Gregory B. Maletis

A Prospective Randomized Study of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparison of Patellar Tendon and Quadruple-Strand Semitendinosus/Gracilis Tendons Fixed with Bioabsorbable Interference Screws

Background Debate exists regarding the optimal graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Few studies have compared the differences in outcome after reconstruction using similar fixation methods. Hypothesis Similar outcomes will be seen after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone or quadruple-strand semitendinosus/gracilis tendons fixed with bioabsorbable interference screws. Study Design Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods Ninety-nine patients were prospectively randomized to bone-patellar tendon-bone (46 patients) or quadruple-strand semitendinosus/gracilis (53 patients) reconstruction groups. The bone-patellar tendon-bone group had slightly lower preinjury Tegner scores (6.7 vs 7.1, P = .03); otherwise, the groups were similar. All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon using an endoscopic technique with bioabsorbable interference screw fixation. Patients were evaluated at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Results Forty-six bone-patellar tendon-bone and 50 quadruple-strand semitendinosus/gracilis patients were available at 24 months (97%). No differences in International Knee Documentation Committee grade, Lysholm score, Tegner activity level, range of motion, single-legged hop test, KT-1000 arthrometer manual maximum difference, Short Form-36, or patient knee rating were found. The bone-patellar tendon-bone group had better flexion strength in the operated leg than in the nonoperated leg (102% vs 90%, P = .0001), fewer patients complaining of difficulty jumping (3% vs 17%, P = .03), and a greater number of patients returning to preinjury Tegner level (51% vs 26%, P = .01). The quadruple-strand semitendinosus/gracilis group had better extension strength in the operated leg than in the nonoperated leg (92% vs 85%, P = .04), fewer patients with sensory deficits (14% vs 83%, P = .0001), and fewer patients with difficulty kneeling (6% vs 20%, P = .04). Both groups showed significant improvement in KT-1000 arthrometer manual maximum difference, Lysholm score, Tegner activity level, International Knee Documentation Committee grade, and patient knee rating score. Conclusions Good outcomes were seen in both the bone-patellar tendon-bone and quadruple-strand semitendinosus/gracilis groups. Subtle differences were noted between the groups, which may help guide optimal graft choice.

A Prospective Study of 80,000 Total Joint and 5000 Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Procedures in a Community-Based Registry in the United States

Health-care costs in the United States have increased substantially over time. From 1980 to 2007, the percentage of gross national product spent on health care has increased from 8.8% to 16%1. Total joint replacement is one of the most costly diagnosis-related groups, with >600,000 procedures performed each year in the United States2,3. The demand for total joint replacement is expected to increase in the United States as a result of advances in medical technology, an increased prevalence of obesity, and an increasing aging population2,4. By 2030, annual volumes are projected to increase by 673% for primary total knee arthroplasty and by 174% for primary total hip arthroplasty4. The demand for revision total knee and total hip arthroplasty is also projected to increase by 601% and 137%, respectively. Total knee and total hip arthroplasty costs are also expected to increase dramatically, with annual hospital charges estimated to reach

Analysis of 16,192 Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions From a Community-Based Registry

40.8 billion for primary total knee arthroplasty and

Are Meniscus and Cartilage Injuries Related to Time to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

17.4 billion for primary total knee arthroplasty by 20155. Similar increases in cost are projected for revision total knee and total hip arthroplasty. Wilson et al. estimated that by 2030, total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty will cost Medicare over

Risk Factors Associated With Revision and Contralateral Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions in the Kaiser Permanente ACLR Registry

50 billion6. In addition to increases in demand and cost, recent concerns about metal-on-metal bearing surfaces7 and recent implant recalls and advisories have emphasized the need to monitor total joint outcomes nationwide. The identification of procedures and implants associated with higher revision rates could prevent revision procedures, improving care and addressing the increased cost and demand associated with this procedure. Joint registries provide one potential solution for reducing total joint replacement implant variation and revision rates. The Swedish Hip Register8-11 has demonstrated the effectiveness …

Incidence of Postoperative Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Infections Graft Choice Makes a Difference

Background: Orthopaedic registries have shown value in tracking and surveillance of patients, implants, and outcomes associated with procedures. No current anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction registry (ACLRR) exists in the United States. Purpose: To describe the current cohort captured by an institutional ACLRR and describe the outcomes observed in the registered patients and how findings from the ACLRR are disseminated. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: The anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions (ACLRs) registered between February 2005 and September 2011 by 244 surgeons in 48 medical centers were evaluated. The ACLRR collected data intra- and postoperatively using paper forms and electronic medical records. The ACLRR cohort was longitudinally followed and outcomes were prospectively ascertained. Outcomes (ie, revisions, subsequent operations, venous thromboembolism, and surgical site infections) were adjudicated via chart review. Descriptive statistics are used to describe the cohort and Kaplan-Meier curves to evaluate survival. Results: During the study period, 16,192 ACLRs (15,101 primary and 1091 revisions) with a median follow-up of 1.6 years (interquartile range, 0.7-2.8 years) were registered. Male patients received 64% of both primary and revision ACLRs. The mean age at surgery was 29.5 years (SD, 11.4 years) for primary and revision reconstructions. Cartilage injuries were noted in 25.2% of primary and 37.5% of revision ACLRs, and meniscal injuries were identified in 60.8% and 53.2%, respectively. Autografts were used in 57.6% of primary ACLRs and 20.9% of revisions. Allografts were used in 42.4% of primaries and 78.8% of revisions. In primary ACLR, the most common femoral and tibial fixation types were interference screws (42.2% and 79.7%, respectively). Fixation type distribution was nearly identical in primaries and revisions. Of the primary ACLRs, 3.7% had subsequent operations on the same knee and 1.7% on the contralateral knee. Deep surgical site infection developed in 0.3% of primaries and 0.8% of revisions. Symptomatic deep vein thromboses were seen in 0.2% of both primaries and revisions. The overall revision rate was 1.7%. Lower rates of graft survival were identified in younger patients and those with allografts. Conclusion: Large, community-based ACLRRs are useful in informing participating surgeons of current treatment practices, prevalence of concurrent injuries, and outcomes associated with the procedures. Information from the ACLRR can be used to develop interactive patient and surgeon tools that can be used to optimize patient care.

Comparison of Community-Based ACL Reconstruction Registries in the U.S. and Norway

Background: Functional instability after anterior cruciate ligament injury can be successfully treated with ligament reconstruction. However, the associated meniscus and cartilage lesions often cannot be repaired and may have long-term detrimental effects on knee function. Purpose: The authors used the large database within the Kaiser Permanente Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Registry to evaluate time to surgery, age, and gender as risk factors for meniscus and cartilage injury and associations with meniscus repair rates in patients. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective review of the Kaiser Permanente Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Registry was performed. The associations between time to surgery, age, and gender with meniscus and cartilage lesions and meniscus repair were analyzed using binary logistic regression modeling to calculate odds ratios (ORs) while adjusting for potential confounding variables. Results: A total of 1252 patients met the inclusion criteria. The risk of medial meniscus injury increased only with time to surgery (6–12 months: OR = 1.81, 95% confidence internal [CI] 1.29-2.54, P = .001; and >12 months: OR = 2.19, 95% CI 1.58-3.02, P < .001). The risk of lateral meniscus injury decreased only with female gender (OR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.51-0.83, P = .001). The risk of cartilage injury increased with age (OR = 1.05 per year, 95% CI 1.04-1.07, P < .001) and time to surgery >12 months (OR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.12-2.20, P = .009), but decreased with female gender (OR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.54-0.92, P = .009). Medial meniscus repairs relative to medial meniscus injury decreased with increasing time to surgery (3-6 months: OR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.37-1.00, P = .050; and >12 months: OR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.25-0.67, P < .001) and increasing age (OR = 0.96 per year, 95% CI 0.94-0.98, P < .001). Conclusion: Increased risk of medial meniscus injury and decreased repair rate were strongly associated with increasing time to surgery. Increased risk of cartilage injury was associated with increasing age, increasing time to surgery, and male gender.

Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: Association of graft choice with increased risk of early revision

Background: Patients generally choose to undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) to return to their active lifestyles. However, returning to their previous activity level may result in a retear of their reconstructed knee or an injury to their contralateral anterior cruciate ligament (CACL). Purpose: To determine the risk factors associated with revision ACLR and contralateral ACLR (CACLR), compare the survival of the reconstructed ACL with the CACL, and determine how the risk factors associated with revision ACLR compare with those for CACLR. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data from the Kaiser Permanente ACLR registry between February 1, 2005, and September 30, 2012, was conducted. Primary ACLR cases without history of contralateral knee ACL injury were included. The study endpoints included revision ACLR and CACLR. Graft type (bone–patellar tendon–bone [BPTB] autograft, hamstring autograft, and allograft) was the main exposure of interest, and patient characteristics were evaluated as risk factors for revision ACLR and CACLR. Survival analyses were conducted. Results: A total of 17,436 ACLRs were evaluated. The median age was 27.2 years (interquartile range, 18.7-37.7 years), and 64% were males. The 5-year survival for index ACLR was 95.1% (95% CI, 94.5%-95.6%), and for CACL it was 95.8% (95% CI, 95.2%-96.3%). Overall, the cohort had a mean of 2.4 ± 1.7 years of follow-up; 18.2% were lost to follow-up. There were fewer CACLRs per 100 years of observation (0.83) than there were revision ACLRs (1.05) during the study period (P < .001). There was a statistically significant difference in the density of revision ACLR and CACL in BPTB autografts (0.74 vs 1.06, respectively; P = .010), hamstring autografts (1.07 vs 0.81; P = .042), and allografts (1.26 vs 0.67; P < .001). The risk factors for revision ACLR and contralateral surgery were different (P < .05). After adjusting for covariates, factors associated with higher risk of revision ACLR were as follows: allografts, hamstring autografts, male sex, younger age, lower body mass index (BMI), and being white as opposed to black. Factors associated with higher risk of CACLR were as follows: younger age, female sex, and lower BMI. Conclusion: The 5-year revision-free and CACLR-free survival rate in this study was 95.1% and 95.8%, respectively. Allografts and hamstring autografts had a higher risk of revision ACLR surgery, and BPTB autografts had a higher risk of CACLR. Males were found to have a higher risk of revision ACLR, and females had a higher risk of CACLR. Increasing age and increasing BMI decreased the risk of both revision and CACLR.

Incidence of Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism After Elective Knee Arthroscopy

Background: Infections after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) can be devastating. Hamstring tendon autografts may be more susceptible to infections than other graft types. Purpose: To determine the incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) in a large sample of patients who underwent ACLR and to evaluate the risk of superficial and deep SSIs associated with grafts used for ACLR. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: All primary ACLRs performed between February 2005 and September 2010 registered in the Kaiser Permanente ACLR registry were included in the study. The graft types evaluated included the bone–patellar tendon–bone (BPTB) autograft, hamstring tendon autograft, and allograft (all types). The main end point of the study, SSIs (deep and superficial), was prospectively ascertained using an electronic screening algorithm and adjudicated by the principal investigator. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the cohort, and logistic regression models were used to evaluate the likelihood of an infection. Results: There were 10,626 cases that fit the study criteria. The overall cohort was 64% male, mean age was 29 ± 11 years, and mean body mass index (BMI) was 27 ± 5 kg/m2. The overall incidence of SSIs was 0.48% (n = 51), with 17 (0.16%) superficial infections and 34 (0.32%) deep infections. Hamstring tendon autografts (n = 20; 0.61%) had the highest incidence of deep SSIs of the graft types (BPTB autograft, n = 2 [0.07%]; allograft, n = 12 [0.27%]; P < .001). After adjusting for age, sex, and BMI, the likelihood of a patient with a hamstring autograft having a deep SSI was 8.24 times higher (95% CI, 1.91-35.55; P = .005) than someone receiving a BPTB autograft. The risk of infections in allografts was not statistically significantly higher than BPTB autografts. Conclusion: The overall SSI rate after ACLR was 0.48%. Deep SSIs were identified in 0.32% of the ACLR cases and superficial SSIs in 0.16%. An 8.2-times higher risk of SSIs was observed in hamstring tendon autografts compared with BPTB autografts. No difference in SSI incidence was identified between allografts and BPTB autografts. Surgeons should bear in mind that although the overall infection rates after ACLR are low, there is an increased risk of deep infections with hamstring tendon autografts.

Revision Risk After Allograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Association With Graft Processing Techniques, Patient Characteristics, and Graft Type

INTRODUCTION Joint registries have demonstrated value as a resource for the study of large numbers of patients, providing the opportunity to study rare occurrences and identify early failures of surgical procedures. Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction registries have been established in Norway and the U.S. In this study, we compared the preoperative characteristics of the Norwegian National Knee Ligament Registry (NKLR) and the Kaiser Permanente Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Registry (KP ACLRR) cohorts. METHODS A cross-sectional comparison of the NKLR and KP ACLRR cohorts registered between 2005 and 2010 was performed. Aggregate level data including preoperative patient characteristics, mechanisms of injury, preoperative Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), intraoperative findings, and adjusted revision rates were shared between the two registries, and a descriptive analysis was conducted. RESULTS During the study period, 10,468 primary ACL reconstructions were entered in the NKLR and 10,394, in the KP ACLRR. The age at the time of surgery was similar between the two cohorts (twenty-seven years in the NKLR versus twenty-eight years in the KP ACLRR), although the KP ACLRR had a higher proportion of males (65% versus 58%, p < 0.001). The revision rate per follow-up year was 0.9% in the NKLR and 1.5% in the KP ACLRR. Soccer was the most common mechanism of injury in both registries (40.0% in the NKLR and 26.6% in the KP ACLRR). The preoperative KOOS was statistically different, but the difference was not clinically relevant (defined as a change of >10 points). A higher prevalence of meniscal tears was seen in the KP ACLRR (61% versus 49%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Baseline findings are so congruent between the NKLR and the KP ACLRR cohorts that comparisons between these two registries will likely provide information to the orthopaedic community that can be generalized.