Grier Page

Comparison of Linkage-Disequilibrium Methods for Localization of Genes Influencing Quantitative Traits in Humans

Linkage disequilibrium has been used to help in the identification of genes predisposing to certain qualitative diseases. Although several linkage-disequilibrium tests have been developed for localization of genes influencing quantitative traits, these tests have not been thoroughly compared with one another. In this report we compare, under a variety of conditions, several different linkage-disequilibrium tests for identification of loci affecting quantitative traits. These tests use either single individuals or parent-child trios. When we compared tests with equal samples, we found that the truncated measured allele (TMA) test was the most powerful. The trait allele frequencies, the stringency of sample ascertainment, the number of marker alleles, and the linked genetic variance affected the power, but the presence of polygenes did not. When there were more than two trait alleles at a locus in the population, power to detect disequilibrium was greatly diminished. The presence of unlinked disequilibrium (D*) increased the false-positive error rates of disequilibrium tests involving single individuals but did not affect the error rates of tests using family trios. The increase in error rates was affected by the stringency of selection, the trait allele frequency, and the linked genetic variance but not by polygenic factors. In an equilibrium population, the TMA test is most powerful, but, when adjusted for the presence of admixture, Allison test 3 becomes the most powerful whenever D*>.15.

Applications of Bayesian Statistical Methods in Microarray Data Analysis

Microarray technology allows one to measure gene expression levels simultaneously on the whole-genome scale. The rapid progress generates both a great wealth of information and challenges in making inferences from such massive data sets. Bayesian statistical modeling offers an alternative approach to frequentist methodologies, and has several features that make these methods advantageous for the analysis of microarray data. These include the incorporation of prior information, flexible exploration of arbitrarily complex hypotheses, easy inclusion of nuisance parameters, and relatively well developed methods to handle missing data.Recent developments in Bayesian methodology generated a variety of techniques for the identification of differentially expressed genes, finding genes with similar expression profiles, and uncovering underlying gene regulatory networks. Bayesian methods will undoubtedly become more common in the future because of their great utility in microarray analysis.

Empirical Bayes estimation of gene-specific effects in micro-array research

Micro-array technology allows investigators the opportunity to measure expression levels of thousands of genes simultaneously. However, investigators are also faced with the challenge of simultaneous estimation of gene expression differences for thousands of genes with very small sample sizes. Traditional estimators of differences between treatment means (ordinary least squares estimators or OLS) are not the best estimators if interest is in estimation of gene expression differences for an ensemble of genes. In the case that gene expression differences are regarded as exchangeable samples from a common population, estimators are available that result in much smaller average mean-square error across the population of gene expression difference estimates. We have simulated the application of such an estimator, namely an empirical Bayes (EB) estimator of random effects in a hierarchical linear model (normal-normal). Simulation results revealed mean-square error as low as 0.05 times the mean-square error of OLS estimators (i.e., the difference between treatment means). We applied the analysis to an example dataset as a demonstration of the shrinkage of EB estimators and of the reduction in mean-square error, i.e., increase in precision, associated with EB estimators in this analysis. The method described here is available in software that is available at http://www.soph.uab.edu/ssg.asp?id=1087.

15 Cost of linkage versus association methods

Identifying genetic factors that influence disease risk is a major goal in genetic epidemiology. In the past, for disease with relatively simple etiology, genetic linkage methods have been highly effective for this purpose. However, as we begin to study more complex diseases and disorders for which each specific genetic factor may play a minor role in causation, the relative values of genetic linkage methods that do not require linkage disequilibrium versus association-based methods that do require linkage disequilibrium must be evaluated. Here, we compare the cost-effectiveness of linkage and association methods for identifying genetic factors for a quantitative trait locus that explains 10% of interindividual variability. We find that the choice of analytical scheme depends upon the degree of disequilibrium in the population. Because this parameter has not been adequately assessed, planning association studies is currently difficult.