Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Grey Giddins is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Grey Giddins.


Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) | 2016

Why and how to report surgeons’ levels of expertise

Grey Giddins

An eminent arthroscopic surgeon was asked by us, ‘If a beginner reported poor results using your technique, would you know whether it is your technique that led to the poor results or the surgeon’s poor execution of the technique?’ He replied, ‘I cannot know unless he had reported that he is a beginner’. This illustrates why the level of expertise of surgeons performing procedures should be reported. This is even clearer for a comparative study, because comparison of outcomes between surgeons of significantly different levels of expertise is invalid. Surprisingly, this important information is usually missing in published articles. Recently, the need to include such information has drawn a great deal of attention from the editorial board of the Journal. We established a panel consisting of senior surgeons with extensive publication and review experience to address information and its integration into future published articles. After hearing from the panel, the Editors agreed the following.


Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) | 2001

DYNAMIC EXTERNAL FIXATION FOR PILON FRACTURES OF THE INTERPHALANGEAL JOINTS

M. C. Hynes; Grey Giddins

Eight consecutive pilon fractures of the finger proximal interphalangeal joint and one of the interphalangeal joint of the thumb were treated by closed reduction and application of a new dynamic external fixator. The average range of movement achieved was 12°–88° and there were no serious complications. The technique described offers an effective and simple solution for treatment of pilon fractures of the interphalangeal joint.


European Journal of Pain | 2010

Predicting pain and disability in patients with hand fractures: Comparing pain anxiety, anxiety sensitivity and pain catastrophizing

Edmund Keogh; Katrin Book; James Thomas; Grey Giddins; Christopher Eccleston

There is a range of anxiety‐related constructs associated with pain and pain‐related disability. Those most often examined are pain catastrophizing, pain anxiety and anxiety sensitivity. All three are conceptualized to be important in the development and maintenance of chronic pain, and are included within fear avoidance models. Surprisingly these constructs are not routinely examined together, and when they are, have been investigated in healthy individuals using experimental techniques or patients with chronic conditions. Although these constructs are also thought to be important in acute clinical pain, they tend not to been examined together in the same study. The focus of the current research was therefore to examine these three anxiety‐related constructs in an acute pain setting, and examine their relative influence on both pain and pain‐related functional disability. Participants were 82 patients with a hand fracture, recruited from a fracture clinic at a general hospital. They completed a battery of measures related to anxiety, pain and disability. Once controlling for injury‐related variables, catastrophizing was found to predict current pain, pain‐related anxiety predicted task‐related pain, whereas anxiety sensitivity was (negatively) associated with disability. These findings are discussed in light of the relative role that these anxiety‐related constructs have in pain and disability, as well as implications for future research.


Orthopedics | 2012

Analysis of NHSLA claims in orthopedic surgery.

Irfan Hamid Khan; Wiqqas Jamil; Sam Mathew Lynn; Osman H Khan; Kate Markland; Grey Giddins

National Health Service (NHS) statistics in the United Kingdom demonstrate an increase in clinical negligence claims over the past 30 years. Reasons for this include elements of a cultural shift in attitudes toward the medical profession and the growth of the legal services industry. This issue affects medical and surgical health providers worldwide.The authors analyzed 2117 NHS Litigation Authority (NHSLA) orthopedic surgery claims between 1995 and 2001 with respect to these clinical areas: emergency department, outpatient care, surgery (elective or trauma operations), and inpatient care. The authors focused on the costs of settling and defending claims, costs attributable to clinical areas, common causes of claims, and claims relating to elective or trauma surgery. Numbers of claims and legal costs increased most notably in surgery (elective and trauma) and in the emergency department. However, claims are being defended more robustly. The annual cost for a successful defense has remained relatively stable, showing a slight decline. The common causes of claims are postoperative complication; wrong, delayed, or failure of diagnosis; inadequate consent; and wrong-site surgery. Certain surgical specialties (eg, spine and lower-limb surgery) have the most claims made during elective surgery, whereas upper-limb surgery has the most claims made during trauma surgery.The authors recommend that individual trusts liaise with orthopedic surgeons to devise strategies to address areas highlighted in our study. Despite differences in health care systems worldwide, the underlying issues are common. With improved understanding, physicians can deliver the service they promise their patients.


Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) | 2010

Analysis of NHSLA claims in hand and wrist surgery

Irfan Hamid Khan; Grey Giddins

Claims for negligence are increasing in medical practice. We analysed data provided by the UK NHS Litigation Authority (NHSLA) on all hand and wrist surgery from 1995–2001. The numbers of claims increased from 13 to 40, but the number being successfully defended also increased from 2 to 13 during this period. Claims were most commonly attributed to errors at surgery (56%) or in outpatient clinics (24%). Strikingly the claims are clustered to a few common conditions, particularly the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (22%) and wrist fractures (48%). There were no claims related to complex hand surgery. We recommend better training for ‘routine surgery’, better description of distal radius fracture parameters at each clinic visit and better training in emergency departments (ED).


Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) | 2015

Thumb carpometacarpal joint total arthroplasty: a systematic review:

Kai Huang; Nadine Hollevoet; Grey Giddins

Thumb carpometacarpal joint total arthroplasty has been undertaken for many years. The proponents believe the short-term outcomes are better than trapeziectomy and its variants, but the longer term complications are often higher. This systematic review of all peer reviewed articles on thumb carpometacarpal joint total arthroplasty for osteoarthritis shows that there are reports of many implants. Some are no longer available. The reported outcomes are very variable: for some there are good long-term outcomes to beyond 10 years; for others there are unacceptably high early rates of failure. Overall the published evidence does not show that total arthroplasty is better than trapeziectomy and its variants yet there is a higher complication rate and significant extra cost of using an implant. Future research needs to compare total arthroplasty with trapeziectomy to assess short term results where the arthroplasties may be better, long-term outcomes and the healthcare and personal costs so that surgeons and patients can make fully informed choices about the treatment of symptomatic thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis.


Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) | 2015

The non-operative management of hand fractures

Grey Giddins

Most hand fractures can be treated non-operatively. Some hand fractures, such as open injuries or markedly displaced intra-articular fractures, are almost always treated operatively. The treatment of many fractures, such as proximal interphalangeal joint fracture subluxations or spiral phalangeal fractures, is unclear. The aim of this review is to establish those injuries where the outcome of non-operative treatment is unlikely to be improved with surgery. This may help to prevent unnecessary surgery, concentrate work on finding the sub-groups that may benefit from surgery and to establish which injuries do so well with non-operative treatment that the only valuable clinical research in future will be large cohort studies of non-operative treatment or randomized controlled trials comparing operative and non-operative treatments. The relevant fractures are spiral metacarpal fractures, transverse metacarpal shaft and neck (boxer’s) fractures, base of proximal phalanx avulsion fractures, thumb metacarpophalangeal joint ulnar and radial collateral ligament injuries and bony mallet injuries. For the majority of these injuries, current knowledge suggests that the outcome of non-operative treatment cannot reliably be improved upon with surgery. Level of evidence IV


Arthritis & Rheumatism | 2013

Selective Blockade of Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor I Inhibits Proinflammatory Cytokine and Chemokine Production in Human Rheumatoid Arthritis Synovial Membrane Cell Cultures

Emily M. Schmidt; Marie Davies; Prafull Mistry; Patricia Green; Grey Giddins; Marc Feldmann; A. Allart Stoop; Fionula M. Brennan

OBJECTIVE To determine whether selective blockade of tumor necrosis factor receptor I (TNFRI) affects spontaneous proinflammatory cytokine and chemokine production in ex vivo-cultured human rheumatoid arthritis synovial membrane mononuclear cells (MNCs) and to compare this response to that of TNF ligand blockade using etanercept. METHODS A bispecific, single variable-domain antibody (anti-TNFRI moiety plus an albumin binding moiety [TNFRI-AlbudAb]) was used to selectively block TNFRI. Inhibition of TNFα-mediated responses in cell lines expressing TNFRI/II confirmed TNFRI-AlbudAb potency, human rhabdomyosarcoma cell line KYM-1D4 cytotoxicity, and human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1) upregulation. Eighteen RA synovial membrane MNC suspensions were cultured for 2 days or 5 days, either alone or in the presence of TNFRI-AlbudAb, control-AlbudAb, or etanercept. Proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines in culture supernatants were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. A mixed-effects statistical analysis model was used to assess the extent of TNFRI selective blockade, where the results were expressed as the percentage change with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). RESULTS TNFRI-AlbudAb inhibited TNFα-induced KYM-1D4 cell cytotoxicity (50% inhibition concentration [IC50 ] 4 nM) and HUVEC VCAM-1 up-regulation (IC50 12 nM) in a dose-dependent manner. In ex vivo-cultured RA synovial membrane MNCs, selective blockade of TNFRI inhibited the production of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines to levels similar to those obtained with TNF ligand blockade, without inducing cellular toxicity. Changes in cytokine levels were as follows: -23.5% (95% CI -12.4, -33.2 [P = 0.004]) for granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, -33.4% (95% CI -20.6, -44.2 [P ≤ 0.0001]) for interleukin-10 (IL-10), -17.6% (95% CI 3.2, -34.2 [P = 0.0880]) for IL-1β, and -19.0% (95% CI -3.4, -32.1 [P = 0.0207]) for IL-6. Changes in chemokine levels were as follows: -34.2% (-14.4, -49.4 [P = 0.0030]) for IL-8, -56.6% (-30.7, -72.9 [P = 0.0011]) for RANTES, and -24.9% (2, -44.8 [P = 0.0656]) for monocyte chemotactic protein 1. CONCLUSION In ex vivo-cultured RA synovial membrane MNCs, although a limited role of TNFRII cannot be ruled out, TNFRI signaling was found to be the dominant pathway leading to proinflammatory cytokine and chemokine production. Thus, selective blockade of TNFRI could potentially be therapeutically beneficial over TNF ligand blockade by retaining the beneficial TNFRII signaling.


Psychology Health & Medicine | 2012

Skating on thin ice? Consultant surgeon's contemporary experience of adverse surgical events

Suzanne M. Skevington; Joanne E. Langdon; Grey Giddins

Concerns about patient safety have prompted studies of adverse surgical events (ASEs), but descriptive classification of errors and malpractice claims have overshadowed qualitative investigations into the processes that lead to expert errors and their solutions. We studied consultant surgeons perspectives on how and why events occurred through semi-structured interviews about general and specific events. The sample contained heterogeneous cross-section of ages, gender and specialists, with >2 years consultant status and working within a 25-mile radius. Overarching findings included (1) pressures to work harder, faster and beyond capability within a blaming culture; (2) optimism bias from over-confidence and complacency; and (3) multiple pressures to ‘finish’ an operation or list, resulting in completion bias. Seven high order themes were identified on the healthcare system, adverse event types, contributing factors, emotions, cognitive processes, error detection, and strategies, solutions and barriers. The process of classifying event types guided solution selection, and the decision about whether to formally report it. How serious consequences were for patients and their temporal effects, defined an adversity continuum. Minor events arose routinely i.e. technical discrepancies, side-effects. More problematic were sub-optimal outcomes and avoidable events. Despite their expertise, consultants were vulnerable to unavoidable, uncontrollable events which were major concerns. Most serious were near-misses, errors and mistakes. However, major errors did not inevitably lead to a catastrophe and minor errors could be extremely serious. A ‘cascade’ of minor events exacerbated by negative emotions can precipitate major events, and interception methods need investigation. Consultants felt powerless and helpless to change environmental, organisational and systemic problems; new communication and action channels are desirable. Confidence building in team leadership would promote ‘flatter’ hierarchies, facilitating appropriate warnings. Although implementing the WHO Checklist averts important problems, social, environmental and organisational contributing factors are largely overlooked here and in existing models.


Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) | 2015

The outcome of conservative treatment of spiral metacarpal fractures and the role of the deep transverse metacarpal ligaments in stabilizing these injuries.

A. Khan; Grey Giddins

We carried out a prospective study to assess the outcome of spiral metacarpal fractures treated with early mobilization even in the presence of malrotation. We treated 30 patients of whom we assessed 25. Of these, 23 had an excellent outcome and two had good outcomes. Objectively all the fractures united with some shortening of between 2–5 mm. Only two cases reported mild dysfunction: one patient had a residual malrotation of 5° and one had some discomfort when boxing. We also carried out simple biomechanical studies on a cadaver and two patients undergoing ray amputations. These showed that, as the distal fracture fragment migrates proximally, any malrotation in a closed injury with intact deep transverse metacarpal ligaments corrects with flexion, which also helps to limit the shortening. Spiral metacarpal fractures, whether central or border, whether single or multiple, can usually be treated reliably with early mobilization as any malrotation corrects with flexion and the degree of shortening is limited. Level of evidence – IV

Collaboration


Dive into the Grey Giddins's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Y. Vinogradova

University of Nottingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. Khan

Royal United Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge