Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Gregory D. Arnone is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Gregory D. Arnone.


Muscle & Nerve | 2013

Microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm in patients >65 years of age: an analysis of outcomes and complications.

Raymond F. Sekula; Andrew M. Frederickson; Gregory D. Arnone; Matthew R. Quigley; Mark Hallett

Few data are available to quantify the risks and benefits of microvascular decompression (MVD) in elderly patients with hemifacial spasm.


Neurological Research | 2011

The pathogenesis of Chiari I malformation and syringomyelia.

Raymond F. Sekula; Gregory D. Arnone; Christine Crocker; Khaled M. Aziz; Noam Alperin

Abstract Objective: The pathogeneses of Chiari malformation type I and syringomyelia are incompletely understood. In this article, the authors attempt to review the current theories on the pathogeneses of Chiari I malformation and syringomyelia. Methods: A literature review for articles pertaining to Chiari I malformation or syringomyelia before August 2010 was conducted; in addition, the author’s own experience in treating Chiari I malformation and syringomyelia is included. Results: Chiari I malformation has been defined radiographically as cerebellar tonsillar herniation or ectopia 5 mm or greater below the foramen magnum. By this narrow definition, Chiari I malformation (i.e. cerebellar tonsillar herniation or ectopia 5 mm or greater below the foramen magnum) likely encompasses a heterogeneous grouping of disorders caused by different mechanisms. Molecular and genetic studies have been helpful in furthering our understanding of Chiari I malformation. Conclusion: A review of the pathogeneses of Chiari I malformation and syringomyelia is reported.


Translational Research | 2016

Novel imaging approaches to cerebrovascular disease

Ziad A. Hage; Ali Alaraj; Gregory D. Arnone; Fady T. Charbel

Imaging techniques available to the physician treating neurovascular disease have substantially grown over the past several decades. New techniques as well as advances in imaging modalities continuously develop and provide an extensive array of modalities to diagnose, characterize, and understand neurovascular pathology. Modern noninvasive neurovascular imaging is generally based on computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, or nuclear imaging and includes CT angiography, CT perfusion, xenon-enhanced CT, single-photon emission CT, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance angiography, MR perfusion, functional magnetic resonance imaging with global and regional blood oxygen level dependent imaging, and magnetic resonance angiography with the use of the noninvasive optional vessel analysis software (River Forest, Ill). In addition to a brief overview of the technique, this review article discusses the clinical indications, advantages, and disadvantages of each of those modalities.


Journal of Neuro-oncology | 2018

Localized targeted antiangiogenic drug delivery for glioblastoma

Gregory D. Arnone; Abhiraj D. Bhimani; Tania Aguilar; Ankit I. Mehta

Systemic delivery of antiangiogenic agents has been ineffective in improving the overall survival of patients with both primary and recurrent glioblastoma, in part due to dose-limiting toxicities. With the development of new and efficient localized delivery methods and vehicles, an otherwise lethal dose of antiangiogenic chemotherapy can be used to treat tumors while minimizing systemic side effects. Current in-vitro and in-vivo animal studies have shown promising results that encourage the pursuit towards human clinical trials for localized antiangiogenic treatment in the near future.


World Neurosurgery | 2018

Adult Chiari I Malformations: An Analysis of Surgical Risk Factors and Complications Using an International Database

Abhiraj D. Bhimani; Darian R. Esfahani; Steven Denyer; Ryan G. Chiu; David Rosenberg; Ashley L. Barks; Gregory D. Arnone; Ankit I. Mehta

BACKGROUND Chiari I malformations are common in adults and a frequent procedure in neurosurgical practice. Despite several studies, there is no consensus about the indications or surgical technique for this common condition. Increasing emphasis on value-based care has emphasized reduction of readmissions and reoperations and is particularly relevant in Chiari, which has traditionally been associated with a high complication rate. OBJECTIVE To provide a contemporary surgical profile of risk factors and complications for Chiari I malformations in adults. METHODS The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried to determine 30-day outcomes after surgery for Chiari I malformations in adults between 2005 and 2016. Demographics, clinical risk factors, and postoperative events were analyzed, along with reoperation and readmission reasons. RESULTS A total of 672 adult patients were identified in the cohort, with a female predominance (80%). The overall cohort readmission rate was 9.3%, and 6.8% of patients returned to the operating room. Obesity (45.7%) was predictive of both readmission and reoperation risk. Male sex and American Society of Anesthesiologists class were predictive for reoperations. The most common reason for reoperation was cerebrospinal fluid leak, which was responsible for nearly two thirds of reoperations and 4% of the cohort. CONCLUSIONS Surgery for Chiari in adults is common and carries a definitive risk profile, including rates of readmission and reoperation higher than other common neurosurgical procedures. This cohort provides a representative sample of contemporary neurosurgical outcomes in surgery for Chiari I malformations.


World Neurosurgery | 2018

Impact of Platelet Transfusion on Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Patients on Antiplatelet Therapy–An Analysis Based on Intracerebral Hemorrhage Score

Gregory D. Arnone; Prateek Kumar; Matt Wonais; Darian R. Esfahani; Sally A. Campbell-Lee; Fady T. Charbel; Sepideh Amin-Hanjani; Ali Alaraj; Andreea Seicean; Ankit I. Mehta

OBJECTIVE Platelet transfusions for patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) on antiplatelet therapy (APT) remain controversial. Diverging past research and differences in platelet preparation warrant further investigation of this topic. In this study, the association between platelet transfusion and clinical outcomes of ICH is investigated in patients matched by ICH score, a validated predictor of mortality. METHODS A consecutive review of all patients from 2012 to 2015 with nontraumatic ICH was performed. Risk factors including demographics, medical comorbidities, APT use, and ICH score were reviewed. Standardized differences were used to assess baseline characteristics; logistic regression models were performed to determine whether platelet transfusions were associated with adverse outcomes, both before and after matching for ICH score. RESULTS A total of 538 patients with nontraumatic ICH were investigated. Of these, 168 were on APT; 71 were excluded. Thirty-nine patients (40%) received platelet transfusions and 58 (60%) did not. An overall mortality of 9.3% was measured, with 29.9% of patients enduring complications. In the unmatched cohort, patients who received platelet transfusions were more likely to deteriorate (odds ratio [OR], 4.7), undergo surgical intervention during their hospital stay (OR, 7.2), be discharged with a worse modified Rankin Scale score (OR, 3.6), or die (OR, 6.1). After matching by ICH score, platelet transfusion was not a significant predictor for any negative outcome. CONCLUSIONS This is the first analysis of platelet transfusions in patients with ICH based on ICH score. For patients on APT, platelet transfusion is not associated with clinical outcomes in an ICH score-matched sample.


The Journal of Spine Surgery | 2018

Non-neurological outcomes of anterior and posterolateral approaches in the surgical treatment of thoracic disc disease: a retrospective study

Cindy R. Nahhas; Justin K. Scheer; Syed I. Khalid; Owoicho Adogwa; Gregory D. Arnone; Abhiraj D. Bhimani; Pouyan Kheirkhah; Ankit I. Mehta

Background Symptomatic thoracic disc herniation (TDH) is rare, and for those patients that fail conservative treatment, two main categories of surgical approaches exist-anterior and posterolateral. In many cases either approach would be considered equally appropriate. Recommendations in support of either anterior or posterolateral approaches are currently based on case series and expert opinion. Here, we utilize National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database to determine and compare the rates of complication associated with anterior or posterolateral approaches in the treatment of TDH. Methods An analysis of NSQIP data from 2005 to 2014 was conducted. Patients were included based on a combination of a postoperative diagnosis of TDH. Patients were then grouped according to anterior or posterior approaches on the basis of Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Propensity score matching was performed to account for baseline demographics [sex, race, age, obesity, diabetes, smoking, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), history of CHF, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class]. The 30-day outcome measures of these patients were analyzed. Results A total of 432 patients were identified, 80.3% underwent posterolateral and 19.7% anterior interventions. There were no significant differences in 30-day outcome measures between the anterior or posterior intervention groups. Within the matched group of 170 patients, the anterior group had significantly longer lengths of stay (5.49±3.96 vs. 4.01±4.81, P<0.0001), but there were no observed significant differences in the rate of occurrences of UTIs, pneumonias, sepsis, bleeding, intubation, or death. Conclusions Posterolateral and anterior approaches carry an equal non-neurological perioperative complication profile. Posterolateral approaches may carry shorter hospital stays compared to anterior interventions.


The Journal of Spine Surgery | 2018

Preoperative steroids do not improve outcomes for intramedullary spinal tumors: a NSQIP analysis of 30-day reoperation and readmission rates

Abhiraj D. Bhimani; Morteza Sadeh; Darian R. Esfahani; Gregory D. Arnone; Steven Denyer; Jack Zakrzewski; Pouyan Kheirkhah; Tania Aguilar; Kate Louise D. Milan; Ankit I. Mehta

Background Intramedullary spinal cord tumors (IMSCTs) account for 8-10% of all spinal cord tumors and affect patients of all ages. Although uncommon, IMSCTs carry risk of neurological morbidity and mortality, with 5-year survival rates ranging from 50% to 80%. In this study, we utilize the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database to determine the effect of steroid administration on 30-day outcomes following surgery for IMSCTs. Methods ACS-NSQIP data for patients undergoing surgery for intramedullary tumors from 2005 to 2015 was reviewed. Patients were selected based on current procedural terminology (CPT) codes 63285 (Laminectomy, intradural, intramedullary, cervical), 63286 (Laminectomy, intradural, intramedullary, thoracic), and 63287 (Laminectomy, intradural, intramedullary, thoracolumbar). ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes were chosen based on the diagnosis of a tumor. The 30-day clinical outcome data, including reoperations and readmission rates, were collected and compared. Results A total of 259 patients were reviewed. One hundred eighty-one patients had benign intramedullary tumors and 78 had malignant intramedullary tumors. The majority of IMSCTs were at the thoracic level (n=100), followed by the cervical (n=99), and thoracolumbar (n=39) levels. Thirty-one patients were on corticosteroid therapy prior to surgery. Patients with preoperative steroid administration had no significant difference in reoperation and readmission rates. No significant differences were noted between steroid vs. non-steroid therapy for discharge destination, length of hospital stay, or other postoperative complications. Conclusions Contrary to previous reports, corticosteroid use prior to surgery for IMSCTs does not have a significant impact on 30-day risk of readmission, reoperation, and risk of postoperative complications.


Spinal cord series and cases | 2018

Spinal subdural hematoma and ankylosing spondylitis: case report and review of literature

Darian R. Esfahani; Harsh Shah; Mandana Behbahani; Gregory D. Arnone; Ankit I. Mehta

IntroductionSpinal subdural hematomas are rare, disabling hemorrhages. Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a relatively common inflammatory condition of the spine that can progress to a fragile, unstable fusion vulnerable to fracture. While spinal epidural hematomas have been described, subdural hematomas to date have not been reported in AS. In this report, we describe the unique case of a patient on warfarin with AS who developed a spinal subdural hematoma and fracture in the absence of trauma. We then discuss the pathogenesis, presentation, prognosis, and management strategies for this unique diagnosis.Case presentationA 60-year-old man with recent AS diagnosis and atrial fibrillation on warfarin presented with 96 h of low back pain and 24 h of leg weakness and urinary retention. CT imaging revealed a bamboo spine and fracture of the posterior elements at L4, while MR revealed a hematoma with thecal sac compression. The warfarin was reversed and the patient taken to the operating room; on laminectomy, however, no hematoma was encountered. The patient then underwent intraoperative ultrasound, durotomy, and evacuation of a thick subdural hematoma, followed by posterior fusion.DiscussionThis case represents the first report of an AS patient who developed a subdural hematoma requiring evacuation. Although rare, the clinician should maintain a broad differential and be familiar with this unique pathology, particularly in high-risk patients, such as those with suspected fractures or on warfarin. In patients with back pain and myelopathic symptoms, rapid diagnosis followed by prompt evacuation allows for the best opportunity for neurologic recovery.


Scientific Reports | 2018

Magnetic Drug Targeting: A Novel Treatment for Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumors

Pouyan Kheirkhah; Steven Denyer; Abhiraj D. Bhimani; Gregory D. Arnone; Darian R. Esfahani; Tania Aguilar; Jack Zakrzewski; Indu Venugopal; Nazia Habib; Gary L. Gallia; Andreas A. Linninger; Fady T. Charbel; Ankit I. Mehta

Most applications of nanotechnology in cancer have focused on systemic delivery of cytotoxic drugs. Systemic delivery relies on accumulation of nanoparticles in a target tissue through enhanced permeability of leaky vasculature and retention effect of poor lymphatic drainage to increase the therapeutic index. Systemic delivery is limited, however, by toxicity and difficulty crossing natural obstructions, like the blood spine barrier. Magnetic drug targeting (MDT) is a new technique to reach tumors of the central nervous system. Here, we describe a novel therapeutic approach for high-grade intramedullary spinal cord tumors using magnetic nanoparticles (MNP). Using biocompatible compounds to form a superparamagnetic carrier and magnetism as a physical stimulus, MNP-conjugated with doxorubicin were successfully localized to a xenografted tumor in a rat model. This study demonstrates proof-of-concept that MDT may provide a novel technique for effective, concentrated delivery of chemotherapeutic agents to intramedullary spinal cord tumors without the toxicity of systemic administration.

Collaboration


Dive into the Gregory D. Arnone's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ankit I. Mehta

University of Illinois at Chicago

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Abhiraj D. Bhimani

University of Illinois at Chicago

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Darian R. Esfahani

University of Illinois at Chicago

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Fady T. Charbel

University of Illinois at Chicago

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pouyan Kheirkhah

University of Illinois at Chicago

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ali Alaraj

University of Illinois at Chicago

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ashley L. Barks

University of Illinois at Chicago

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Matt Wonais

University of Illinois at Chicago

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Raymond F. Sekula

Allegheny General Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Steven Denyer

University of Illinois at Chicago

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge