Griet Scheldeman
Lancaster University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Griet Scheldeman.
Environment and Planning A | 2012
Tim Jones; Colin G. Pooley; Griet Scheldeman; Dave Horton; Miles Tight; Caroline Mullen; Ann Jopson; Anthony Whiteing
There remains only limited understanding of perceptions of travel behaviour in relation to short journeys in urban areas and, in particular, the perceived role that walking and cycling for personal travel can realistically play in contemporary society. This paper reveals discourses surrounding the practice, performance, identity, conflicts, and visions relating to walking and cycling in English cities. These were derived from a large-scale study that utilised a comprehensive mixed-method approach using both quantitative and qualitative methods. Q methodology was used as an additional tool to investigate subjectivities on walking and cycling in the city in a structured, interpretable format and it is this approach that is the focus of this paper. The paper concludes with a discussion on the implications of these discourses for policy makers interested in encouraging a shift from car use to walking and cycling for short journeys in urban areas.
Archive | 2012
Colin G. Pooley; Dave Horton; Griet Scheldeman; Miles Tight; H Harwatt; Ann Jopson; Tim Jones; Alison Chisholm; Caroline Mullen
Purpose – To examine the potential for switching short trips in urban areas from cars to walking and cycling, and the possible contribution, this could make to a reduction in transport-related greenhouse gas emissions. Methods – Case studies in four urban areas combining a questionnaire survey, interviews with households and during journeys and in-depth ethnographies of everyday travel. Findings – The barriers to an increase in walking and cycling in British urban areas are emphasised. It demonstrates that motivations for walking and cycling are mostly personal (health and local environment) and that the complexities and contingencies of everyday travel for many households, combined with inadequate infrastructure, safety concerns and the fact that walking and cycling are seen by many as abnormal modes of travel, mean that increasing rates of walking and cycling will be hard. Given that the contribution of trips less than 2 miles to transport-related greenhouse gas emissions is relatively small, it is argued that any gains from increased walking and cycling would mostly accrue to personal health and the local environment rather than to the UKs carbon reduction target. Social implications – Positive attitudes towards walking and cycling are motivated mainly by personal concerns rather than global environmental issues. Originality – Use of detailed ethnographic material in policy-related transport research.
Journal of Transport Geography | 2011
Colin G. Pooley; Dave Horton; Griet Scheldeman; Miles Tight; Tim Jones; Alison Chisholm; H Harwatt; Anne Jopson
Transport Policy | 2013
Colin G. Pooley; Dave Horton; Griet Scheldeman; Caroline Mullen; Tim Jones; Miles Tight; Ann Jopson; Alison Chisholm
Archive | 2011
Colin G. Pooley; Miles Tight; Tim Jones; David Horton; Griet Scheldeman; Ann Jopson; Caroline Mullen; Alison Chisholm; Emanuele Strano; Sheila Constantine
Archive | 2013
Colin G. Pooley; Tim Jones; Miles Tight; Dave Horton; Griet Scheldeman; Caroline Mullen; Ann Jopson; Emanuele Strano
Journal of transport and health | 2014
Colin G. Pooley; Dave Horton; Griet Scheldeman; Caroline Mullen; Tim Jones; Miles Tight
Built Environment | 2010
Colin G. Pooley; David Horton; Griet Scheldeman; Richard Harrison
Archive | 2013
Tim Jones; David Horton; Caroline Mullen; Colin G. Pooley; Emanuele Strano; Miles Tight; Griet Scheldeman
Archive | 2012
Colin G. Pooley; Dave Horton; Griet Scheldeman; Miles Tight; H Harwatt; Ann Jopson; Tim Jones; Alison Chisholm; Caroline Mullen