, CKD prevalence was higher than the overall prevalence among participants with diabetes (38%) or diabetes and hypertension (42%). Most KEEP México participants were unaware of the CKD diagnosis, despite that 71% in KEEP México City had seen a doctor in the previous year. CKD is highly prevalent, underdiagnosed, and underrecognized among high-risk individuals in México. KEEP is an effective screening program that can successfully be adapted for use in México.


The Lancet | 2017

Global kidney health 2017 and beyond: a roadmap for closing gaps in care, research, and policy

Adeera Levin; Marcello Tonelli; Joseph V. Bonventre; Josef Coresh; Jo-Ann Donner; Agnes B. Fogo; Caroline S. Fox; Ron T. Gansevoort; Hiddo J. Lambers Heerspink; Meg Jardine; Bertram L. Kasiske; Anna Köttgen; Matthias Kretzler; Andrew S. Levey; Valerie A. Luyckx; Ravindra L. Mehta; Orson W. Moe; Gregorio T. Obrador; Neesh Pannu; Chirag R. Parikh; Vlado Perkovic; Carol A. Pollock; Peter Stenvinkel; Katherine R. Tuttle; David C. Wheeler; Kai-Uwe Eckardt; Dwomoa Adu; Sanjay Kumar Agarwal; Mona Alrukhaimi; Hans-Joachim Anders

The global nephrology community recognises the need for a cohesive plan to address the problem of chronic kidney disease (CKD). In July, 2016, the International Society of Nephrology hosted a CKD summit of more than 85 people with diverse expertise and professional backgrounds from around the globe. The purpose was to identify and prioritise key activities for the next 5-10 years in the domains of clinical care, research, and advocacy and to create an action plan and performance framework based on ten themes: strengthen CKD surveillance; tackle major risk factors for CKD; reduce acute kidney injury-a special risk factor for CKD; enhance understanding of the genetic causes of CKD; establish better diagnostic methods in CKD; improve understanding of the natural course of CKD; assess and implement established treatment options in patients with CKD; improve management of symptoms and complications of CKD; develop novel therapeutic interventions to slow CKD progression and reduce CKD complications; and increase the quantity and quality of clinical trials in CKD. Each group produced a prioritised list of goals, activities, and a set of key deliverable objectives for each of the themes. The intended users of this action plan are clinicians, patients, scientists, industry partners, governments, and advocacy organisations. Implementation of this integrated comprehensive plan will benefit people who are at risk for or affected by CKD worldwide.


Kidney International | 2016

Iron management in chronic kidney disease: conclusions from a “Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes” (KDIGO) Controversies Conference

Iain C. Macdougall; Andreas J. Bircher; Kai-Uwe Eckardt; Gregorio T. Obrador; Carol A. Pollock; Peter Stenvinkel; Dorine W. Swinkels; Christoph Wanner; Günter Weiss; Glenn M. Chertow; John W. Adamson; Tadao Akizawa; Stefan D. Anker; Michael Auerbach; Peter Bárány; Anatole Besarab; Sunil Bhandari; Ioav Cabantchik; Alan J. Collins; Daniel W. Coyne; Angel de Francisco; Steven Fishbane; Carlo A. J. M. Gaillard; Tomas Ganz; David Goldsmith; Chaim Hershko; Ewa A. Jankowska; Kirsten L. Johansen; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Philip A. Kalra

Before the introduction of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in 1989, repeated transfusions given to patients with end-stage renal disease caused iron overload, and the need for supplemental iron was rare. However, with the widespread introduction of ESAs, it was recognized that supplemental iron was necessary to optimize hemoglobin response and allow reduction of the ESA dose for economic reasons and recent concerns about ESA safety. Iron supplementation was also found to be more efficacious via intravenous compared to oral administration, and the use of intravenous iron has escalated in recent years. The safety of various iron compounds has been of theoretical concern due to their potential to induce iron overload, oxidative stress, hypersensitivity reactions, and a permissive environment for infectious processes. Therefore, an expert group was convened to assess the benefits and risks of parenteral iron, and to provide strategies for its optimal use while mitigating the risk for acute reactions and other adverse effects.


Transplantation | 2007

A report of the Lisbon Conference on the care of the kidney transplant recipient

Mario Abbud-Filho; Patricia L. Adams; Josefina Alberú; Carl Cardella; Jeremy R. Chapman; Pierre Cochat; Fernando G. Cosio; Gabriel M. Danovitch; Connie L. Davis; Robert S. Gaston; Atul Humar; Lawrence G. Hunsicker; Michelle A. Josephson; Bertram L. Kasiske; Günter Kirste; Alan B. Leichtman; Stephen R. Munn; Gregorio T. Obrador; Annika Tibell; Jonas Wadström; Martin Zeier; Francis L. Delmonico

An International Conference on the Care of the Kidney Transplant Recipient was convened in Lisbon, Portugal from February 2– 4, 2006 under the auspices of the National Kidney Foundation and Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO), and in cooperation with The Transplantation Society. Conference participants included over 100 experts and leaders in kidney transplantation, representing more than 40 countries from around the world, including participants from Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, North American, and South America (Appendix). The goal of the conference was to develop recommendations to improve the outcomes of kidney transplant recipients worldwide with regard to the following basic medical issues: cardiovascular disease (Work Group I), cancer and infection (Work Group II), and anemia, bone disease, reproductive issues, growth and development (Work Group III). Work Groups I, II, and III addressed the preand posttransplant care of kidney transplant recipients by the following components: timelines of preand posttransplantation, immunosuppression, level of kidney allograft function, and burden of disease (prior history of dialysis or preemptive transplant and how that history affects outcome). A graft maintenance section (Work Group IV) addressed: 1) recipient (and donor) selection; 2) surgical aspects and immediate posttransplant care of recipients including consideration of minimal surgical infrastructure; 3) immunosuppression including an assessment of the incremental expected value of more complex and expensive regimens in comparison to simpler and less expensive regimens, generics, midand long-term immunosuppression; 4) living donor versus deceased donor transplantation; and 5) midand long-term posttransplant care and monitoring of allograft function. In addition, conference participants were asked to examine the issue of applicability of the recently published Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease (CKD) in kidney allograft recipients (1). Specifically, Work Group V addressed the role of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in monitoring kidney function after transplantation, as well as the stratification for intervention according to eGFR values.


American Journal of Kidney Diseases | 2011

Establishing the Global Kidney Disease Prevention Network (KDPN): A Position Statement From the National Kidney Foundation

Gregorio T. Obrador; Mitra Mahdavi-Mazdeh; Allan J. Collins

The Global Kidney Disease Prevention Network is an international public health organization devoted to encouraging and enhancing efforts to increase awareness and recognition of kidney disease, detect it early, and provide treatment to prevent disease progression, improve patient outcomes, and decrease costs. Twenty-six participants from 12 low-, middle-, and high-income countries attended the first meeting, held in Geneva, Switzerland, on September 12-13, 2009. Work groups discussed target populations for chronic kidney disease (CKD) screening, optimal parameters for screening on a public health level, evaluating the impact of early screening programs, and use of screening data to inform health care policy. Of the screening programs discussed, most have targeted populations at high risk of CKD and have included medical history; weight, height, and blood pressure measurements; and blood and urine tests. In screenees, CKD prevalence ranged from 11%-33%. In screenees with CKD, few were aware of the disease, although substantial proportions had been seen by a physician in the previous 6-12 months. At the policy level, prevention of CKD implies prevention and control of risk-factor conditions, including diabetes, hypertension, and others. Given the high prevalence and under-recognition of CKD in different countries, a concerted effort to globally improve primary and secondary CKD prevention appears to be warranted.


Clinical Journal of The American Society of Nephrology | 2013

Effect of Red Cell Transfusions on Future Kidney Transplantation

Gregorio T. Obrador; Iain C. Macdougall

Red cell transfusions, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), and intravenous iron therapy all have a place in the treatment of anemia associated with CKD. Their relative merits and uses are subject to many clinical and nonclinical factors. New concerns associated with the use of ESA therapy make it likely that the use of blood transfusions will increase, refueling previous debates about their associated risks. Data on whether red cell transfusions increase sensitization to HLA antigens, rendering subsequent transplantation more problematic, are mainly derived from older literature. Older data suggested that women were more at risk of HLA sensitization than men, particularly those with previous multiple pregnancies, although recent U.S. Renal Data System data have challenged this. HLA sensitization prolongs the waiting time for transplantation and reduces graft survival. Leukocyte depletion of red cells does not appear to reduce the risk of HLA sensitization. This review summarizes much of the data on these issues, as well as highlighting the need for further research on the potential risks for blood transfusion in patients with CKD.


Journal of The American Society of Nephrology | 2002

End-Stage Renal Disease in Patients with Fabry Disease

Gregorio T. Obrador; Akinlolu Ojo; Ravi Thadhani

Anderson-Fabry disease (AFD) is a rare cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Renal pathology in AFD is notable for diffuse deposition of glycosphingolipid in the renal glomeruli, tubules, and vasculature. Light microscopic findings include a “foamy” appearance of the glomeruli with diffuse

Collaboration


Dive into the Gregorio T. Obrador's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bertram L. Kasiske

Hennepin County Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jonathan C. Craig

Children's Hospital at Westmead

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge