Gregory K. Bartlett

Evaluation of superficial dosimetry between treatment planning system and measurement for several breast cancer treatment techniques

PURPOSE Dosimetric accuracy in radiation treatment of breast cancer is critical for the evaluation of cosmetic outcomes and survival. It is often considered that treatment planning systems (TPS) may not be able to provide accurate dosimetry in the buildup region. This was investigated in various treatment techniques such as tangential wedges, field-in-field (FF), electronic compensator (eComp), and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). METHODS Under Institutional Review Board (IRB) exemption, radiotherapy treatment plans of 111 cases were retrospectively analyzed. The distance between skin surface and 95% isodose line was measured. For measurements, Gafchromic EBT2 films were used on a humanoid unsliced phantom. Multiple layers of variable thickness of superflab bolus were placed on the breast phantom and CT scanned for planning. Treatment plans were generated using four techniques with two different grid sizes (1 × 1 and 2.5 × 2.5 mm(2)) to provide optimum dose distribution. Films were placed at different depths and exposed with the selected techniques. A calibration curve for dose versus pixel values was also generated on the same day as the phantom measurement was conducted. The DICOM RT image, dose, and plan data were imported to the in-house software. On axial plane of CT slices, curves were drawn at the position where EBT2 films were placed, and the dose profiles on the lines were acquired. The calculated and measured dose profiles were separated by check points which were marked on the films before irradiation. The segments of calculated profiles were stretched to match their resolutions to that of film dosimetry. RESULTS On review of treatment plans, the distance between skin and 95% prescribed dose was up to 8 mm for plans of 27 patients. The film measurement revealed that the medial region of phantom surface received a mere 45%-50% of prescribed dose. For wedges, FF, and eComp techniques, region around the nipple received approximately 80% of prescribed dose, although only IMRT showed inhomogeneous dose profile. At deeper depths mainly (6-11 mm depths), film dosimetry showed good agreement with the TPS calculation. In contrast, the measured dose at a 3-mm depth was higher than TPS calculation by 15%-30% for all techniques. For the tangential and IMRT techniques, 1 × 1 mm(2) grid size showed a smaller difference than that with a 2.5 × 2.5 mm(2) grid size compared to the measurements. CONCLUSIONS In general, TPS even with advanced algorithms do not provide accurate dosimetry in the buildup region, as verified by EBT2 film for all treatment techniques. For all cases, TPS and measured doses were in agreement from 6 mm in depth but differed at shallower depths. Grid size plays an important role in dose calculation. For accurate dosimetry small grid size should be used where differences are lower between TPS and measurements.

Functional liver image guided hepatic therapy (FLIGHT) with hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid (HIDA) scans

PURPOSE Hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid (HIDA) scans provide global and regional assessments of liver function that can serve as a road map for functional avoidance in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) planning. Functional liver image guided hepatic therapy (FLIGHT), an innovative planning technique, is described and compared with standard planning using functional dose-volume histograms. Thresholds predicting for decompensation during follow up are evaluated. METHODS AND MATERIALS We studied 17 patients who underwent HIDA scans before SBRT. All SBRT cases were replanned using FLIGHT. The following dosimetric endpoints were compared for FLIGHT versus standard SBRT planning: functional residual capacity <15 Gy (FRC15HIDA), mean liver dose (MLD), equivalent uniform dose (EUD), and functional EUD (FEUD). Receiver operating characteristics curves were used to evaluate whether baseline HIDA values, standard cirrhosis scoring, and/or dosimetric data predicted clinical decompensation. RESULTS Compared with standard planning, FLIGHT significantly improved FRC15HIDA (mean improvement: 5.3%) as well as MLD, EUD, and FEUD (P < .05). Considerable interindividual variations in the extent of benefit were noted. Decompensation during follow-up was associated with baseline global HIDA <2.915%/min/m2, FRC15HIDA <2.11%/min/m2, and MELD ≥11 (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS FLIGHT with HIDA-based parameters may complement blood chemistry-based assessments of liver function and facilitate individualized, adaptive liver SBRT planning.

SU-G-BRC-04: Collimator Angle Optimization in Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy

PURPOSE Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) has revolutionized radiation treatment by decreasing treatment time and monitor units, thus reducing scattered and whole body radiation dose. As the collimator angle changes the apparent leaf gap becomes larger which can impact plan quality, organ at risk (OAR) sparing as well as IMRT QA passing rate which is investigated. METHODS Two sites (prostate and head and neck) that have maximum utilization of VMAT were investigated. Two previously treated VMAT patients were chosen. For each patient 10 plans were created by maintaining constant optimization constraints while varying collimator angles from 0-90 deg at an interval of 10 degrees for the first arc and the appropriate complimentary angle for the second arc. Plans were created with AAA algorithm using 6 MV beam on a Varian IX machine with Millennium 120 MLC. The dose-volume histogram (DVH) for each plan was exported and dosimetric parameters (D98, D95, D50, D2) as well homogeneity index (HI) and conformity index (CI) were computed. Each plan was validated for QA using ArcCheck with gamma index passing criteria of 2%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm. Additionally, normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for each OAR was computed using Uzan-Nahum software. RESULTS The CI values for both sites had no impact as target volume coverage in every collimator angle were the same since it was optimized for adequate coverage. The HI which is representative of DVH gradient or dose uniformity in PTV showed a clear trend in both sites. The NTCP for OAR (brain and cochlea) in H&N plan and (bladder and rectum) in prostate plan showed a distinct superiority for collimator angles between 15-30 deg. The gamma passing rates were not correlated with angle. CONCLUSION Based on CI, HI, NTCP and gamma passing index, it can be concluded that collimator angles should be maintained within 15-30 deg.

Role of belly board device in the age of intensity modulated radiotherapy for pelvic irradiation

Small bowel dose often represents a limiting factor for radiation treatment of pelvic malignancies. To reduce small bowel toxicity, a belly board device (BBD) with a prone position is often recommended. Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) could reduce dose to small bowel based on the desired dose-volume constraints. We investigated the efficacy of BBD in conjunction with IMRT. A total of 11 consecutive patients with the diagnosis of rectal cancer, who were candidates for definitive therapy, were selected. Patients were immobilized with BBD in prone position for simulation and treatment. Supine position computed tomography (CT) data were either acquired at the same time or during a diagnostic scan, and if existed was used. Target volumes (TV) as well as organs at risk (OAR) were delineated in both studies. Three-dimensional conformal treatment (3DCRT) and IMRT plans were made for both scans. Thus for each patient, 4 plans were generated. Statistical analysis was conducted for maximum, minimum, and mean dose to each structure. When comparing the normalized mean Gross TV dose for the different plans, there was no statistical difference found between the planning types. There was a significant difference in small bowel sparing when using prone position on BBD comparing 3DCRT and IMRT plans, favoring IMRT with a 29.6% reduction in dose (p = 0.007). There was also a statistically significant difference in small bowel sparing when comparing supine position IMRT to prone-BBD IMRT favoring prone-BBD IMRT with a reduction of 30.3% (p = 0.002). For rectal cancer when small bowel could be a limiting factor, prone position using BBD along with IMRT provides the best sparing. We conclude that whenever a dose escalation in rectal cancer is desired where small bowel could be limiting factor, IMRT in conjunction with BBD should be selected.

Dosimetric Comparison of Treatment Techniques: Brachytherapy, Intensity- Modulated Radiation Therapy, and Proton Beam in Partial Breast Irradiation

Abstract Purpose: To perform a dosimetric comparison of 3 accelerated partial breast irradiation techniques: catheter-based brachytherapy (BT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and proton beam therapy (PBT). Patients and Methods: Twelve patients with left-sided breast cancer treated with SAVI (Strut-Adjusted Volume Implant) were selected in this study. The original BT plans were compared with optimum plans using IMRT and PBT for 34 Gy (RBE) with 1.1 RBE in 10 fractions using identical parameters for target and organs at risk. Results: Significant reduction in maximum dose to the ipsilateral breast was observed with PBT and IMRT (mean 108.58% [PBT] versus 107.78% [IMRT] versus 2194.43% [BT], P = .001 for both PBT and IMRT compared to BT). The mean dose to the heart was 0%, 1.38%, and 3.85%, for PBT, IMRT, and BT, respectively (P < .001 and P = .026). The chest wall mean dose was 10.07%, 14.65%, and 29.44% for PBT, IMRT, and BT, respectively (P = .001 and .013 compared to BT). The PBT was super...

TH‐F‐211‐05: Evaluation of Superficial Dosimetry between Treatment Planning System and Measurement among Several Breast Cancer Treatment Techniques

Purpose: Accurate superficial dosimetry in breast cancer treatment is critical for the evaluation of the cosmetic and recurrence free survival. It is often believed that treatment planning systems (TPS) may not be able to provide accurate dosimetry in buildup region as it is not properly modeled in most TPS. Breast dosimetry in various treatment techniques; tangential, field‐in field, electronic compensator and IMRT are studied using EBT2 film and compared with TPS. Methods: A humanoid unsliced phantom was chosen for this study. Multiple layers of superflab bolus were placed on the breast for EBT2 film dosimetry. Treatment plans were generated using 4 techniques with 2 different grid sizes (1×1 and 2.5×2.5 mm2) to provide optimum dose distribution using AAA algorithm. Films were exposed with selected techniques and analyzed after 24 hrs. A calibration curve for dose versus pixel values was also generated at the same day as of the phantom measurement. The calculated dose and image data are imported to in‐house software developed using Visual C++, and the dose profiles on the film positions were collected. The calculated profiles were stretched to match their resolutions to that of film dosimetry.Results: At 6 mm and 11 mm depths, film dosimetry showed good agreement with the TPS calculation. On the other hand, the measured dose at 3 mm depth was higher than calculation by 15–30% for all techniques. For tangential and IMRT techniques, the calculation with 1×1 mm2 grid size showed smaller difference than 2.5×2.5 mm2 grid size. Conclusions: It is concluded that TPS do not provide accurate dosimetry in the buildup region as verified by EBT2 film for all treatment techniques. For all cases TPS and measured dose are in agreement from 6 mm in depths but differ at shallower depths. Grid size does play role in dose calculation. This work was supported by the JSPS Core‐to‐Core Program No. 23003.