Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Gregory Landini is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Gregory Landini.


PLOS ONE | 2012

Preserved Self-Awareness following Extensive Bilateral Brain Damage to the Insula, Anterior Cingulate, and Medial Prefrontal Cortices

Carissa L. Philippi; Justin S. Feinstein; Sahib S. Khalsa; Antonio R. Damasio; Daniel Tranel; Gregory Landini; Kenneth Williford; David Rudrauf

It has been proposed that self-awareness (SA), a multifaceted phenomenon central to human consciousness, depends critically on specific brain regions, namely the insular cortex, the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). Such a proposal predicts that damage to these regions should disrupt or even abolish SA. We tested this prediction in a rare neurological patient with extensive bilateral brain damage encompassing the insula, ACC, mPFC, and the medial temporal lobes. In spite of severe amnesia, which partially affected his “autobiographical self”, the patients SA remained fundamentally intact. His Core SA, including basic self-recognition and sense of self-agency, was preserved. His Extended SA and Introspective SA were also largely intact, as he has a stable self-concept and intact higher-order metacognitive abilities. The results suggest that the insular cortex, ACC and mPFC are not required for most aspects of SA. Our findings are compatible with the hypothesis that SA is likely to emerge from more distributed interactions among brain networks including those in the brainstem, thalamus, and posteromedial cortices.


History and Philosophy of Logic | 1991

A new interpretation of russell's multiple-relation theory of judgment

Gregory Landini

This paper offers an interpretation of Russells multiple-relation theory of judgment which characterizes it as direct application of the 1905 theory of definite descriptions. The paper maintains that it was by regarding propositional symbols (when occurring as subordinate clauses) as disguised descriptions of complexes, that Russell generated the philosophical explanation of the hierarchy of orders and the ramified theory of types of Principia mathematica (1910). The interpretation provides a new understanding of Russells abandoned book Theory of knowledge (1913), the ‘direction problems’ and Wittgensteins criticisms.


Journal of Theoretical Biology | 2017

A mathematical model of embodied consciousness

David Rudrauf; Daniel Bennequin; Isabela Granic; Gregory Landini; K. J. Friston; Kenneth Williford

We introduce a mathematical model of embodied consciousness, the Projective Consciousness Model (PCM), which is based on the hypothesis that the spatial field of consciousness (FoC) is structured by a projective geometry and under the control of a process of active inference. The FoC in the PCM combines multisensory evidence with prior beliefs in memory and frames them by selecting points of view and perspectives according to preferences. The choice of projective frames governs how expectations are transformed by consciousness. Violations of expectation are encoded as free energy. Free energy minimization drives perspective taking, and controls the switch between perception, imagination and action. In the PCM, consciousness functions as an algorithm for the maximization of resilience, using projective perspective taking and imagination in order to escape local minima of free energy. The PCM can account for a variety of psychological phenomena: the characteristic spatial phenomenology of subjective experience, the distinctions and integral relationships between perception, imagination and action, the role of affective processes in intentionality, but also perceptual phenomena such as the dynamics of bistable figures and body swap illusions in virtual reality. It relates phenomenology to function, showing the computational advantages of consciousness. It suggests that changes of brain states from unconscious to conscious reflect the action of projective transformations and suggests specific neurophenomenological hypotheses about the brain, guidelines for designing artificial systems, and formal principles for psychology.


Journal of Philosophical Logic | 1996

The definability of the set of natural numbers in the 1925 principia mathematica

Gregory Landini

In his new introduction to the 1925 second edition of Principia Mathematica, Russell maintained that by adopting Wittgensteins idea that a logically perfect language should be extensional mathematical induction could be rectified for finite cardinals without the axiom of reducibility. In an Appendix B, Russell set forth a proof. Gödel caught a defect in the proof at *89.16, so that the matter of rectification remained open. Myhill later arrived at a negative result: Principia with extensionality principles and without reducibility cannot recover mathematical induction. The finite cardinals are indefinable in it. This paper shows that while Gödel and Myhill are correct, Russell was not wrong. The 1925 system employs a different grammar than the original Principia. A new proof for *89.16 is given and induction is recovered.


History and Philosophy of Logic | 2009

Russell's Schema, Not Priest's Inclosure

Gregory Landini

On investigating a theorem that Russell used in discussing paradoxes of classes, Graham Priest distills a schema and then extends it to form an Inclosure Schema, which he argues is the common structure underlying both class-theoretical paradoxes (such as that of Russell, Cantor, Burali-Forti) and the paradoxes of ‘definability’ (offered by Richard, König-Dixon and Berry). This article shows that Russells theorem is not Priests schema and questions the application of Priests Inclosure Schema to the paradoxes of ‘definability’.1 1 Special thanks to Francesco Orilia for criticisms of an early draft of this article.


Archive | 2003

Russell’s Substitutional Theory

Gregory Landini; Nicholas Griffin

introduction In his 1893 Grundgesetze der Arithmetik Frege sought to demonstrate a thesis which has come to be called Logicism. Frege maintained that there are no uniquely arithmetic intuitions that ground mathematical induction and the foundational principles of arithmetic. Couched within a proper conceptual analysis of cardinal number, arithmetic truths will be seen to be truths of the science of logic. Frege set out a formal system - a characteristica universalis - after Leibniz, whose formation rules and transformation (inference) rules were explicit and, he thought, clearly within the domain of the science of logic. Confident that no nonlogical intuitions could seep into such a tightly articulated system, Frege endeavored to demonstrate logicism by deducing the principle of mathematical induction and foundational theorems for arithmetic. In his 1903 The Principles of Mathematics , Russell set out a doctrine of Logicism according to which there are no special intuitions unique to the branches of non-applied mathematics. All the truths of non-applied mathematics are truths of the science of logic. Russell embraced this more encompassing form of logicism because, unlike Frege, he accepted the arithmetization of all of non-applied mathematics, including Geometry and Rational Dynamics. Both Frege and Russell regarded logic as itself a science. Frege refrained from calling it a synthetic a priori science so as to mark his departure from the notion of pure empirical intuition ( anschauung ) set forth in Kant’s 1781 Critique of Pure Reason . In Frege’s view, Kant’s transcendental argument for a form of pure empirical (aesthetic) intuition that grounds the synthetic a priori truths of arithmetic is unwarranted. Russell concurred, but spoke unabashedly of a purely logical intuition grounding our knowledge of logical truths. Russell wrote that Kant “never doubted for a moment that the propositions of logic are analytic, whereas he rightly perceived that those of mathematics are synthetic . . . It has since appeared that logic is just as synthetic . . .” ( POM , p. 457).


History and Philosophy of Logic | 1996

Decomposition and analysis in frege’s grundgesetze

Gregory Landini

Frege seems to hold two incompatible theses:(i) that sentences differing in structure can yet express the same sense; and (ii) that the senses of the meaningful parts of a complex term are determinate parts of the sense of the term. Dummett offered a solution, distinguishing analysis from decomposition. The present paper offers an embellishment of Dummett’s distinction by providing a way of depicting the internal structures of complex senses—determinate structures that yield distinct decompositions. Decomposition is then shown to be adequate as a foundation for the informativity and analyticity of logic


History and Philosophy of Logic | 1987

Russell's substitutional theory of classes and relations

Gregory Landini

This paper examines Russells substitutional theory of classes and relations, and its influence on the development of the theory of logical types between the years 1906 and the publication of Principia Mathematica (volume I) in 1910. The substitutional theory proves to have been much more influential on Russells writings than has been hitherto thought. After a brief introduction, the paper traces Russells published works on type-theory up to Principia. Each is interpreted as presenting a version or modification of the substitutional theory. New motivations for Russells 1908 axiom of infinity and axiom of reducibility are revealed.


Archive | 1986

Philosophical Bibliography of Hector-Neri Castañeda

Gregory Landini

‘TOMBERLIN (1983)’ = ‘James E. Tomberlin, Agent, Language, and the Structure of the World: Essays in Honor of Hector-Neri CastaŇeda, with His Replies (Hackett Publishing Co., Indianapolis, 1983)’.


History and Philosophy of Logic | 2013

Typos of Principia Mathematica

Gregory Landini

Principia Mathematic goes to great lengths to hide its order/type indices and to make it appear as if its incomplete symbols behave as if they are singular terms. But well-hidden as they are, we cannot understand the proofs in Principia unless we bring them into focus. When we do, some rather surprising results emerge – which is the subject of this paper.

Collaboration


Dive into the Gregory Landini's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kenneth Williford

University of Texas at Arlington

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Antonio R. Damasio

University of Southern California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Carissa L. Philippi

University of Wisconsin-Madison

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Isabela Granic

Radboud University Nijmegen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

K. J. Friston

University College London

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge