Greta Forster

HIV post-exposure prophylaxis after sexual assault: the experience of a sexual assault service in London

Objectives: To review the provision, uptake and outcome of HIV post-exposure prophylaxis (HIV-PEP) after sexual assault. Methods: A retrospective case note review of patients attending a sexual assault service in London during 1999. Results: Ten out of 150 patients were considered eligible for PEP after a careful risk assessment. Eight patients accepted HIV-PEP. Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) consisted of Combivir/indinavir in six patients and Combivir/nelfinavir in two patients. Two patients changed their combination due to adverse events. Five patients completed the recommended 28 days of treatment. Three patients discontinued therapy due to adverse events. Two patients who completed HIV-PEP were noted to have raised cholesterol at follow-up. All patients who took PEP were HIV-1 and -2 antibody negative at six months. Conclusions: Compared with other published studies the completion rate of HIV-PEP in our study was high. The uptake and adverse events of HAART in this scenario were similar to previously published studies. A multidisciplinary approach to the management of this patient group will improve adherence to PEP.

The psychological impact of sexual assault: A study of female attenders of a sexual health psychology service.

Abstract Genitourinary clinics are often used as an early point of contact for individuals attending for medical screening following sexual assault. This paper describes the psychological impact of sexual assault in 32 women referred over a one year period to clinical psychology in an East London Genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinic. Women presented with complex histories of sexual abuse and assault and multiple psychological problems. Medical services need to be prepared to deal with the immediate and long-term effects of sexual assault and have access to professional psychological support.

UK National Guideline on the Management of Sexually Transmitted Infections and Related Conditions in Children and Young People (2009)

This guideline is appropriate for use in genitourinary (GU) medicine/sexually transmitted infections (STIs) clinics, and by other National Health Service (NHS) or other services providing sexual health advice, management or treatment to young people, e.g. sexual health clinics, young person’s clinics, contraceptive clinics, gynaecology/antenatal services, termination services, Sexual Assault Referral Centres (SARCs), paediatric services and general practice in the UK. The principles apply wherever young people are seen for sexual health care or where there are concerns about child sexual abuse (CSA) or where a STI has been detected. It includes recommendations on the assessment, examination, diagnostic tests, treatment regimens and prophylaxis for the effective management of children and young persons under 16 at risk of, or who have, an STI. It offers guidance on consent and confidentiality on children and young people presenting to health-care professionals working in sexual health services. It is also applicable to young people aged 16–18 who have learning difficulties or who are ‘vulnerable’. Some parts of the guidelines are relevant to all those providing sexual health services, but other parts are only relevant to Level 3 service providers. Prevention of STIs through health education and one-to-one interventions as recommended by the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) is an integral part of sexual health care of young people but is outside the scope of the guidelines. Stakeholder involvement, rigour of development, levels of evidence and grading of recommendations are available online only in the full version of this guideline at http://ijsa.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/full/21/4/229/DC1 This guideline is laid out in specific sections: Part 1: Introduction and discussion of issues concerning consent, confidentiality, child protection and basic principles of care. Part 2: The diagnosis and management of specific STIs and related conditions in the under 16s. Correspondence to: K Rogstad

Sexually transmitted diseases in rape victims.

From 1 January 1986 to 1 September 1989 124 women presented to the Ambrose King Centre (the department of genitourinary medicine of the London Hospital) alleging rape. Sexually transmitted diseases were found in 36 (29%) women (excluding candidosis and bacterial vaginosis). The commonest organisms detected were Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Trichomonas vaginalis, each being present in 15 patients. Eleven women had genital warts. Chlamydia trachomatis was isolated in six patients, two had herpes simplex virus infection and one patient had pediculosis pubis. Serological evidence of past hepatitis B infection was detected in five women and one patient had antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus. Eighteen of the 36 women (50%) had multiple infections. Six women had abnormal cervical cytology smears, three being suggestive of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades II-III. Although it is rarely possible to attribute infection to an assailant, these patients require further counselling, treatment and review. Rape victims are thus a population at risk of having sexually transmitted diseases and screening should be offered.

Should we offer antibiotic prophylaxis post sexual assault

Our objective was to assess whether antibiotic prophylaxis should be offered to women post sexual assault by considering acceptability of prophylaxis, follow up attendance rates and the prevalence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in these women. Retrospective case notes review of female survivors of rape or sexual assault attending the Rose Clinic, Ambrose King Centre, Royal London Hospital between 1 January 1997 and 31 May 1999 was carried out. The following selection criteria were applied: age greater than 16 years; attending within two weeks of assault; having experienced vaginal and/or anal penetration. All women were screened for STI using standard investigation methods detailed below. Antibiotic prophylaxis was offered within two weeks of the assault, the antibiotic regimens used as recommended. The women were invited to attend for results at two weeks and offered a further screen at three months post assault. Bacterial vaginosis was present in 32% of the women screened, Chlamydia trachomatis was identified in 8%, none tested positive for Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Of the 25 women who were offered antibiotic prophylaxis, 88% accepted. Follow up attendances were 57% at two weeks and 30% at three months. Antibiotic prophylaxis was acceptable to women. Among recent rape victims, follow-up rates are low confirmed by our study. These factors support the use of antibiotic prophylaxis post sexual assault. There was an apparently high prevalence of STIs amongst women in this study. More research is required with respect to this aspect of the work and to consider the cost–benefit analysis of antibiotic prophylaxis.

National guideline for the management of suspected sexually transmitted infections in children and young people

The Children Act 19891 defines a child as “a person who has not yet reached 18 years of age.” In England, Wales, and Scotland the present age of consent for heterosexual and homosexual sex is 16 years and in Northern Ireland it is 17 years. The proportion of young people who report heterosexual intercourse before the age of 16 years increased in the 1990s compared with the previous decade.2

Management of epididymo-orchitis in Genitourinary Medicine clinics in the United Kingdom's North Thames region 2000

A questionnaire survey and case notes audit reviewing management of epididymo-orchitis (E-O) by 34 Genitourinary Medicine (GUM) clinics located in the North Thames was undertaken. Twenty-two clinics (65%) returned completed questionnaires and audited a total of 83 newly diagnosed cases. All participating clinics offer microscopy of urethral smears and screening for Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis to all patients, regardless of age. However, greater numbers of clinics would offer routine microbiology of mid-stream urine (MSU) samples (20/22, 91% versus 16/22, 73%) and scrotal ultrasound (5/22, 23% versus 1/22, 5%) to patients aged over 35, compared with men under 35. Half of the cases audited were due either to sexually transmitted infections (STIs) (41/83, 49%), or associated with ascending urinary tract infections (4/83, 5%). No obvious infectious cause was identified for 38/83 cases (46%). Reported management was appropriate for the causative conditions diagnosed and accorded with the UK National Guidelines for this and related conditions.

Management of sexually acquired reactive arthritis in 19 North Thames GUM clinics

Our objective was to describe how genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinics in the North Thames region manage sexually acquired reactive arthritis (SARA), and to compare management with national guidelines. A self-completed questionnaire survey and retrospective case note review was conducted between September and October 2001. Clinicians in 33 clinics were asked to describe their clinics policy on the management of SARA, and to review the last five cases seen or the last cases seen in the preceding two years, if less than five. Nineteen (58%) clinics took part. There were inter-clinic variations in the investigation and management of patients, with only 63% (12/19) of clinics offering non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and 58% (11/19) giving doxycycline 1001mg. twice daily for two weeks for urethritis - the rest using any of three other antibiotic regimens. There was no consistent policy of referral between other specialties and GUM for genital screening and partner notification. A total of 36 male and female case notes were reviewed. Patients without arthritis or joint swelling (5/38, 13%), or with non-typical symptoms such as diarrhoea (5/38, 13%) were diagnosed inappropriately with SARA. Only 33 (87%) had evidence of a sexually transmitted infection (STI) with at least two (5%) of patients being treated with antibiotics despite no apparent indication being present. Only 21 (55%) had documented NSAID therapy. Case identification was difficult due to the lack of a national disease code (KC60) for SARA. The data suggest that a diagnosis of SARA is sometimes being made with no identifiable STI, or where symptoms are more suggestive that another route of infection is likely. A clear guideline within clinics to standardize prescribing of antibiotics is needed and collaborative policies with GUM are needed for other specialties to use when investigating and managing patients with seronegative arthritis. GUM should consider re-introducing a KC60 code for SARA for better case identification.

Screening for sexually transmitted infections in children and adolescents in the United Kingdom: British Co-operative Clinical Group.

Our objectives were (1) to assess the number of young people aged under 16 years attending genitourinary medicine (GUM) departments in the UK in 1998; (2) to identify clinical activity and policy; (3) to determine the knowledge and training needs of healthcare professionals within GUM providing care for this client group. In July 1999 a questionnaire was circulated via the 18 regional British Co-operative Clinical Group (BCCG) representatives to the consultants in charge of all 197 main GUM departments in the UK. One hundred and sixty out of 197 (81%) completed questionnaires were returned and analysed. The reported number of under-16-year-olds attending in 1998 varied considerably between clinics; for females ranging from 0 to 256 and for males between 0 and 50, with a male to female ratio of 1:4.4. The majority of responding clinics, 139/160 (87%) had been involved in the screening of abused children/adolescents for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Most clinics were prepared to screen for STI (86%), HIV test (79%) and assess contraceptive needs (50%) in this age group. Staff involved in care included health advisers (74), nurses (59), and doctors (138) in the responding clinics. Only 31/160 clinics (19%) had a written policy for the management of children/adolescents attending their clinic. The majority of respondents were aware of their child protection policy [122/154 (79%)] and designated child sexual abuse doctor, [125/157 (80%)] in their district. When questioned on previous and current training needs, 134/160 (84%) respondents identified their need for further training in the area of adolescent sexual health and 124/160 (78%) in child sex abuse. The publication Physical Signs of Sexual Abuse in Children, was known to 112/160 (70%) respondents, of whom 58/112 (52%) who answered this question had read the publication. Genitourinary physicians in the UK are aware of the increasing number of children and adolescents accessing their services, and recognize the need to identify those in abusive situations. Written policies dealing with children and adolescents in GUM clinics in the UK are lacking. This needs to be rectified urgently. This survey identifies that further training in the field of child sexual abuse and adolescent sexual health would be welcomed by the respondents.

Management of Chlamydia trachomatis genital tract infection in Genitourinary Medicine clinics in the United Kingdom's North Thames Region 1999

Assessment of clinical management of Chlamydia trachomatis genital tract infection was made, with particular regard to the UK National Guideline. Questionnaires for self-completion, mailed to lead clinicians in 31 Genitourinary Medicine (GUM) clinics in the North Thames Region between May and June 1999, focused on policies and practice. Audit of actual management of up to 10 most recent cases (5 male and 5 female) attending each clinic within the past 2 years was also undertaken. Twenty-two units (71% response) completed the survey questionnaire and 23 units (74% response) audited a total of 229 cases (males=108, females=118, sex not stated=3). Findings indicate that GUM clinics are managing these infections largely as recommended in the national guideline. Nucleic acid amplification techniques will supersede established diagnostic tests for GUM clinics in North Thames, increasing costs for the service, but also sensitivity of detection.