Gregory A. Wiseman

Use of Positron Emission Tomography for Response Assessment of Lymphoma: Consensus of the Imaging Subcommittee of International Harmonization Project in Lymphoma

PURPOSE To develop guidelines for performing and interpreting positron emission tomography (PET) imaging for treatment assessment in patients with lymphoma both in clinical practice and in clinical trials. METHODS An International Harmonization Project (IHP) was convened to discuss standardization of clinical trial parameters in lymphoma. An imaging subcommittee developed consensus recommendations based on published PET literature and the collective expertise of its members in the use of PET in lymphoma. Only recommendations subsequently endorsed by all IHP subcommittees were adopted. RECOMMENDATIONS PET after completion of therapy should be performed at least 3 weeks, and preferably at 6 to 8 weeks, after chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy, and 8 to 12 weeks after radiation or chemoradiotherapy. Visual assessment alone is adequate for interpreting PET findings as positive or negative when assessing response after completion of therapy. Mediastinal blood pool activity is recommended as the reference background activity to define PET positivity for a residual mass > or = 2 cm in greatest transverse diameter, regardless of its location. A smaller residual mass or a normal sized lymph node (ie, < or = 1 x 1 cm in diameter) should be considered positive if its activity is above that of the surrounding background. Specific criteria for defining PET positivity in the liver, spleen, lung, and bone marrow are also proposed. Use of attenuation-corrected PET is strongly encouraged. Use of PET for treatment monitoring during a course of therapy should only be done in a clinical trial or as part of a prospective registry.

Randomized Controlled Trial of Yttrium-90–Labeled Ibritumomab Tiuxetan Radioimmunotherapy Versus Rituximab Immunotherapy for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Low-Grade, Follicular, or Transformed B-Cell Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma

PURPOSE Radioimmunotherapy combines biologic and radiolytic mechanisms to target and destroy tumor cells, thus offering a needed therapeutic alternative for refractory non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL) patients. This phase III randomized study compares the novel radioimmunotherapy yttrium-90 ((90)Y) ibritumomab tiuxetan with a control immunotherapy, rituximab, in 143 patients with relapsed or refractory low-grade, follicular, or transformed CD20(+) transformed NHL. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients received either a single intravenous (IV) dose of (90)Y ibritumomab tiuxetan 0.4 mCi/kg (n = 73) or rituximab 375 mg/m(2) IV weekly for four doses (n = 70). The radioimmunotherapy group was pretreated with two rituximab doses (250 mg/m(2)) to improve biodistribution and one dose of indium-111 ibritumomab tiuxetan for imaging and dosimetry. The primary end point, overall response rate (ORR), was assessed by an independent, blinded, lymphoma expert panel. RESULTS ORR was 80% for the (90)Y ibritumomab tiuxetan group versus 56% for the rituximab group (P =.002). Complete response (CR) rates were 30% and 16% in the (90)Y ibritumomab tiuxetan and rituximab groups, respectively (P =.04). An additional 4% achieved an unconfirmed CR in each group. Kaplan-Meier estimated median duration of response was 14.2 months in the (90)Y ibritumomab tiuxetan group versus 12.1 months in the control group (P =.6), and time to progression was 11.2 versus 10.1 months (P =.173) in all patients. Durable responses of > or = 6 months were 64% versus 47% (P =.030). Reversible myelosuppression was the primary toxicity noted with (90)Y ibritumomab tiuxetan. CONCLUSION Radioimmunotherapy with (90)Y ibritumomab tiuxetan is well tolerated and produces statistically and clinically significant higher ORR and CR compared with rituximab alone.

Treatment With Ibritumomab Tiuxetan Radioimmunotherapy in Patients With Rituximab-Refractory Follicular Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma

PURPOSE Rituximab is commonly used as a single agent or in combination therapy for non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL). Ibritumomab tiuxetan radioimmunotherapy targets the same antigen as rituximab and has demonstrated efficacy in rituximab-naïve NHL. This study evaluated ibritumomab tiuxetan in the treatment of rituximab-refractory follicular NHL. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients were refractory to rituximab; this was defined as no objective response to rituximab (375 mg/m(2) weekly for 4 weeks) or time to progression (TTP) of < or = 6 months. The ibritumomab tiuxetan treatment regimen consisted of pretreatment with rituximab (250 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 1 and 8) to deplete peripheral blood B cells, then yttrium-90 ibritumomab tiuxetan (0.4 mCi/kg; maximum, 32 mCi) intravenously on day 8, administered on an outpatient basis. An imaging/dosimetry dose of indium-111 ibritumomab tiuxetan (5 mCi) was injected after rituximab (day 1) in 28 patients. RESULTS Fifty-seven patients were treated. The median age was 54 years, 74% had tumors > or = 5 cm, and all were extensively pretreated (median, four prior therapies; range, one to nine). The estimated radiation-absorbed doses to healthy organs were below the study-defined limit in all patients studied with dosimetry. The overall response rate for the 54 patients with follicular NHL was 74% (15% complete responses and 59% partial responses). The Kaplan-Meier-estimated TTP was 6.8 months (range, 1.1 to > or = 25.9 months) for all patients and 8.7 months for responders. Adverse events were primarily hematologic; the incidence of grade 4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia was 35%, 9%, and 4%, respectively. CONCLUSION Ibritumomab tiuxetan radioimmunotherapy is effective in rituximab-refractory patients. The only significant toxicity is hematologic.

Phase I/II Trial of IDEC-Y2B8 Radioimmunotherapy for Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory CD20+ B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

PURPOSE Yttrium-90 ibritumomab tiuxetan (IDEC-Y2B8) is a murine immunoglobulin G1 kappa monoclonal antibody that covalently binds MX-DTPA (tiuxetan), which chelates the radioisotope yttrium-90. The antibody targets CD20, a B-lymphocyte antigen. A multicenter phase I/II trial was conducted to compare two doses of unlabeled rituximab given before radiolabeled antibody, to determine the maximum-tolerated single dose of IDEC-Y2B8 that could be administered without stem-cell support, and to evaluate safety and efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients had relapsed or refractory (two prior regimens or anthracycline if low-grade disease) CD20(+) B-cell low-grade, intermediate-grade, or mantle-cell non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL). There was no limit on bulky disease, and 59% had at least one mass > or = 5 cm. RESULTS The maximum-tolerated dose was 0.4 mCi/kg IDEC-Y2B8 (0.3 mCi/kg for patients with baseline platelet counts 100 to 149,000/microL). The overall response rate for the intent-to-treat population (n = 51) was 67% (26% complete response [CR]; 41% partial response [PR]); for low-grade disease (n = 34), 82% (26% CR; 56% PR); for intermediate-grade disease (n = 14), 43%; and for mantle-cell disease (n = 3), 0%. Responses occurred in patients with bulky disease (> or = 7 cm; 41%) and splenomegaly (50%). Kaplan-Meier estimate of time to disease progression in responders and duration of response is 12.9+ months and 11.7+ months, respectively. Adverse events were primarily hematologic and correlated with baseline extent of marrow involvement with NHL and baseline platelet count. One patient (2%) developed an anti-antibody response (human antichimeric antibody/human antimouse antibody). CONCLUSION These phase I/II data demonstrate that IDEC-Y2B8 radioimmunotherapy is a safe and effective alternative for outpatient therapy of patients with relapsed or refractory NHL. A phase III study is ongoing.

Safety of yttrium-90 ibritumomab tiuxetan radioimmunotherapy for relapsed low-grade, follicular, or transformed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

PURPOSE Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) with yttrium-90 ((90)Y)-labeled anti-CD20 antibody ((90)Y ibritumomab tiuxetan; Zevalin, IDEC Pharmaceuticals Corporation, San Diego, CA) has a high rate of tumor response in patients with relapsed or refractory, low-grade, follicular, or transformed B-cell non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL). This study presents the safety data from 349 patients in five studies of outpatient treatment with (90)Y ibritumomab tiuxetan. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients received rituximab 250 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, and either 0.4 mCi/kg (15 MBq/kg) or 0.3 mCi/kg (11 MBq/kg) of (90)Y ibritumomab tiuxetan on day 8 (maximum dose, 32 mCi). Patients were observed for up to 4 years after therapy or until progressive disease. RESULTS Infusion-related toxicities were typically grade 1 or 2 and were associated with rituximab. No significant organ toxicity was noted. Toxicity was primarily hematologic, with nadir counts occurring at 7 to 9 weeks and lasting approximately 1 to 4 weeks depending on the method of calculation. After the 0.4-mCi/kg dose, grade 4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia occurred in 30%, 10%, and 3% of patients, respectively, and after the 0.3-mCi/kg dose, these grade 4 toxicities occurred in 35%, 14%, and 8% of patients, respectively. The risk of hematologic toxicity increased with degree of baseline bone marrow involvement with NHL. Seven percent of patients were hospitalized with infection (3% with neutropenia) and 2% had grade 3 or 4 bleeding events. Myelodysplasia or acute myelogenous leukemia was reported in five patients (1%) 8 to 34 months after treatment. CONCLUSION Single-dose (90)Y ibritumomab tiuxetan RIT has an acceptable safety profile in relapsed NHL patients with less than 25% lymphoma marrow involvement, adequate marrow reserve, platelets greater than 100,000 cells/ micro L, and neutrophils greater than 1,500 cells/ micro L.

Phase I/II 90Y-Zevalin (yttrium-90 ibritumomab tiuxetan, IDEC-Y2B8) radioimmunotherapy dosimetry results in relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Abstract.Dosimetry studies in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma were performed to estimate the radiation absorbed dose to normal organs and bone marrow from 90Y-Zevalin (yttrium-90 ibritumomab tiuxetan, IDEC-Y2B8) treatment in this phase I/II, multicenter trial. The trial was designed to determine the dose of Rituximab (chimeric anti-CD20, Rituxan, IDEC-C2B8, MabThera), the unlabeled antibody given prior to the radioconjugate to clear peripheral blood B cells and optimize distribution, and to determine the maximum tolerated dose of 90Y-Zevalin [7.4, 11, or 15 MBq/kg (0.2, 0.3, or 0.4 mCi/kg)]. Patients received 111In-Zevalin (indium-111 ibritumomab tiuxetan, IDEC-In2B8 ) on day 0 followed by a therapeutic dose of 90Y-Zevalin on day 7. Both doses were preceded by an infusion of the chimeric, unlabeled antibody Rituximab. Following administration of 111In-Zevalin, serial anterior/posterior whole-body scans were acquired. Major-organ radioactivity versus time estimates were calculated using regions of interest. Residence times were computed and entered into the MIRDOSE3 computer software program to calculate estimated radiation absorbed dose to each organ. Initial analyses of estimated radiation absorbed dose were completed at the clinical site. An additional, centralized dosimetry analysis was performed subsequently to provide a consistent analysis of data collected from the seven clinical sites. In all patients with dosimetry data (n=56), normal organ and red marrow radiation absorbed doses were estimated to be well under the protocol-defined upper limit of 20 Gy and 3 Gy, respectively. Median estimated radiation absorbed dose was 3.4 Gy to liver (range 1.2–7.8 Gy), 2.6 Gy to lungs (range 0.72–4.4 Gy), and 0.38 Gy to kidneys (range 0.07–0.61 Gy). Median estimated tumor radiation absorbed dose was 17 Gy (range 5.8–67 Gy). No correlation was noted between hematologic toxicity and the following variables: red marrow radiation absorbed dose, blood T1/2, blood AUC, plasma T1/2, and plasma AUC. It is concluded that 90Y-Zevalin administered at nonmyeloablative maximum tolerated doses results in acceptable radiation absorbed doses to normal organs. The only toxicity of note is hematologic and is not correlated to red marrow radiation absorbed dose estimates or T1/2, reflecting that hematologic toxicity is dependent on bone marrow reserve in this heavily pretreated population.

The NANETS consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and management of poorly differentiated (High-Grade) extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas

Extrapulmonary poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas can originate in the gastrointestinal tract, bladder, cervix, and prostate. These high-grade malignancies are characterized by aggressive histological features (high mitotic rate, extensive necrosis, and nuclear atypia) and a poor clinical prognosis. They are infrequently associated with secretory hormonal syndromes (such as the carcinoid syndrome) and rarely express somatostatin receptors.Most poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas are locally advanced or metastatic at presentation. First-line systemic chemotherapy with a platinum agent (cisplatin or carboplatin) and etoposide is recommended for most patients with metastatic-stage disease; however, response durations are often short. Sequential or concurrent chemoradiation is recommended for patients with loco-regional disease. In patients with localized tumors undergoing surgical resection, adjuvant treatment (chemotherapy with or without radiation) is warranted in most cases.

Biodistribution and dosimetry results from a phase III prospectively randomized controlled trial of Zevalin radioimmunotherapy for low-grade, follicular, or transformed B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

UNLABELLED Radiation dosimetry studies were performed in patients with non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL) treated with 90Y Zevalin (90yttrium ibritumomab tiuxetan, IDEC-Y2B8) on a Phase III open-label prospectively randomized multicenter trial. The trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 90Y Zevalin radioimmunotherapy compared to rituximab (Rituxan, MabThera) immunotherapy for patients with relapsed or refractory low-grade, follicular, or transformed NHL. An important secondary objective was to determine if radiation dosimetry prior to 90Y Zevalin administration is required for safe treatment in this patient population. METHODS Patients randomized into the Zevalin arm were given a tracer dose of 5 mCi (185 MBq) (111)In Zevalin (111indium ibritumomab tiuxetan) on Day 0, evaluated with dosimetry, and then administered a therapeutic dose of 0.4 mCi/kg (15 MBq/kg) 90Y Zevalin on Day 7. Both Zevalin doses were preceded by an infusion of 250 mg/m(2) rituximab to clear peripheral B-cells and improve Zevalin biodistribution. Following administration of (111)In Zevalin, serial anterior and posterior whole-body scans were acquired and blood samples were obtained. Residence times for 90Y were estimated for major organs, and the MIRDOSE3 computer software program was used to calculate organ-specific and total body radiation absorbed dose. Patients randomized into the rituximab arm received a standard course of rituximab immunotherapy (375 mg/m(2) weekly x 4). RESULTS In a prospectively defined 90 patient interim analysis, the overall response rate was 80% for Zevalin vs. 44% for rituximab. For all patients with Zevalin dosimetry data (N=72), radiation absorbed doses were estimated to be below the protocol-defined upper limits of 300 cGy to red marrow and 2000 cGy to normal organs. The median estimated radiation absorbed doses were 71 cGy to red marrow (range: 18-221 cGy), 216 cGy to lungs (94-457 cGy), 532 cGy to liver (range: 234-1856 cGy), 848 cGy to spleen (range: 76-1902 cGy), 15 cGy to kidneys (0.27-76 cGy) and 1484 cGy to tumor (range: 61-24274 cGy). Toxicity was primarily hematologic, transient, and reversible. The severity of hematologic nadir did not correlate with estimates of effective half-life (half-life) or residence time of 90Y in blood, or radiation absorbed dose to the red marrow or total body. CONCLUSION 90Y Zevalin administered to NHL patients at non-myeloablative maximum tolerated doses delivers acceptable radiation absorbed doses to uninvolved organs. Lack of correlation between dosimetric or pharmacokinetic parameters and the severity of hematologic nadir suggest that hematologic toxicity is more dependent on bone marrow reserve in this heavily pre-treated population. Based on these findings, it is safe to administer 90Y Zevalin in this defined patient population without pre-treatment (111)In-based radiation dosimetry.

NANETS consensus guidelines for the diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumor.

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare, slow-growing neoplasms characterized by their ability to store and secrete different peptides and neuroamines. 1 Some of these substances cause specific clinical syndromes, 2 whereas other may have elevated plasma or urine levels that are not associated with specific syndromes or symptom complexes Unfortunately, there is no Bideal neuroendocrine tumor marker,[ 3 but according to the presentation, the sensitivity and specificity of each marker vary, and it is generally possible to choose those of greatest value for each clinical syndrome. The biochemical markers are those hormones or amines secreted by the neuroendocrine cells from which these tumors are derived. Some of these are not specific to any tumor, but are produced and secreted by most NETs, whereas other biochemical markers are more specific to the type of tumor and where their quantification can lead to the suspicion or confirmation of the presence of such a tumor. The annual incidence of NETs has risen to 40 to 50 cases per million, perhaps because of better diagnosis and the availability of highly specific and sensitive ways to measure these tumors’ products, improved immunohistochemistry, and enhanced techniques for tumor detection. Thus, the perceived increase in incidence may not be a real change in the incidence of the disease. There are a number of impediments to the diagnosis of these tumors. They are rare, comprising less than 2% of gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies, and are therefore not high on the list of causes of specific symptom complexes. Symptoms themselves are often nonspecific and do not lend themselves readily to identifying the specific underlying tumor. In addition, the manifestations are protean and mimic a variety of disorders. Tumors may be found incidentally on laparoscopy for abdominal pain or during the surgical removal of an appendix or even during a computerized tomographic scan of the abdomen for unexplained symptoms. Lung carcinoids may present with hemoptysis or asthma-like symptoms, and midgut carcinoids may be confused with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The natural history of this disease is invariably attended by a long history of vague abdominal symptoms, a series of visits to a primary care practitioner, and referral to a gastroenterologist, often with a misdiagnosis of IBS. These symptoms persist with a median latency to correct diagnosis of 9.2 years by which time the tumor has metastasized, causing symptoms such as flushing and diarrhea and progressing on its slow but relentless course until the patient dies. Clearly, a greater index of suspicion and a carcinoid tumor profile screen are warranted for all patients presenting with Btraditional IBS symptoms.[ Midgut carcinoids are associated with mesenteric fibrosis, which can compress mesenteric vessels and cause bowel ischemia and malabsorption, which may be found in the absence of an abdominal mass. The diagnosis of metastases to the liver is generally more obvious but often still takes place only after a delay of many years. Even then, an incorrect diagnosis is not uncommon. Unless biopsy material is examined for the secretory peptides chromogranin, synaptophysin, or neuron-specific enolase (NSE), tumors may be labeled erroneously as adenocarcinoma, with a negative impact on physician’s attitudes regarding management and underestimation of prospects for survival. 4 The common symptomatic manifestations of patients with carcinoid tumors are illustrated in Tables 1 and 2. Flushing

Long-term responses in patients with recurring or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated with yttrium 90 ibritumomab tiuxetan†

Radioimmunotherapy with radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies to CD20 produces a high response rate in patients with recurring non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), but the durability of those remissions is not well defined.